DailyNews: records show that very very very few of relationships started from the internet live long and stay faithful....maybe yours might make the list of the very very few that will be successful if luck is on your side....but of the truth, it hardly works cos most people that go on social networks to seek for love are mostly- stay-at-home teenagers with less exposure abt life, over aged people with hidden intentions, and ppl with less opportunities, and sometimes opportunists...but some do end successful, negligible number though. goodluck

candygosh: It ccould be fascinating, shocking, suspensefilled, fun, intriguing, blessing-in disguise, and also ur worse nightmare.
Anyone!

LastApostle: What possibly could an individual be seeking on a social media when such person is besiege by countless potentials around?

For a man: you went to secondary school, university,church, you commute a lot, attend weddings, ceremonies, old boys associations, clubs, parties and you never met your woman except on the internet with limited opportunity, are you tongue tied? Start writing letters then to express your feelings joor.

A lot of inconveniences are associated with social relationship not to talk of the apparent risk involved with the endeavour!

Freiburger: My instinct keeps telling me that one out of every third relationship in the world will be connected online by the year 2030.

ibkaye: Not for me personally but absolutely nothing wrong with it

Tashamania:

I know, right

Texas.Cowgirl:


I have a very great argument for this baseless post, but I lack the energy to waste today.

DailyNews: records show that very very very few of relationships started from the internet live long and stay faithful....maybe yours might make the list of the very very few that will be successful if luck is on your side....but of the truth, it hardly works cos most people that go on social networks to seek for love are mostly- stay-at-home teenagers with less exposure abt life, over aged people with hidden intentions, and ppl with less opportunities, and sometimes opportunists...but some do end successful, negligible number though. goodluck

Texas.Cowgirl:


Liar. You forgot about our bad lesbian romance?

ibkaye:
Lol the past is 'the past' for a reason

ibkaye:
Lol the past is 'the past' for a reason

2legit2qwt:

Am i your past as well ibk? You forgot all the love we shared on social network

candygosh:

Babe

Btw those goodies aint for u alone. I sw dem just kept my mouth in d state of :-#

Texas.Cowgirl:

Liar. You forgot about our bad lesbian romance?

ibkaye:
Lol the past is 'the past' for a reason

2legit2qwt:
Am i your past as well ibk? You forgot all the love we shared on social network

ibkaye:
Haha you will always have my love babe

ogugua88: [size=13pt]It works for some and it may not work for others. Meeting someone in person isn't a sure route to a successful relationship and/or happiness. Divorce rates and relationship failures were high before the introduction of social networking. People scam and manipulate in the real world just like they do online.

Anyone trying it has nothing to lose. If you be yourself, you may be lucky and find someone who's genuine as well. As aforementioned, some of the key ingredients for a successful relationship are love and understanding. Those things aren't exclusive to "real" life.[/size]

story

2legit2qwt:



In your face Texas cow girl

@ibk No social network can stop this

eyenCalabar: Matured people don't engage in such relationships. It doesn't make sense.

DailyNews: records show that very very very few of relationships started from the internet live long and stay faithful....maybe yours might make the list of the very very few that will be successful if luck is on your side....but of the truth, it hardly works cos most people that go on social networks to seek for love are mostly- stay-at-home teenagers with less exposure abt life, over aged people with hidden intentions, and ppl with less opportunities, and sometimes opportunists...but some do end successful, negligible number though. goodluck

teejay2003: I think it's 50-50