yomi96:
This guy used to make sense before, now na opkata yarn e dey talk. The name Jesus is proven and tested. He can go to hell with his bs rethorics

Truth is Bitter

delugajackson:
I'm begining to suspect that this guy is an antichrist. Beware of false prophets, my people.

Where is Uncle Christ? Aunty Christ indeed!

Any black person who prays to or calls on Jezus aka Jesus is a compound IDIOT

the original Mahdi/Messiah/Savoiur sent to the original people of the earth (black people) is a blackman not that gay white basterd you worship
And his name is Yeshwah
Also called Iheshowah by some or in full Yeshwah Ben Yesef (Yeshwah son of Yesef)

7 Messiah's have been sent (including Mohammed) and they are all black people

Throw your useless bibles and Qurans into the dustbin and go seek true enlightenment

Tessyama1:
Controversial OAP and online pastor, Daddy Freeze says 99% of what our Pastors and GOs taught us is false.

According to him, the word 'Jesus' has no meaning and was invented by manipulators. Read his post below...

"

https://www.instagram.com/p/BpmVxtwAQ5t/

https://www.amagitesblog.com/2018/10/it-has-no-meaning-daddy-freeze-codemns-the-name-jesus.html

AGENTS OF D REAL ANTI CHRIST UNFOLDING GRADUALLY TAKING POSITIONS IN D GLOBAL STAGE. RIDE ON. FALSE TEACHERS KNOW MORE THAT THEIR MENTORS.

Seun:
Daddy Freeze is absolutely right that the original name of Jesus is 'Yeshua' or 'Joshua'. The 'controversy' here is about whether or not the translated versions of this name in other languages, such as Ιησούς (Greek), Jesus (English), Jesu(Yoruba), Jizọs(Igbo), Yesu(Hausa), and Isa(Arabic) are as potent against demons, and for causing prayers to be instantly answered, as his original Jewish name, 'Yeshua' or 'Joshua'.

One could argue that there is no magic in any of the names: they've all been used against ISIS and Boko Haram and none of them worked.

Seun you are here again?

For the sake of those who may be in doubt in this matter let me drop this here

A minority of Christian voices through the centuries have insisted on stressing the Jewishness of Jesus.1 Already in the New Testament, we learn that some Christians were retaining Jewish customs and doctrines in an attempt to create a hybrid religion. These attempts met stern apostolic criticism (e.g., Galatians 5:2; Colossians 2:16). Generally, as Christianity transitioned from a majority-Jewish to a majority-Gentile religion, these voices were steadily muted. However, a resurgence of the Jewish Jesus movement has led a number of people to allege ecclesiastical conspiracies to “cover up” the Jewishness of Jesus. Among the sensational claims is the alleged “change” of the name of God’s Son from Yeshua to Jesus.

Before we analyze the rationale and legitimacy behind the question of the name, let us affirm two incontrovertible truths. First, Jesus was a Jew. Scripture is clear that the New Covenant was not inaugurated until the death of Christ (Hebrews 9:16-17). Therefore, Jesus (or Yeshua, if you like) lived His entire life as a Jew under the Law of Moses. The name has nothing to do with His Jewishness. Second, His name in Hebrew was indeed Yehōshūa‘, or more likely in Aramaic Yēshūa‘. Growing up in the Galilee region, Jesus would have almost certainly spoken Aramaic, and He would not have heard His name as “Jesus.” Indeed, the Syriac translations of the New Testament spell the name Yēshūa‘.2 The New Testament, however, is not written in Aramaic or in Syriac, but in Greek. And the English name “Jesus” is a transliteration based on the Latin, which is based on the Greek, which is in turn based on the original Aramaic.

ALLEGED REASONS FOR THE NAME “CHANGE”
“Don’t believe everything you read on the Internet.” This maxim is taught to third-graders and college students alike. Still, it doesn’t seem to sink in. People continue to read Web sites that propagate fictional conspiracy theories to allege the name of God’s Son was changed from its pure Hebrew form to its current corruption. And here are a few of the most common reasons why.

First, it is alleged that early Christians—even the authors of the New Testament!—were racists. They wished to erase the Jewishness of Jesus from the record in an effort to make Him seem “Christian” and “Gentile.” This simply isn’t true. First, every author of the New Testament seems to possess a Jewish background of some kind, and most were born Jewish (cf. Galatians 2:15). Second, Paul can boast not only of his Jewish lineage (Philippians 3:5), but also claim, “I am a Pharisee” (present tense!) long after his conversion (Acts 23:6). Third, where there is racism in the New Testament, it is usually against Gentiles rather than Jews (Galatians 2:12-16; cf. Romans 2:14).

