Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,166,078 members, 7,863,796 topics. Date: Tuesday, 18 June 2024 at 06:34 AM

Atiku Indicted - Politics (8) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Atiku Indicted (9417 Views)

Tinubu And Atiku In Closed-Door Meeting Over Buhari’s Victory / Atiku, Kwankwaso, Others Have Abandoned Buhari, Says PDP / Breaking News: Nigerian Governors Indicted (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Atiku Indicted by Ferlie(m): 2:29pm On Mar 23, 2007
Atiku stole $20million - thief. Where is the money? They said the President used the money he is being accused of, to fund projects outside the mandate of PTDF, fair enough, but hey, Atiku's $20million was lodged in a private account with TIB and he said the President gave him a verbal approval to do so - common - even if it is true - he is a fool, doesnt he know how necessary it is to seek a written permission in doing things like that - in short, where is the money now?

Now, politicians are saying EFCC is hounding him because of his disagreement with the President, have we forgotten it was America that asked Atiku to be investigated in the first place? Was it not the link between Jefferson and Atiku that necessitated the probe? How come people are accusing EFCC of hounding him unnecessarily? People forget so easily and people now find it easy to use democracy as an hiding place to prevent the truth from being told -

Who is he Atiku anyway, if he beleives so much in his innocence, why ddnt he resign initially - of course he wont, why, because he knows if he does that, he would have lost his immunity and EFCC will open his cupboard, now - t continue enjoying the immunity, he wants to stay as VP and from there become a President. hun.

How come nobody is asking him, where is d money he and Tinubu used in buying newspaper houses came from? Houses in Maryland, USA, houses in the UK. NPA privatisation, and so many business interests he has? People complain about Obasanjo, does anybody know if Obasanjo has any house abroad? Any newspaper house? Any interests in muliti national companies? common -

Let the truth be told, and who told him he is the best thing Nigeria wants anyway.
Re: Atiku Indicted by Mariory(m): 10:23am On Mar 24, 2007
http://www.punchng.com/Articl.aspx?theartic=Art200703242485382

But a member of the Ndoma-Egba-led PTDF ad hoc committee, Senator Victor Oyofo, told newsmen in Abuja on Friday that the review committee report was fit only for the dustbin. He said, “I agree with the statement that there is confusion. It is even worse than confusion; it is a quagmire. If you attempt to stand truth on its head, then it leads to the confusion we are in now. For example, how can any body suggest that President Obasanjo is guilty in the handling of the PTDF? There is no shred of evidence to support it. Number one, administratively, the executive secretary reports to the Federal Executive Council via Mr. Vice-President.”

According to Oyofo, there is nowhere in the report where the President was said to have benefited directly from the funds. This, he argued, was different from the case of the vice-president who was in charge of the daily administration of the fund.

He said he was taken aback by the report of the review committee with respect to the issue of $125 million.

In his view, said there is no excuse to let the vice-president off the hook when he approved an additional $20m, knowing that the $125m earlier granted was not used for the stated purpose.
Re: Atiku Indicted by Mariory(m): 10:02pm On Mar 24, 2007
And the drama continues

http://www.thisdayonline.com/nview.php?id=73725
A member of the Senate Ad-Hoc Committee on Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF), Senator Victor Kassim Oyofo (Edo North) has dismissed the report of the Review Committee as hogwash and a document fit only for the garbage can.
Oyofo, a former Chief Whip of the Senate, called on Nigerians to be conversant with the fact that the report has not yet been accepted by the Senate and therefore they should discountenance it.
Speaking yesterday with Senate Correspondents in Abuja, Oyofo said that what the Senate had done and which was procedurally correct was to allow the Review Committee headed by Senator Umaru Tsauri to lay the report on the table of the Senate preparatory to debate in May.
But he noted that the confusion in the Senate over the report has its roots in the vendetta mission by the other camp to pronounce President Olusegun Obasanjo guilty.
He also said that the inability of Some Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Senators to secure re-election tickets contributed to the accomplishment of the mission to “stand truth on its head” in the matter and blamed the PDP leadership for not taking proper control of the Senate and the Presidency’s relationship with the Upper Legislative Chamber.
Oyofo stated that he agreed completely with the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Mallam Nuhu Ribadu that the Senate is confused over the PTDF matter.
According to him, “Indeed, I agree with the statement by the EFCC Chairman that there is confusion. It is even worse than confusion. I think it is a quagmire.”
Re: Atiku Indicted by Sijien(m): 5:19pm On Mar 27, 2007
http://www.nationaldailyngr.com/cover.htm

