dhammyg:

SO ACCORDING TO U ALL WOMEN DONT ENJOY SPORTS
U BETTER COMOT FOR MY SIGHT WITH UR MYOPIC REASONING.AM NOT IN A GOOD MOOD THIS MORNING

aim5:


Get off his ball.sack you Biafran piece of sh.it.

Hahaha...AWESOME!

Eden007:
you are the bigger fool! manny won that fight! get ur facts right!!!

daveP:
luckily you kept your dough where it should be

amir is up next!

Floyd says last match should be september-is Khan the opponent?

Floyd is wiser than tyson in terms of saving for age 58! Assests everywhere. But seriously the hype is killing boxing. Seems its slowly tilting towards bad times.

If Khan is the one, i want him to KO floyd, but mock Floyd with the same tactics of running round

cc:KingT om, Cfc Fan

Happy sunday

(turns and serves them some coffee as they enter)

Stunner1:



No matter how much khan prepares floyd will KO him in d 2nd round (na king tom talk am oo)

If the tables turn na cave sure pass ooo

Stunner1:



No matter how much khan prepares floyd will KO him in d 2nd round (na kingtom talk am oo)

If the tables turn na cave sure pass ooo

KingTom:
Floyd K.O's Khan, Khan is down Khan is down!! Oh Ali vs. Frasier I still dey watch that match everyday

50calibre:
Very crappy fight!! Floyd was on his heels for the 12 rounds.

This isn't boxing but hide & seek

@ SirShymmex this isn't a fight, only one person was fighting.

I'm going to sleep, I can't believe I stayed up for this child's play.

meccuno:
Well to those who placed their bets on pac man.....guess what? Yall Lost.....

Ralphlauren:

Hmmmm

If the jabs were so good, it should have ended as a KO.

Floyd was more defensive. Sometimes I wonder where all his points came from. Lol

chucky234:
Money man has always been a cheat, Manny is the real deal.

kendrick9:
where is mike tyson,the second greatest boxer after ali?

micktoxin:

It wasn't quite a master class or a clinic. But it wasn't that far off. Before the fight I said that deciding the winner was close but that the fight wouldn't be. I stick to that view. Pacquiao had a few rounds of success but that was it… a few rounds. Mayweather outboxed him. He came close to giving him a boxing lesson. Pacquiao had no way to consistently land offence, no way to pin Mayweather down and no way to stop Mayweather picking him off. There was no controversy, no real drama, nothing that would demand an immediate rematch. Mayweather simply did what he has done to so many other boxers who came in with dreams of winning. He crushed their dreams and outboxed them.This was the Hagler/Leonard of this generation… but Mayweather never let it be as close as that classic. This was a classic performance by Mayweather. It was not a classic bout to remember through the ages. That, perhaps more than anything, sums up Mayweather's brilliance. He's so good that he takes the drama out of bouts. He's so good that even landing a single punch on him gets a roar from the crowd as it's such a rare event.

SirShymexx:


Real deal, or awkward and overrated fighter.

Why was he scared to come forward and throw shiit load of punches like he does most times?

God saved his ar.se he fought conservatively, else his midget ar.se would've been knocked out with that straight right.

You lot don't understand the ring genius of Mayweather, and his ability to always impose himself on a fight. Thus making his opponents look like bums.

That fight was one-sided like I predicted .

safarigirl:
as in......after watching Cinderella Man, I realised boxing isn't about being aggressive, but patient and calculating.....

A lot of people mistake boxing for a street fight or even MMA. That's why they're not the judges

Darkrebel666:


~ It was far from being one-sided .....

ttmacoy:
First rule of boxing is hit and avoid being hit.

You need to appreciate his skills and techniques.

SirShymexx:


Lol.

What match did you watch?

Apart from round 4 and 6 (maybe 8 and 10 - debatable) - which other round did Pacman win?

50calibre:


Man fuc*k that rule! I wanna see guys trade punches not duck and throw few punches

I'm not against having good defences but it should be balanced with a decent offensive as well. People pay to watch one guy knock out the other guy or at least try to, not play it safe all day long.

JonBee1:


Why is Mayweather proclaimed the best Pound for Pound in the world? I didn't see any evidence of that in him jumping around,holding down the other guy and always on the defense. I wont pay a dime to see the re-match if there will be any. The only thing I got from that fight is that Mayweather is an entertainer in Boxing while Pacquiao is a genuine fighter. Anyway the fighter was not as great as it was billed most partly down to tactics of Mayweather.

If I may add, that match was like Chelsea(Mayweather) and Barcelona(Pacquiao) and I'm a Chelsea fan. Mayweather is NOT a great boxer,only a good one at finding ways to win no matter how it makes the sport of boxing look bad. No wonder interest in boxing had dwindle since Tyson,Holyfield and Lennox Lewis era. I wont bother watching another boxing match again - Kolawole Ali

SirShymexx:


Don't mind them. It's called the sweet science for a reason - the ability to hit and impose yourself on an opponent, while being able to tactically avoid not being hit.

Muhammed Ali, the greatest, was hailed for the genius of rope-a-dope against George Foreman in Zaire (rumble in the jungle). Else George Foreman and that phantom right hand would have killed him in the ring. But hey, Mayweather isn't allowed to do what he does best and what the sport is about cos of haters.