Obinoscopy: Choose whatever u want to say but we want the truth and nothing but the truth .

ItsModella: ok, personal stuff like hobbies and occupation would make sense. I thought you meant age, name and shiz like that.

CFCfan:

Judge, should I take the oath on the Bible?

Obinoscopy: Lol, I don't think that's necessary

Obinoscopy: Good luck bro

chelseabmw: My suggestion: Idowuogbo should NOT be part of the judges except this contest is a joke.



Thanks

Obinoscopy: I have two suggestions (dunno if they had been suggested earlier by anyone):

1. A biography of contestants should be gotten before the contest proper. These biographies should be made public at a stage during the contest

2. Aside from using votes to screen out contestants, there should be a stage (perhaps the quarter final stage) where a panel of judges ask the contestants some technical questions and score them based on their responses. Such scores can then be used to decide who moves on to the next stage.

It's high time we took this Mr/Miss NL to the next level.

chelseabmw: My suggestion: Idowuogbo should NOT be part of the judges except this contest is a joke.



Thanks

Mrs.Chima:


Aww jealous?

Idowuogbo:
Hurting? I understand!

chelseabmw:

Aint jealous...... u are a old member so u should understand what i mean....

chelseabmw:

No not that..If its a joke contest then you are a perfect judge but not this one... You know you are not even qualified

Idowuogbo:
Is dat so? Who made u judge of qualifications? Carry ur beef comot abeg! U not making sense.

D-Explorer:

On point 2, i think Obinoscopy saw through my eyes. That was my point ealier. We just can't have the winner of a beauty peagent without brain. The judges should question these contestants (i suggest the finalist alone) and let the quality of their answers earn them a score which's gonna be added to the total votes of each contestant.

Now, the unique side to this is that, if a particular contestant is been voted because he/she got alot of friends here, and she score low on the questions asked, the potential 2nd runner up got hope if she did well during the questioning.

In a practical approach, lets assume this' the contest and Shollypopz is leading with 60VOTES (votes powered by friends/campaign) and Idowuogbo as the potential 1st runner up has 50VOTES, if Sholly answered her questions poorly and Idowu got them right, that means, despite vote margin, Idowu can claim the top spot and win the contest.

Nothing else can be more interesting than this if we want a winner with beauty and brain.

ItsModella:
Then there is no point voting in the first place if the votes will account for nothing. However, it would make sense if the viewers voted up until the final round, then during that round, the winner would be determined by how well he/she answered his/her questions. That how it's normally done.

You can't let people waste time in voting and then decide you're gonna pick a winner based on how well he/she answered his/her questions.

Obinoscopy: At least u and D-Ex both agree there should be question sessions where the judges score the participants which will determine who goes over to the next stage. The issue is now at which stage should the question session be introduced.

I'm of the suggestion that it should be introduced at the semi- or quarter-final stage. However let the votes alone count in the finals.

D-Explorer:
All judges musn't compaign or vote.

ItsModella: shey sanb na the new vanneni? always chatting from the past.

D-Explorer:


Nothing else can be more interesting than this if we want a winner with beauty and brain.