cold:
The bible has as many violent verses as the quran. This is not surprising as both books were plagiarised from the torah. Moreso the quran which reads like a copy and paste of the old testament with a few tweaks here and there.
The early of christianity was rife with violence and bloodshed.

Ultimus:


Lie. The Knights Templar announced their murderous campaigns in the name of Christ. Once again, you people are ignorant of the religion you hold so dear.

Joagbaje:


Christianity was never plagued with violence. Christianity has always been about love of God in provable life. Ever before Islam existed

Annunaki:


Even morons and idiots know that those old testament verses quoted in that manipulative video do not define christianity neither are they christian doctrines but rather obsolete instructions given to jewish people at a specific time in their history. These are not christian teachings. If you want to criticise christianity you have to go the new testament and let's take it from there. Need I remind you mohammed came over six hundred years after Jesus established a new and better covenant to try and return people to bondage and he instructed his followers to carry out acts of terror to spread the religion of islam. How can any right thinking person accept the evil mohamed represents after Jesus christ preached love and peace to the world?

BodyKiss:


If I get you correctly, you're saying the old testerment is not part of the christian bible, and your God's ideas are obsolete, right? Are you not of the Abrahamic God?

Num 23:19 - God is not a man, that he should lie, or a son of man, that he should change his mind.

Annunaki:


Dunce I said it's not part of christian doctrine even though it was left in the bible so we christians can know what the past dispensation looked liked and appreciate the grace we enjoy in this current dispensation. God himself rendered the old testament obsolete when he made a new and better covenant through his Son Jesus Christ. Today it's clear that it is the quoran that is obsolete whilst the biblical new testament is fresher than tomorrow's newspaper.

quickly:


I[b]n modern day only islamic beleifs lead ppl to kill others to please their god.[/b]

How do u think islam was spread in the north --thru killing of hausa and terrorising them to dump their culture.

today hausa have no culture persay all they have is religion of arab.


However arab culture remains

in nigeria christainity was spread through missionaries and education
Eg mary slessor

talk about nigeria

Joagbaje:


Christianity was never plagued with violence. Christianity has always been about love of God in provable life. Ever before Islam existed

lepasharon:


Oh really ? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3343562/Planned-Parenthood-murder-suspect-vandalized-abortion-clinic-years-ago-according-ex-wife.html

Dont forget the child witchcraft allegations caused by some brainwashed coon of a pastor causing vulnerable kids to be abandoned often in south Nigeria.

How do you fvcking think Christianity was spread in Nigeria ?

We could say the same about you christian coons all you have is no culture persay and the religion of Europeans. Europeans flipping came to Africa and took some as slaves, they clearly didnt like Africans, why do you think they will tell you that Jesus is the way to heaven ? Why would you worship their god who allowed them to enslave our ancestors

Fvcking hypocrit

lepasharon:
When it comes to condemning gay ppl now the OT suddenly matters. You better rip that OT out of ur bible now ! Christianity is not all sunshine and rainbow and the study exposed that

lepasharon:
When it comes to condemning gay ppl now the OT suddenly matters. You better rip that OT out of ur bible now ! Christianity is not all sunshine and rainbow and the study exposed that

Empiree:
You nailed it. Quran speaks of their hypocrisy.


[s]"......Then is it only a part of the Book that ye believe in, and do ye reject the rest? but what is the reward for those among you who behave like this but disgrace in this life?- and on the Day of Judgment they shall be consigned to the most grievous penalty. For God is not unmindful of what ye do. Qur'an 2:85 [/s]

plappville:


Your prophet was a terrorist 1400 years back and his followers still terrorising us. Jesus didnt kill a soul. Non of his followers does. I can post verses isis and boko use in terrorism. But you cant post a verse from Jesus telling Christians to kill for Yahweh. Blind black arab god slave just like allah said.

plappville:


You muslims who says Isis acts is not based on tbe Quranic verses they qoute, why not first erase such hate from the quran before defending? We know the quran was edited in the past. Why not do the same to prove you are not killing for allah

plappville:


The God the West missionaris came to preach is the God of Israel. They never claimed it was thier God. According to the bible. OTher nations outside Israel were gentiles. We because God's people through Christ.
Don't forget allah called you black please. Ships, raisin head and said you are destined for HELL. while the white for HEAVEN. Think with your head not chest.

