Diademk07:


In the second half of course.

I said Hazard wasn't as shite in the 1st half as Fabregas was in the 2nd half. That makes Hazard Chelsea's best player!

Alright, now let's remove Fabregas' assists and Costa's goals since it was hazard's sheer brilliance alone that won mourinho the league, hazard scored 14 goals in 38games that season, just how instrumental was it to their league triumph?

Explain extensively

dopeJemi:


Alright, now let's remove Fabregas' assists and Costa's goals since it was hazard's sheer brilliance alone that won mourinho the league, hazard scored 14 goals in 38games that season, just how instrumental was it to their league triumph?

Explain extensively

Point of correction, goals and assists!

Diademk07:


Point of correction, goals and assists!

Okay, goals and assists

Explain extensively

Diademk07:


The whole team were playing well in the first half. Stop the revisionism.

But he won the league, he couldn't do before those guys came, for Jose.

No reply to the 2nd post

chrisley024:
But he won the league, he couldn't do before those guys came, for Jose.

No reply to the 2nd post

Chelsea wouldn't have won the title without his sheer brilliance as well.

I guess Lille won the title every season because they had the super man Hazard with them, right?

So much megedefegede being read on this thread today!


Lmao!!!





***Sips black label, pours dopejemi a double shot of the same***

Smh it's Diademk07 again!!!... Bro I thought you was slowly turning a new leaf with some sensible posts weeks ago..

Wtf is this

BossKratos:




So much megedefegede being read on this thread today!



Lmao!!!






***Sips black label, pours dopejemi a double shot of the same***

Abeg gimme 3 shots... Ayam not understanding?!!!

dopeJemi:


Okay, goals and assists

Explain extensively

His 14 goals and 11 assists in which majority of it overturned their deficit or got them into winning position were instrumental. You won't even see any Chelsea fan dispute that. if you know nothing about Chelsea team that year, get yourself updated and stop asking me yeye question!

Diademk07:


Chelsea wouldn't have won the title without his sheer brilliance as well.

Good you've accepted.

chrisley024:
Good you've accepted.

He was as good as the whole team in the first half and when everything turned out shite in the second half, he was the one bailing the team out..

I remembered a Westbrom team trashing Chelsea 3-0 that year, just to show you how poor the team were!
Do you think it was coincidence they turned out shite the following year without Hazard brilliance to constantly bail them out? That Chelsea team was already there for the taking if it weren't for Hazard form in the previous season!

Abegi, People should stop arguing on what they do not know!

Diademk07:


His 14 goals and 11 assists in which majority of it overturned their deficit or got them into winning position were instrumental. You won't even see any Chelsea fan dispute that. if you know nothing about Chelsea team that year, get yourself updated and stop asking me yeye question!

E never reach to make your temper boil

I asked you to bring the same statistics you brought out for hazard for Costa, you haven't done that yet

Can you please list the games were "Majority" of his goals and assists overturned their deficit or got them into winning positions?

Note: majority of his goals and assists is equals to majority of the 38games, so don't give me 5 games and still tell me his sheer brilliance alone won mourinho the league, unless you don't know the meaning of "sheer brilliance ALONE". His contributions must be in majority of those games, when I say contributions I mean "Decisive" ones

You have all the time in the world

SIRcumalot:
West Ham don enter am
Dem for no leave that Boleyn stadium.

Lol. People think na by new Stadium. See how Arsenal initially struggled wen dey left Highbury.

Anyways, hope Liverpool still dey plan construct new Stadium sha.

Diademk07:


He was as good as the whole team in the first half and when everything turned out shite in the second half, he was the one bailing the team out..

I remembered a Westbrom team trashing Chelsea 3-0 that year, just to show you how poor the team were!
Do you think it was coincidence they turned out shite the following year without Hazard brilliance to constantly bail them out? That Chelsea team was already there for the taking if it weren't for Hazard form in the previous season!

Abegi, People should stop arguing on what they do not know!

West brom vs chelsea, scoreline, 3-0, game 37(chelsea's second to last game of the season)

Don't argue what you don't know

Ruudie seems Moyes don get competition o

Its now between Bilic and Moyes. Who ll be the first manager to be sacked this season?? My money still on Moyes sha

Only player that can lay claim to be directly responsible for his teams successes over a period of time is Messi and even that is debatable, so wtf is our resident canopy analyst saying?

dopeJemi:


E never reach to make your temper boil

I asked you to bring the same statistics you brought out for hazard for Costa, you haven't done that yet

Can you please list the games were "Majority" of his goals and assists overturned their deficit or got them into winning positions?

Note: majority of his goals and assists is equals to majority of the 38games, so don't give me 5 games and still tell me his sheer brilliance alone won mourinho the league, unless you don't know the meaning of "sheer brilliance ALONE". His contributions must be in majority of those games, when I say contributions I mean "Decisive" ones

You have all the time in the world

I already provided the site, check that for yourself!

I watch a lot of Chelsea games with my Cousin so I don't need to review those matches again.

BossKratos:




So much megedefegede being read on this thread today!



Lmao!!!






***Sips black label, pours dopejemi a double shot of the same***

Thank you jare

dopeJemi:


West brom vs chelsea, scoreline, 3-0, game 37(chelsea's second to last game of the season)

Don't argue what you don't know

So?
3-0 is no more trashing because it was their 37th game? LOL!

Diademk07:


I already provided the site, check that for yourself!

I watch a lot of Chelsea games with my Cousin so I don't need to review those matches again.

