Yes, automated testing is generally faster than manual testing, particularly when it comes to repetitive and time-consuming tasks. Here are some reasons why automated testing is faster:

1. Test Execution Speed
2. Parallel Test Execution
3. Test Coverage and Reusability
4. Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD
5. Regression Testing Efficiency

It's important to keep in mind that while automated testing can be faster for certain aspects, manual testing still has its own merits. Manual testing is often valuable for exploratory testing, usability testing, and scenarios that require human observation and judgment. It allows for flexibility and adaptability in testing, whereas automated testing excels in repetitive and routine tasks.
In summary, automated testing especially with popular tools like HeadSpin offers speed, efficiency, and scalability advantages over manual testing, particularly in scenarios where repetitive or large-scale testing is required. However, a balanced approach combining both automated and manual testing is often optimal to ensure comprehensive test coverage and a thorough assessment of software quality.