I think they used d point system which we were told had been neglected. cos looking @ d scores, it z smhw. d higher ur relevant O level grades, jamb, d higher ur grades. n 1 sitting z @ advantage based on points.

pagorino:
I think they used d point system which we were told had been neglected. cos looking @ d scores, it z smhw. d higher ur relevant O level grades, jamb, d higher ur grades. n 1 sitting z @ advantage based on points.

No, we've tried calculating with Dha point system, it didn't Tally so, it's obvious dey didn't use it..

[quote author=Jason555 post=47554975 . what abt those d@ hv done d admission screening but hv nt been posted by jamb? any opinion?

remiiko:
bro werin u cum score?

47

pagorino:
[quote author=Jason555 post=47554975 . what abt those d@ hv done d admission screening but hv nt been posted by jamb? any opinion?

Studying dha Jamb guideline and Modality stuff very well, ah discovered dhat jamb strictly warned dhat no school should offer Admission except jamb.. Jamb also added dhat dha provisional admission will serve as admission letter as there will be no admission letter this year..
Wha AAU is only trying to do is dey do nad wanna refund cash to candidates and dhat was why dey asked everyone to come for screening... (mah opinion though)










Cutecindybabe , sorry if mah initial posts "got to you" , apologies..

xender:
47

congratulations bro! Much hope! Let's just keep waiting for wha AAU will say (cut off) hopefully by Monday.. Once again, congratulations! .. It's already ending in praise..

[quote author=Jason555 post=47555616][/quote] yea ur ryt, but looking @ d situation of tinz, not all aspirants who scored above 180 hv been posted by jamb...sm schools r sending 4 screening and aspirants hv not been posted 2 dat same skul but they chose d institution . just confused

pagorino:
yea ur ryt, but looking @ d situation of tinz, not all aspirants who scored above 180 hv been posted by jamb...sm schools r sending 4 screening and aspirants hv not been posted 2 dat same skul but they chose d institution . just confused

True sha.. Bhu we don't have much business with other schools a party from ours (AAU) so, dhats their business sha...

Jason555:
True sha.. Bhu we don't have much business with other schools a party from ours (AAU) so, dhats their business sha...

alryt, let's hope 4 d best.

Jason555:
congratulations bro! Much hope! Let's just keep waiting for wha AAU will say (cut off) hopefully by Monday.. Once again, congratulations! .. It's already ending in praise..

here..the way you dey congratulate person one will think I have been admitted already thanks bro..fingers crossed waiting for AAU.

xender:
here..the way you dey congratulate person one will think I have been admitted already thanks bro..fingers crossed waiting for AAU.

hey xender I lost ur contact its me gebhota how was the screening

Jason555: typo please got 63. not yet posted by jamb, just confuse.

lizzydonald:
Jason555: typo please got 63. not yet posted by jamb, just confuse.

Nice, please permit me to say I'm more confused cause something is fishy here..

OSESUNATE had 279 , and he was given 64

KELVIN had 245 and was given 57( I saw his two results mah self)

I had 239 and was given 56

Two of mah friends with 234 both had 55( saw it with mah eyes too)

Two friends again had 231,233 and where given 55(also saw this with mah eyes)

Another friend with 230 had 54(saw this with mah korokoro eyes)
Just to mention bhu a few

The above candidates all applied for MBBS .. I was at college of Medicine yesterday and saw also so many other funny scores...

NOW, WHAT AM I TRYING TO SAY ?
From mah calculations , I've observed dha way dha scores where calculated and dhat was why ah asked you so many times and requested for a screen shot when you said you had 73... Even at college yesterday , a guy lied he had 74 only for us to find out it was a fat lie!
Another guy also lied he had 246 only for us to find out it was another fat lie (dha guy even had 206) just today, , this morning another guy lied he had 60 with 242 only for me to find out it was another fat lie after having access into his kofa account. Then it was then ah concluded dhat I must see it with mah eyes before believing

Lemme explain...
Ah think AAU didn't consider SSCE results (dhat is, they probably didn't follow dha point system).. They only used what I'll call UTME SCORE RANGE!!!!!!!
See clear illustration below and understand...
From dha above scores , you'll agree with me dhat Mah friends with 231 and 233 , 234, 234 all fell between dha same rang (1-5) and dhat was why dey all had 55...
Hope I'm making sense..?

