BatmanIsWatching:
Read the story carefully. He didn't steal the car.

BatmanIsWatching:
Read the story carefully. He didn't steal the car.

dre11:





www.pmnewsnigeria.com/2016/02/21/i-stole-my-boss-car-to-attend-valentine-party-suspect-2/


Pic: Emmanuel John with his boss car

Fialm:
35,000 monthly. Abeg dis guy no get sense at all,he is ungrateful. Olosho

IamMissMarvel:
The village people that followed this guy have finished their work already.

BatmanIsWatching:
Read the story carefully. He didn't steal the car.

iPopAlomo:
Not condoning whatever he did ooo... but what are Nigerian Police investigating again...?! He had no intention of stealing the car... even the madame confirmed it...

iPopAlomo:
Not condoning whatever he did ooo... but what are Nigerian Police investigating again...?! He had no intention of stealing the car... even the madame confirmed it...

Icecomrade:


Establishing that an act of crime has been done isn't sufficient to convict and the state of mind is more important.
TThe principle of law broke down the two which must Coincide.

From the fact of this case, driving back the same to the same place after long hours of removal after a simple call from his madam requesting that she wants to be taken to a place negates that intention to steal the car.

Duplicating a car key can earn him prison sentence but not for car theft.

Let me also add that if the prosecution fails to modify this charge, this guy may even walk free
[/b]

BatmanIsWatching:
Read the story carefully. He didn't steal the car.

thunder74:

I am an insider, the news is not a full reflection of what happened. The truth is that when Flora discovered that her car was missing from where she parked it, and after searching for it for some minutes by asking neighbors, it was then that somebody suggested that she should call her driver. Before then, one good Samaritan who also lives in the estate instructed the security men to lock the gate when he suspected the driver by the way he drove recklessly in the estate in an attempt to take the car away.

When he was stopped, then her madam's call came in, then he lied he was on his way home before the man collected the phone from him to inform Flora that she should be coming to the estate gate that her car is with the driver and should come to identify him before it was now discovered that the car they are looking for was removed by the driver without her consent with a duplicated keys.

The Valentine's story was the driver's story to escape and attract sympathy to distract stealing accusation. He was just taking the car away when he was caught and not that he was returning it.

While this was going on, RSS men came, the madam said she does not want to press charges but the RSS men insisted on taking him away. He would have been released but his family insisted that the madam should give them the 50k to bail the suspect which she said she can't give them.

Last December, the driver hit and broke about four people's leg and condemned the car she was using before. The case is still in court, the madam spent so much money to settle the victims/case before this driver's attempt to steal her new car that she bought in January this year to replace the one he damaged.

thunder74:

I am an insider, the news is not a full reflection of what happened. The truth is that when Flora discovered that her car was missing from where she parked it, and after searching for it for some minutes by asking neighbors, it was then that somebody suggested that she should call her driver. Before then, one good Samaritan who also lives in the estate instructed the security men to lock the gate when he suspected the driver by the way he drove recklessly in the estate in an attempt to take the car away.

When he was stopped, then her madam's call came in, then he lied he was on his way home before the man collected the phone from him to inform Flora that she should be coming to the estate gate that her car is with the driver and should come to identify him before it was now discovered that the car they are looking for was removed by the driver without her consent with a duplicated keys.

The Valentine's story was the driver's story to escape and attract sympathy to distract stealing accusation. He was just taking the car away when he was caught and not that he was returning it.

While this was going on, RSS men came, the madam said she does not want to press charges but the RSS men insisted on taking him away. He would have been released but his family insisted that the madam should give them the 50k to bail the suspect which she said she can't give them.

Last December, the driver hit and broke about four people's leg and condemned the car she was using before. The case is still in court, the madam spent so much money to settle the victims/case before this driver's attempt to steal her new car that she bought in January this year to replace the one he damaged.

Archiq:
Na lie, from there he for steal the car one day. That guy has tendency to steal the car. If why duplicate the key. Car na bicycle? Even bicycle you can't ride it away without the owner's consent.

EMMAUGOH:
the boy looks like the owner of this forum

thunder74:

I am an insider, the news is not a full reflection of what happened. The truth is that when Flora discovered that her car was missing from where she parked it, and after searching for it for some minutes by asking neighbors, it was then that somebody suggested that she should call her driver. Before then, one good Samaritan who also lives in the estate instructed the security men to lock the gate when he suspected the driver by the way he drove recklessly in the estate in an attempt to take the car away.

When he was stopped, then her madam's call came in, then he lied he was on his way home before the man collected the phone from him to inform Flora that she should be coming to the estate gate that her car is with the driver and should come to identify him before it was now discovered that the car they are looking for was removed by the driver without her consent with a duplicated keys.

The Valentine's story was the driver's story to escape and attract sympathy to distract stealing accusation. He was just taking the car away when he was caught and not that he was returning it.

While this was going on, RSS men came, the madam said she does not want to press charges but the RSS men insisted on taking him away. He would have been released but his family insisted that the madam should give them the 50k to bail the suspect which she said she can't give them.

Last December, the driver hit and broke about four people's leg and condemned the car she was using before. The case is still in court, the madam spent so much money to settle the victims/case before this driver's attempt to steal her new car that she bought in January this year to replace the one he damaged.

TheGoodJoe:



Are you more of an insider than the owner? The owner of the car gave her side of the story and you are saying another thing.

“I called him to ask him where he was and he told me that he was at home. I told him to come and pick me to somewhere. He said okay. He came and we saw the car with him,” she explained.

thunder74:

That is what you read from the news. Hope you read from the same news where it was stated thatbhe does not work on Sunday? Guess you also read where the woman stated she parked the car when she came back from the church from the same PM news.
It is a free world, you are free to believe whatever you want. You are an adult and responsible for your action and believe.

TheGoodJoe:


If he works on Sunday, she would not worry about the car or call him to take her somewhere. He would be around to take her out. It is stated clearly he did not work on Sunday.

I am talking that your report is conflicting with the report of the owner of the car. She called him and he came with the car. He was not running with the car. He statement confirmed it.


“I called him to ask him where he was and he told me that he was at home. I told him to come and pick me to somewhere. He said okay. He came and we saw the car with him,” she explained.

thunder74:


This is what the boy said from the same news

“After driving the car round Ajah, I was on my way home at about around 8:00 p.m. when I saw Madam calling my set. She asked me where I was and I told her and she said I should come to her house, that I was going to take her somewhere...."

Madam called her to take her somewhere with the car she has original keys with her and he drove away with duplicated key without her consent? How lame?

thunder74:


This is what the boy said from the same news

“After driving the car round Ajah, I was on my way home at about around 8:00 p.m. when I saw Madam calling my set. She asked me where I was and I told her and she said I should come to her house, that I was going to take her somewhere...."

Madam called her to take her somewhere with the car she has original keys with her and he drove away with duplicated key without her consent? How lame?