Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,151,277 members, 7,811,812 topics. Date: Sunday, 28 April 2024 at 08:16 PM

Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc - Foreign Affairs (600) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Foreign Affairs / Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc (985114 Views)

President Zuma Had Telephonic Discussions With President Trump / Photos: Heavy U.S Military Equipments Arrives Germany Against Russian. / @elbinawi Tweets On International Qudsday (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (597) (598) (599) (600) (601) (602) (603) ... (667) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 2:09pm On Dec 21, 2020
Raaven:


for the syrian ambassor speech , its clearly a sarcasm . about a syrian opposition, rebels , armed and modified by US to destroy syria wink
Ok!
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 5:01pm On Dec 21, 2020
The Kirov class! No ship carries ANYTHING near the firepower of this nuclear powered beast which is why it's classified as a battle cruiser, a mix of a WW2 battleship and a cruiser.
The Kirov is a multipurpose platform for ASuW/Anti Sub/Anti air duties and carries MORE firepower than a NATO destroyer group!?

50% longer than a USN Ticonderoga its almost 3x heavier and is a floating arsenal.

Look at that ordnance!

Nakhimov and Pyotr Veiliky point defense SAM[2]
40 × OSA-MA (SA-N-4 Gecko) PD SAM. Not on Pyotr Velikiy
Guns:
1 × twin AK-130 130 mm/L70 dual purpose gun (2 × AK-100 100 mm/L60 DP guns in Ushakov)
8 × AK-630 six-barreled Gatling 30 mm/L60 PD guns (Ushakov, Lazarev)
6 × CADS-N-1 Kortik gun/missile system (Nakhimov, Pyotr Velikiy[2])
Torpedoes and others:
2 × 10 RBU-1000 305 mm ASW rocket launchers
1 × 6 RBU-12000 (Udav-1) 254 mm ASW rocket launchers
10 × 533 mm ASW/ASuW torpedo tubes, Type 53 torpedo or RPK-2 Vyuga (SS-N-15) ASW missile
Armour:
76 mm plating around reactor compartment, light splinter protection
Aircraft carried:
3 helicopters
Aviation facilities:
Below-deck hangar
[url][/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirov-class_battlecruiser]

There were only 4 when launched in 1980 and the USN quickly relaunched the WW2 Battleship Iowa with her massive 16 inch guns. The Kirovs were a products of Admirals Gosrhkovs thinking- sinking super carriers with heavyweight AshMs. The Granits were huge 7 T Mach 2.5 super carrier killers with an early form of cooperative engagement.
A volley of 4 would be launched while one would fly high and give real time targeting updates to the rest via radio signals. If shot down another would automatically take its place.
As you can see the super structure is too cluttered to be anything but a MASSIVE radar target in todays sensor packed seas but its still being modernised as the new Kirov Pyotr Velikky shows. OBVIOUSLY the ordnance payload outweighs the downside.
What not to like !?

5 Likes 1 Share

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Raaven: 5:13pm On Dec 22, 2020
nice report very detailed about the TOS-1 220mm Heavy Flamethrower System


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcehYsrBJTI
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Raaven: 2:17pm On Dec 24, 2020
houthi in yemen shot down a CH4 UAV , we can see that saudi air force try to bomb the remains of the uav



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fS9NUO04V4

1 Share

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Lurker4Long: 4:35pm On Dec 24, 2020
Raaven:
houthi in yemen shot down a CH4 UAV , we can see that saudi air force try to bomb the remains of the uav



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fS9NUO04V4
Saudi incompetence knows no bounds!

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Xbee007(m): 4:49pm On Dec 24, 2020
Lurker4Long:

Saudi incompetence knows no bounds!
Perhaps "Saudi incompetence" is just a myth. Nothing anyone could do against that missile.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Lurker4Long: 8:37pm On Dec 24, 2020
Xbee007:

Perhaps "Saudi incompetence" is just a myth. Nothing anyone could do against that missile.

When you fight a losing war with guys in scandals and your drone gets downed; you send a fighter plane to bomb the wreckage and you miss; perhaps gross incompetence is too mild a term.

4 Likes 1 Share

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Raaven: 10:28am On Dec 26, 2020
8×8 Boxer Multi-Role Armoured Vehicle



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6WAkezuGi4
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by mysticwarrior(m): 4:44am On Dec 27, 2020
Lurker4Long:


When you fight a losing war with guys in scandals and your drone gets downed; you send a fighter plane to bomb the wreckage and you miss; perhaps gross incompetence is too mild a term.
fighting a war with someone who has nothing to loose is a dangerous motive, they will keep embarrassing you and make you look stupid, that is what the mujahedeens did against the USSR, the North Vietnamese against the USA, Boko haram against the Nigerian army and now Houti against Saudi Arabia.

