KingEbukasBlog:


Hmmm

For Enoch & Elijah . These two great men never saw death and looking at Revelation 11:1-14 . There are possibilities that Enoch and Elijah are the two witnesses that will come to earth, prophesy , torment the people of the earth , be killed and then ascend to heaven . According to your video , Enoch means teaching . How will you relate to this ?

plaetton:


The moment you called the theory of evolution a religion, I suddenly feel so embarrassed that I actually exchange words with you.

A wave of pessimism overcomes me, as I am reminded of the great brain robbery perpetuated on Africans with middle East Stone-age trash.

I actually owe you an apology for condescending to engage with you.

winner01:
Guy, refute his posts na

Im enjoying how you can be so stup1d and confident at the same time.

1feness:


When an object spins at a very high speed it becomes invisible to an object spinning at a low speed. Such is the state of a dying person. They vibrate faster than us who are alive and tend to be more of themselves. Hence they see object/"people" exactly like them.

Sarassin:

For Christians the defense of the creationist position is rooted in the fear that to concede otherwise would negate the perceived element of biblical infallibility.

However, the arguments for the creationist position are not based on any evidence presented within the book itself other than its own assertions. Rather, assumptions are made about the nature of the scripture co-opting theories of inspiration, and beliefs about how God works in human history and then the conclusion is arrived at that the universe must have been created by God. For instance, Paul writes something in his letter to the Thessalonians therefore the book of Genesis is validated. In other words, the argument for creationism is presented within an already decided conclusion. It amounts to an apologetic for biblical infallibility.

Empirically the biblical view of a universe whose history is dependent on the will of the Israelite God can only prevail in a cosmos in which the laws of nature govern events in accordance with the laws of probability, therefore by necessity probability or chance must be encompassed by divine providence.

In Chaos theory we study dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions, (for instance the butterfly effect) we establish that the motion of a system of three or more stars interacting gravitationally (the gravitational N-body problem) is generically chaotic. At best if God did indeed create the universe it is beyond doubt that God then abandoned his creation to random process.

At a stretch it is certainly possible to conceive of God using apparently random processes to achieve creative purposes. What then would be the overarching reason for God? In my view science is on the verge of providing us the keys to the physical universe, therefore it is no longer enough for Christians to simply state “ In the beginning, God created heaven and earth"

vooks:

What part of them 'vibrates faster'?

Sarassin:

For Christians the defense of the creationist position is rooted in the fear that to concede otherwise would negate the perceived element of biblical infallibility.

However, the arguments for the creationist position are not based on any evidence presented within the book itself other than its own assertions. Rather, assumptions are made about the nature of the scripture co-opting theories of inspiration, and beliefs about how God works in human history and then the conclusion is arrived at that the universe must have been created by God. For instance, Paul writes something in his letter to the Thessalonians therefore the book of Genesis is validated. In other words, the argument for creationism is presented within an already decided conclusion. It amounts to an apologetic for biblical infallibility.

Empirically the biblical view of a universe whose history is dependent on the will of the Israelite God can only prevail in a cosmos in which the laws of nature govern events in accordance with the laws of probability, therefore by necessity probability or chance must be encompassed by divine providence.

In Chaos theory we study dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions, (for instance the butterfly effect) we establish that the motion of a system of three or more stars interacting gravitationally (the gravitational N-body problem) is generically chaotic. At best if God did indeed create the universe it is beyond doubt that God then abandoned his creation to random process.

At a stretch it is certainly possible to conceive of God using apparently random processes to achieve creative purposes. What then would be the overarching reason for God? In my view science is on the verge of providing us the keys to the physical universe, therefore it is no longer enough for Christians to simply state “ In the beginning, God created heaven and earth"

vooks:

You have it in reverse, evolution or basically naturalism theories are rooted in fear of accountability to God. It is a desperate attempt to explain away God. And it fails woefully on all accounts, especially astronomy. I could school you on this if you promised to have a teachable spirit


Chriatianity is a religion that tells you, 'in the beginning GOD....' While evolution is another that tells me, 'in the beginning DIRT...' Even an unborn fetus can see which is bullsh*t



Tell me where matter originated from, or was it eternal?
WHY did 'Big Bang' happen 13B years go and not later nor sooner?

1feness:


TB Joshua is an illusionist. There is nothing wrong paying him a visit. But have you asked yourself what makes him different? He is a man in a country full of blind people.

vooks:

You have it in reverse, evolution or basically naturalism theories are rooted in fear of accountability to God. It is a desperate attempt to explain away God. And it fails woefully on all accounts, especially astronomy. I could school you on this if you promised to have a teachable spirit

Chriatianity is a religion that tells you, 'in the beginning GOD....' While evolution is another that tells me, 'in the beginning DIRT...' Even an unborn fetus can see which is bullsh*t

Tell me where matter originated from, or was it eternal?
WHY did 'Big Bang' happen 13B years go and not later nor sooner?

