The ABC of Osun Case for Layman by Prof Misbau Alamu Lateef who is a Professor of Law.

Let me just explain what happened to you in the simplest of ways.

1) The BVAS is truly a game changer and should ordinarily be above manipulation.

2) The BVAS ascertains or validates voters' identity, and it is mandatory prior to voting. Every voter must be BVASed before they are issued with a ballot to vote. In short, BVAS accredits voters.

3) After elections, the results are then collated and entered manually on INEC form EC8As. However, the number of voters on INEC Form EC8A must never exceed the number of accredited voters on BVAS. That's over-voting and automatic cancellation under the EA 2022.

4) When a winner was declared by INEC in Osun elections, it was assumed by all that the BVAS and Form EC8As tallied. It was thought that Adeleke won and Oyetola lost.

5) APC applied for the BVAS report and Form EC8AS to file their petition days after the winner was declared.

6) APC in preparing their Petition found discrepancies between BVAS report and FORM EC8As in over 700 polling units. The votes recorded on Form EC8As literally exceeded what the BVAS accredited. There was over-voting by people who must have literally bypassed the BVAS either for not having PVCs or other dubious reasons.

7) Once INEC, PDP, and the Governor were served with the APC Petition, they all filed their responses and INEC added/pleaded another entirely different BVAS report, which INEC now DUBIOUSLY called a "SYNCHRONISED BVAS Report."

7) So, there were two BVAS reports before the Tribunal. The one issued to APC before they filled their petition and the one issued by INEC to self during the pendency of the petition.

At the Tribunal, each party strove hard to prove which BVAS was credible and which was not. The Tribunal then had to decide that....

Now, you please be the judge. Which of the two conflicting BVAS does your conscience, if functional, say is credible? The first one that was used to declare a winner on the elections day or the other "SYNCHRONISED BVAS" issued to self and pleaded by INEC almost 30 days after a winner was already declared and during the pendency of the Petition of the APC

What does your functional conscience say?

I think INEC National should be grateful to APC/Oyetola/Osun for helping them expose the manipulation that dubious INEC officials and politicians can subject the BVAS to.

Plus, voters must now know that bypassing the BVAS is not helpful. Everyone must be accredited by the BVAS to be eligible to vote.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria 🇳🇬 🇳🇬

Laugh ooo

Another point of note is that the number of cancelled vote is far above the difference between oyetola and adeleke which mean that instead of declaring oyetola winner, the tribunal should have called for a fresh election as you can't tell if the over voting was not given to oyetola? It will be upturned at the appeal court

Qtrpst4:
Another point of note is that the number of cancelled vote is far above the difference between oyetola and adeleke which mean that instead of declaring oyetola winner, the tribunal should have called for a fresh election as you can't tell if the over voting was not given to oyetola? It will be upturned at the appeal court

yes soo. Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

AyeMoJuba:
The ABC of Osun Case for Layman by Prof Misbau Alamu Lateef who is a Professor of Law.

Let me just explain what happened to you in the simplest of ways.

1) The BVAS is truly a game changer and should ordinarily be above manipulation.

2) The BVAS ascertains or validates voters' identity, and it is mandatory prior to voting. Every voter must be BVASed before they are issued with a ballot to vote. In short, BVAS accredits voters.

3) After elections, the results are then collated and entered manually on INEC form EC8As. However, the number of voters on INEC Form EC8A must never exceed the number of accredited voters on BVAS. That's over-voting and automatic cancellation under the EA 2022.

4) When a winner was declared by INEC in Osun elections, it was assumed by all that the BVAS and Form EC8As tallied. It was thought that Adeleke won and Oyetola lost.

5) APC applied for the BVAS report and Form EC8AS to file their petition days after the winner was declared.

6) APC in preparing their Petition found discrepancies between BVAS report and FORM EC8As in over 700 polling units. The votes recorded on Form EC8As literally exceeded what the BVAS accredited. There was over-voting by people who must have literally bypassed the BVAS either for not having PVCs or other dubious reasons.

