dalaman:


Lies, we can infer from the bible and say that snakes once flew

I wonder how I inferred that snakes once walked. My inference was right and yours about flying, hopping, standing still were all wrong. I guess you need to sharpen your inference abilities they are deliberately blunt.

Which research? You think plagiarism something you are notoriously known for here is research abi? Well done.

Plagiarism you say? Yet a scientific journal confirmed my words and I posted them here and the links. I am still waiting for you to call those peer reviewed journals as lies.

You know very well that I was referring to the bible. We could say that snakes flew or hopped according to the bible. No were was it written inside the bible that snakes once walked. What ever you sails remains your own assumption. If I insist that snakes were flying according to the bible, you have no evidence from the bible to show that my position is not true.

This is your modus operandi

You get caught, you switch and keep switching.

If I inferred correctly I must be extremely lucky to have inferred rightly and spot on with science.

I remember you also denied that snakes once had limbs until I showed you from science. God said the serpent from now on would crawl on its belly which meant it once had limbs and you denied this until science showed you your shameful error.

Next I told you they walked and you denied this and said they could have been flying, hopping or stationary and this you maintained until science showed you AGAIN your shameful error.

Ogbeni go and sharpen your inference abilities and stop dumping your burdens on me.

ScienceWatch:
welcome back mighty warrior. Yes indeed, The highly esteemed Butterfly1on is a sight to behold. He weaves his way through the shadow of the valley of death like a skilled Ninja.

We have observed his humility only in the face of truth, never toward swine.

Scientifically verifiable evidence of the superior might of Jesus Christ is increasing the FAITH of believers world wide.

Thank you sir, you are far too kind. I call butterflylion and kingebukasblog ninja/shadow athiest slayer(s) cause whenever they appear those fellows be crawling back into their 'closed places'... Lol.

butterflyl1on:


Continuously banned or continuously reported?

If the latter then you must be a thorn in the sides of many here

Yes It is the latter. All I did was to agree with their Satanic prophet of Atheism Richard Dawkins that all Atheists were once fish.

Another 5day ban was freely given to me again one hour after the previous three bans expired because I proclaimed in bold letters;
I LOVE YOU JESUS!!!

ScienceWatch:
Yes It is the latter. All I did was to agree with their Satanic prophet of Atheism Richard Dawkins that all Atheists were once fish.

Another 5day ban was freely given to me again one hour after the previous three bans expired because I proclaimed in bold letters;
I LOVE YOU JESUS!!!

Are you kidding me?

sonofthunder:

Thank you sir, you are far too kind. I call butterflylion and kingebukasblog ninja/shadow athiest slayer(s) cause whenever they appear those fellows be crawling back into their 'closed places'... Lol.

Lol Yes you right again.

butterflylion:


Are you kidding me?

I Have generously received more than four consecutive bans with very little time in between to say good bye to my granny.
It must be traced to the evolution thing that ATHEISTS prefer. Lol very loud.

ScienceWatch:
I Have generously received more than four consecutive bans with very little time in between to say good bye to my granny.
It must be traced to the evolution thing that ATHEISTS prefer. Lol very loud.

I believe that one of them whom you (we) engage is a MOD and dishes out bans for any and every reason.

Personally I was restricted from commenting on a particular thread here specifically. I could comment on any thread in the religious section except that one. Anytime I tried commenting I got slapped an auto ban.

dalaman:


Lies, we can infer from the bible and say that snakes once flew.


Which research? You think plagiarism something you are notoriously known for here is research abi? Well done.



You know very well that I was referring to the bible. We could say that snakes flew or hopped according to the bible. No were was it written inside the bible that snakes once walked. What ever you sails remains your own assumption. If I insist that snakes were flying according to the bible, you have no evidence from the bible to show that my position is not true.

Ok. I know you won't resort to plagiarism to answer this intriguing question. Tell us Sir, why do snakes have tails ? 50 years ago research proved that snakes would have been more prosperous without a tail. Now tell us, did your evolution burden this snake, or did this snake evolve from a different species of fish ?

butterflylion:


I believe that one of them whom you (we) engage is a MOD and dishes out bans for any and every reason.

Personally I was restricted from commenting on a particular thread here specifically. I could comment on any thread in the religious section except that one. Anytime I tried commenting I got slapped an auto ban.

Yes I agree. One creepy guy that comes to mind is Frank something and the highly pretentious guy that panics when he sees us, he would jump on his boyfriends back, insert his penis and shout, "Here comes the derailers." I can't get to his name right now.

The image he provokes in my mind is affecting my memory.

butterflyl1on:


Good. Since you said WITHIN the days, is this not referring to a time bracket? What you said is simply WITHIN A BRACKET OF DAYS. This is you saying something like IN THE DAYS OF YOUR YOUTH. Your youth was sure but the time span of your youth is not stated. You only gave a time bracket.

Were you once a youth? Yes

Did you say WHEN you were a youth? No

Did your statement imply a time bracket of your youth period? Yes.

I hope you get it now?

I have been reading through your arguments with Sarassin concerning the phrase "In the days of Abiathar" and its really funny. Let me ask you one question as it seems on this tread you have crowned yourself the custodian of "common sense". I will use an analogy, If Lai Mohammed came out in a press conference and made the comment " in the days of Obasanjo" what time frame do you think he is referring to? Somethings are quite easy to understand but when we choose to make baseless arguments of it, we extend the length of a single tread to 30pages talking about things that could have been concluded in 5. And please stop the cynical comments and gestures, asides the fact its boring, your arguments are somewhat myopic within the contexts of biblical historicity.

Matthew 28:9.... '' And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying All hail. And they came and HELD HIM BY THE FEET and worshipped him.
John 20:17...... Jesus said unto her TOUCH ME NOT for i am not yet ascended to my father.

ojobolinda:
Matthew 28:9.... '' And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met them, saying All hail. And they came and HELD HIM BY THE FEET and worshipped him.
John 20:17...... Jesus said unto her TOUCH ME NOT for i am not yet ascended to my father.

Five days gone...yet no answer to this question...

Two things...

1) Perhaps a direct translation of the scriptures from Hebrew or Aramaic or whatever language these chapters were originally written in into English may help...

2) Between the time Jesus appeared to the Ladies by the tomb and when He appeared to the Apostles...He might have transited between Heaven and Earth... after all, there are no records in the scriptures telling where exactly Jesus had been each and everyday after He resurrected...

Is this thread still on?

GE 1:3-5 On the first day, God created light, then separated light and darkness.
GE 1:14-19 The sun (which separates night and day) wasn't created until the fourth day.

The GREATEST LIE of Christianity and indeed of the millenium is a white Jesus and white Israel.

donnie:
The GREATEST LIE of Christianity and indeed of the millenium is a white Jesus and white Israel.

A worse lie, greater than the GREATEST LIE of Christianity and indeed of the millenium of a white Jesus and white Israel, is that of Yahshua Ha Mashiach aka Jesus Christ being portrayed by afrocentrists like donnie, that He is an African black skinned Son of Man, where facts show that He is Semitic and from the Levant, circa Mediterranean Sea region area, hence could never be white skinned and neither be black skinned, but instead Him and the original Israelites would be a skin spectrum that falls anywhere between medium white to light brown and Olive, moderate reddish brown.