jln115:

Well maybe I can, ive never tried cutting hair!! After all I'm a man of many many talents.

So you agree you are a barber.

MikeCZAR:
No, modern pilots can't "comfortably withstand a G-Force of 9".

Mumu!

jln115:

Really? Do you have a citation that proves your point?

The chart you used to obtain Gripen landing diatance 550 km says it's with the aid of a slow down drag chute.

Go back and look it up, one eyed man. The chart is repeated by @Henry below....

jln115:

Neither is the fact that the jf-17 can only handle 8g oh and BTW the the Gripen can handle a Max g of 9 and not 8.5.

8.5 for the Gripen, still not enough to cost $43 million more.


Why did Pretoria buy a JF-17 at $68 million dollars, it seems rather foolish.

jln115:

Well maybe I can, ive never tried cutting hair!! After all I'm a man of many many talents.

@jln115 admits he is a salon barber
.

Henry120:


The JF-17 incorporates DSI as a basic design feature, hence it's amazing manoeuvrability. Again, the JF-17 video I posted supports the fact the JF-17 is way more manoeuvrable than the Gripen.


Evidence has been provided, and it shows the JF-17 look down radar is better.



JF-17 block 2 speed is Mach 2, same as the Gripen C/D.

The Gripen C/D's speed is only better than the JF-17 block 1, at Mach 2 - 1.8.

JF-17 has a better range and combat altitude than the Gripen.

Need I remind you that the F-35 also runs on a C++ code, 1 hard point better than the JF-17, still not enough reason to cost between 38 million - 43 million more.

Nope the specifications of both aircraft state that the Gripen has better manoeverability, way better in fact.

Secondly no evidence has been provided that the Junk Fighter has better ground search radar.

And lastly the Gripen has:
Higher payload
Better software
Better HMD
Lower stall speed
Shorter landing distance
Lower maintenance cost
Lower RCS
Higher Max g
Lower wing loading
Better thrust to weight ratio
Better claimb rate
Better radar
better HMI
Ect
Ect

Henry120:


8.5 for the Gripen, still not enough to cost $43 million more.


Why did Pretoria buy a JF-17 at $68 million dollars, it seems rather foolish.

Nope it has a Max g of 9, go look it up.

agaugust:


@jln115 admits he is a salon barber
.

Agaugust seated and Jillingy doing what he does best.

Henry120:


8.5 for the Gripen, still not enough to cost $43 million more.


Why did Pretoria buy a JF-17 at $68 million dollars, it seems rather foolish.

This stupidd man is more like comparing Toyota Camry to BMW 320i. They are both cars and yet Toyota camry is much of a cheaper brand with poor performance.

agaugust:


@jln115 admits he is a salon barber
.

When did I admit this? Are you so retaarded that you can't even understand my post?

jln115:


F-7 = Mig 21

jln115:


Yes F-7 is just a Mig 21 with better avionics.

Okay, first comment : F-7 = MiG-21

Second comment F-7 > MiG-21

@jln115, in mathematics (Which is a subject beyond the brain capacity of all 50 million South Africans) there is a topic called LOGIC.

See dude, if A = B, then A cannot be > B.

F-7 = MiG-21, so how is F-7 also > MiG-21 according to your own mathematics.

If I call you a barber now, you will say it's an insult
.

Henry120:


Agaugust seated and Jillingy doing what he does best.

Wow! Agaugust is one ugly fvcker!!

Henry120:


Agaugust seated and Jillingy doing what he does best.

You can see his barber logic in the maths equation I quoted above

Henry120:


Agaugust seated and Jillingy doing what he does best.

Your fellow countrymen like agaugust are cutting hairs of South Africans on the streets of Joburg just to make a living.

agaugust:




Okay, first comment : F-7 = MiG-21

Second comment F-7 > MiG-21

@jln115, in mathematics (Which is a subject beyond the brain capacity of all 50 million South Africans) there is a topic called LOGIC.

See dude, if A = B, then A cannot be > B.

F-7 = MiG-21, so how is F-7 also > MiG-21 according to your own mathematics.

If I call you a barber now, you will say it's an insult
.

OK so I'm guessing a new Toyota corolla is not a Toyota corolla because its a bit better than the previous model?

Henry120:


Agaugust seated and Jillingy doing what he does best.

He makes nice haircuts, I am a living proof of that.

jln115:

OK so I'm guessing a new Toyota corolla is not a Toyota corolla because its a bit better than the previous model?

Technical road performance of analog 1980 Toyota corolla and computerized 2010 Toyota corolla, are they the same specs and capability ?

The product name Toyota, and the manufacturer's name Toyota Inc, are exactly the same.

Show us how manufacturer name Chengdu = Mikoyan Gurevich and how F-7 product name is same as MiG-21 name.....product names and manufacturers.....

> is NOT same as =

E-Fool
.

agaugust:


He makes nice haircuts, I am a living proof of that.

Jap sorry bro!!! I tried my best but your face is to damn ugly not even my so called barber skills could take the focus away from your fvcked up face!

agaugust:


The product name Toyota, and the manufacturer's name Toyota Inc, are exactly the same.

Show us how manufacturer name Chengdu = Mikoyan Gurevich and how F-7 product name is same as MiG-21 name.....product names and manufacturers.....E-Fool
.

