DoctorAlien:


You are preaching evolution, aren't you?

What was the first living thing on earth and how did it evolve into all the forms of life on earth today?

donnffd:


Point of correct, i am not preaching anything, Evolution is a fact...

donnffd:
Life reproduces, how does it do that, by duplicating its DNA(i am certain you know what DNA is and what it does), now during duplication, things dont go as smoothly as expected, they could be copying errors, genes could be duplicated, e.t.c. All these produces a new kind of sequence that codes for a different protein than the one in the parent organism, it would then create a feature that wasnt present in the parent organism even if its miniscule.

DoctorAlien:


Who or what has proved evolution? What concrete, undeniable proofs exist of evolution?

donnffd:
Now let me tell you about how we humans are driving evolution, and i could use many examples like bananas, corn, cows e.t.c but i would focus on Dogs.

Dogs are descended from a species of wolves, they were first domesticated about 15000years ago. We humans started controlling their breeding, the features we liked we kept and breed and the ones we dont,we discarded. Now look at the sheer amount of diversity of dogs, we have german Shepard, poodle, pitbull, Rottweiler, Great Dane, Labrador, Husky, bulldog, pug, Dobberman, Chihuahua e.t.c. We did it, we drove this changes in 15000years, imagine what Nature would do in 3.5 billion years.

donnffd:


If you were trying to make a point, it got lost in a lot of fallacies, sorry to say.

First of all, Noone said the Dolphin is a flaw, infact it is a very beautiful creature and highly intelligent. It lives in water and it is perfectly adapted to where it lives, if it wasnt, it would have died out a long time ago.

The Dolphins are mammals, they give birth to there young alive, breath through a blowhole which on close inspection resembles a nostrils, their fins move up and down compared with the fish that moves side to side, they are warm-blooded compared with fishes that are cold-blooded, they have lungs very similar to that of a land animal. These are a few of their features but they are work together to keep the dolphin alive in water.

Now, to my second point, how did the dolphin come about?, was it created by a designer or did it evolve like science claims?.

Well, if a designer wanted to design a sea animal, he would give that animal gills, because we know it comes in handy, keep the animal cold-blooded, its alot better and safer. If we examine fishes, we can deduce that if there was a designer, he or she does already knows how to create a sea-animal then why is the dolphin heavily flawed compared to other sea-animals(fishes). If indeed there was a designer, he was either incompetent and just wanted to experiment or he wasnt paying attention.

Now, lets examine evolution, from evolution, we know mammals are the youngest kids on block, they give birth to their young alive, have lungs for land, are warm-blooded, all of the features dolphins and other cetaceans have, if that is true, then it is possible that dolphins and their ancestors were once land animals that slowly moved to the sea, thats why they are not has good as fishes and also have lots of features that clearly were for land animals.

In conclusion, Evolution does a way better job in explaining why the dolphins have all the features it has today than a designer, although there is still a possibility of an incompetent designer(noone knows).

DoctorAlien:


I believe you are talking about mutation. Scientific evidence shows that mutation is rare and when it occurs, has negative effects on organisms that mutate i.e. it is detrimental and destructive to the organisms. Therefore, mutation leads to destruction rather than evolution.

Darwin himself conceded that most mutants are recessive and degenerative.

How then could mutation drive the process of Natural Selection which supposedly produces better species?

DoctorAlien:


Oh really? Were you there 15 000 years ago? Or was the person that told you there?

You know, in a bid to make their fables a bit credible, these "scientists" only mention astronomical periods of time. Who was alive 3.5 billion years ago to record evolution?

PastorAIO:
This is the stupidest thread ever, fully exposing the idiocy that religious brainwashing can reduce you to.

'The atheist said that God made a flaw'. What an idiot!

donnffd:


1. Fossil records.
2. DNA
3. Comparative Anatomy
4. Embrology
5. Geological distribution
6. Vestigial Organs
7. Common structures

DoctorAlien:


It's very funny because fossil records are the greatest undoing of your fairytale called "evolution."