Now, if you notice, I had 239 , ah fell withing dha second range (6-10) and probably dhat was why ah had 56(one mark ahead)

Now, Dr. KELVIN had 245 and fell in dha immediately range above me and dhat was why he had 57 (1-5)

Without been told, even before OSESUNATE told me he had 64, ah already made mah calculations and mah calculate arrived at 64...

Now, initial you said you had 245 and 73.. I requested for dha screen shot so as to get mah calculate correctly and now, you said twas a typographical error dhat it was 63..fine, if you had 63, with 245, how come Kelvin had 245 and 57? (who's getting me..??)
How come OSESUNATE had 279 and had 64?
Do nad tell me oo level was used cause it wasn't.. One of dha guys with 55 points above used two SSCE with low grades (c's) bhu had 55points too (is any one catching mah flow here) ??
NOTE Please , I'm nad in anyway saying you're nad telling dha truth bhu we need proof so as to understand cause you can't tell me someone with 279 and had 64 is a fool and you had 245 with 63.. So please , throw more light or better still, we need clear screen shots so we can understand this whole saga very well

Jason555:
Nice, please permit me to say I'm more confused cause something is fishy here..
OSESUNATE had 279 , and he was given 64
KELVIN had 245 and was given 57( I saw his two results mah self)
I had 239 and was given 56
Two of mah friends with 234 both had 55( saw it with mah eyes too)
Two friends again had 231,233 and where given 55(also saw this with mah eyes)
Another friend with 230 had 54(saw this with mah korokoro eyes)
Just to mention bhu a few
The above candidates all applied for MBBS .. I was at college of Medicine yesterday and saw also so many other funny scores...
NOW, WHAT AM I TRYING TO SAY ?
From mah calculations , I've observed dha way dha scores where calculated and dhat was why ah asked you so many times and requested for a screen shot when you said you had 73... Even at college yesterday , a guy lied he had 74 only for us to find out it was a fat lie!
Another guy also lied he had 246 only for us to find out it was another fat lie (dha guy even had 206) just today, , this morning another guy lied he had 60 with 242 only for me to find out it was another fat lie after having access into his kofa account. Then it was then ah concluded dhat I must see it with mah eyes before believing
Lemme explain...
Ah think AAU didn't consider SSCE results (dhat is, they probably didn't follow dha point system).. They only used what I'll call UTME SCORE RANGE!!!!!!!
See clear illustration below and understand...
From dha above scores , you'll agree with me dhat Mah friends with 231 and 233 , 234, 234 all fell between dha same rang (1-5) and dhat was why dey all had 55...
Hope I'm making sense..?
Now, if you notice, I had 239 , ah fell withing dha second range (6-10) and probably dhat was why ah had 56(one mark ahead)
Now, Dr. KELVIN had 245 and fell in dha immediately range above me and dhat was why he had 57 (1-5)
Without been told, even before OSESUNATE told me he had 64, ah already made mah calculations and mah calculate arrived at 64...
Now, initial you said you had 245 and 73.. I requested for dha screen shot so as to get mah calculate correctly and now, you said twas a typographical error dhat it was 63..fine, if you had 63, with 245, how come Kelvin had 245 and 57? (who's getting me..??)
How come OSESUNATE had 279 and had 64?
Do nad tell me oo level was used cause it wasn't.. One of dha guys with 55 points above used two SSCE with low grades (c's) bhu had 55points too (is any one catching mah flow here) ??
NOTE Please , I'm nad in anyway saying you're nad telling dha truth bhu we need proof so as to understand cause you can't tell me someone with 279 and had 64 is a fool and you had 245 with 63.. So please , throw more light or better still, we need clear screen shots so we can understand this whole saga very well

I think they used ssce because remember I had 210 in jamb hit my screening point was 55. But based on the released calculation method I was expecting to see 57....... so I don't know.
Also If the guy that had 245 in jamb had 4 A's and 1 B in his or her waec then there is a possibility of the person surpassing osesunate's score in the screening....... This means the person's waec

