raphieMontella:

mr horlufemi knows it all..but cant understand the definition of a code.

who called dna a code?
U or i?
When u make up ur mind..u define


what do i need links for?
To base my arguments on someone else's ideas?
I ask you simple questions and u avoid them..

how does music coded in disc follows information theory? Since your information theory is universal..explain
U keep on changing the meaning of information to fit your blind rigmaroles.
What is information?
How do scientists put down all we see in nature?

Cs u want to talk about a noise stuff or so..

i clearly gave u

i repeat...the first mistake u made..
Is ''close mindedly assuming that the standard for codes is= instructions on how to build a molecule''

theists on this forum know my status..i cant engage in straw arguments...
U need to learn what a debate is..
U dont just drop a picture and smile...like wtf?

dont be silly!
Ignorance is not a right to folly

you do not understand what i mean that dna is not arbitrary..


in natural language...we have ''dog'' in english ''chien'' in french..
But in dna "ACTGAGACC" is just as meaningful as
"ACTGAGACT''
they cannot refer to the same thing..


the "meaning" of a triplet of nucleotides is a physical
property of the structure of transfer RNA molecules.
The DNA triplet "CTT" codes for the amino acid
leucine because the transfer RNA molecule which
bears leucine has the nucleotide triplet "GAA" in its anticodon region, and the connection between the
signifier and signified is guaranteed by the physical
existence of hydrogen bonds between
complementary bases. In natural language, the
connection between signifier and signified is not
guaranteed by a physical property of the universe in this way.

I can write this message
in a number of fonts, font sizes, underlined,
italicized, bolded, etc. You can not do this with DNA.
You can not print out a line of A's, T's, C's, and G's
on a microscopic typewriter, insert it into E. coli, and
expect the corresponding protein to be produced.

Back to you

You still fail to understand and have an open mind and I won't repeat myself. I feel you need to update your research in the latest things happening in science.

You, like the theists, are ignorant of a lot of things and just refuse to see others point of view.

I'll leave you with this.

You can't prove God exists and you can't disprove God's existence.

Take it or leave it.

God help us!

i undastand but still want to know beta''

opichika:
i undastand but still want to know beta''

alright, that's good.

. DEUTERONOMY 29:29.

29. The Secret Things
belong unto The LORD our God:
but those things which are Revealed
belong unto us
and to our Children for ever,
that we may do
all The Words of This Law.

SHALOM!

The short answer to that is that God was in ETERNITY- a place of NO-SPACE and NO TIME.

To access Eternity from HERE takes GREAT POWER. To merely BELIEVE in It or THINK about It, let alone TALK about It REQUIRES GREAT POWER.d
.
If it were important to GOD that Sinners understand such things BEFORE they REPENT, He would have told them.

lol...