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Raaven: 6:41pm On Dec 30, 2020
terminators cool

4 Likes 1 Share

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kemicalreact: 7:30pm On Dec 30, 2020
Raaven:
terminators cool
Such babies kiss kiss

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Raaven: 12:41am On Jan 02, 2021
in a small village in pakistan grin . they produce artisanal rifles shocked


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpzrIL5p16U

2 Likes 2 Shares

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Xbee007(m): 12:49am On Jan 02, 2021
Raaven:
in a small village in pakistan grin . they produce artisanal rifles shocked


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpzrIL5p16U
They are quiet common in Pakistan and Afghanistan and they are unregulated. Anybody could buy any sort of weapon, no string attached.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kemicalreact: 1:34am On Jan 02, 2021
Raaven:
in a small village in pakistan grin . they produce artisanal rifles shocked


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpzrIL5p16U
Ọmọ shocked shocked
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by mysticwarrior(m): 4:51pm On Jan 03, 2021
Xbee007:

They are quiet common in Pakistan and Afghanistan and they are unregulated. Anybody could buy any sort of weapon, no string attached.
we need such in Nigeria so people would buy guns to protect themselves from herdsmen, bandits, Boko haram, aged robbers and kidnappers.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 6:17pm On Jan 04, 2021
The first Russian tank, the 170 ton Armoured Land Cruiser designed a 100 years ago by the son of the inventor of the periodic table no less!?

It was a wonderful concept vehicle originally meant to be fired on rail tracks. When the idea was nixed he went ahead to give it a gas suspension SYSTEM along with a 120mm naval gun and a petrol sub engine: MIND YOU THIS WAS 1915!?

[url]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC2r3Fl8x2M/url]

It was meant to serve as a bunker when at a standstill. The WW1 Eastern Front would've been way different had they had a mere squadron of these beasts to field against the Germans.

1 Share

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by GabrielYulaw(m): 5:37pm On Jan 07, 2021
kikuyu1:
The first Russian tank, the 170 ton Armoured Land Cruiser designed a 100 years ago by the son of the inventor of the periodic table no less!?

It was a wonderful concept vehicle originally meant to be fired on rail tracks. When the idea was nixed he went ahead to give it a gas suspension SYSTEM along with a 120mm naval gun and a petrol sub engine: MIND YOU THIS WAS 1915!?

[url]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC2r3Fl8x2M/url]

It was meant to serve as a bunker when at a standstill. The WW1 Eastern Front would've been way different had they had a mere squadron of these beasts to field against the Germans.

Way different because of this? My apologies but I don't think so at all. Such a vehicle would be too slow as to be a death trap and not very reliable. At the beginning of Operation Barbarossa the Germans had almost complete command of the air. They merely had a to send a single Stuka to damage such a mobile bunker so severly it would had to stop and then use either heavy artillery or Flak 88 to turn in into scrap metal.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kikuyu1(m): 4:12pm On Jan 08, 2021
GabrielYulaw:


Way different because of this? My apologies but I don't think so at all. Such a vehicle would be too slow as to be a death trap and not very reliable. At the beginning of Operation Barbarossa the Germans had almost complete command of the air. They merely had a to send a single Stuka to damage such a mobile bunker so severly it would had to stop and then use either heavy artillery or Flak 88 to turn in into scrap metal.

This was 30 years before WW2.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by GabrielYulaw(m): 5:02pm On Jan 08, 2021
kikuyu1:


This was 30 years before WW2.
Ok. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Raaven: 7:29pm On Jan 19, 2021
North korean , US made MD 500 Helicopters



How North Korea Got It's Hands On 87 U.S. MD 500 Helicopters


Here's What You Need To Remember: McDonnell Douglas had been duped into shipping nearly a hundred scout helicopters to a country that still considered itself at war with the United States. However, the Semler brothers were let off with light sentences in exchange for guilty pleas, claiming they had been misled by Behrens as to the destination of the helicopters. They paid fines far below the value of the money they had received for shipping the helicopters. Behrens rather dubiously claimed the MD 500s did not fall under the export ban because they were not military types.


On July 27, 2013, as a column of armored personnel carriers and tanks rumbled before the stand of Kim Jong-un to commemorate the end of a bloody war with the United States sixty years earlier, four small American-made MD 500E helicopters buzzed low overhead. You can see it occur at 3:13 in the this video. If you look closely, you can see they have been wired with antitank missiles on racks slung on the sides.

In fact, this was the first confirmation that Pyongyang has maintained the fleet of 87 U.S.-built helicopters it smuggled into the country more than a quarter century ago.

The MD 500 is a civilian version of the distinctive Army OH-6 Cayuse light observation helicopter, which entered U.S. military service back in the 1960s. The no-frills design has been nicknamed the “Flying Egg” due to its compact, ovoid fuselage. It was widely employed to evacuate casualties, escort friendly transport helicopters, scout for enemy forces up close, and provide light fire support to troops on the ground with miniguns and rocket pods. Exceptionally cheap—selling for $20,000 each in 1962!—they were agile and small enough to land in places other helicopters couldn’t.


