Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,195,065 members, 7,956,979 topics. Date: Tuesday, 24 September 2024 at 01:10 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka (31771 Views)
The Nigerian Nation Against General Buhari, By Wole Soyinka / Jonathan’s Igbo Internet Warriors Are A Disgrace To Humanity By C. Don Adinuba / Bringbackjonathan2015: The Wages Of Impunity By Wole Soyinka (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (15) (16) (17) (18) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 8:23pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
F00028: You are a person! See the way you are being battered with your scraps of moronic points! A moronic product of a failed madrassa education system. How can catholicism be part of Western civilisation when Western civilisation is based on and promotes secularity? Secondly, so you agree paedophilia is part of and justified by Islamic civilisation? And the one you have been running from: Did Muhammed not participate in armed robbery and did he not order his followers to conduct armed robbery of travellers? So what ill-gotten wealth and honest to God labour were you moronically talking about? You can't defend your religion shows you yourself can see all the faults in it! Only your fucktardism makes you continue practicing the religion. Moronic, poorly-educated ignorant cretin! |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 8:39pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
Sagamite:yes, I was not. and you quote this: F00028: I am not your history teacher. I've done my research, you do yours if want to rebut my assertions. does that say, look for evidence for me? olodo, abi make we continue this thing for pidgin since english dey hard you? tay tay we know say na pidgin dem dey use instruct una up to js3 |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 8:43pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
F00028: Madrassa person! How can catholicism be part of Western civilisation when Western civilisation is based on and promotes secularity? Secondly, so you agree paedophilia is part of and justified by Islamic civilisation? And the one you have been running from: Did Muhammed not participate in armed robbery and did he not order his followers to conduct armed robbery of travellers? So what ill-gotten wealth and honest to God labour were you moronically talking about? You can't defend your religion shows you yourself can see all the faults in it! Only your fucktardism makes you continue practicing the religion. |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 9:49pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
F00028: |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 10:01pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
Madrassa person! All your moronic points have been battered! Now RUN! How can catholicism be part of Western civilisation when Western civilisation is based on and promotes secularity? Secondly, so you agree paedophilia is part of and justified by Islamic civilisation? And the one you have been running from: Did Muhammed not participate in armed robbery and did he not order his followers to conduct armed robbery of travellers? So what ill-gotten wealth and honest to God labour were you moronically talking about? You can't defend your religion shows you yourself can see all the faults in it! Only your fucktardism makes you continue practicing the religion. |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 11:13pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
F00028: |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 11:41pm On Oct 09, 2012 |
Shut up, person! You have made me humiliate you and your islamic "civilisation". You are so dumb, you cannot even defend the religion that controls your life. Cretinous Zombie! I know a person when I hear one, that is why I was quick to call you one. You are too moronic and easy to intellectually batter. |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 12:16pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
I know this is above your head but here goes anyway. I remember this every time I see you screaming about your alleged intellectual ability. when margaret thatcher said, being powerful is like being a lady, if you have to tell people you are, you're not. well the same goes for intelligence and cheddar: IF YOU GOTTA KEEP TELLING PEOPLE IT'S 'COS YOU DON'T GOT IT. ....Godd.amned imbecil'e 1 Like |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 12:40pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