PTDF review report
How Nnamani saved Obasanjo
By SULEIMAN OKARA

PRESIDENT Olusegun Obasanjo would have been removed from office last week if not for the selflessness and unrelenting effort of the Senate President, Ken Nnamani.


National Daily learnt that the anti-Obasanjo senators had secured the mandatory majority needed for them to pass a vote of no confidence on the president and proceed with impeachment procedures.


Obasanjo and Vice-President, Atiku Abubakar were indicted by the Senate committee which reviewed the report of the Victor Ndoma-Egba-led panel on the activities of the Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF) which submitted its report to the Senate last Tuesday. The chairman of the committee is Senator Umaru Tsauri from Katsina State. Other members are: Senators Timothy Adudu, Chris Adighije, Akin Olasunkanmi, Abubakar Sa'ad Mohammed, John Azuta-Mbata and Bello Maitama Yusuf.


Obasanjo was found guilty of approving the payment of over $125 million in respect of projects commenced by the PTDF without due process and approval by the Federal Executive Council (FEC).


The projects are: incorporation of Galaxy backbone, purchase of computers for Computer for all Nigeria Initiative (CANI) and Defence Industry Corporation of Nigeria (DICON). The president later got the projects ratified retroactively by the FEC. The Review Panel referred Obasanjo to the Code of Conduct Bureau for further action.


On the part of Atiku, he was found culpable of the approval of $208 million of PTDF funds without the authority of the president. The committee viewed the approval of the vice-president as illegal and therefore also referred him to the Code of Conduct Bureau for further action. The panel, however, absolved Atiku of any culpability in respect of $125 million deposit in ETB and TIB because he acted within constitutional provisions.


The reaction of the president and his vice came simultaneously. While the Special Assistant to the President on Public Affairs, Uba Sani, criticised the committee for purportedly doing a hatchet job in order to smear the president, the Atiku Campaign Organisation, however, commended the committee for “coming nearer to the truth” by vindicating Atiku on the $125 million deposit in ETB and FIB. Atiku's Spokesman, Garba Shehu, insisted that the president approved the $20 million PTDF project fund and said he will provide documented evidence if the president swears to an oath that he did not give his consent to the withdrawal.


The People's Democratic Party (PDP) and the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), Nuhu Ribadu, were infuriated by the findings of the committee, specifically the indictment of the president, who had been absolved by the EFCC of any wrong-doing. Ojo Madukwe, PDP National Secretary, described members of the committee as saboteurs and men of questionable integrity.


Ribadu dismissed the report as hogwash and insisted that Atiku is corrupt.


National Daily leant that Obasanjo was shocked by the findings of the committee which tried to rubbish his image as a forthright and incorrigible leader.


“The president believed that he had acquainted himself of any unlawful conduct in his explanatory note to the Senate committee. He was not expecting to be indicted at all,” said an informed source.


Sources said the president would have been in more distress situation if the Senate president did not scuttle the last minute effort by pro-Atiku senators to disgrace him out of office.
Sources said that soon the radical group got the hint that the review committee final report tilted against the president, it began to mobilise support for a vote of no confidence and impeachment notice to be served on Obasanjo.