It was build under licence you retaard so yes its the same thing.

jln115:

It was build under licence you retaard so yes its the same thing.

Nope, you are the retaared who keeps shooting himself thrice in the foot

jln115:


Yes F-7 is just a Mig 21 with better avionics.

How can two things be the same when one is better according to your own words ?

I pity the schools that will give you certificate, you will wreck their global rankings
.

agaugust:


[size=20pt]You failed to provide name I.D. for the two cadet pilots posing with the ATAK gunships.

I provided a source to prove you wrong, your large group photo is a mix of both Ethiopian and Somali cadets, NOT only Somalis as you fraudulently claim every black cadet in Turkey is Somali....do you have their list of names and national I.D.s ? Fraudster !

I said I see likely West African cadet among those in the ATAK helicopter photo, and yes I gave a source to prove there are Gambian cadets in Turkey, Gambia is West African.

I gave a clear source that Nigeria has cadets training in Turkey, clean and clear proof !

Nobody claims to have a source to say NAF pilots are among the Nigerian cadets in Turkey.

However, we proved that contrary to your fraudulent claims, Gambia and Nigeria have cadets in Turkey.

Your "100% Somali cadet team" story is proved false information.

Please apologize to the entire forum and the Turkish guy on Nairaland you were insulting.

Soweto fraudster !
.[/size]

[size=25]The only person that failed is you. You have failed beyond any doubts to convince us that Turkey is training any Nigerian pilots. You cannot force us to believe lies. SORRY BOSS, YOU BOUNCED. BIG TIME.[/size]

agaugust:


Nope, you are the retaared who keeps shooting himself thrice in the foot

Yes mig 21 is a mig 21 regardles if the one has better avionics or not, is gripenA not a gripen because it has different avionics to the gripenC?

jln115:

Yes mig 21 is a mig 21 regardles if the one has better avionics or not, is gripenA not a gripen because it has different avionics to the gripenC?

SAAB Gripen is SAAB Gripen, yes ! MiG-21 is MiG-21 if its name is still MiG-21.

.....but here, the names are still different, Chengdu F-7 is not same as Mikoyan MiG-21....topic is called logic, subject is mathematics, you are an intellectual failure by birth
.

agaugust:


Technical road performance of analog 1980 Toyota corolla and computerized 2010 Toyota corolla, are they the same specs and capability ?

The product name Toyota, and the manufacturer's name Toyota Inc, are exactly the same.

Show us how manufacturer name Chengdu = Mikoyan Gurevich and how F-7 product name is same as MiG-21 name.....product names and manufacturers.....

> is NOT same as =

E-Fool
.

The part that differs is sophistication. period.

agaugust:


SAAB Gripen is SAAB Gripen, yes !

.....but here, the names are still different, Chengdu F-7 is not same as Mikoyan MiG-21....topic is logic, subject if mathematics, you are an intellectual failure by birth
.

It's the same, the j/f-7 was a mig 21 built under licence.

jln115:

It was build under licence you retaard so yes its the same thing.

Straight delta wing Vs Swept delta wing

Linear canopy Vs Bubble canopy

Non stabilizer Vs Vertical fin stabilizers

Basic analog display Vs Heads Up display

Russian engine Vs Chinese engine

1960s Russian short range radar Vs 2000s Italian medium range radar

1960s analog avionics Vs 2010 computerized avionics

Russian 1960s missile Vs 2000s Chinese missile.

Dude, the word 'SAME' is well understood even by the jobless men in Gauteng slums, they know their lives and that of their white masters are not the 'SAME'......one is better
.

jln115:

It's the same, the j/f-7 was a mig 21 built under licence.

LOL.....that was J-7 NOT F-7, the J-7 is a wholly Chinese analog jet built in 1966, how is it same as F-7 NOT 'J', it's 'F', computerized F-7 built in 2010 with European avionics....? E-dummy
.

Beast...

agaugust:


Straight delta wing Vs Swept delta wing

Linear canopy Vs Bubble canopy

Non stabilizer Vs Vertical fin stabilizers

Basic analog display Vs Heads Up display

Russian engine Vs Chinese engine

1960s Russian short range radar Vs 2000s Italian medium range radar

1960s analog avionics Vs 2010 computerized avionics

Russian 1960s missile Vs 2000s Chinese missile.

Dude, the word 'SAME' is well understood even by the jobless men in Gauteng slums, they know their lives and that of their white masters are not the 'SAME'......one is better
.

pic1 F-7
Pic2 Mig 21
Pic3 F-7
Pic4 Mig 21

They look almost identical! And I was lenient by taking a PIC of the most modern F-7 cockpit.

jln115:

Yes mig 21 is a mig 21 regardles if the one has better avionics or not, is gripenA not a gripen because it has different avionics to the gripenC?

This still doesn't explain why you paid $68 million for a JF-17 thunder.

Henry120:


This still doesn't explain why you paid $68 million for a JF-17 thunder.

Because we never bought the Junk Fighter.

[size=20]Chinese air force considers a Junk Fighter a BIG FAILURE.[/size]


https://africadefensejournal./2011/11/28/chinese-jf-17-is-a-cheap-competition-for-the-f-16/