plappville:


You call this a book? ? When u read it its just a copy paste of the old testament. Muhammad is a good servant of Satan. He toyed with your souls. SMH..

lepasharon:


How sure are you about this ?

cold:

You disingenuity comes as no surprise to me. It's second nature to you.Like peak milk..it's in you. Your blatant falsehood has been exposed on this forum severally. You shouldn't even be making comments on here. Have you no shame?

lepasharon:


Oh really ? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3343562/Planned-Parenthood-murder-suspect-vandalized-abortion-clinic-years-ago-according-ex-wife.html

Dont forget the child witchcraft allegations caused by some brainwashed coon of a pastor causing vulnerable kids to be abandoned often in south Nigeria.

How do you fvcking think Christianity was spread in Nigeria ?

We could say the same about you christian coons all you have is no culture persay and the religion of Europeans. Europeans flipping came to Africa and took some as slaves, they clearly didnt like Africans, why do you think they will tell you that Jesus is the way to heaven ? Why would you worship their god who allowed them to enslave our ancestors

Fvcking hypocrite

Joagbaje:


Quote instances from the Bible.

quickly:


U need to get ur facts right Christianity was spread firstly in Nigeria thru the southwest from the Portuguese, brasilians and then other European vice versa in the east and ss.

so r u saying there is no African culture in southern Nigeria? Just look on the front page and u will.hear about coronation of ooni. Is that European or Christian culture?

How ever go to the north and u will hear sultan of sokoto - which is the highest king inthe north or emir of kano.

those are all Arab culture.

Or u Neva.hear of sultan of brunei or emirars

The Arab bleeped the north so bad they lost their soul and culture

Everybody knows the Islamist want to kill everybody who does not bow to there.demon called allah.
That is the problem

Annunaki:


Dunce I said it's not part of christian doctrine even though it was left in the bible so we christians can know what the past dispensation looked liked and appreciate the grace we enjoy in this current dispensation. God himself rendered the old testament obsolete when he made a new and better covenant through his Son Jesus Christ. Today it's clear that it is the quoran that is obsolete whilst the biblical new testament is fresher than tomorrow's newspaper.

lepasharon:



God of Nigeria nko ? We Africans already had our indigenous beleif system, it may be bullshit but it's better than being a brainwashed coon. Worshipping white Jesus is why Africans are psycholoically messed up and feel inferiors to caucasians. FOH We dont any god of Israel he aint sh*t.

lepasharon:


Who the fvck says im a muslim ?

lepasharon:


like christians dont want to kill ppl too :http://listverse.com/2015/03/22/10-plans-christian-radicals-have-for-america/

mubarakopeyemi:
let me peep in and start giving these islamophobe chtistains nightmares.
Why do Christians dissociate from the OT
Christians answer this question.

Answer: In Matthew’s record of what is commonly called the Sermon on the Mount, these words of Jesus are recorded: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18).

It is frequently argued that if Jesus did not “abolish” the law, then it must still be binding. Accordingly, such components as the Sabbath-day requirement must be operative still, along with perhaps numerous other elements of the Mosaic Law. This assumption is grounded in a misunderstanding of the words and intent of this passage. Christ did not suggest here that the binding nature of the law of Moses would remain forever in effect. Such a view would contradict everything we learn from the balance of the New Testament (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15).

Of special significance in this study is the word rendered “abolish.” It translates the Greek term kataluo, literally meaning “to loosen down.” The word is found seventeen times in the New Testament. It is used, for example, of the destruction of the Jewish temple by the Romans (Matthew 26:61; 27:40; Acts 6:14), and of the dissolving of the human body at death (2 Corinthians 5:1). The term can carry the extended meaning of “to overthrow,” i.e., “to render vain, deprive of success.” In classical Greek, it was used in connection with institutions, laws, etc., to convey the idea of “to invalidate.”

It is especially important to note how the word is used in Matthew 5:17. In this context, “abolish” is set in opposition to “fulfill.” Christ came “...not to abolish, but to fulfill.” Jesus did not come to this earth for the purpose of acting as an opponent of the law. His goal was not to prevent its fulfillment. Rather, He revered it, loved it, obeyed it, and brought it to fruition. He fulfilled the law’s prophetic utterances regarding Himself (Luke 24:44). Christ fulfilled the demands of the Mosaic law, which called for perfect obedience under threat of a “curse” (see Galatians 3:10, 13). In this sense, the law’s divine design will ever have an abiding effect. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was given.