“The pro Atiku group were excited that Obasanjo has also been indicted and recommended for sanction as well as Atiku. To them, there is now no victor or vanquished between Obasanjo and Atiku. But they even have the opportunity of disgracing Obasanjo out of office” an inside source said.


The anti-Obasanjo senators, led by a senator from North Central are mostly those who were aggrieved that they lost their bid to secure a second term in the Senate, Senators who have been financially induced by the Atiku camp and members of the opposition, All Nigeria People's Party (ANPP) and Action Congress (AC).


These groups were said to have out-numbered the Senators who sympathised with the hapless president.

National Daily sources said the “operation indict Obasanjo” project gulped about N300 million and that the money was used to induce some independent-minded senators to cast their lot with the pro-Atiku group.

Inside sources told National Daily that the anti-Obasanjo senators tried to induce the committee members to write a report favourable to the group, but were allegedly rebuffed.“The Atiku group was desperate to deal with the president, you know they mobilised a lot of money to lobby the committee and other senators. I heard the committee rejected the monetary offer but I cannot absolve other senators,” said a source, adding: “our group (pro-Obasanjo) was caught napping, we didn't know they will try to influence the committee or buy over our colleagues.” While the Tsauri committee met to do justice to their assignment, the pro-Atiku group held several meetings at a popular hotel in Wuse 2, Abuja to fine-tune their strategies.


The Tsauri committee started writing its report on Sunday, March 18, before Otunba Johnson Fashawe made the stunning revelation that Obasanjo lodged N700 million in his MOFAS account despite the president's earlier denial that he had nothing to do with the said account.
By the evening of Monday, March 19, the committee concluded its report and was ready to present it on the floor of the Senate.


Meanwhile, the anti-Obasanjo group had resolved that as soon as the senate accepted the committee's indictment of Obasanjo, a popular senator from the South-East, who championed the opposition against the third term agenda, will move a motion for a vote of no confidence to be passed on him. Consequently, the president will be expected to toe the honourable path by resigning from office or face the humiliation of impeachment.


If the president refused to resign from office, a resolution would be passed asking the chief justice to constitute a panel which will investigate the allegations brought against him.
The time-frame between impeachment process and handover will not be a constraint because the Ndoma-Egba panel report and that of the review committee will be available to the chief justice panel. So, the chief justice panel would be expected to conclude its assignment before the end of April to enable the Senate accept its recommendations on the impeachment of the president.


However, as soon as the Senate President was informed of the plan of the senators, he moved to nip it in the bud.


First, Nnamani, in a secret meeting with the review committee members in the morning of March 18, pleaded with them to give him their report before bringing it to the floor of the Senate.


Nnamani reportedly told the committee members that the Presidency has been ridiculed by the PTDF scandal and the nation's image equally battered. He said the committee report if not well handled could finally pull down the Presidency and rubbish the image of the country in the comity of nations.


He urged Tsauri and his colleagues not to recommend the impeachment of the president.
The chairman Tsauri was said not to have given any assurance to the Senate president. He said the committee will consider national interest in the final report.


Not convinced that he has achieved the objective of this interactive session, Nnamani reportedly reached out to some influential senators and close associates of the review committee members, imploring them to put words across to the committee members.


Meanwhile, Nnamani himself was under severe pressure from the Presidency and the PDP echelon to save the president and the party the embarrassment of indictment and removal from office.


“They told the Senate president to do something quickly to scuttle whatever negative intention the committee and the aggrieved senators had against Obasanjo. Nnamani was so confused about what to do,” sources said.


The Tsauri committee, which sent shock waves across the Senate with its controversial resignation on March 19, finaly submitted its report to the Senate on March 20 at about 2.30pm.


Nnamani, perceiving that the anti-Obasanjo group was still yearning to take their pound of flesh that day, decided that the report will be debated behind close doors to enable him do the necessary manouvres before the finding is disclosed to the public.


During the closed-door deliberation, sources said the Senate president applied the stick and carrot tactic in persuading his colleagues to tamper justice with mercy.