7) Once INEC, PDP, and the Governor were served with the APC Petition, they all filed their responses and INEC added/pleaded another entirely different BVAS report, which INEC now DUBIOUSLY called a "SYNCHRONISED BVAS Report."

7) So, there were two BVAS reports before the Tribunal. The one issued to APC before they filled their petition and the one issued by INEC to self during the pendency of the petition.

At the Tribunal, each party strove hard to prove which BVAS was credible and which was not. The Tribunal then had to decide that....

Now, you please be the judge. Which of the two conflicting BVAS does your conscience, if functional, say is credible? The first one that was used to declare a winner on the elections day or the other "SYNCHRONISED BVAS" issued to self and pleaded by INEC almost 30 days after a winner was already declared and during the pendency of the Petition of the APC

What does your functional conscience say?

I think INEC National should be grateful to APC/Oyetola/Osun for helping them expose the manipulation that dubious INEC officials and politicians can subject the BVAS to.

Plus, voters must now know that bypassing the BVAS is not helpful. Everyone must be accredited by the BVAS to be eligible to vote.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria 🇳🇬 🇳🇬

God bless you sir. Trying to rig is now more dangerous to your candidate.

Adeleke will reclaim his mandate back from baba lagos landlord and his political son.

Qtrpst4:
Another point of note is that the number of cancelled vote is far above the difference between oyetola and adeleke which mean that instead of declaring oyetola winner, the tribunal should have called for a fresh election as you can't tell if the over voting was not given to oyetola? It will be upturned at the appeal court

Is that what the law says? Explain further.

Johnnyessence:
yes soo. Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

I doubt it

Some of the staff paid money before they got the job

So on point

Johnnyessence:
yes soo. Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Just dey play

quickberry:


Just dey play

play it well oooo

It is well

Na we be your best plug for everything Sexual enhancement tho

Johnnyessence:
play it well oooo

Adeleke maa lule ni Appeal Court ati Supreme Court.

Johnnyessence:
play it well oooo

PDP fraudsters will never return to Osun, go & find work.

Yes

duro4chang:
Is that what the law says? Explain further.

femisplash:

PDP fraudsters will never return to Osun, go & find work.

oponu afofun gbemu, Pdp wins Appeal court and Supreme Court justice too. Tinubu the clueless drug baron ma lule pii Lekan siii niiii. February 25th presidential poll is a protest votes in Osun State and Yoruba Land. Tinubu the clueless drug baron ma lule niii

quickberry:


Adeleke maa lule ni Appeal Court ati Supreme Court.

Oyetola ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu lokan to ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii . February 25th presidential poll is here and we are fully ready to votes massively . Tinubu the clueless drug trafficker ma lule niiii

Qtrpst4:
Yes

It is all right. But let me also add that time will tell. Are you a lawyer?

AyeMoJuba:
The ABC of Osun Case for Layman by Prof Misbau Alamu Lateef who is a Professor of Law.

Let me just explain what happened to you in the simplest of ways.

1) The BVAS is truly a game changer and should ordinarily be above manipulation.

2) The BVAS ascertains or validates voters' identity, and it is mandatory prior to voting. Every voter must be BVASed before they are issued with a ballot to vote. In short, BVAS accredits voters.

3) After elections, the results are then collated and entered manually on INEC form EC8As. However, the number of voters on INEC Form EC8A must never exceed the number of accredited voters on BVAS. That's over-voting and automatic cancellation under the EA 2022.

4) When a winner was declared by INEC in Osun elections, it was assumed by all that the BVAS and Form EC8As tallied. It was thought that Adeleke won and Oyetola lost.

5) APC applied for the BVAS report and Form EC8AS to file their petition days after the winner was declared.