If, however, the law of Moses bears the same relationship to men today, in terms of its binding status, then it was not fulfilled, and Jesus failed at what He came to do. On the other hand, if the Lord did accomplish His goal, then the law was fulfilled, and it is not a binding legal institution today. Further, if the law of Moses was not fulfilled by Christ—and thus remains as a binding legal system for today—then it is not just partially binding. Rather, it is a totally compelling system. Jesus plainly said that not one “jot or tittle” (representative of the smallest markings of the Hebrew script) would pass away until all was fulfilled. Consequently, nothing of the law was to fail until it had completely accomplished its purpose. Jesus fulfilled the law. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. We cannot say that Jesus fulfilled the sacrificial system, but did not fulfill the other aspects of the law. Jesus either fulfilled all of the law, or none of it. What Jesus' death means for the sacrificial system, it also means for the other aspects of the law.

Answer: In Matthew’s record of what is commonly called the Sermon on the Mount, these words of Jesus are recorded: “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18).

It is frequently argued that if Jesus did not “abolish” the law, then it must still be binding. Accordingly, such components as the Sabbath-day requirement must be operative still, along with perhaps numerous other elements of the Mosaic Law. This assumption is grounded in a misunderstanding of the words and intent of this passage. Christ did not suggest here that the binding nature of the law of Moses would remain forever in effect. Such a view would contradict everything we learn from the balance of the New Testament (Romans 10:4; Galatians 3:23-25; Ephesians 2:15).

Of special significance in this study is the word rendered “abolish.” It translates the Greek term kataluo, literally meaning “to loosen down.” The word is found seventeen times in the New Testament. It is used, for example, of the destruction of the Jewish temple by the Romans (Matthew 26:61; 27:40; Acts 6:14), and of the dissolving of the human body at death (2 Corinthians 5:1). The term can carry the extended meaning of “to overthrow,” i.e., “to render vain, deprive of success.” In classical Greek, it was used in connection with institutions, laws, etc., to convey the idea of “to invalidate.”

It is especially important to note how the word is used in Matthew 5:17. In this context, “abolish” is set in opposition to “fulfill.” Christ came “...not to abolish, but to fulfill.” Jesus did not come to this earth for the purpose of acting as an opponent of the law. His goal was not to prevent its fulfillment. Rather, He revered it, loved it, obeyed it, and brought it to fruition. He fulfilled the law’s prophetic utterances regarding Himself (Luke 24:44). Christ fulfilled the demands of the Mosaic law, which called for perfect obedience under threat of a “curse” (see Galatians 3:10, 13). In this sense, the law’s divine design will ever have an abiding effect. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was given.

If, however, the law of Moses bears the same relationship to men today, in terms of its binding status, then it was not fulfilled, and Jesus failed at what He came to do. On the other hand, if the Lord did accomplish His goal, then the law was fulfilled, and it is not a binding legal institution today. Further, if the law of Moses was not fulfilled by Christ—and thus remains as a binding legal system for today—then it is not just partially binding. Rather, it is a totally compelling system. Jesus plainly said that not one “jot or tittle” (representative of the smallest markings of the Hebrew script) would pass away until all was fulfilled. Consequently, nothing of the law was to fail until it had completely accomplished its purpose. Jesus fulfilled the law. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. We cannot say that Jesus fulfilled the sacrificial system, but did not fulfill the other aspects of the law. Jesus either fulfilled all of the law, or none of it. What Jesus' death means for the sacrificial system, it also means for the other aspects of the law.

BodyKiss:



Can you prove the emboldened sentence with scriptural backuping for all to see? You're blatantly denying the words of your God, just so you can win an argument. No surprise there.

P.S. What this your comment is saying in general is that your God didn't know better. So much for the all-knowing God.

mubarakopeyemi:

see this Goat see what I asked she the bull shit she's answering. Copy and paste ignoramus. Plapville You're not intelligent I've been saying this and ignorant you shall remain. I regret having to read all the bullshit even.



My question is simple.

Why do you christains dissociate from the OT? simple!