Jason555:
Nice, please permit me to say I'm more confused cause something is fishy here..
OSESUNATE had 279 , and he was given 64
KELVIN had 245 and was given 57( I saw his two results mah self)
I had 239 and was given 56
Two of mah friends with 234 both had 55( saw it with mah eyes too)
Two friends again had 231,233 and where given 55(also saw this with mah eyes)
Another friend with 230 had 54(saw this with mah korokoro eyes)
Just to mention bhu a few
The above candidates all applied for MBBS .. I was at college of Medicine yesterday and saw also so many other funny scores...
NOW, WHAT AM I TRYING TO SAY ?
From mah calculations , I've observed dha way dha scores where calculated and dhat was why ah asked you so many times and requested for a screen shot when you said you had 73... Even at college yesterday , a guy lied he had 74 only for us to find out it was a fat lie!
Another guy also lied he had 246 only for us to find out it was another fat lie (dha guy even had 206) just today, , this morning another guy lied he had 60 with 242 only for me to find out it was another fat lie after having access into his kofa account. Then it was then ah concluded dhat I must see it with mah eyes before believing
Lemme explain...
Ah think AAU didn't consider SSCE results (dhat is, they probably didn't follow dha point system).. They only used what I'll call UTME SCORE RANGE!!!!!!!
See clear illustration below and understand...
From dha above scores , you'll agree with me dhat Mah friends with 231 and 233 , 234, 234 all fell between dha same rang (1-5) and dhat was why dey all had 55...
Hope I'm making sense..?
Now, if you notice, I had 239 , ah fell withing dha second range (6-10) and probably dhat was why ah had 56(one mark ahead)
Now, Dr. KELVIN had 245 and fell in dha immediately range above me and dhat was why he had 57 (1-5)
Without been told, even before OSESUNATE told me he had 64, ah already made mah calculations and mah calculate arrived at 64...
Now, initial you said you had 245 and 73.. I requested for dha screen shot so as to get mah calculate correctly and now, you said twas a typographical error dhat it was 63..fine, if you had 63, with 245, how come Kelvin had 245 and 57? (who's getting me..??)
How come OSESUNATE had 279 and had 64?
Do nad tell me oo level was used cause it wasn't.. One of dha guys with 55 points above used two SSCE with low grades (c's) bhu had 55points too (is any one catching mah flow here) ??
NOTE Please , I'm nad in anyway saying you're nad telling dha truth bhu we need proof so as to understand cause you can't tell me someone with 279 and had 64 is a fool and you had 245 with 63.. So please , throw more light or better still, we need clear screen shots so we can understand this whole saga very well

I think they used ssce because remember I had 210 in jamb hit my screening point was 55. But based on the released calculation method I was expecting to see 57....... so I don't know.
Also If the guy that had 245 in jamb had 4 A's and 1 B in his or her waec then there is a possibility of the person surpassing osesunate's score in the screening....... This means the person's waec is awesome

though I do get u@jason555 there are some inconsistencies in some candidates scores. which still petrifies me........ I'm still waiting for jamb provisional admission letter though

kswag13:

I think they used ssce because remember I had 210 in jamb hit my screening point was 55. But based on the released calculation method I was expecting to see 57....... so I don't know.
Also If the guy that had 245 in jamb had 4 A's and 1 B in his or her waec then there is a possibility of the person surpassing osesunate's score in the screening....... This means the person's waec
I think they used ssce because remember I had 210 in jamb hit my screening point was 55. But based on the released calculation method I was expecting to see 57....... so I don't know.
Also If the guy that had 245 in jamb had 4 A's and 1 B in his or her waec then there is a possibility of the person surpassing osesunate's score in the screening....... This means the person's waec is awesome

Hahahahahaha... I can boldly say SSCE wasn't used.. If you were to judge by dhat, ah had physio, chemistry , Biology , English , maths (All B2) even had an A in another subject which is nad among mah 5 compulsory.. Calculating with dhat, ah ought to score like 60+

One of dha guys with 55 points in mah previous post didn't do well in his ssce even tho he merged bhu he also had 55 points..

