Demdem:

Even if the collateral damage is even much more than the real criminals themselves, u will surely have no issues with it. U sound like one that dont value human lives at all. No wonder u have been shying away from my references of the death of innocent lives in my post so far on this thread. Not surprised though, afterall ur good friend lodge killers and murderers.

thegoodjoehunt:

I can agree with this. If he feels he should not respond to this allegations, then he has his reasons.

thegoodjoehunt:

You misunderstood me. I am saying that if the General is angry with the attacks because it is causing collateral damages on innocent people, then I have no problem with what the General is saying. I can agree with him on that.

That is if the General feels the attack should be planned more to make sure loss of lives is reduced.

Ganys:
and you will continue suffering and smiling under Mr Clueless

Demdem:

And i can assure u that is what the General wants. He wants the military operation to be surgical with little or no collateral damage if possible. He wants those miscreants fished out and dealt with.

mahleeq:

No no no and no GMB thinks GEJ is too harsh on BH, he doesn't sound too concerned about the casualties(civilians) rather he is concerned with killing BH members.

thegoodjoehunt:

Did you see militants blowing churches with bomb, killing innocent people on the streets including women and children week in week out? Stop being biased. It makes you look too sentimental and detached from reality. Boko Haram is the worst thing to happen in this country. It damaged out image internationally and finally got Nigerians labeled as terrorists.

During the Militancy saga, were Nigerians seen as Terrorists? Yet you are trying to make it the same.