KoiceReloaded:


In terms of technology, they're nowhere as advanced as Japan (there's a reason UN doesn't allow Japan to have a military force), and yet I'd put my money on China if both were to engage in war fare.

alexistaiwo:
Don't twist history.

Japan doesn't have a military force because of the world war 2 settlement agreement and technically, they have a military force but they can't deploy outside Japan.

Same applies to their fellow Axis partner too (Germany)

alexistaiwo:
Don't twist history.
Where was China's superior military numbers when Japan invaded them in WWII

Japan doesn't have a military force because of the world war 2 settlement agreement and technically, they have a military force but they can't deploy outside Japan.

Same applies to their fellow Axis partner too (Germany)

Beorn1:
Seun, Lalasticlala, Mukina2 and co, isn't it time antispermbot is removed from this site? Of what use is it if people like me can be banned for no just reason; not for posting suspicious links or insulting anyone or even breaking any rules, but for posting a reasonable post. My BEORN moniker has just been banned by Spermbot for a reason I'm still stressing my brain to figure out. This shit_ is very annoying. WTF?!!

KoiceReloaded:
.

alexistaiwo:
Don't twist history.
Where was China's superior military numbers when Japan invaded them in WWII

Beorn1:


Bro, I don tire. If Seun doesn't want us to post on his site, let him kukuma tell us. Which kain nonsense is this?

pryme:


Yeah Aston Kutcher,
sometimes critics could be a bunch of r3tards with access to a larger coverage.

You can imagine a movie like Under The Skin got a high rating of 84% percent. I rushed and watched the movie, after that I said fvck the critics and their corny ratings.
If you watch this movie you will easily get into a fight that day because you will be very pissed after wasting your time watching such can of shiit.

KoiceReloaded:



[Horrified]

You mean the ITK guy? Surely, I'm not nearly as annoying?!

oyaskii:
RE: i have actually seen the web dl pop up this morning... Check Mkvcage

alexistaiwo:
Who told you that the taliban terrorists are untrained?

Just so you know, you don't have to enlist in conventional military service before you become a war dog.


Most terrorist cells military trainings are even tougher than your conventional training.


You think a warlord will give his RPGs and Aks to an untrained civilian turned terrorist to experiment on?

Forget all the hype.
Elite military trainings are usually most effective in covert operations, in an all out fire fight like what was witnessed in black hawk down, the side with the home advantage coupled with unlimited supply of reinforcement will always do the most damage.

Why is the northern part of the country still ravaged by terrorism?
Home advantage!

mekaprime:


I will consider some of your points valid if only you stick to our two countries of comparison, which is the US and Somalia.

Yes i quite agree that most terrorist cells military trainings are tougher than the conventional training, but that'll be in comparison to the conventional training of the military force of some third world countries, not the US.
Don't forget that child solders & child volunteers also made up at least 50% of the militia, so you implying that the training they give these kids are tougher than the conventional training given to an ordinary US marine??

You make it sound as if its an herculean task handling an RPG & AK47. How difficult is it in handling an RPG or Ak47??, I myself can learn how to handle both weapons in a week & perfect my accuracy & aim in 2 weeks or a month.


All they had was home advantage, which was basically the terrain, they knew the terrain & were to strike from to cause maximum damage, as for reinforcements & weaponry, the US was far greater. Wikipedia puts the militia & volunteers at 2000-4000, while the US had 160 soldiers,12 vehicles
(9 Humvees , 3M939 trucks) 19 aircraft
(16 helicopters – 8 Black Hawks and 8
Little Birds ) 3,000+ (as a rescue force).

alexistaiwo:
@bolded.

Soldiers are trained to return home after the war while terrorists are trained to go out in a blast of glory.

Just so you know, moral compass aside, a terrorist is more dangerous than the best trained soldier in the world.

You can't compare a Somalian man/child (terrorist) prepared to fight to the death with a US soldier who has family to get back to.


Soldiers will rather fight conventional war against fellow soldiers than fight religious zealots/terrorists

mekaprime:


So you know, there is a huge difference between radical fighting & tactical fighting, the later sure outweighs the former.

alexistaiwo:
The latter is now outdated.
Radical fighting is in vogue now.

mekaprime:
.

KoiceReloaded:


It's okay that you like the movie but let's not get carried away. Compared to well written masterpieces like Looper and Donnie Darko, it's a ridiculous attempt at the metaphysical nature of human life choices. The film oozed plot holes like a ripe puss. Also, Aston Kutcher has one of the most punchable faces I've have seen.

Slowmojay:
Zero, Dark Thirty Anyone?

alexistaiwo:
When was the last conventional warfare (countries against countries violent conflict)?

Everybody is now fighting terrorism.

Raalsalghul:
[b]As a continuation of my Oscar bait film marathon...I saw Blackkklansman today.
Rating: 10/10

I don't have too many spike lee films on my watch list but this will linger on my memory for a long time.
The usual american race tensions comes into play here and we've got major players on both sides, but it is balanced out by neutrals.

If you're expecting violence, marches and random gun shots in chanting crowds, avoid this one please. The film is a heavily dramatized one as it details a black cop's investigation into the ku klux klan in the 1970's.
The kkk still exists for a fact but the film boldly acknowledges their change of tactics from violence to propagating thier agenda via contesting for political offices.

This is a fine kick off film for John David WashingtonYes the son of the Denzel Washington). Known him since his days at HBO series Ballers. His acting here is characterized with ambitiousness sprinkled with comedic chops. Will advise he goes for a comic role in the future though featuring in an upcoming Nolan film will certainly boost his resume.

However the film fails to tie up some loose ends by the time the credit rolls in. While a success for the film's characters, still it's a failure in the grand scheme of things as Spike lee throws in some 2017 videos of race protests in Virginia. Serving as a reminder that racism will always be part of the American society.

Next on my list is Vice starring Christian Bale and Amy Adams.[/b]

alexistaiwo:
Don't twist history.
Where was China's superior military numbers when Japan invaded them in WWII

Japan doesn't have a military force because of the world war 2 settlement agreement and technically, they have a military force but they can't deploy outside Japan.

Same applies to their fellow Axis partner too (Germany)

JeromeBlack:


I'm surprised that you know a bit of history.

I think this is a broken clock moment.