aribisala0:

Shut up
That is a rant
not proof.,
6 million Jews were killed by Christians

aribisala0:
I really do not have time to educate imbeciles.Too busy

FRESHG:
ODE YOU WANT TO TEACH ME ABOUT WHAT I SPENT 4 GOOD YEARS STUDYING IN THE UNIVERSITY YOU MUST BE A CRAZY FELLOW


NOW LISTEN ATTENTIVELY. ARGUMENTUM AD HOMINEM IS A PHILOSOPHICAL FALLACY WHEREBY AN ARGUMENT IS REBUTTED BY ATTACKING THE (CHARACTER) MESSENGER, MOTIVE OR OTHER ATTRIBUTE OF THE PERSON MAKING THE ARGUMENT RATHER THAN ATTACKING THE MESSAGE.

aribisala0:
ATTACK Now I will attack

Your mother is crazy she will die barking

aribisala0:
ATTACK Now I will attack

Your mother is crazy she will die barking

aribisala0:

It was inspired by Christian Religion in exactly the same way that Islam inspires terrorism Boko Haram and such like.

The hate for Jews was a very "Christian" thing

BlowBack:



It was Christian values that put an end to the European slave trade.

aribisala0:
Your mother will choke and cough to death

TheCabal:


Catholic liberal here. I disagree with your "opinions" and methodology.

Most of your writings are heavily biased. This is a confrontation on Islam, and not a examination or presentation of your findings in regards to slavery in religion.

In fact, this entire thread is not about the ethics or morality of slavery.

In every post @Blowback makes, he attempts to whitewash christianity .

When in fact Catholics and Muslims have and still are engaged in slavery.

What is slavery? Are their types of slavery? How are slaves acquired? How do they get there?

If you really want to examine slavery, in so doing extricate one religion from culpability, you must place each religion side by side and do so.

@Blowback is drawing evidence from words/recommendations written a thousand years ago, which nobody is obligated to follow.

He ignores the economic aspect. Would "buying and selling" slave thrive, if it were unprofitable?

Blowback seems to have read a history books but he/she is obviously deficient in logic.

I suggest Graham Priest's, Logic - A short introduction.

kingxsamz:
stupid op...please if u know nothing about the quaran stop misleading people...your topic itself is misleading....if u have nothing resonable to post today pls u can take a nap... thank you...

Fyi I'm a christian.

SalamRushdie:
1

You are not a Christian so stop lying

aribisala0:

Your mother will die foaming at the mouth.
if you like come with 100 IDs all of you will perish like Ogun's dog

SalamRushdie:
1

You are not a Christian so stop lying

aribisala0:

Your mother will die foaming at the mouth.
if you like come with 100 IDs all of you will perish like Ogun's dog

BlowBack:


E don reach like this?

Obviously you can not deny the obvious neither can you defend your prophet and his evil religion.

kingxsamz:


this is a faceless forum, so u don't know me...and I won't argue with u about whether I'm a christian or not, as long as I've passed my message...good day.

cstr1000:

Nigga can no longer cope with the facts.

He wants to dilute the thread by baiting you into trading insults where he will probably win with experience.

BlowBack:



The simple question to ask is:

Did the Trans-Atlantic slave trade by Europeans draw divine inspiration and justification from the Christian Bible just as the Muslim Arab slavers drew from Islamic teachings and the life of Mohammed their Prophet?

BlowBack:



The Europeans never used religion to justify the enslavement of Africans rather they justified the enslavement of millions of Africans citing contemporary scientific views mainly drawn from the Darwin evolutionary theory.

It was Christian values that put an end to the European slave trade.

And it is very important that we revist Islam when discussing the latest Libyan slave auctions. Because it is only Muslims that have so far engaged in this dastardly act.

From Shekau boasting of selling abducted Christian school girls in slave markets to the Islamic State auctioning of captured Christian, Yazidi and Shia women to the existing slave markets in Mauritania.

Muslims have no problem against slavery a their quaran justifies capturing and selling off of Kafirs.

Exodus 21:20-21
20 “Anyone who beats their male or female slave with a rod must be punished if the slave dies as a direct result, 21 but they are not to be punished if the slave recovers after a day or two, since the slave is their property.

Exodus 7-9
7And if a man sell his daughter to be a maidservant, she shall not go out as the menservants do. 8If she please not her master, who hath betrothed her to himself, then shall he let her be redeemed: to sell her unto a strange nation he shall have no power, seeing he hath dealt deceitfully with her. 9And if he have betrothed her unto his son, he shall deal with her after the manner of daughters

BlowBack:


You are never a Christian!

I know your type very well.

TheCabal:


Blowback, Slave trading (trading people for money/goods/services); predates the Catholicism or Islam, even Judaism.

Hence, justifications for and against slave trading, predates either religion and cannot be found in those books alone.

It would be ridiculous to assume, Christianity (whatever form), was the sole advocate on the morality of slavery ; when slavery existed far long before Christianity or Islam.

Like I said, read Graham's book. It is a hundred pages, or thereabout.

kingxsamz:


lol... as long as this is a faceless forum and as long as you don't know me or anything about me,I won't argue with you.

BlowBack:


I will not want to know or associate with you in the real world as I know for sure that you are a Muslim.

BlowBack:


Nobody said Mohammed invented Slavery

Only Islam provides the religious manual and justification of enslaving and selling people.

This is my point.

What you saw in Libya was revived by the Islamic State and even our own Boko Shekau cited Koranic references as justification for capturing and selling off Christian school girls.

Off course crime is not limited to Muslims as people who identify as Christians and non-muslims commit one form of crime daily but the simple difference is that they can't draw religious justification from the Bible in raping a woman but Islam gives the Muslim man the divine right to abduct and turn a Christian woman or girl into his personal sex slaves.

Islam also permits Muslim men to have sex slaves apart from their 4 wives.

This is the point I am making!

TheCabal:


I avoid using either of the holy books in arguments for or against vices/issues our society is experiencing today; because every verse can be logically countered using external references. These books were written by Man, after all.

As providence would bestow, @wirinet has cited "counter" biblical verses here: ^{https://www.nairaland.com/4206996/islam-approves-libyan-slave-markets/2#62860063}.

In my first response, I concluded this thread has nothing to do with the "morality of slavery in either religion".

Your response has corroborated my position. You seem to have veered into politics (the Islamic State) and women's rights in Islam (recommendation on the nos of wives one can marry.)

BlowBack:



The Europeans never used religion to justify the enslavement of Africans rather they justified the enslavement of millions of Africans citing contemporary scientific views mainly drawn from the Darwin evolutionary theory.

It was Christian values that put an end to the European slave trade.

And it is very important that we revist Islam when discussing the latest Libyan slave auctions. Because it is only Muslims that have so far engaged in this dastardly act.

From Shekau boasting of selling abducted Christian school girls in slave markets to the Islamic State auctioning of captured Christian, Yazidi and Shia women to the existing slave markets in Mauritania.

Muslims have no problem against slavery a their quaran justifies capturing and selling off of Kafirs.