Evolution has it that everything is in the process of changing into another thing. This means that fossil records should reveal an utter absence of precise family boundaries: millions of half-developed fish trying to morph into amphibians, with reptiles half-way transformed into birds and so on.

Now, what have the scientists found? Exactly the opposite. Not one single studied fossil ever shows any sign of trying to change into something else. Everything stays within well defined boundaries, contrary to evolutionist ideas.

Google "the mystery of the empty strata" and see your scientists agree that their evolution is a laughable fable.

DoctorAlien:


Tell us how evolution produced all the different forms of life and how everything that is alive now came from a single cell in the ocean.

felixomor:


Stop deceiving urself, who verified the theory of evolution, that u r talking about?

Very soon u will tell us that because human beings go to toilet, the design is not "intelligent"?

Keep Trying to use a finger to cover the sun with one eye closed, mschew!

Just take a look at this guy. What have u been using ur brain for u should be studying not displaying ignorance on NL.

donnffd:


I am guessing you missed biology class when Evolution by Natural selection was taught.

Anyways, if i told you, you would call me a liar, if i explained it to you, you would still say its a lie, so it would be a pure waste of time, Although Evolution by Natural selection is a course and really cant be explained here, so if you really want to know, go to the library, do some internet research, i am positive you would get materials that explain to you how it works and if at the end, you still ask the question you ask, then all i can say is,"more grace to your elbows".

ValentineMary:

There are several theories on this. But all life did not come from one cell. It would lead us to talk about pre biotic chemistry.

donnffd:


You see what i mean...total waste of time.

I would leave you with this assignment, Read on Radio-dating and how rocks are aged. It should enlighten you abit...takia

ValentineMary:

Just take a look at this guy. What have u been using ur brain for u should be studying not displaying ignorance on NL.

blessedvisky:
Crocodiles are reptiles, same with turtles, but they are aquatic.

DoctorAlien:
You see, African atheists are very funny. They claim they don't have a religion yet they practise a funny religion well-thought out by white men masquerading as rationalists. They are made to believe that they reason with their head, and therefore are not brainwashed.

To confuse and keep them spell-bound, Charles Darwin, their prophet, came up with a fable called Evolution. They were then taught that their ancestors were formerly worms; then they became toads, lizards, monkeys, apes and finally they are here.

But what man who thinks with his head would accept and hold as truth a laughable fable such as evolution? That not only makes it believers very credulous, but degrades their very existence? That teaches them that there is no difference between them and a goat? That removes all sorts of purpose from their existence and then ascribes the name "higher animal" to them?

To sum up the whole joke, Charles Darwin explicitly said that his fable, evolution, has no proof, not even of fossil records.

DoctorAlien:


Prithee, tell us about pre-biotic chemistry and how life came to be.

EyeHateGod:

Guy Stop no waste ya time again but Do u know they now teach Evolution in Church? And we have so many Christian website Explaining it?

cloudgoddess:

How annoying, geez

You beg and beg for him to explain, only to respond with the same defensive trash & ignorance that he explicitly stated would make it a waste of his time. If you're not willing to learn then go sit down somewhere with your comforting creationist apologetics, & stop pretending you actually want to understand evolution when you don't.

ValentineMary:

There are several hypothesis from abiogenesis to extra terrestrial life. But pre biotic chemistry deals with abiogenesis

DoctorAlien:


Who or what has proved evolution? What concrete, undeniable proofs exist of evolution?

raphieMontella:

evolution is a fact tho..
here..proofs of evolution

adjoviomole:


Evolution has no proof..the so called link u provided you will see lots of words like' would have, should be, must have been- all this are words of probability, that is all your so called scientist are not sure, but they just say them based on probability, and that is not a fact. Is it?

raphieMontella:

evolution is a fact tho..
here..proofs of evolution

donnffd:


Wow, thats pretty impressive...it would make lot of sense if it came from churches themselves, that way the blind followers would just do what they know how to do best, blindly follow.