6) APC in preparing their Petition found discrepancies between BVAS report and FORM EC8As in over 700 polling units. The votes recorded on Form EC8As literally exceeded what the BVAS accredited. There was over-voting by people who must have literally bypassed the BVAS either for not having PVCs or other dubious reasons.

7) Once INEC, PDP, and the Governor were served with the APC Petition, they all filed their responses and INEC added/pleaded another entirely different BVAS report, which INEC now DUBIOUSLY called a "SYNCHRONISED BVAS Report."

7) So, there were two BVAS reports before the Tribunal. The one issued to APC before they filled their petition and the one issued by INEC to self during the pendency of the petition.

At the Tribunal, each party strove hard to prove which BVAS was credible and which was not. The Tribunal then had to decide that....

Now, you please be the judge. Which of the two conflicting BVAS does your conscience, if functional, say is credible? The first one that was used to declare a winner on the elections day or the other "SYNCHRONISED BVAS" issued to self and pleaded by INEC almost 30 days after a winner was already declared and during the pendency of the Petition of the APC

What does your functional conscience say?

I think INEC National should be grateful to APC/Oyetola/Osun for helping them expose the manipulation that dubious INEC officials and politicians can subject the BVAS to.

Plus, voters must now know that bypassing the BVAS is not helpful. Everyone must be accredited by the BVAS to be eligible to vote.

God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria 🇳🇬 🇳🇬

Why and how did we have two BVAS report. That inconsistencies shows there could be fake BVAS out there or the BVAS is easily manipulated.

Johnnyessence:
oponu afofun gbemu, Pdp wins Appeal court and Supreme Court justice too. Tinubu the clueless drug baron ma lule pii Lekan siii niiii. February 25th presidential poll is a protest votes in Osun State and Yoruba Land. Tinubu the clueless drug baron ma lule niii

Osun is BATIFIED.
You have always been a loser, you carry badluck everywhere. Go & join Adedancer as a backup dancer so that you can feed your wife & kid.

femisplash:

Osun is BATIFIED.
You have always been a loser, you carry badluck everywhere. Go & join Adedancer as a backup dancer so that you can feed your wife & kid.

Tinubu ti lule piii Lekan siii niiii. Infact in his country home in Iragbiji, Tinubu ti lule piii ni be. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. It’s fight to victories for Atiku in February 25th presidential poll. Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

Johnnyessence:
Oyetola ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu lokan to ma lule piii Lekan siii niiii . February 25th presidential poll is here and we are fully ready to votes massively . Tinubu the clueless drug trafficker ma lule niiii

Oju e maa to la...Oyetola lo ni Osun, Jagaban lo ni aare orile ede Nigeria.

quickberry:


Oju e maa to la...Oyetola lo ni Osun, Jagaban lo ni aare orile ede Nigeria.

odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. Tinubu lokan that will collect his breakfast. Ole jati jati. Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

*HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.*


1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' REGISTERS. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS REGISTER AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.

3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS REGISTER AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.

5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.

6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.

7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.

8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.

9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.

10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.

11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.

12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.

13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.

14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.

15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.

16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.

17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.

18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.

- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

Few points on this judgement:
1. The first report given to APC actually showed over-voting in more than 700 polling units. It is actually around 1500 polling units or thereabout including units APC won. Therefore, the alleged over-voting is widespread although APC based their petition on units they lost (700). This was alluded to in the minority judgement. Therefore, it is not restricted to where PDP won.
2. The second report given to PDP was better but was also showing over-voting in some units as well. The majority ruling of the tribunal claimed that INEC colluded with PDP in the pendency of the petition by APC to produce the second reports. However, this argument is puerile at best by two reasons (a) PDP is entitled to ask for the same forms/reports given to APC to defend the petition and can only ask for it in the pendency of the petition. Why would the winner of election ask for BVAS report? PDP won the election. They asked for the report after studying the petition of APC.
(b) The second BVAS report cannot be said to be tampered with because it still showed over-voting as claimed by APC although in less polling units across the state.
3. The two reports are contradictory leaving the PDP to then ask for physical inspection of the BVAS machines. At least the reports are generated by BVAS machines. The BVAS machines were brought to the open court and inspected and the data there correspond with the election results. Now, there were three evidences. 2 BVAS reports (printed from server, mind you) and one physical reports of the BVAS machines in the open court. In fact the two BVAS reports are not in tandem with the results of the physical inspection of the BVAS machines. The majority ruling decided to go with first BVAS report, neglecting 2nd BVAS validly given to PDP and the data on the BVAS itself.
4. In the majority judgement, the judge harped heavily and compared the veracity of the two BVAS reports. He said the 2nd BVAS report is doctored. Okay, but what of the BVAS machines itself? Is it also doctored? The tribunal gave permission to inspect the machines by the two parties and everyone in court saw there was no over-voting in BVAS machines but the tribunal didn't even take a position on the results of BVAS inspection in their ruling.
5. The tribunal didn't dabble into whether the results of BVAS machines inspection are accurate or tampered with as well. The question is, are BVAS machines tampered with as well? I will answer in negative by two reasons:
(a) we learned that only the chairman of INEC and director of ICT can have access to data stored on the BVAS machines. Even one of them cannot access the machines data without the cooperation of other. We all know that immediately after election and after tribunal started sitting, the BVAS machines were housed in the tribunal and not with INEC in Osogbo.
(b) The second reason why I believe that the machines were not tampered with was because the inspection of the machines showed over-voting in 6 units. If INEC had tampered with it, no polling units will report over-voting.
5. There were 3 members of the tribunal. The chairman wrote the leading judgment and other member wrote minority judgement. The third member of the panel did not agree with either the majority or minority judgements in the open court. After reading of the judgment by the chairman, the third member only greeted people and say goodbye. No concurrence or otherwise. I dare to say there is no judgement of that tribunal.
In conclusion, I believe the fight is actually against BVAS machines to erode the confidence of people on the machines or INEC and bring apathy in the forthcoming general election. Everybody should endeavour to get their PVC and vote wisely. Your vote will count.

Qtrpst4:
Another point of note is that the number of cancelled vote is far above the difference between oyetola and adeleke which mean that instead of declaring oyetola winner, the tribunal should have called for a fresh election as you can't tell if the over voting was not given to oyetola? It will be upturned at the appeal court

Kindly check the new electoral act sir

Over voting is an electoral fraud and the penalty is cancellation except if the remaining polling unit is less than 2 third majority... section 5, new electoral act 2022

quickberry:


Oju e maa to la...Oyetola lo ni Osun, Jagaban lo ni aare orile ede Nigeria.

Comrade ignore that land fraudster . He is a known land grabber/ fraudster. his antecedents are everywhere on social media even here on Nairaland.

When I return from our campaign from Akwa Ibom this week, I will expose his past records here on Nairaland including where he was begging after he was exposed for his dubious/ and blackmailing activities regards here on Nairaland

Johnnyessence:
yes soo. Oyetola will lose both in Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice

You are reasoning outside the law
Adeleke has gone

Kindly listen to Femi FALANA....

Johnnyessence:
Tinubu ti lule piii Lekan siii niiii. Infact in his country home in Iragbiji, Tinubu ti lule piii ni be. Odi Aye Atunwa fun ijoba Oyetola ni ipinle Osun. It’s fight to victories for Atiku in February 25th presidential poll. Protest votes on February 25th presidential poll

Awon electoral fraudsters lule pii, PDP Ole!
Go & find work.

femisplash:

Awon electoral fraudsters lule pii, PDP Ole!
Go & find work.

Nobody will give the fraudster any work.

His records are here on Nairaland. This week, I will expose his antecedents.

He has records for blackmailing and dubious activities.

Not hearsay