F00028: I know this is above your head but here goes anyway. You are a person! person, because a famous person says something does not necessarily mean what they say is true or valid. Instead of consuming things fed to you, try and think about it. Even test it. No 1, to test this moronic quote you used: So if Putin tells people he is powerful, does that mean he is not? person, you should have questioned your moronic Alfas when they were feeding you, in your madrassa class, moronic anti-West doctrines that you came to vomit on this thread. That would have saved you from the intellectual slaughtering. No 2, I don't need to tell people I am intelligent, my posts and intellectual slaughtering of fucktards like you make the whole audience realise it. I just say it to rob the salt into the injury. You have to admit it, it must be quite painful for someone to tell you that he is more intelligent than you, he would intellectually humiliate you and then he does intellectually humiliate you and there is nothing you can do about it. You just can not match the intellect to stop the battering and you feel humiliated. Surely it is painful. Cretin, when you get to the mosque this Friday, tell your Mullahs you disgraced your religion this week. You were too cretinous to be able to defend it. 1 Like |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by jaybee3(m): 12:49pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
Oga saga just did a quick search on google only to findd out that you've used the word *person* 4670 times. You had better trademark that word i tell ya |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 12:53pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
jay bee: Oga saga just did a quick search on google only to findd out that you've used the word *person* 4670 times. You had better trademark that word i tell ya I didn't know or notice one could do such a search. The world is full of fucktards sha, so 4670 is quite low. |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 6:27pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
Sagamite:I SWEAR TO GOD YOU ARE AN I'DIOT! that's the whole point! putin does not have to say it...even hypothetically! Sagamite: No 2, I don't need to tell people I am intelligent, my posts and intellectual slaughtering of fucktards like you make the whole audience realise it. I just say it to rob the salt into the injury. it's only in your demented mind they seem intelligent but to real people your only defence mechanism is to keep proCLAIMing it you dimwitted fucktardimite. that's why all your illustrations are i'diotic |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by meeka4: 6:52pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
@sagamie Comon shattap!! Blaady fool!!! You said that - “As a civilisation, it has been said that the Western civilisation is superior to the Islamic one, I could not concur more to that statement.” Now they are asking you essentially with concrete examples how is it better if it is guilty of worse than you accuse the Islamic one and your line of counter argument is : “I am sure the Arabs themselves killed of several people during their spread of Islam.” “Are you saying if it was another racial group that had the kind of western powers during that era, they would not do the same thing?” “Did Islamic Arabs not take black slaves?” Is this a motor park debate? Is that intellectual? is that how you are suppose to win in debate? MOOMOO! BLADDY FOOOL!! I SAY SHATTAP IDEEYOT!!! AND YOU FOO28 GO AND FIND SOMETHING BETTER TO DO WITH YOUR TIME! 1 Like |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 8:37pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
F00028: You are a person! He does not have to tell but if he does, does it mean he is not powerful? CRETIN! Test your assertions before applying them. person, so why are you running like a pus*y from questions then? Are you saying it is not a sign of being scared or my superior intellect? You are comfortable writing moronic junk all day but you lack the intellect to defend the religion that dictates your life. Zombie! You run like Al Qaeda runs from a superior civilisation. So why are you a muslim then if you condemn what islam promotes? Because you are a person? Pussyclat! |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 8:40pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
meeka4: @sagamie You are a fucktardious cretin! You are so dumb to the point you see fire and you jumped in thinking your skin can be fire proof. You are D-U-N done, cretin! Now, person, take his place and come and tell us how Islamic civilisation is not inferior. |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 8:45pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
meeka4: @sagamie would love to oblige you me but me and guys are getting a lotta laughs making this ignorant buffoon jump through hoops. he's always good for a laugh. like someone once said, he's a like gift that keeps on giving. |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 8:47pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
F00028: You and who? Your fellow fucktards? Why do you follow a religion which you condemn its edicts? |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by F00028: 8:58pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
meeka4: @sagamie |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Nobody: 9:53pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
Can we debate as civilized people?