He warned them not to be overwhelmed by selfish interest and unrestrained desire for vengeance, as their decision was capable of truncating the transition programme and possibly cause chaos in the polity.


He urged the senators not to move a vote of no confidence or impeachment motion against the president.

“Gentlemen, if we do the right thing, we will go down in history as statesmen,” Nnamani reportedly said.


National Daily learnt that Nnamani was pressured to support the removal of Obasanjo and Atiku so that he could become the president and organise elections after three months according to constitutional provisions, but he rejected the proposal. He said he is not an inordinately ambitious man but rather a statesman, who is committed to peace and the growth of participatory democracy.
Re: Atiku Indicted by 9ja4eva: 8:04pm On Mar 27, 2007
Why is everyone talking of only Abubakar when there is the main thief Obasanjo?
Re: Atiku Indicted by Mariory(m): 10:56am On Mar 28, 2007
http://www.thisdayonline.com/nview.php?id=74119
But while reacting to a statement credited to Lagos lawyer used as Missile in THISDAY yesterday, Political Adviser to the President, Bashorun Akin Osuntokun, said Atiku, rather than the president has questions to answer.
Osuntokun's statement reads: "Our attention has been drawn to a quote contained in the THISDAY of Tuesday, March 27th, 2007, in which renowned social crusader, Mr. Femi Falana, called on Vice President Atiku Abubakar to resign over his various indictments concerning the Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF).
“Mr. Falana was quoted in these words: 'What Mr. Vice President is saying is clear. That I am a thief and that my boss should also own up. That admission is enough for him to resign and quit the presidential race. In a normal situation, both of them would have resigned honourably, having been indicted by the National Assembly'.
"As much as we appreciate the concerns of Mr. Falana on this issue, we have to, however, set the picture straight. [b]The PTDF issue has gone through five stages of investigation or review viz: the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) investigations and indictment; the Federal Executive Council review headed by the Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Bayo Ojo, his indictment, white paper and gazette; and the Professor Ignatius Ayua Administrative Panel of Inquiry inquest and indictment.
"Furthermore, the Senator Ndoma-Egba Senate Committee report similarly investigated the issue and returned a verdict of indictment on the Vice President, followed at last by the Senator Tsauri Committee of the Senate, which reviewed the Ndoma-Egba Committee’s work. It also returned a vote of indictment on the Vice President.
"The only difference this time is that the Tsauri Committee, which is chiefly populated by senators who have one axe or the other to grind with the President, decided to also drag President Obasanjo’s name into the scandal- not for corruption but what it deemed as 'illegality' in the approval of public utility projects
"The President has maintained that he did no wrong, and his views have been corroborated by prominent and credible government officials, including the Chairman of the EFCC, Malam Nuhu Ribadu and the Minister of Finance, Mrs. Nenadi Usman.
"The same cannot apply to Vice President Atiku Abubakar, whose only defence is that he is not the only one with soiled fingers. We agree with Mr. Falana that it is only an abnormally immoral person who will be indicted by five consecutive panels that will still remain in the office of the Vice President and in the race for President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
[/b].
Re: Atiku Indicted by alabiyemmy(m): 9:57am On Mar 31, 2007
.
Re: Atiku Indicted by alabiyemmy(m): 9:58am On Mar 31, 2007
Obasanjo Envisaged Rot, Reveals Document
By Yemi Adebowale, 03.31.2007