Are you insinuating dhat she had 5 A's?? Blood of jesu!!! Owk.. Even at dhat, if you calculate, it won't still be up to 63...
Also, what will you say about OSESUNATE's score? Abi we nor go still add E SSCE Lol..
Ah love your comment bro.. Bhu lizzydonald should also help us by providing screen shots.. Think dhat will be better..

You are correct about something fishy going on but...... look bro........... 245 divided by 8 gives 30 plus 10 for one result= 40. follow me......... then 3 A's = 18 plus 2 b's = 8............ add up bruh
66

Jason555:
Nice, please permit me to say I'm more confused cause something is fishy here..

OSESUNATE had 279 , and he was given 64

KELVIN had 245 and was given 57( I saw his two results mah self)

I had 239 and was given 56

Two of mah friends with 234 both had 55( saw it with mah eyes too)

Two friends again had 231,233 and where given 55(also saw this with mah eyes)

Another friend with 230 had 54(saw this with mah korokoro eyes)
Just to mention bhu a few

The above candidates all applied for MBBS .. I was at college of Medicine yesterday and saw also so many other funny scores...

NOW, WHAT AM I TRYING TO SAY ?
From mah calculations , I've observed dha way dha scores where calculated and dhat was why ah asked you so many times and requested for a screen shot when you said you had 73... Even at college yesterday , a guy lied he had 74 only for us to find out it was a fat lie!
Another guy also lied he had 246 only for us to find out it was another fat lie (dha guy even had 206) just today, , this morning another guy lied he had 60 with 242 only for me to find out it was another fat lie after having access into his kofa account. Then it was then ah concluded dhat I must see it with mah eyes before believing

Lemme explain...
Ah think AAU didn't consider SSCE results (dhat is, they probably didn't follow dha point system).. They only used what I'll call UTME SCORE RANGE!!!!!!!
See clear illustration below and understand...
From dha above scores , you'll agree with me dhat Mah friends with 231 and 233 , 234, 234 all fell between dha same rang (1-5) and dhat was why dey all had 55...
Hope I'm making sense..?

Now, if you notice, I had 239 , ah fell withing dha second range (6-10) and probably dhat was why ah had 56(one mark ahead)

Now, Dr. KELVIN had 245 and fell in dha immediately range above me and dhat was why he had 57 (1-5)

Without been told, even before OSESUNATE told me he had 64, ah already made mah calculations and mah calculate arrived at 64...

Now, initial you said you had 245 and 73.. I requested for dha screen shot so as to get mah calculate correctly and now, you said twas a typographical error dhat it was 63..fine, if you had 63, with 245, how come Kelvin had 245 and 57? (who's getting me..??)
How come OSESUNATE had 279 and had 64?
Do nad tell me oo level was used cause it wasn't.. One of dha guys with 55 points above used two SSCE with low grades (c's) bhu had 55points too (is any one catching mah flow here) ??
NOTE Please , I'm nad in anyway saying you're nad telling dha truth bhu we need proof so as to understand cause you can't tell me someone with 279 and had 64 is a fool and you had 245 with 63.. So please , throw more light or better still, we need clear screen shots so we can understand this whole saga very well

I was almost falling for your statistics until some one made mention of having 55 for a jamb score 210, while i had 53 for a jamb score 218. U might be right but it could be possible that some other things were looked out for.

I also think dey use SSCE RESULT cos i hav 210 in my jamb and i was given 55.

kswag13:
You are correct about something fishy going on but...... look bro........... 245 divided by 8 gives 30 plus 10 for one result= 40. follow me......... then 3 A's = 18 plus 2 b's = 8............ add up bruh
66

Bro.. Ah love great thinkers like you seriously.. Lol..
Bhu also, don't forget all you gave above were assumptions (Dha ssce grades)

Also, 245/8=30.6 approximately 31


Now, use dhat for Another mbbs aspirant who clearly had 231, 2B's and 3 C's with two SSCE result, AAU gave dha guy 55 points..


Using your methods, I'm suppose to get like 60 la...

5B's = 20
1 sitting = 10points
UTME score(239/8=30) =30
Total suppose be =60
Bhu how come they gave me 56?