|
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Nobody: 10:14pm On Oct 10, 2012 |
ebamma: Take Islam out and the world will be in peace and Christianity and kids will not be scared of hell any longer |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by ezicat: 5:29pm On Oct 20, 2012 |
Awwww - do you feel threatened as a result? Anyhoo - last speech from the throne because you're not worth wasting even more of my time... In response to your question: "A system where you have no chance of a say in the rules and regulation and where people are quick to put a sword to your neck for being different from them, or a system where you are exploited mainly because others are more intelligent than you but you have a say and if you could get or use your brain, you have a chance to change things?[/quote]" - if assuming that there is no room for conflict in a totalitarian regime, what then turned Western Europe from brutal monarchies to slightly better democracies (at list from the perspective of their own citizens)? - if assuming that the average person has a say in today's democracies and economies, why then is the average American/European (the forerunners of present-day democracies, and gods to you, apparently) so disgruntled; why the 3-year and on-going tither of economic recession? What happened to their "intelligence?" Lol The point, which you've failed to see and still continue to argue blindly is just that - faith and belief leave room for manipulation and corruption by the powers that be; that's what history has shown us...but some, like you, refuse to learn from it. Sagamite: |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by Sagamite(m): 9:33pm On Oct 20, 2012 |
ezicat: Awwww - do you feel threatened as a result? Threatened by idiocy? I dey laugh ooooooooooooooooooooo! ezicat: What kind of moronic question is this? You felt like Einstein when you composed this poo? ezicat: More fucktardious questions! Do you honestly expect me to respond to this cretinous questions? What schools failed you? Which secondary school and which university? Mooooron! |
Re: Religion Against Humanity By Wole Soyinka by TheIkoro(m): 5:51pm On Feb 07, 2015 |
IleIfe2: Re: "Religion Against Humanity by Wole Soyinka" by Ikoro Iyineleda A stitch in time would have saved all creation. A stitch in time would have had a human being that appealed to all humanity to be allowed to live life as a part of life, and run not the human race on crippled feet; be not annointed by GOD to break the shackles of hypocrisy that deny human beings that right for which he appealed - merely because he spoke up after forty years on earth, or after but twelve years, or even after up to twenty four years, or simply because he was not as fortunate as was Kunta Kinte to have had a father that had him set forth at dawn. A stitch in time would have had the most gross epitome of hypocrisy that has ever strutted its cruelty under the camouflage of religion heed the words, "I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men: SHE IS TO KEEP SILENT;" that the denial of those words may then justify in all its entirety that which is written of the shrew that, being Woman, it refused to tame into both silence and subjection: "And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: So is the tongue among our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the course of Nature; and it is set on the fire of Hell." That which, being written, denies an underestimation of "an unruly evil, full of deadly poison;" as no more than "a pebble thrown by an infantile hand in Papua New Guinea with attempts to demolish the Rock of Gibraltar." Because it is written of He that is infinitely greater than any that has ever called itself the Rock of Gibraltar: "Do not let the priests and the people break through to come up to The LORD, lest He break out against them." If those of whom it is written are The LORD's "portion" and His "alloted heritage" are not to come up to The LORD because of that possible eventuality that has been since the very beginning, "lest they die;" how much more those that approach Him obviously to provoke Him (even if only with "pebbles" hurled by "infantile" hands - be the "infantile" literal; or that of the Woman that has been accorded such an elevated position in society that she has not only proclaimed herself to be "the new man," but she has also seen herself to be "God" how much more will those that provoke Him (even if only with "pebbles" bring to pass the prophecy written of that which will be the course of Nature, when the hypocrisy of an adulterous generation refuses to tame the shrew that is Woman into subjection? "It shall be set on fire." He will break out against them - regardless of how infantile they may truly be, or claim to be. They will surely die. For even with the feeble attempts by which Humanity strives to live by the law, a delinquent infant is still required to face the wrath of the law - regardless of how subdued the wrath may be. And therefore, if we are "to ignore, and walk away from" "the products of infantilism and slow development" that are the "pebbles" known more pecisely as "blasphemy" in the world of Religion; then