1feness:


Actually declaring there is no god is called having the balls to own up to an obvious fact. If Evolutionist/atheist/others were filled with fear,none of them will question the bible. Regardless of being threatened with hell fire and its horror acts,I as an individual is giving a middle finger to the idea of a god.

Matter is condensed energy. Both can lead to the other regardless.

Sarassin:


Wherever matter originated from, whatever the starting unitary position of the big bang, what is clear is that the semi-coherent and badly collated biblical accounts cannot be relied upon as absolute statements of facts. As articles of faith…I grant you, as statements of facts….No. There is a difference.

1feness:


Let me explain it better for you

All matter is a mere energy condensed to a low vibration. You may have heard quotes like "He has a negative vibe","He is so energetic" Yet few of us ever really stop to fathom the depths of these common expressions and remarks.

On both a primal and intuitive level, we can sense that not only is everything composed of energy, but this energy varies in its quantity and quality drastically in our everyday lives.

High vibrations are generally associated with positive qualities and feelings, such as love, forgiveness, compassion and peace. On the other hand, low vibrations are associated with darker qualities such as hatred, fear, greed and depression.
Back to your question,every part of them/us is made up of energy. Death of a person equally means his/her vibrational frequency has become too much for the body/matter to handle,hence the body will collapse and the energy pulls out at great speed.

vooks:


Ok
New Age bullsh*t
Depak Chopra would die and roll in his grave over his mindless sheeple

Here is something to help you along;
http://sebpearce.com/bullshit/

1feness:


It is advance physics mixed with reality

1feness:
This is why most of you run to tb Joshua when you need help.

You know so little

vooks:

All ignorant pricks I have met tell me so

vooks:


Where did matter originate from before it decided to do something meaningful with itself?

Sarassin:


At this point in time nobody knows where matter originated from.

1feness:


You don't have to turn it into a fight bro

vooks:

How plausible is it for nothing to form something of itself?

What if somebody told you that this beau, Subaru WRX S4 SporVita was thrown off a volcano in Japan together with magma?

You'd think they escaped a lunatic asylum.
That is exactly how evolutionists sound when they tell you random processes generated complex life. This is pretending for a while that we know where matter came from

Sarassin:


Indeed the vehicle is very nice. You see, you can cut short the question and answer session. It ends something like this, you tell me matter cannot form itself out of nothing and I tell you in that case that God cannot be self-creating, it is a Mexican stand-off and rather pointless.

Empirically what I will say is that scientists have recently isolated and identified the Higgs particle the “Boson” that gives mass to other particles, experiments are being conducted to account for the interactions of the basic building blocks of matter i.e Quarks and leptons with gravity. Once the relationship is established the antecedents of matter becomes a lot clearer. As I mentioned in my previous post, scientists will sooner or later hand over the keys to the universe. If you forgive the pun, it’s simply a matter of time.

KingEbukasBlog:


They are actually "creating another universe" not trying to unravel the mystery of our own . Im following that experiment keenly

vooks:

You too.
How is my New Age bullsh*t generator serving you?

Here is another

1feness:


Does your comment deserve a reply? I'm not sure. Cos I don't know what new age is. But you know what? Life is good when your destiny is in your hands. Life is good to me in general. No fear of the Unknown.

I will tell you what is bullsh**t, sucking very hard on Yahweh's balls

1feness:


Does your comment deserve a reply? I'm not sure. Cos I don't know what new age is. But you know what? Life is good when your destiny is in your hands. Life is good to me in general. No fear of the Unknown.

I will tell you what is bullsh**t, sucking very hard on Yahweh's balls

Sarassin:


Indeed the vehicle is very nice. You see, you can cut short the question and answer session. It ends something like this, you tell me matter cannot form itself out of nothing and I tell you in that case that God cannot be self-creating, it is a Mexican stand-off and rather pointless.

Empirically what I will say is that scientists have recently isolated and identified the Higgs particle the “Boson” that gives mass to other particles, experiments are being conducted to account for the interactions of the basic building blocks of matter i.e Quarks and leptons with gravity. Once the relationship is established the antecedents of matter becomes a lot clearer. As I mentioned in my previous post, scientists will sooner or later hand over the keys to the universe. If you forgive the pun, it’s simply a matter of time.

vooks:


No it is not. He is the Ultimate Uncaused Cause. That is more sensible to your claims of matter causing itself.
Boson or God particle is nothing but a minister of more doubt than answers. It is nothing to brag about my broda.
What you should avoid when engaging adults is Google and copy+pastic antics