KingEbukasBlog:
butterflyl1on

Sir , JackBizzle has mental orgasms with the views and pages on his thread . He is trying as much as possible to make the argument interminable so people would see his "creative" thoughts about an entity whom he said with certitude does not exist. He is not interested in the knowing the truth . He is all about his perverse pleasure being made to look inferior , and the views and pages on his threads .

budaatum:

Like change from a god of wrath who gets pissed at everyone into a turn the other cheek God, right?

KingEbukasBlog:


I'm a theist , you are an atheist , why are we talking about the bible ? Whether it is fallible or not does not question the existence of God . There are theists (deists) who criticize religious books and they acknowledge God's existence .

From my thread on Sunday we can see that atheism becomes more insignificant since it just rejects deification , nothing else . There are atheists who acknowledge intelligence or mind behind the universe but they don't deify it . Frustrating for Nairaland atheists isn't it ? With more knowledge , you'd see how useless atheism is .

Akdegreat:


I do not view the ability of an omnipotent entity to change in some respect as a logical impossibility, and that mustn't always go in discordance with other attributes of his.

An immaterial God may choose to change form and manifest materially for a good purpose.

KingEbukasBlog:


Ureligion came before Hinduism

budaatum:

Where are you?

budaatum:

Where are you?