So you see, O level wasn't used..

Twas UTME SCORE RANGE!!
LET'S keep thinking Doc.!



Bhu lizzydonald should also make it easy for us by uploading screen shots of her UTME and screening scores...

Faccuzzii:
I also think dey use SSCE RESULT cos i hav 210 in my jamb and i was given 55.

I don't really fink they used d SSCE issue. Cux if that was d case. my score would be wae lower than 52. according to what I calculated earlier it was around 47. N it was 2 sitting. With some funny grades.

kingofthejungle:
hey xender I lost ur contact its me gebhota how was the screening

ehnn.....I kon dey wonder d way you just loss. Well the screening went well we waiting for AAU's official statement and cutoff marks as well as how they arrived at ridiculous scores! Hope yours went well ?

Good... It's getting interesting... I love this..

Now, ah made a mistake somewhere.. Ah mean ah forgot to add one factor dhat was looked into..

Now, NOTE this..

The UTME SCORE RANGE ah earlier talked about also has to do with departments (courses)
I also noticed from mah findings dhats dha calculation for other courses (departments) where different... So, facuzzii and Ella , please you guys should state your courses...




Also,
We have to be very sincere here if we need dha truth cause as it stands now, ah hardly believe people's scores oo not after dha heartbreaking lies I've received lately.. Close friends lieing only to find out dhat all they've been saying were lies.. Chai , heart break..

And dhats why lizzydonald needs to help us with Dha screen shot of her UTME score and screening score...

@ jason555- u maybe right about that cause mine is Nursing.

ella4140:
@ jason555- u maybe right about that cause mine is Nursing.

good.. Now you catching mah logics.. Right..?
Anyways, thanks for your contribution.. We Still calculating sha bhu NOTE dhat all mah calculations and examples /illustration above where based on MBBS

Ones again , Nice one Nrs.Ella!

but hey Jason do you know there's a probability that some candidates are lying. about their score ........ but still ignoring That variable I still think........ this is human error....... reason with me........ you know we typed the scores manually and it wasn't a form type of filling which can be automatically calculated by a computer......... in this manual mode therefore....... it was ppl that scored it and there might have been some errors, workings( you know what I mean). and even some errors on some candidates part who typed in wrong info...... so that's just what I think.......... I'm open to corrections though.......... and other suggestions

kswag13:
but hey Jason do you know there's a probability that some candidates are lying. about their score ........ but still ignoring That variable I still think........ this is human error....... reason with me........ you know we typed the scores manually and it wasn't a form type of filling which can be automatically calculated by a computer......... in this manual mode therefore....... it was ppl that scored it and there might have been some errors, workings( you know what I mean). and even some errors on some candidates part who typed in wrong info...... so that's just what I think.......... I'm open to corrections though.......... and other suggestions

Nice.. You've said right.. Now, remember dha purpose for dha screening? Twas just for confirmation of credentials... Remember wha displayed immediately you inserted your UTME registration number? It displayed your profile .. So, it was just for verification..


Talking about errors , ah posted something about dhat on Dha previous page when ah said it was like an MS Word stuff...

Bhu ah think judging by dha fact dhat they calculated each departments separately, ah think dhat settles it already...



Also, all candidate has to be truthful so we can get to dha root of dha whole issue.

Ah just pray lizzydonald sends a screen shot to annul mah assumptions and calculations then I'll start mah thinking /calculations afresh!

Mine is Bus admin

another suggestion this just popped into ma head right now...... what if The grades were used critically as in B2 wasn't the same score with B3 or C4 want same with C5 or C6........... again I was just thinking

Jasson's permutations were correct cos if the point system was actually used i should'nt have gotten 64 but a lesser score giving the fact that I used a combined result. Twas only our utme scores that where used

kswag13:
another suggestion this just popped into ma head right now...... what if The grades were used critically as in B2 wasn't the same score with B3 or C4 want same with C5 or C6........... again I was just thinking

u made a good point. But I still don't think the SSCE was used. take for example, some one with 2 sitting. 1st one C4 n 2nd sitting B3 in biology . how would they grade that. is the C4 going to be taken or the B3. _just saying. still learning.