malvisguy212:
[s]you cannot even answer my simple question I ask, the quran say Jesus is sinless, ONLY Jesus , NO one else is, doesent this proved He is indeed a deity? Let this be seal in your heart.

From the link you paste, I click were they write (see the Author's WE) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nosism#The_author.27s_.22we.22_or_pluralis_modestiae
the link direct me to were the ROYAL "WE" is explained:

The author's "we" or pluralis
modestiae
Similar to the editorial "we", pluralis
modestiae is the practice common in
scientific literature of referring to a
generic third person by we (instead of
the more common one or the informal
you):
By adding four and five, we obtain
nine.
We are thus led also to a definition of
"time" in physics. – Albert Einstein
"We" in this sense often refers to "the
reader and the author," since the author
often assumes that the reader knows and
agrees with certain principles or previous
theorems for the sake of brevity (or, if
not, the reader is prompted to look them
up).
This practice is also common in
philosophy journals and texts, and
comments in computer source code.
[ citation needed]
The patronizing "we"
The patronizing "we" is sometimes used
in addressing instead of "you,"
suggesting that the addressee is not
alone in his or her situation, that "I am
with you, we are in this together." This
usage is emotionally non-neutral and
usually bears a condescending, ironic,
praising, or some other connotation,
depending on an intonation: "Aren't we
looking cute?" This is sometimes
employed by health care workers when
addressing their patients, e. g. "How are
we feeling today?"
The non-confrontative "we"
In distinction to the patronizing "we" is
the non-confrontative "we" used in T-V
languages such as Spanish where the
phrase ¿Cómo estamos? (literally, "How
are we?" is sometimes used to avoid
both over-familiarity and over-formality
among near-peer acquaintances[/s].

vedaxcool:


You are not worth my time anymore, you skipped the place that explicitly exposes your hypocrisy!

malvisguy212:
[s]can it be more clearer than this?

Similar to the editorial "we", pluralis
modestiae is the practice common in
scientific literature of referring to a
generic THIRD PERSON by we (instead of
the more common one or the informal
you):
By adding four and five, we obtain
nine.
We are thus led also to a definition of
"time" in physics. – Albert Einstein[/s]

vedaxcool:


I am happy you show how shameless you can be, lying despite the screenshot I posted, your comprehension ability is either woefully or perchant to lie is extremely high either way you should go and hold a convo with your ilk. Funny didn't know Albert Einstein wrote the bible!

bilalfarid:
OP u dnt just copy somthing from another website and paste here on NL for discussion, even my 15 year old Lil brother would give a satisfying answer to wat ur so called MATT Slick holds unto as d reason y jesus is gr8ter dan Muhammad (saw).
magnitude of miracles can no be used as a standard to judge which prophet is greater. The bible even mentioned other miracles by other prophets which where gr8ter than that of Jesus, examples below:
Jesus (ﷺ) fed thousands with a few fish and loaves of bread

Elisha fed a hundred people with twenty barley loaves and a few ears of corn (2 Kings 4:44); granted a widow such an abundant flow of oil from a jar that she was able to pay off her debts, save her sons from slavery, and live on the profits (2 Kings 4:1-7); and gave increase to a handful of flour and spot of oil such that he, a widow and her son had enough to eat for many days, after which "The bin of flour was not used up, nor did the jar of oil run dry". (1 Kings 17:10-16).

B. Jesus (ﷺ) healed the lepers

Elisha healed Naaman (2 Kings 5:7-14); for that matter, the disciples were bidden to such service in Matthew 10:8.

C. Jesus (ﷺ) cured a blind man

Elisha not only struck his enemies blind, but restored vision to the blind through prayer (2 Kings 6:17-20).

D. Jesus (ﷺ) raised the dead

Moses put life into a dead stick and transmuted it from the plant kingdom to the animal kingdom by making it into a serpent (Exodus 7:10)

Elisha raised two children from the dead (1 Kings 17:22; 2 Kings 4:34)

Elisha's bones brought a man back to life merely by coming into contact with the corpse (2 Kings 13:21)

The disciples were bidden to raise the dead (Matthew 10:

E. Jesus (ﷺ) walked on water

Moses (ﷺ) parted the sea.

