WonderMan76:


A few inquiries is what you call weaponized? LMAO. Baba stop moving in circles. Tell me when a Republican led government ever used its DOJ to indict a former Democrat president or Major Democrat candidate. That’s the level we are talking about. They could have easily gone after both Bill and Hillary Clinton. But I assure you Biden won’t be spared.

American Oversight has uncovered the signed directive from former Attorney General Jeff Sessions instructing a federal prosecutor to carry out President Trump’s authoritarian demand to investigate Hillary Clinton.

The document, obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation by American Oversight, is a formal, November 2017 letter from Sessions to U.S. Attorney for Utah John Huber and has never before been released to the public. In a sworn declaration filed in November 2018 in response to American Oversight’s lawsuit, the Justice Department had insisted that no written directive existed and that all guidance to Huber had been delivered verbally.

Trump has repeatedly tweeted demands for DOJ to investigate Clinton. Throughout the 2016 presidential general election campaign and at multiple rallies after taking office, Trump and his supporters have used the rallying cry “Lock her up” to call for the prosecution of Clinton.

“’Lock her up’ was wrong at campaign rallies, and it’s even worse coming from the Department of Justice,” said Austin Evers, American Oversight executive director. “Even after this long, it’s still deeply shocking to see the black-and-white proof that Jeff Sessions caved to President Trump’s worst authoritarian impulses and ordered a wide-ranging investigation of his political opponents based on demands from Congress instead of the facts and the law.”
https://www.americanoversight.org/sessions-letter

wirinet:


They did go after Bill and Hillary Clinton aggressively, but they found nothing. Trump's tag line for the 2015 elections was "Lock Her Up"
You think if Trump has any evidence of a crime by Hillary Clinton, he will not go after her directly.

Trump demanded directly Jeff Sessions investigate Hillary Clinton.

wirinet:


They did go after Bill and Hillary Clinton aggressively, but they found nothing. Trump's tag line for the 2015 elections was "Lock Her Up"
You think if Trump has any evidence of a crime by Hillary Clinton, he will not go after her directly.

Trump demanded directly Jeff Sessions investigate Hillary Clinton.

Which of the Bidens are you talking about? If you are talking about Hunter Biden, then you guys have can knock yourselves out. If you are referring to President Biden, you guys need to alleged a valid crime first, then present evidence before a grand jury to obtain an indictment first, then take the indictment before a jury in a competent court to obtain a conviction. Up till now there is no evidence of a crime by Joe Biden.

Trump is a walking crime magnet. All his activities - political, business or social involves criminality. He induces crime in everyone he interacts with.

Ekemeze:
😂😂😂😂😂
If indeed Trump did that(flushing documents down the toilet), then he's the dumbest of them all.

budaatum:


You can "wanted me to see it this way" as much as you want. Unfortunately for you I am not registered in your club.

WonderMan76:


Walking crime magnet yet for over 75 years of his life he was never indicted until he entered politics and hurt the Democrats feelings. How convenient.

basilico:


Not only that. I think this is now absurd.Bail set at 200k. Pocket change to Trump.
He must not talk to witnesses (about the case I hope).He must not use social media to frame the case.
If this is not election interference then it's promotion of democracy, democrat style.
Effectively gag Trump from campaigning.
Maybe they will lock him up on sham charges.

Obrigardo:
Criminal trump would rather flee in the dead of night than go to jail.
He knows we are onto him 😅

basilico:


Not only that. I think this is now absurd.Bail set at 200k. Pocket change to Trump.
He must not talk to witnesses (about the case I hope).He must not use social media to frame the case.
If this is not election interference then it's promotion of democracy, democrat style.
Effectively gag Trump from campaigning.
Maybe they will lock him up on sham charges.

WonderMan76:


A few inquiries is what you call weaponized? LMAO. Baba stop moving in circles. Tell me when a Republican led government ever used its DOJ to indict a former Democrat president or Major Democrat candidate. That’s the level we are talking about. They could have easily gone after both Bill and Hillary Clinton. But I assure you Biden won’t be spared.

basilico:


This is what you cannot see.

budaatum:


You can only indict if you have evidence of a crime.

WonderMan76:


This is actually false. That’s why your god Jack Smith has lost so many times in court. because he keeps indicting people on weak or non-existent evidence. He is a Career loser!

budaatum:


That's what happens if your evidence does not stack up in court, just as all evidence dump won did not stack up in court.

If Jack Smith has no evidence against dump, dump will rightly walk. Hopefully this case will be televised so you get to see it all live.

WonderMan76:


I’m just calling you out for your false assertion that an indictment always means there is good evidence. You know how many people get indicted on weak evidence for all kinds of reasons?

The evidence in all Trumps indictments are weak.

The reason Is politics.


I just hope you lot don’t go into cardiac arrest when this drama doesn’t end with Trump behind bars like you pray for everyday.

budaatum:


That's what happens if your evidence does not stack up in court, just as all evidence dump won did not stack up in court.

If Jack Smith has no evidence against dump, dump will rightly walk. Hopefully this case will be televised so you get to see it all live.

budaatum:


The evidence must be good enough for a grand jury to indict. The defence then has an opportunity in court where they scrutinise that evidence and present there's to counter it.

As for dump behind bars, you really need to stop creating crap in your own head and believing it. I've said it enough times that I hope dump behind bars does not happen and that Biden pardons him if he is sent to jail (Fed or State), as it's the politically smart thing to do.

Konkoja:
[/b]

Bolded will not make any difference, they all saw January 6th, Buda.

WonderMan76:


Idiot. You are really uneducated. He is being sarcastic and asking why the stupid DA is asking for bail when there is obviously no chance of him fleeing anywhere. This is the most recognizable man in the world. You people have nothing but Trump derangement in your head. No actual brains in there.

WonderMan76:


It will just cost him a lot of money and time out of his campaign and that has been their goal all along.

Obrigardo:


Who is this dodo?

budaatum:


Biden used the Barisma money to silence Maui sirens!

basilico:
New York Times.


[I] On the eve of the first debate of the 2024 presidential race, trust in government is rivaling historic lows. Officials have been working hard to safeguard elections and assure citizens of their integrity. But if we want public office to have integrity, we might be better off eliminating elections altogether. [/I]

feedthenation:


@basilico---Jenna Ellis needs your monetary support as Trump is not forthcoming to help those who have been indicted---so much for following the grifter---

Earlier this year, she admitted in court to making false statements about the 2020 presidential election, leading a judge to issue a public censure.

“The parties agree that Respondent, through her conduct, undermined the American public’s confidence in the presidential election, violating her duty of candor to the public,” Bryon Large, Colorado’s presiding disciplinary judge, wrote in his opinion in March.
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4163154-trump-attorney-jenna-ellis-asks-why-maga-pac-isnt-paying-for-her-georgia-defense/

feedthenation:


@basilico---Jenna Ellis needs your monetary support as Trump is not forthcoming to help those who have been indicted---so much for following the grifter---

budaatum:


You are right. They shut off their brains to deny what they saw.

Thankfully, they are not the only ones voting for president, and as shown in the past election, they are a minority.

WonderMan76:


You mean like the grand jury headed by this crazy person?


https://m.youtube.com/shorts/HvAe7z2YMVs

Hahahahahahahaha.

Stop being Naive bro. you’re too old and your head is too big for that. We all know grand jury’s are a farce and prosecutors have several ways of manipulating, even deceiving them.

What matters is the trial!!! And I’m telling you that if Trump appeals each of these cases to the highest levels, they will all collapse one by one at some point.

It will just cost him a lot of money and time out of his campaign and that has been their goal all along.