Mynd_44: Here we go again

Mynd_44: Can I join in? Please, pretty please

Shollypopz:
lol, if u promise not to get too emotional or get offended when I challenge your core belief as a christian

Mynd_44:
My core as a Christian? I am trying to understand the religion sef.
So whats the topic for today?

Shollypopz:
Sometimes I think the bible itself is disproving the idea of "Trinity"

1 Cor. 15 vs 27-28

Mathew 24 vs 36

Mark 10 vs 18

John 1 vs 1-5

John 14 vs 28

You have to read the bible verses though

Shollypopz:
Sometimes I think the bible itself is disproving the idea of "Trinity"

1 Cor. 15 vs 27-28

Mathew 24 vs 36

Mark 10 vs 18

John 1 vs 1-5

John 14 vs 28

You have to read the bible verses though

Mynd_44:
I don't believe in the Trinity. It was never mentioned in the bible. It was introduced by the Romans just like their silly representation of Madonna

sexkillz: the trinity was never a teaching of the bible.

Shollypopz:
LMAO!! Are u a christian?? Cos u can't be a christian and not believe in the trinity. It goes against what Christianity is and it's foundation graduating from Judaism.

Mynd_44:
Just cos I am Christian does not mean I should believe in every crap ot there.

Shollypopz:
No, but Christians believe it is implied in the bible.

Btw, I know u believe in the trinity.

Shollypopz:

lol, the trinity cannot be crap to you. Because if there is no trinity, then there is no Christianity.

You cannot say u don't believe in the trinity and then call urself a Christian.

It's quite funny to me actually, do u know what ur faith is at all??

sexkillz: I dont believe the trinity, just the same as i dont celebrate Christmas!

Shollypopz:

lol, the trinity cannot be crap to you. Because if there is no trinity, then there is no Christianity.

You cannot say u don't believe in the trinity and then call urself a Christian.

It's quite funny to me actually, do u know what ur faith is at all??

Shollypopz:
WTF?? Falls down from bed.....

lol, are u a Jehovah's Witnes??

sexkillz: The problem with people like you is that your aim is always to win arguments rather than reasoning together with others. How can you say if there is no trinity there is no Christianity when trinity is not biblical?

And you have people saying they do not believe the trinity and you wanna win an argument forcing them to believe in it because they are Christians?

Shollypopz:
LMAO!! Calm down boy, this is no argument....

I just have to ask, who is Jesus and the Holy spirit to y'all??!!

Mynd_44:
I celebrate Christmas, I just don't agree with the date. In my house, they call me "The Grinch"

Shollypopz:
LMAO!! Calm down boy, this is no argument....

I just have to ask, who is Jesus and the Holy spirit to y'all??!!

Shollypopz:
WTF?? Falls down from bed.....

lol, are u a Jehovah's Witnes??

Mynd_44: In genesis one, it says "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth, the earth was without form or void and the spirit of God move above the waters"
now the first person introduced in the bible is the Holy Spirit but remember that God is also omnipresent and it is by this spirit that he does that. That does not make the holy spirit someone else. It just makes him God's presence.
The son or word is also in Genesis. Every time "God said" he is bringing the Word into action and that's why John 1 says the word created everything.
Can you separate a man from his Word? That's why God and his word are one.
"in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the word was God"
when the word needed being saved, the Word was made flesh. Which is the same word that has being in existence from the beginning. So you see, the word, spirit and God are the same person. Unlike what the trinity says

Mynd_44: In genesis one, it says "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth, the earth was without form or void and the spirit of God move above the waters"
now the first person introduced in the bible is the Holy Spirit but remember that God is also omnipresent and it is by this spirit that he does that. That does not make the holy spirit someone else. It just makes him God's presence.
The son or word is also in Genesis. Every time "God said" he is bringing the Word into action and that's why John 1 says the word created everything.
Can you separate a man from his Word? That's why God and his word are one.
"in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the word was God"
when the word needed being saved, the Word was made flesh. Which is the same word that has being in existence from the beginning. So you see, the word, spirit and God are the same person. Unlike what the trinity says

Shollypopz:

Wikipedia's Definition of Trinity(which will be my stance): The Christian doctrine of the Trinity defines God as three divine persons or hypostases:[1] the Father, the Son (Jesus Christ), and the Holy Spirit.

The three persons are distinct yet coexist in unity, and are co-equal, co-eternal and con-substantial. Put another way, the three persons of the Trinity are of one being or ousia.[2] The Trinity is considered to be a mystery of Christian faith.

[3]According to this doctrine, there is only one God in three persons. Each person is God, whole and entire. They are distinct from one another in their relations of origin: as the Fourth Lateran Council declared, "it is the Father who generates, the Son who is begotten, and the Holy Spirit who proceeds". While distinct in their relations with one another, they are one in all else. The whole work of creation and grace is a single operation common to all three divine persons, who at the same time operate according to their unique properties, so that all things are from the Father, through the Son and in the Holy Spirit.

Mynd_44:
What was your former signature?
"I can stand non educated wikipedia educated folks" right? Or was it someone else? The fact that wiki says so does not make it true na.
The three of them are not distinct, they are the same so I don't believe in the trinity. Simple.
The same way I don't believe the book of Job actually happened

Shollypopz:

No, u misunderstood me. I'm not saying because Wikipedia defined something that makes it right. Most of the time in a discourse most ppl have different meanings of what they are talking about. So, I'm only trying to tell u my definition of trinity. which is the generally accepted meaning/version. I don't copy anything from Wikipedia without looking @ its source.

LMAO!! Just defining something doesn't mean I've won the argument. It's just an introduction to the direction in which my argument will take off.