ezeagu:
Apart from the name Biafra having absolutely no value in any language in the general south east of Nigeria, I'm still confused as to where the majority of pro-Biafrans believe Biafra to be or better yet the lands they claim are part of a proposed Biafra.

Personally, I'm against the creating of this microcosm of Nigeria called "Biafra" without any evidence of a clear plan for the upliftment of its proposed peopling. Apart from that, different Biafra groups are claiming 'Biafra' to just be Igboland, others are saying Biafra even includes Igala and Idoma people. Do the Igala and Idoma people even know what Biafra is talkless of wether they are part of it? And if it's Igboland, where is Igboland? Who does it include?

So I ask, where and what on earth is Biafra? And if successful nations can usually be described as a people of a particular culture who speak a particular language, like Spanish people of Spain speak Spanish, German people of Germany speak German, English people of England speak English, then what do the Biafran people speak? The Biafran language?

Princecalm:




you were making sense before you reached the border, you really got it wrong there

cremedelacreme:
So I ask, where and what on earth is Biafra? And if successful nations can usually be described as a people of a particular culture who speak a particular language, like Spanish people of Spain speak Spanish, German people of Germany speak German, English people of England speak English, then what do the Biafran people speak? The Biafran language?
Guy your logic is flawed. Do Nigerian people of Nigeria speak Nigerian?

cremedelacreme:
Crap!

ezeagu:


Well, if you explain yourself I can actually know what you mean.



.

Princecalm:



I was trying to tell you I do a does not have any link with Biafra

onenaira3:
Biafra is biafra. It's includes igboland be it in SS and SE. Biafra will not force any group or person to join and if you, ezeagu, don't ever to join, you can stay in one Nigeria..no problem but best believe no part of igboland is staying in that one Nigeria so you have to pack your bags and head to any part of one Nigeria and call it your home.

ezeagu:


Sorry?

ezeagu:


Sorry?

Princecalm:



for your self

ezeagu:


So Biafra is an Igbo thing? Why are there groups talking about Idoma, Igala, and Igede and others who have never had anything to do with Biafra?

ezeagu:


Guy, you're making absolutely no sense.

onenaira3:


Whoever is talking about igede and coo is a buf00n simple. Most of the people on NL taking about biafra have little to zero idea the content of Biafra just joining in the bad wagon to talk. The only idoma or igala involved in biafra are the ones found in Enugu and Anambra. And similar to what I said, no part of igboland is staying in one Nigeria. If they don't like Biafra, they can equally pack their bags and heard to middle belt where they came from...no wahalla and End of story.

Princecalm:


look... . you know nothing about the Idomas and Igede

ezeagu:


What are you trying to say? Just write it in plain English, please.

ezeagu:


But it's IPOB, the front runner of this 'Biafra' movement, who are claiming Igede, "Isobo" (Urhobo/Isoko), Igala "Igbo-Nta" (Ibibio) and Itsekiri because "their names start with I and they wear two piece wrapper". Is that not a joke?

onenaira3:


The fact you included iteskiri and urhobo/isoko shows you actually don't know nor listen to IPOB or even Massob ideology. The only group you actually included in their that is included in Biafra is Ibibio and that's because ipob has a significant number of members that are ibibio. A perfect example is my best friend who is not an ipob yet (he's on the process of getting ipob membership) but he is one of the biggest biafran agitator and sirpporter I know at least in my own neck of the wood. Me personally, I'm against non Igbo joining Biafra hence my point of Biafra focuses on just Igbo land alone.

ezeagu:
Apart from the name Biafra having absolutely no value in any language in the general south east of Nigeria, I'm still confused as to where the majority of pro-Biafrans believe Biafra to be or better yet the lands they claim are part of a proposed Biafra.

Personally, I'm against the creating of this microcosm of Nigeria called "Biafra" without any evidence of a clear plan for the upliftment of its proposed peopling. Apart from that, different Biafra groups are claiming 'Biafra' to just be Igboland, others are saying Biafra even includes Igala and Idoma people. Do the Igala and Idoma people even know what Biafra is talkless of whether they are part of it? And if it's Igboland, where is Igboland? Who does it include?

So I ask, where and what on earth is Biafra? And if successful nations can usually be described as a people of a particular culture who speak a particular language, like Spanish people of Spain speak Spanish, German people of Germany speak German, English people of England speak English, then what do the Biafran people speak? The Biafran language?

ezeagu:


Sorry?

ezeagu:
Apart from the name Biafra having absolutely no value in any language in the general south east of Nigeria, I'm still confused as to where the majority of pro-Biafrans believe Biafra to be or better yet the lands they claim are part of a proposed Biafra.

Personally, I'm against the creating of this microcosm of Nigeria called "Biafra" without any evidence of a clear plan for the upliftment of its proposed peopling. Apart from that, different Biafra groups are claiming 'Biafra' to just be Igboland, others are saying Biafra even includes Igala and Idoma people. Do the Igala and Idoma people even know what Biafra is talkless of whether they are part of it? And if it's Igboland, where is Igboland? Who does it include?

So I ask, where and what on earth is Biafra? And if successful nations can usually be described as a people of a particular culture who speak a particular language, like Spanish people of Spain speak Spanish, German people of Germany speak German, English people of England speak English, then what do the Biafran people speak? The Biafran language?

onenaira3:
Biafra is biafra. It's includes igboland be it in SS and SE. Biafra will not force any group or person to join and if you, ezeagu, don't ever to join, you can stay in one Nigeria..no problem but best believe no part of igboland is staying in that one Nigeria so you have to pack your bags and head to any part of one Nigeria and call it your home.

ezeagu:


But it's IPOB, the front runner of this 'Biafra' movement, who are claiming Igede, "Isobo" (Urhobo/Isoko), Igala "Igbo-Nta" (Ibibio) and Itsekiri because "their names start with I and they wear two piece wrapper". Is that not a joke?

onenaira3:


The fact you included iteskiri and urhobo/isoko shows you actually don't know nor listen to IPOB or even Massob ideology. The only group you actually included in their that is included in Biafra is Ibibio and that's because ipob has a significant number of members that are ibibio. A perfect example is my best friend who is not an ipob yet (he's on the process of getting ipob membership) but he is one of the biggest biafran agitator and sirpporter I know at least in my own neck of the wood. Me personally, I'm against non Igbo joining Biafra hence my point of Biafra focuses on just Igbo land alone.

ezeagu:


So Biafra is an Igbo thing? Why are there groups talking about Idoma, Igala, and Igede and others who have never had anything to do with Biafra?