PTDF

Fresh facts on the crisis rocking the Petroleum Technology Developm-ent Fund (PTDF) has revealed that President Olusegun Obasanjo made moves in 2004 to stop approvals by Vice President Atiku Abubakar for the placement of PTDF funds in banks. Documents made exclusively to THISDAY showed that Obasanjo had the premonition that the PTDF would end up in a mess, even when his relationship with Atiku was still rosy.
In the memo dated July 5, 2004 to Atiku, following a report on activities of the PTDF to the presidency, Obasanjo warned: “I do, however, consider the financial practice of having a large sum of N20 billion (Twenty billion Naira) and $150 million (One hundred and fifty million dollars) as deposit placements with commercial banks as an aspect of PTDF’s operation that is susceptible to abuse.” The President in the memo expressed fears that it would be detrimental to the economy for such quantum of funds to be left with commercial banks, “in the light of the sharp practices that are associated with the activities of the sector, now under scrutiny.” Obasanjo subsequently directed that the deposits be immediately withdrawn from the banks and transferred to the account of the PTDF with the Central Bank, for investment in Treasury Bills.
He continued in the memo: “Following from this, any other fund attributable to PTDF must be directly lodged in the same Central Bank Account. On a final note, I wish to state that henceforth, no monies of the fund from the Central Bank account should be withdrawn without the authorisation of the Vice-President and endorsed by me.”
The PTDF funds placed in banks eventually snowballed into a big crisis last year when Obasanjo – following security tips – called in the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate Atiku. EFCC investigated and found him guilty of money laundering and other financial misdemeanours in the management of PTDF funds. The EFCC provided evidence showing that Atiku helped Mike Adenuga pay for the Glo GSM license with PTDF funds. PTDF's $110m was allegedly placed at ETB owned by Chief Mike Adenuga and $20 million in TIB, substantially owned by Oyo and Osun States. PTDF had deposited money in 12 other banks, including ETB and TIB.
Atiku was also alleged to have transferred $20 million out of PTDF without Obasanjo and FEC approval. Again, the VP was alleged to own 12.5 per cent of Globacom. But the telecom firm has denied this. According to EFCC: "Prince Babatunde Akinyera is believed to be fronting for His Excellency, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, for the 12.5 per cent against his name at Globacom. That contrary to the believe that it was only the sum of $115 million that was placed at ETB by PTDF, it has been discovered again that another $50 million was transferred from UBA (New York) account of PTDF to ETB with the knowledge of the approving authority, just at the time Otunba Mike Adenuga was to pay his $20million deposit to NCC." It indicted Atiku of being party to the placement of deposits in Equitorial Trust Bank (ETB) and the defunct Trans International Bank (TIB).
An administrative panel headed by the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chief Bayo Ojo, was subsequently raised by Obasanjo to examine the report of the EFCC. Others in the panel were Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai; Education Minister, Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili; National Security Adviser, Major-Gen Sarki Muktar (rtd.); and the Minister of State for Agriculture, Mr. Bamidele Dada. The Panel of Inquiry also found Atiku guilty. The panel submitted that money was laundered from the PTDF to procure the Globacom licence. The panel was said to have confronted Atiku with incriminating documents. It questioned Atiku on the coincidence of Adenuga’s payment of the 10 per cent deposit required for Globacom’s licence shortly after ETB received the PTDF deposit. The panel also questioned Atiku on how Otunba Oyewole Fashawe, believed to be Atiku’s business associate and an estranged friend of Obasanjo, was able to secure over N700 million loan from TIB shortly after the bank secured the PTDF’s deposit. Atiku was also questioned about Fashawe's donation of a building to ABTI Academy owned by Atiku.
Atiku told the EFCC as well as the Administrative Panel that he would not know the factors that come to bear when banks determine how they use their deposits.
On Globacom, Atiku said it paid for its license eight months before ETB secured the PTDF fund placement. An aide of Atiku who pleaded for anonymity claimed that the PTDF’s former executive secretary, Hamisu Yusuf Mairago, had recommended the placement of the deposits in the local banks because he believed they would attract higher interests than leaving them in overseas banks: The aide said: "In fact, while foreign banks were offering 3 per cent and 4 per cent, the Nigerian banks offered more than ten per cent. It was on the basis of the sound business judgment that the Vice President recommended the request to the President who immediately approved. PTDF went on to earn over N1billion interest from its deposit at ETB. The bank has also paid back the money following government’s recall of public funds in commercial banks. In other words, not a single kobo of PTDF has been lost in the transaction.”
An adhoc committee set up by the Senate and headed by Victor Ndoma Egba was asked to investigate the PTDF scam. It found Atiku guilty in controversial circumstances. It also found the president guilty for taking decisions outside the prescribed mandate of the fund while asking he should make refund in an instance where he made an unwarranted withdrawal. The panel while prescribing punishment for Atiku merely stated that the president should be advised for the wrong decisions he took over the fund placement.
A review committee was later set up by the Senate, which found both Obasanjo and Atiku guilty. Atiku, who was disqualified from the April Presidential polls on the basis of the Ojo Panel Report, is already in court, challenging it.
Re: Atiku Indicted by Mamajama(m): 2:21pm On Mar 31, 2007
Wao good findings. this is impresive
Re: Atiku Indicted by Mariory(m): 5:56pm On Mar 31, 2007
alabiyemmy:

