Khd95:
D title is misleading

''God caught...''sounds absurd

johnydon22:
Who knows God here according to plaetton might be referring to gravity.

Some might bolt in here expecting to see some humanoid talking to himself and planets pop out from no where in a second..

Khd95:
D title is misleading

''God caught...''sounds absurd

plaetton:
OK. "God seen..." Sounds better. Right?

malvisguy212:
will you dump your atheism and believe in this god?

plaetton:


Lol.


No comments at this time.

But let me ask;
Why would you or I need to BELIEVE IN something, if that something is already evident?

CoolUsername:
I guess this disproves several creation myths. Although I don't really see many religious folks admitting that; they'll probably fend it off with their cognitive dissonance and verbal gymnastics.

plaetton:
Here are some excerpts from the article:


Scientists have witnessed an unprecedented space miracle: They saw a new planet being born right before their eyes. The phenomenon, which even scientists had never seen before, has been recorded and shared online.
A juvenile planet formed around a young star named LkCa 15 in the neighborhood of Taurus, some 450 light years from Earth.

“This is the first time that we’ve imaged a planet that we can say is still forming,” said Stephanie Sallum, a University of Arizona graduate student who worked on the research.

Scientists, who were actually working separately at first, suspected that this particular galaxy might have an embryonic planet while doing previous research. Both Sallum and her colleague, Kate Follette, focused on LkCa15. However, the sensation here is not so much the new planet itself, but the process of its formation.

johnydon22:
Planetary formation was a huge leap in space observation because it confirmed our thesis on that subject..
Just like stars are results of the action of Gravity on matter (nebula), Planets are the same action of Gravity on star debris.. remnants or shed offs of a star during formation comes under the action of gravity and comes together to form a spinning ball of hot matter.
The complexity, orbital tendencies, formation of new stars, galaxies, planets are all possible due to gravity..

johnydon22:


Scientific discoveries and facts destroys Every myth and religious dogmas about the universe.

They can only come here to tell you they don't believe scientific findings that it is the devils work.

People with brains down writing scientific findings in order to up hold by faith sheepishly primitive superstition and myths..

johnydon22:


Scientific discoveries and facts destroys Every myth and religious dogmas about the universe.

They can only come here to tell you they don't believe scientific findings that it is the devils work.

People with brains down writing scientific findings in order to up hold by faith sheepishly primitive superstition and myths..

Scholar8200:
Nice discovery!
However, it raises questions which I hope the experts in these very technical areas will be able to shed light on.

1. Since all other planets were formed by the same action of gravity on star debris, how come only one perfectly supports life?

2. As a result of (1), were all the 9 planets formed simultaneously or one after the other?

3. If consecutively, which came first and which was last?

4. For those who are knowledgeable in Big Bang, did that process bring about the solar system too or was it extant at the time when Big Bang occured?

5. If the Solar system existed before Big Bang, then how correct will it be to say planets are formed from star debris?

6. If the Solar system was a creation of the Big Bang then what informs the formation of more stars sans another Big bang?

7. Did the Big Bang produce only Earth or the other Planets too?

8. What births a Planet, Big Bangs or Gravity's activity on star debris?

#sighs should i repeat myself over planetary formations

Looking forward to answers.
P.S. As much as possible, use layman's terms.

1feness:
We see these things due to advance technology and yet we believe a god created them? Christian delusion is a person choice from now on.

flamingREED:
The mistake scientists make is to think that they only make discoveries, and that their discoveries mean there's no God. I have felt God's presence, His literal peace and Spirit's operation which are my own discoveries, which reinforce my belief in God. This is also in spite of what atheists think. They think we're lying, but we know our discoveries are true. More so, our spiritual experiences being overwhelmingly delightsome than physical cum technological benefits, we accept and pursue a hope of A BETTER COUNTRY. Eg, on a certain day I laid down on the floor, and as most men, facing up. Then suddenly, I was filled with a sensation which itself was an absence of sensations -of pain, of heat, of whatever pressures of any degrees in any part of me -bone, tissue, cells, organs, systems and psychology. That peace I can't describe, for the tongue of flesh and brain of mortal literacy fail me to frame it's excellency. I was certain I felt heaven's atmosphere while I laid me down. It granted me absolute tranquility; I felt so free yet full; so healed, yet in a body; so pure, yet in a corrupt world. It so medicined me to such state and rapture that no clinician can restore the most verdant of men. My man, stop doubting, and never think your human thoughts would suffice to alienate us from Jehovah. Impossible. And to the skeptic I say, it's better to come to terms with God and explore His grace in order to be on the better side and avoid cases that touch on the last day. God loves, lives, heals and helps. And to destroy His faith, no man can. His church will ever stand. 'tis written by His finger. Heaven is His, so is wisdom and power, and the glory of asphyxiating innovations. Amen. His Spirit teach the minds of the sons of men even when they perceive it not.

KingEbukasBlog:


I thought there were really dumb comments here but then you showed up . You never disappoint

KingEbukasBlog:
@johnydon22

Most of your answers are wrong . Please tell me this is a joke

1feness:

Your euphoric feeling could be a sign of hard drugs or false scene of hope.

Scholar8200:
Nice discovery!
However, it raises questions which I hope the experts in these very technical areas will be able to shed light on.
1. Since all other planets were formed by the same action of gravity on star debris, how come only one perfectly supports life?
2. As a result of (1), were all the 9 planets formed simultaneously or one after the other?
3. If consecutively, which came first and which was last?
4. For those who are knowledgeable in Big Bang, did that process bring about the solar system too or was it extant at the time when Big Bang occured?
5. If the Solar system existed before Big Bang, then how correct will it be to say planets are formed from star debris?
6. If the Solar system was a creation of the Big Bang then what informs the formation of more stars sans another Big bang?
7. Did the Big Bang produce only Earth or the other Planets too?
8. What births a Planet, Big Bangs or Gravity's activity on star debris?

Looking forward to answers.

P.S. As much as possible, use layman's terms.

1feness:


Don't forget you have failed to give evidence of the existence of your god the other day. You simply took off. It does seem you are always happy to see me. I can be a great mentor of yours.

KingEbukasBlog:


Please if I should you explain to this pillock what being a historical figure means then he deserves to be flogged .

KingEbukasBlog:


Please if I should you explain to this pillock what being a historical figure means then he deserves to be flogged .

Scholar8200:
Nice discovery!
However, it raises questions which I hope the experts in these very technical areas will be able to shed light on.
1. Since all other planets were formed by the same action of gravity on star debris, how come only one perfectly supports life?
2. As a result of (1), were all the 9 planets formed simultaneously or one after the other?
3. If consecutively, which came first and which was last?
4. For those who are knowledgeable in Big Bang, did that process bring about the solar system too or was it extant at the time when Big Bang occured?
5. If the Solar system existed before Big Bang, then how correct will it be to say planets are formed from star debris?
6. If the Solar system was a creation of the Big Bang then what informs the formation of more stars sans another Big bang?
7. Did the Big Bang produce only Earth or the other Planets too?
8. What births a Planet, Big Bangs or Gravity's activity on star debris?

Looking forward to answers.

P.S. As much as possible, use layman's terms.