musKeeto:
You dolts... if he's still using 'natural events' to punish sinners, then of what use was Jesus' 'sacrifice'? How then is he different from the monster in the OT?

musKeeto:
You dolts... if he's still using 'natural events' to punish sinners, then of what use was Jesus' 'sacrifice'? How then is he different from the monster in the OT?

plaetton: Where in the bible does it say that a thief should pay back seven times?

CrazyMan:
Its obvious that you type without taking time to reason properly if what you're about to say makes any sense.

Matthew 27:51.  At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split NIV

When Jesus died, the laws of moses was abolished...read your bible properly stop posting like an ignorant fellow.

Hebrews 9:14-15. How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death, so that we may serve the living God!

15 For this reason Christ is the mediator of a new covenant, that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance—now that he has died as a ransom to set them free from the sins committed under the first covenant.

Stop disappointing me...read and understand something properly before coming publicly to state where you stand. Believe me, it would save you a lot a humiliation.

Jesus is the way, the truth and the life...the laws of moses are no longer valid...christ death and resurrection has brought us closer to God.


How about the passage I posted previously...where we're being told to flee from fornication.  1 Corinthians 6:18.

Are you reading my post at all, or are you just hitting the reply button simply because you want to keep up this argument?


I don't need to waste my time on you any longer...its obvious you lack understanding of the scriptures. You just post passages that agree with your argument.

You're an atheist, so even if I type here till eternity, you'll never be convinced...so what's the point.

J12:

Thats irrelevant to the subject.

J12:

Thats irrelevant to the subject.

CrazyMan:
 Proverbs 6:30-31. People do not despise a thief if he steals
to satisfy his hunger when he is starving.

31 Yet if he is caught, he must pay sevenfold,
though it costs him all the wealth of his house.

plaetton:

First of all, was this a law or just a proverb, an idiomatic expression?

But wait!
Isn't proverbs part of the old testament supposedly written, long before Jesus, by Solomon, an old testament king who lived and ruled according to old testament law? The same old testament law that you have said are null and void by virtue of Jesus?

How many times have you contradicted yourself today?

musKeeto:
if these guys could erase history, they'd make the Refurbished testaments...
The New Testament depends on the Old Testamment. Without Adam, there would be no Jesus.

J12: I'm not supporting neither am i condemning the pastor for his statement. All i'm saying is that you're all as ignorant as the pastor if you can't refute his claims with reasonable spiritual or scientific facts.

J12: I'm not supporting neither am i condemning the pastor for his statement. All i'm saying is that you're all as ignorant as the pastor if you can't refute his claims with reasonable spiritual or scientific facts.

musKeeto:
You dolts... if he's still using 'natural events' to punish sinners, then of what use was Jesus' 'sacrifice'? How then is he different from the monster in the OT?

plaetton:

Did I hear you say Spiritual Facts?
OMG! Everyday, a new record is broken in this ridiculous, no, religilous, I mean religious section.

This one is a record breaker, at least so far this week.

Naaaaaa waaaaaaa.

J12: I'm not supporting neither am i condemning the pastor for his statement. All i'm saying is that you're all as ignorant as the pastor if you can't refute his claims with reasonable spiritual or scientific facts.

J12: LMAO




Spiritual facts are only acknowledged by persons who are spiritually conscious not otherwise.

wiegraf:

Wtf

We're ignorant about spirits and such of course, because they don't exist. If the pastor claims these spirits are responsible for hurricanes, the onus is now on him to prove that and show these spirits in action, no? If you are ignorant about how tornadoes or whatever work use google ffs and find the scientific, objectably verifiable theories on the subject. Don't just make $hit up then expect the rest of us take you seriously, let alone disprove something you have not even proven. Take a step back and think about just how stoopid you sound at the moment.

With this subject matter real life people are being persecuted because of your story books. Wtf is wrong with you ppl?

J12: LMAO

You can't claim that spirits don't exist because you cant prove their in-existence. Like I said, the pastor was speaking from a spiritual perspective, therefore, only spiritually conscious people can relate to his claims. He owes no one, specifically atheist, agnostics etc. no proof of his claims because from a spiritual perspective y'all blind and fooolish.

J12: LMAO

You can't claim that spirits don't exist because you cant prove their in-existence. Like I said, the pastor was speaking from a spiritual perspective, therefore, only spiritually conscious people can relate to his claims. He owes no one, specifically atheist, agnostics etc. no proof of his claims because from a spiritual perspective y'all blind and fooolish.