we should also, in the world of Humanity, "ignore, and walk away from" the juvenile delinquents such as those that continue to give the word "confraternity" that bad name of "cultism" and "gangsterism" in Nigerian universities. And considering the fact that that which is written of that which thou art supposed to have said once, O CB (in the edition of The Nigerian Guardian dated "Sunday May 14 - 17, 2008" concerning those juvenile delinquents, is: "When I hear that Wole Soyinka started secret cults, I always wish that thunder will descend and smite the mouths of those who say it." If thou would thunder "smite" merely because of that which others would term, "libel;" how much more will the Moslem in particular wish that even worse descend on those who make statements of libel against The Prophet they hold in such high esteem (had Christians today the same regard for The Christ, they would emulate him as religiously as Moslems emulate - on the average - Mohammed) and why then should Religion in general not have that which is even worse than worse descend on those who have evolved from the pits of libel into the dank depths of blasphemy: Be it as the wrath of The Allah that is seen as being so volatile that not only is Boko Haram made to be synonymous with "religious terror," but Islam also is made to be synonymous with "terrorism;" or be it as The LORD that the fool, the hypocrite, and the naïve that consists of the Christendom of this most evil and adulterous generation continues striving to have all believe is such a placid conformist that absolutely no one could have said unto Moses, "You speak to us, and we will hear; but let not GOD speak to us, lest we die" - the Christianity that continues striving to have all believe that absolutely none like Him before Whom they are to bow could have said, "Therefore will I also deal in fury: Mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity; and though they cry in Mine ears with a loud voice, yet I will not hear them." Hear, O Masculinism: The LORD our God, The LORD is GOD. And in the world of the Religion that brings about not only the recognition of Him that created not only Humanity itself, but the righteousness also by which thou seems to imply it should live - yet by laws that recognise not The Creator; "the equally infantile responses that are however incendiary and homicidal in dimension, and largely directed against the innocent" is thoroughly dwarfed by the wrath of He that is provoked by the "pebbles" thou believes can provoke only "equally infantile responses." He is "a consuming fire." And of the "innocent" that may be consumed by the fire? Like unto them is the nation of which it is written: "And The LORD gave the people favour in the sight of the Egyptians." That despite the favour, it may then be written of that nation: "and there was a great cry in Egypt, for there was not a house where one was not dead." For regardless of how "innocent" thou might believe thyself to be, should thou be on the other side of The LORD, thou art rendered guilty of all charges made by the one side. And thus a stitch in time would have saved the "blood and gore;" would have saved the spiral of reprisals that brought about the realisation of the war being - even in the sphere of Humanity's Politics - "religious;" may have brought about "the path to national discourse" that would have The Ikoro rather jaw-jaw than war-war; would have saved the denial of the sacrifice (if ever made) that would have had "the world stand still, cover its head in sackcloth and ashes, grovel in self-abasement or else prepare itself for earthly pestilence for failure to anticipate the occasional penetration of their self ascribed carapace of inviolability," - the sacrifice that would deny both the justice and the judgment due to which even Sons of The Most High will "die like men, and fall like any prince;" would have saved all creation from the ultimate end from which will be saved he only of whom it is written "endures to the end." The conclusion of the matter, and concerning both Humanity and Religion: Humanity is that which recognises the existence of not only "good and evil," not only wickedness and righteousness; but of the war also between good and evil, between wickedness and righteousness: And yet denies The LORD as justifiably as he that (in the world of secular Humanity, takes the law into his hand) is justified by the law. Religion is that which has the good wage war on evil, the righteous on wickedness, as "servants of GOD to execute His wrath on the wrongdoer." Thou may therefore make thy choice, O CB, between that which is justifiable, and that which is to be condemned; even should thou judge only by the feeble attempts of Humanity to live by laws that give no due recognition of the Religion that honours The Creator of Humanity. - Ikoro Iyineleda. (Author: The Faith Of The Less). |
(1) (2) (3) ... (15) (16) (17) (18) (Reply)
N5,000 Stipend: PDP Slams buhari, APC Senators / Deborah Ighiwiyisi Agbonayinma Worked In Pencom With Fake Degrees / See The Moment President Buhari And His Entire Household Voted Tinubu (Pictures)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 103 |