Proudgorgeousga:


Felix doesn't get it because he thinks evolution disproves intelligent design.

I am starting to think he's not real. He could be a bot created by Seun to drive traffic to this section using stupidity as his modus operandi.
Everyone loves to poke fun at a fool.

Ranchhoddas:
I did not see it. Please tell me the difference I beg you.

Biological evolution is driven by blind forces of nature, we are told. They said also that evolution wasn't trying to create anything in particular. Things which we don't observe now, biological evolutionists tells can happen if given enough time. LOL.

Evolution in the mere sense of the word can apply to anything, including technology. But we know that the evolution of technology is being driven by intelligent man. Nokia 3310 did not suddenly become a touchscreen phone, nor could it have.

Ranchhoddas:
I did not see it. Please tell me the difference I beg you.

Evolution of Mercedes benz, or IBM is man made evolution.
It does not deny creation of the IbM by Bill Gates and co etc.
If put at best, it is evolution by artificial selection of man made electronics.

Evolution by natural selection denies creation of man
It boldly states that it is By natural selection which is a completely blind process.
It states that man was not created but that man evolved from apes.

Bro, these are just a few.
If u had read the internet or even Wikipedia, they Clearly differentiated these 2 types of evolution.

DoctorAlien:


Biological evolution is driven by blind forces of nature, we are told. They said also that evolution wasn't trying to create anything in particular. Things which we don't observe now, biological evolutionists tells can happen if given enough time. LOL.

Evolution in the mere sense of the word can apply to anything, including technology. But we know that the evolution of technology is being driven by intelligent man. Nokia 3310 did not suddenly become a touchscreen phone.

Why do you keep insisting that nature is unintelligent?

Ranchhoddas:
Why do you keep insisting that nature is unintelligent?

Is the force of gravity intelligent? Is the first law of thermodynamics intelligent? Was Nature trying to create an eye, according to evolutionists, or did it just happen that the eye appeared?

DoctorAlien:


Is the force of gravity intelligent? Is the first law of thermodynamics intelligent? Was Nature trying to create an eye, according to evolutionists, or did it just happen that the eye appeared.

Are you unintelligent. Are you not a product of nature?

Ranchhoddas:
Why do you keep insisting that nature is unintelligent?

That is what Darwin and atheists say.
That Nature is unintelligent and blind.
because if they admit nature is intelligent then it means someone is behind it.
So that will defeat them. So because they dont want to be defeated, they claim nature is blind.

So Please start preaching to them.

Ranchhoddas:
Are you unintelligent. Are you not a product of nature?

No. GOD created me. I don't believe that my ancestors were single cells in the ocean. I don't have enough faith to believe that.

I think you always confuse definitions. Nature might be different from natural forces. Man, for example is part of nature. But man is not a force of nature.

DoctorAlien:


No. GOD created me. I don't believe that my ancestors were single cells in the ocean. I don't have enough faith to believe that.

I think you always confuse definitions. Nature might be different from natural forces. Man, for example is part of nature. But man is not a force of nature.

We were all single cells at some point. I cannot argue against BELIEF.

felixomor:


That is what Darwin and atheists say.
That Nature is unintelligent and blind.
because if they admit nature is intelligent then it means someone is behind it.
So that will defeat them. So because they dont want to be defeated, they claim nature is blind.

So Please start preaching to them.

Nature is not blind.
I don't know when Darwin told you that.

Ranchhoddas:
We were all single cells at some point. I cannot argue against BELIEF.

Continue shifting the goalpost. Were you a single cell IN THE OCEAN at some point?

Ranchhoddas:
I am starting to think he's not real. He could be a bot created by Seun to drive traffic to this section using stupidity as his modus operandi.
Everyone loves to poke fun at a fool.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/6038380_3619681imagejpegjpeg6f95b5e7a24ad4fc0808d6698fd37362_jpeg5a273e4a705ac9e4ab5e0333e0307201

Jesus

DoctorAlien:


Continue shifting the goalpost. Were you a single cell IN THE OCEAN at some point?

I don't know. That is not what evolution is.

Ranchhoddas:
I don't know. That is not what evolution is.

You need to go and read then. Biological evolutionists tell us that at some point in history, the only living thing was a cell in the ocean.

And I don't have enough faith to believe that.

DoctorAlien:


You need to go and read then. Biological evolutionists tell us that at some point in history, the only living thing was a cell in the ocean.

And I don't have enough faith to believe that.

You are right.

Ranchhoddas:
Nature is not blind.
I don't know when Darwin told you that.

Just as you didnt know the meaning of evolution by natural selection.
Not surprised

felixomor:

Just as you didnt know the meaning of evolution by natural selection. Not surprised

You are right. Oya have the last word and go.

adepeter2027:

www.nairaland.com/attachments/6038380_3619681imagejpegjpeg6f95b5e7a24ad4fc0808d6698fd37362_jpeg5a273e4a705ac9e4ab5e0333e0307201

Jesus

Loool

Who knows the interval of Time since Time was first created? Only foolish men trying to understand creation. Be it through a god or scientific evolution. Which one is closer to the truth? None.

The Religious are fools for concluding but it comforts their ignorance of reality. The pseudo scientists are also fools for “concluding” their stance on evolution. No true scientist ever concludes. They only theorize based on evidence.

Both must concede that you don’t have enough information to explain your creation otherwise you will defend yourself foolishly. Be open minded to knowledge because even the most religious person depends on technology to live.

felixomor:
A fool sees an IBM computer,
He acknowledges The maker of the computer

The same fool sees a human being which is a billion times more complex than the computer, he assumes the human is a product of random accident.

Nice one, Op.
Not a chance.

Another fool is a programmer who took time to design a programme seudo-code, design the workflow, follow a lot of process and later come out with a good working application, he acknowledged that.

But considering how he manage to deny Intelligent Design baffles me.

DoctorAlien:


Now, that is not the topic of the thread. This thread is about whether evolution could have produced the eye. Let us not derail it.

Create a thread on whether God created/could create a perfect world and invite me. I assure you, I'll answer every reasonable question you have.

This is one of the reason why some atheist have moronism in their blood. Hardly give attention to details but quick to ask question as long as it concern God

GoodMuyis:


This is one of the reason why some atheist have moronism in their blood. Hardly give attention to details but quick to ask question as long as it concern God

Lol

Good afternoon.

Not a chance!

plaetton:

And this is how fools reason.
They skip many critical thoughts, and arrive at foolishness.

Now to the subject.

Actually an IBM computer is a simple example of the process of evolution.

I challenge you, if you're smart enough, to think deeply about the IBM Computer and how it demonstrates the processes of evolution.

na wah oh... you actually wrote this?

Good evening

--

,.,.

No!!

Nope!

,,

sentalfa:
doG did it.

Dog gid ti