That you didn't know it was chelsea's 37th game of the season that they got thumped 3-0 by westbrom

I'm going to check for costa's statistics in that site, if I don't see it, you'll provide it

Thanks

dopeJemi:


That you didn't know it was chelsea's 37th game of the season that they got thumped 3-0 by westbrom

I'm going to check for costa's statistics in that site, if I don't see it, you'll provide it

Thanks

They still got thrashed! Did you think a Bayern or Barca team who were about to win/just won the league would get thrashed like that? LOL!

Lana1:
Ruudie seems Moyes don get competition o

Its now between Bilic and Moyes. Who ll be the first manager to be sacked this season?? My money still on Moyes sha

Are you on a mission to get Ruudie's head turned against United?
As per under performing gaffers, I'd be more disappointed with Bilic considering the quality of players at his disposal. West ham should be doing a lot better.

Diademk07:


He was as good as the whole team in the first half and when everything turned out shite in the second half, he was the one bailing the team out..

I remembered a Westbrom team trashing Chelsea 3-0 that year, just to show you how poor the team were!
Do you think it was coincidence they turned out shite the following year without Hazard brilliance to constantly bail them out? That Chelsea team was already there for the taking if it weren't for Hazard form in the previous season!

Abegi, People should stop arguing on what they do not know!

Well, so much for Mr know-it-all. Sure you know which game gave Chelsea the title.

Have a good night.

so the defence didn't conceede goals because hazard was good?

Diademk07:


So?
3-0 is no more trashing because it was their 37th game? LOL!

Don't twist it, your statement, "I remember them getting thrashed 3-0 by westbrom, just to show you how poor they were"

Are you now saying they were poor in the same year you claimed hazard's sheer brilliance won them the league? The year were his goals weren't all that decisive as seen in my previous post

Note: hazard was in that match

Can I say hazard was shite in the first half of the season were it was Costa and Fabregas' sheer brilliance that won them games?

.

elrony:

Abeg gimme 3 shots... Ayam not understanding?!!!

Have 4 shots sef, since na 4-1 dey rain dis days.........

Diademk07:


They still got thrashed! Did you think a Bayern or Barca team who were about to win/just won the league would get thrashed like that? LOL!

But sheer brilliance alone was in the match

Lana1:
Lmao! Excuses! Excuses!

U must ve been really pained United played its best game post SAF yesterday. And to even make matters worse, it must ve hurt to know ur local hero and role model was glued to the bench when United was tearing the EPL champions a new one and made no meaningful contributions when he came on.

Yesterday's awesome win must ve hit u really hard bcoz u must ve been expecting us to lose or struggle to win 1-0 so u could come out with ur usual rants of "Mourinho this, Pogba that". Eya e pele sir. I'm not sorry ur bad bele was thoroughly put to shame yesterday tho.

No worry tho. By the time we play those teams, u go begin dey wait to see how United plays against Barca, Madrid and Bayern.

. When van gaal was signed I remembered warning you guys about your incessant erections, why isn't your team top of the EPL log. You beat liecester by scoring from set pieces,what is the big deal, common feyenoord destroyed united not to talk of watford. When the time comes I would remind you.

Lana1:
Lmao! Excuses! Excuses!

U must ve been really pained United played its best game post SAF yesterday. And to even make matters worse, it must ve hurt to know ur local hero and role model was glued to the bench when United was tearing the EPL champions a new one and made no meaningful contributions when he came on.

Yesterday's awesome win must ve hit u really hard bcoz u must ve been expecting us to lose or struggle to win 1-0 so u could come out with ur usual rants of "Mourinho this, Pogba that". Eya e pele sir. I'm not sorry ur bad bele was thoroughly put to shame yesterday tho.

No worry tho. By the time we play those teams, u go begin dey wait to see how United plays against Barca, Madrid and Bayern.

best match you said in your own opinion, when united destroyed city 4 2 during lvg's time, when united beat arsenal 2 1 at OT during lvgKd time. United destroying leverlusen 5 0 and 4 2 during moyes's time. Not to talk about the 3 0 defeats dished to liverpool under lvg, yesterday's win isn't one of the top 8 performances post alex. Probably you meant post lvg.

dopeJemi:


Don't twist it, your statement, "I remember them getting thrashed 3-0 by westbrom, just to show you how poor they were"

Are you now saying they were poor in the same year you claimed hazard's sheer brilliance won them the league? The year were his goals weren't all that decisive as seen in my previous post

Note: hazard was in that match

Can I say hazard was shite in the first half of the season were it was Costa and Fabregas' sheer brilliance that won them games?

Yeah, remembering that performance turned out to be real and not an imagination, So what's the fuss?

That Hazard wasn't able to show his super man strength in every game after he already pulled them to the title?

What kind of question is this for crying out loud!

patrickmuf:
Are you on a mission to get Ruudie's head turned against United?
As per under performing gaffers, I'd be more disappointed with Bilic considering the quality of players at his disposal. West ham should be doing a lot better.

Against United?? Quick question. Was he ever for United??
Coz if u ask me, i'd say he's always been against United coz no sane person who was for United would want the club to sign the likes of Lee Catermole, Agbonlahor, Leon Osman etc not to talk of him wanting Moyes to have more time as manager.

dopeJemi:


But sheer brilliance alone was in the match

The fact that Mourinho expected that same sheer brilliance in every match instead of getting down to the root of the problem of his dysfunctional team before next season commenced makes him an incompetent and foolish man, just like his followers!