ireke:
Nonsense. Absolute nonsensical nonsense. How many courses is the prof taking?
Step 1: Get all the result sheets from all the courses he has taken for the current session and the immediate past session
Step 2: Identify every female that failed his course over this period.
Step 3: interview those that got between 30 and 40. You may pick a couple that got between 40 - 45 too.

Chances are high that if you do not even get to know the particular female student through this procedure, you may get someone else to corroborate the story. Come to think of It, if they are calling the girl's number, then they must know her. Anyways, the girl is just a witness. The prof has a case to answer that is not invalidated even if the girl disappears or dies today self.

If the girl is pursuing a case against the prof, the case against the prof can not be heard if she refuses to come forward. Unfortunately, prof's offense is not just against the girl. His action was criminal and unethical so the university has grounds to discipline him if he can be found guilty via other means.

mechanics:
In the law court, the Prof will win the case because of no witness and if she does not come out now the Prof will still continue his escapades.

ireke:


So the point of my story is that there are two things involved and they are separate.

1. Student accuses professor in a case of victimization or whatever we want to call it. If this particular student doesn't show up, then there is no case.

2. School Authority is aware of a case of prof's alleged unethical practice. They do not need this particular girl to initiate the case. She is a witness, one of many exhibits that can be used to substantiate or disproof the case. Other witnesses, exam result trends, etc. should be reviewed to arrive a a conclusion.

If the girl was raped, she needs to come forward. If she's claiming that prof failed her and she wants her scripts to be remarked or she's seeking for justice on her part ny any means, she needs to come forward.

In my opinion it is a sign of incompetence or lack of the will to do the right thing that will make the school authority to claim that they can not investigate this matter without the girl in the audio call.

in other words, this girl is not an accuser in this matter. She is merely a whistleblower. The onus is on the school authority to conduct a proper and fair investigation

Thewesterner:
As much as you are trying to make a point, care must be taken... What if after the whole investigations, the prof is guilty?... This comment might come to hunt you... If