Obasanjo Envisaged Rot, Reveals Document
By Yemi Adebowale, 03.31.2007


PTDF

Fresh facts on the crisis rocking the Petroleum Technology Developm-ent Fund (PTDF) has revealed that President Olusegun Obasanjo made moves in 2004 to stop approvals by Vice President Atiku Abubakar for the placement of PTDF funds in banks. Documents made exclusively to THISDAY showed that Obasanjo had the premonition that the PTDF would end up in a mess, even when his relationship with Atiku was still rosy.
In the memo dated July 5, 2004 to Atiku, following a report on activities of the PTDF to the presidency, Obasanjo warned: “I do, however, consider the financial practice of having a large sum of N20 billion (Twenty billion Naira) and $150 million (One hundred and fifty million dollars) as deposit placements with commercial banks as an aspect of PTDF’s operation that is susceptible to abuse.” The President in the memo expressed fears that it would be detrimental to the economy for such quantum of funds to be left with commercial banks, “in the light of the sharp practices that are associated with the activities of the sector, now under scrutiny.” Obasanjo subsequently directed that the deposits be immediately withdrawn from the banks and transferred to the account of the PTDF with the Central Bank, for investment in Treasury Bills.
He continued in the memo: “Following from this, any other fund attributable to PTDF must be directly lodged in the same Central Bank Account. On a final note, I wish to state that henceforth, no monies of the fund from the Central Bank account should be withdrawn without the authorisation of the Vice-President and endorsed by me.”
The PTDF funds placed in banks eventually snowballed into a big crisis last year when Obasanjo – following security tips – called in the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to investigate Atiku. EFCC investigated and found him guilty of money laundering and other financial misdemeanours in the management of PTDF funds. The EFCC provided evidence showing that Atiku helped Mike Adenuga pay for the Glo GSM license with PTDF funds. PTDF's $110m was allegedly placed at ETB owned by Chief Mike Adenuga and $20 million in TIB, substantially owned by Oyo and Osun States. PTDF had deposited money in 12 other banks, including ETB and TIB.
Atiku was also alleged to have transferred $20 million out of PTDF without Obasanjo and FEC approval. Again, the VP was alleged to own 12.5 per cent of Globacom. But the telecom firm has denied this. According to EFCC: "Prince Babatunde Akinyera is believed to be fronting for His Excellency, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, for the 12.5 per cent against his name at Globacom. That contrary to the believe that it was only the sum of $115 million that was placed at ETB by PTDF, it has been discovered again that another $50 million was transferred from UBA (New York) account of PTDF to ETB with the knowledge of the approving authority, just at the time Otunba Mike Adenuga was to pay his $20million deposit to NCC." It indicted Atiku of being party to the placement of deposits in Equitorial Trust Bank (ETB) and the defunct Trans International Bank (TIB).
An administrative panel headed by the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chief Bayo Ojo, was subsequently raised by Obasanjo to examine the report of the EFCC. Others in the panel were Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai; Education Minister, Mrs. Oby Ezekwesili; National Security Adviser, Major-Gen Sarki Muktar (rtd.); and the Minister of State for Agriculture, Mr. Bamidele Dada. The Panel of Inquiry also found Atiku guilty. The panel submitted that money was laundered from the PTDF to procure the Globacom licence. The panel was said to have confronted Atiku with incriminating documents. It questioned Atiku on the coincidence of Adenuga’s payment of the 10 per cent deposit required for Globacom’s licence shortly after ETB received the PTDF deposit. The panel also questioned Atiku on how Otunba Oyewole Fashawe, believed to be Atiku’s business associate and an estranged friend of Obasanjo, was able to secure over N700 million loan from TIB shortly after the bank secured the PTDF’s deposit. Atiku was also questioned about Fashawe's donation of a building to ABTI Academy owned by Atiku.
Atiku told the EFCC as well as the Administrative Panel that he would not know the factors that come to bear when banks determine how they use their deposits.
On Globacom, Atiku said it paid for its license eight months before ETB secured the PTDF fund placement. An aide of Atiku who pleaded for anonymity claimed that the PTDF’s former executive secretary, Hamisu Yusuf Mairago, had recommended the placement of the deposits in the local banks because he believed they would attract higher interests than leaving them in overseas banks: The aide said: "In fact, while foreign banks were offering 3 per cent and 4 per cent, the Nigerian banks offered more than ten per cent. It was on the basis of the sound business judgment that the Vice President recommended the request to the President who immediately approved. PTDF went on to earn over N1billion interest from its deposit at ETB. The bank has also paid back the money following government’s recall of public funds in commercial banks. In other words, not a single kobo of PTDF has been lost in the transaction.”
An adhoc committee set up by the Senate and headed by Victor Ndoma Egba was asked to investigate the PTDF scam. It found Atiku guilty in controversial circumstances. It also found the president guilty for taking decisions outside the prescribed mandate of the fund while asking he should make refund in an instance where he made an unwarranted withdrawal. The panel while prescribing punishment for Atiku merely stated that the president should be advised for the wrong decisions he took over the fund placement.
A review committee was later set up by the Senate, which found both Obasanjo and Atiku guilty. Atiku, who was disqualified from the April Presidential polls on the basis of the Ojo Panel Report, is already in court, challenging it.