F. Jesus (ﷺ) cast out devils

So did his disciples (Matthew 10: and the sons of the Pharisees (Matthew 12:27; Luke 11:19).
So OP disregard matt slick's write ups. If magnitude of miracles determine a prophets gr8tnes the jesus won't be head of when they talk of miracles.
NOTE: according to the bible. dis raises another uestion of the bible inaccuracy.

malvisguy212:
both the quran and bible indicate Jesus is the ONLY man whom God spirit is upon, NO other prophet is given this title.

All other prophet start their message like this "thus say thy Lord or the Word of God came to Me"
ONLY Jesus say VERILY VERILY I say unto you meaning He is thy Lord, The word of God that is sending the prophet.

Miracle does not proved if you are genuine man of God or prophet because even satan can empower someone to performed sign and wonders. But muhammed performed zero miracle and did not even here directly from God like the other prophet .

menesheh:



Science has performed and still performing the most miracles and can demonstrate and prove whatever seemed miraculous and magical in our eyes.


Most of the myth you called miracles performed by jesus and muhammed is science fiction and will soon come to reality and can be demonstrated and proven by science in the near future.

malvisguy212:
if you cannot answer my questions, why do you quote me?

mustymatic:

Malvis you don't accept clear answers that's y, all your claims hav been debunkd

menesheh:



Science has performed and still performing the most miracles and can demonstrate and prove whatever seemed miraculous and magical in our eyes.


Most of the myth you called miracles performed by jesus and muhammed is science fiction and will soon come to reality and can be demonstrated and proven by science in the near future.

VorkalthDigby:


Hmm. Can we then please see a comparison between Moses and Jesus. Thanks

vedaxcool:


A silly op at best and grotesque reasoning at worst. All your claims about the divinity of Jesus has been shown to be fasle and lies told by the bible against jesus. Muslims don't ddiscriminate against prophets of God and hold all of them in high esteem.

royallord1:


but @ d mention of his name....JESUS, every knee must bow..tongues confess and demons cast out.... which other prophet has such power in their NAME... Even when jesus said greater works shall you do... but all works are done in his name..
JESUS IS LORD OVER ALL...

Anas09:


Pls Mustymatics and Crusadistic, where are they Empree, Rilwayne.
Answer the questions posted to you. You all jump from place to place as though you are standing on ants.
1). Why is Jesus the only Sinless Prophet in ur koran. When Mohammed is as good as Satan?
2). Who are the "we, us, and our" Allah keeps referring to?
3). Why does Allah who is suppose to be god need "PEACE". You always say peace be unto him. Why? Is he in any kind of trouble.
3). What is Allah doing with all the blood being offered to him by muslims everyday?
4). Who are "Allat, Malat, and Uzzah?
Simple questions you can't answer, yet you claim you have won an arguement.

OLAADEGBU:


Science man, what is the ultimate cause of the universe?

menesheh:



i don't know. do you?

menesheh:



i don't know. do you?

OLAADEGBU:


I assumed you will go into your laboratory to experiment and conjour (concoct) the answer for us, no?

menesheh:



You don't know right?

Science is just a model setup to thoroughly (i mean thoroughly) examine and substantiate everythings possible. The possibilities should be within the reach of time, space and matter to the best (i mean the best) of human physical and mental capability.

Any story or thesis that can't be substantiated is irrelevant. Any claim of the ultimate cause of the universe at this moment is silly. science never for once claim to know absolutely but are following wherever any convincing evidence leads even faith if there is any.

OLAADEGBU:


But I can scientifically give you the evidence of the ultimate origin of the universe and this will only confirm what the Bible says. Do you want to try me?

menesheh:



Listening?

And after that you are going to win international science prizes and awards for being the person to do that.

OLAADEGBU:


Na today? Click on the thread below and scroll down before you get to the end of the first page to see how a creation scientist has successfully done that.

https://www.nairaland.com/1438016/how-atheist

menesheh:



is crappy.

i ve read that b4.

you can excerpt any part, then pose it to me.

malvisguy212:
which of my claims ? I ask, why is Jesus only the prophet in islam who is sinless and you guys cannot answer. Smh

mustymatic:

Where did you get that?

plainbibletruth:

You now want to pretend not to be following the thread or what?
Jokers!
Ok, go here for some basic lessons: https://www.nairaland.com/2391643/uniqueness-jesus-quran

mustymatic:
Do you believe in the quran now?

malvisguy212:
NO muslims will be able to reply this. Let the truth be sealed.

mustymatic:

Do you believe in the quran now?