Joshuabase:


Obviously, the quantum world comprises of fundamental particles like fermions(quarks and leptons) , bosons and gluons

the classical reality is reality that we all know - where the law of gravity exists, newtonian motion etc these laws only govern baryonic matter (matter made up of atoms)

THE quantum world is too small for any of the classical laws to hold any sway. That's why electrons don't orbit an atom, they are superpositioned around it. If they orbited it, it would mean atomic nucleus exhibited quantum gravity - a phenomenon which doesn't exist.

my question is has this OP proved any of this theories has he seen an atom before.?
or is just tagging along .

Joshuabase:


THE Christian God is an ever receding pocket of ignorance,the more we know - the less we need him. - Niel degrasse Tyson

You are and idiot. you are only stating the effect of this and that but not the cause.
gravity is a curvature and lead to creation.than what lead to gravity? Cow ,they go dumb.

Joshuabase:


"Theists don't just believe in what's not real, they also deny reality to satisfy their delusions"

As G. K. Chesterton once observed, "If man
will not believe in God, the danger is not that
he will believe in nothing, but that he will
believe in anything."

zzzzy:
so there are atheists in Nigeria? I've seen a lot of 'em on google plus. Well, atheism only makes me believe in the existence of God more. So you really think the world came out of nothing. Screw all knowledge and "facts", God exists.

the funny thing is even before the whiteman came. their forefathers were not athesist.becos they believed in gods and worshiped different objects. so you can't say religeon is a whiteman's invention.

do athesist believe in magic?do they know that their are occultist that have serious evil power.
i think a satanist has more sense than an athesist. they are just fools or insane.

efficiencie:




Lol, funny!!!

If i state a stochastic function:

Y=f(X)+u where u~NIID(0,§)

meaning X determines Y but not vice versa, the model would have been taken as complete but if we find that Z determines X then it would be erroneous to deal with that equation alone hence we have:

Y=f(X)+u(y)
X=f(Z)+u(x)
where u(x)~NIID(0,§); u(y)~NIID(0,§)

If we keep this up we get a system of infinite equations and at some point econometricians may have to end the madness...

Now my point is that if creation was from pre-existing materials, we must ask how the pre-existing materials came about...this leads back to the original problem of finding the originator of existence...and soon it leads to a state of infinite regress. To truncate this regress, it becomes pertinent for there to exist a primordial creator who made stuff without pre-existing materials or created pre-existing material without pre-existing material...a truncation of this regress must hold...

guy tell this idiot . e dey use physicts dey decieve gulliable people like him.
an atom can neither be created or destoryed.
so if by science standard atoms did not just come into been .so who did it?