Link to the above article
http://www.thisdayonline.com/nview.php?id=74367
Re: Atiku Indicted by 9ja4eva: 8:55am On Apr 01, 2007
Wao.Let dem act den.
Re: Atiku Indicted by Echidime(m): 9:07am On Apr 13, 2007
LadyT: Whats new? have been absent for a while,what is happening to our friend Atiku abubakar, is he free now to run for the race?
Re: Atiku Indicted by Enigma(m): 8:18pm On Apr 13, 2007
There is an article on the legal side (Court of Appeal versus Federal High Court) at http://lexnigeriana..com/
Re: Atiku Indicted by LadyT(f): 10:15pm On Apr 13, 2007
Hey Enigma wink I have been absent for a while just changed jobs. Last I heard of Atiku is that we are still waiting to see if he will be allowed to contest!
Re: Atiku Indicted by 4Play(m): 10:21pm On Apr 13, 2007
Enigma:

There is an article on the legal side (Court of Appeal versus Federal High Court) at http://lexnigeriana..com/

That blog reflects a legal scholar's predilection for verbosity grin Great article though

(1) (2) (3) ... (5) (6) (7) (8) (Reply)

Landslide Gulps 13 Buildings, Sacks 28 Families In Anambra / Ss & Sw Leaders Issue A Joint Communiqué To Gej – Grow Some Balls, They Urged. / Jonathan Was Fair To Ndigbo, Says Igbo Group

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 70
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.