However, they were also highly exposed to enemy fire: 842 of the initial 1,400 OH-6As were lost in action in Vietnam. Evolved MH-6 and AH-6 “Little Bird” special operations and mini gunship variants continue to see action with the U.S. military today in Africa and the Middle East.

Back in the 1980s, McDonnell Douglas received an order for 102 helicopters from the Delta-Avia Fluggerate, an export firm registered in West Germany under businessman Kurt Behrens. Between 1983 and 1985, the U.S. company Associated Industries transferred eighty-six MD 500D and -E helicopters and one Hughes 300 (an even smaller two-man type) via six shipments for export by Delta Avia to Japan, Nigeria, Portugal and Spain.

However, in February 1985, the U.S. Commerce Department revealed it had discovered some hair-raising anomalies in the company’s operations—and some fraudulent claims about the shipments’ destination. For example, fifteen helicopters unloaded at Rotterdam, ostensibly for special fitting, were then transported overland to the Soviet freighter Prorokov. The Prorokov then unloaded the helicopters in North Korea. Similarly, a freighter docked in Japan transferred two helicopters to a North Korean freighter in Hong Kong, with similar results. Furthermore, it turned out the Semler brothers running Associated Industries were secretly majority owners of Delta Avia.

Though eighty-seven helicopters had already been delivered, the remaining fifteen MD 500s were seized and the Semlers were tried in 1987 for violating a law forbidding export of nearly anything to North Korea. It was alleged that Fluggeratte was simply a front company to ship the aircraft to North Korea, and that it had been promised a profit of $10 million for completing the deal. It was also revealed that a London insurer was in the know, and that payments had been laundered through Swiss bank accounts.

McDonnell Douglas had been duped into shipping nearly a hundred scout helicopters to a country that still considered itself at war with the United States


source and the rest of article : https://news.yahoo.com/amphtml/north-korea-got-hands-87-090000711.html

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by GabrielYulaw(m): 12:51am On Jan 21, 2021
Raaven:
North korean , US made MD 500 Helicopters



How North Korea Got It's Hands On 87 U.S. MD 500 Helicopters




source and the rest of article : https://news.yahoo.com/amphtml/north-korea-got-hands-87-090000711.html

I love the Loach. There's just something about it that I love to bits
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by shegzhkn: 4:17pm On Jan 25, 2021
mysticwarrior:
fighting a war with someone who has nothing to loose is a dangerous motive, they will keep embarrassing you and make you look stupid, that is what the mujahedeens did against the USSR, the North Vietnamese against the USA, Boko haram against the Nigerian army and now Houti against Saudi Arabia.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nemesis2you: 1:06pm On Jan 29, 2021
How you guys doing

Wondering if the ceramics guy is still around grin

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Xbee007(m): 1:08pm On Jan 29, 2021
Nemesis2you:
How you guys doing

Wondering if the ceramics guy is still around grin
Nemesis8u, this you?

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nemesis2you: 1:18pm On Jan 29, 2021
Xbee007:

Nemesis8u, this you?

Yeah me

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kabe1: 1:19pm On Jan 29, 2021
Nemesis2you:
How you guys doing

Wondering if the ceramics guy is still around grin

Uncle Nemesis, why did you do us like this?
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nemesis2you: 1:21pm On Jan 29, 2021
Last year in October India tested SMART drdo SMART ( supersonic missile assisted release of torpedo ) .

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nemesis2you: 1:27pm On Jan 29, 2021
kabe1:


Uncle Nemesis, why did you do us like this?

Grandpa kabe1 becz of a few reasons , most importantly when people start ignoring scientific and technical points there is no longer a basis left make a point.

And actually I am pressed for time too , I will around for a week only before I go awol again.

2 Likes

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nemesis2you: 1:29pm On Jan 29, 2021
DRDO SMART is the world's longest range land based anti submarine missile system .

It can target submarines at a range of 650 km .

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by Nemesis2you: 1:31pm On Jan 29, 2021

1 Like

Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by kabe1: 1:35pm On Jan 29, 2021
Nemesis2you:


Grandpa kabe1 becz of a few reasons , most importantly when people start ignoring scientific and technical points there is no longer a basis left make a point.

And actually I am pressed for time too , I will around for a week only before I go awol again.

You're free to do as you see fit, glad to have you come around.

News on LCA, new pictures on LCA would be more than welcome.
Re: Technical Discussions On International Military Equipments Doctrines Tactics Etc by barineh(m): 1:38pm On Jan 29, 2021
Nemesis2you:
DRDO SMART is the world's longest range land based anti submarine missile system .

It can target submarines at a range of 650 km .

How does this work?

(1) (2) (3) ... (597) (598) (599) (600) (601) (602) (603) ... (667) (Reply)

American Politics Thread - 2024 Elections — Biden’s Presidency! / Battle Field Discussion (picture/video) Of African Military . / Who Has The Strongest Military In Africa?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 48
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.