Second, some would never lay such an allegation as racism at the feet of the Apostles, but they have no qualms about hurling this insult at the Catholic Church. They believe the early church falsified manuscripts of the New Testament in order to erase “Yeshua” and insert the more Western-sounding “Jesus.” There is no evidence for such a claim. We have nearly 6,000 manuscripts of the Greek New Testament, and approximately 19,000 New Testament manuscripts in other early languages, such as Syriac, Coptic, and Latin. In addition to these direct copies, we have tens of thousands of pages of early Christian writings, some of which are from Jewish-Christian groups. The name of Jesus occurs hundreds of thousands of times collectively in these ancient documents, and none of them speaks to a conspiratorial name change. If the “change” from Yeshua to Jesus was an early Catholic conspiracy, it is the best-executed cover-up in world history.

Third, it is occasionally alleged that the name Jesus is an attempt to insert paganism into Christianity. A few (very, very few) argue the name “Jesus” means “hail Zeus.” I suspect someone somewhere noticed the pronunciation of the name, especially in a language such as Spanish, sounds strikingly like “Hey-Zoos.” This must be a furtive nod to the chief god of the Greek pantheon, right? Not in the slightest. The New Testament was not written in English or Spanish, but in Greek. In Greek, “hail Zeus” would be chaire zeu, which bears absolutely no phonetic resemblance to “Jesus.”

HOW DID WE GET FROM YESHUA TO JESUS?
Although Jesus probably grew up in Galilee hearing His name as Yēshūa‘, it is not the case that the Christian world moved from Yeshua to Jesus. This is because Yeshua and Jesus are not different names, but different pronunciations of the same name. Different languages hear sounds differently. The Hebrews of the Old Testament era heard the name of the Persian king as “Ahasuerus” whereas the Greeks heard it as “Xerxes” (compare ESV with NIV in Ezra 4:6). If your name is Peter in the United States or Great Britain, you are Petros in Greece, Pietro in Italy, Pierre in France, and Pedro in Spain. Did each of these languages change your name!? No. These languages simply pronounce the same name in different ways. And so it is with Jesus. The Greek Iēsous represents the Aramaic Yēshūa‘.

But what about the meaning of the name? Those who argue in favor of the superiority of the name Yeshua insist that the Hebrew form means “salvation” whereas the Greek form is meaningless. This is true, and I believe every Christian should know the name of Jesus in Hebrew and Aramaic means “salvation.” However, Peter-Petros-Pietro-Pierre-Pedro means “rock” only in the Greek language. It is meaningless in the others; yet none of us seems bothered by this problem, and no one insists on a consistent, universal pronunciation as Petros. Second, Matthew already felt the need to explain the name of Jesus in his Gospel (Matthew 1:21). And it is routine in the New Testament to translate the meaning of certain foreign words (e.g., Matthew 27:46; Mark 5:41; John 1:38, 41). If the inspired writers were content to use the medium of the Greek language, while also providing explanations, is it wrong of us to follow their example?

Third, there is more than one “Jesus” in the New Testament. In the genealogy of Christ a certain “Jesus son of Eliezer” is named (Luke 3:29). Then there is the Jesus also known as Justus (Colossians 4:11). Finally, the Old Testament hero Joshua is known in Greek transliteration as Iēsous, his name being indistinguishable in Greek from Jesus the Christ (Acts 7:45; Hebrews 4:8, KJV).

CONCLUSION
Technically, if the New Testament were written in Hebrew or Aramaic, Yeshua would have been the form the authors used. But it wasn’t. It was written in Greek. So the authors represented the name as it was known in Greek. The name “Jesus,” in fact, was well-established in Greek transliteration as Iēsous thanks to the Septuagint, where it is found over 250 times. The New Testament authors did not change the name from Yeshua to Jesus, nor did the early Catholic Church.

Whenever modern theorists insist on the name Yeshua, they are contending for a position the New Testament authors themselves never took. The name of Jesus appears over 900 times in the Greek New Testament, every single time as Iēsous. If one travels to Israel, one will find the name of Jesus is still pronounced “Yeshua” today. But not in China, nor in Russia, nor in any European, North, or South American country will he or she find this pronunciation. The spelling and pronunciation of the name of Jesus is not a matter of conspiracy, but of culture.






Courtesy : apologetics press
http://apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=13&article=5602

Freeze is an unlearned and an uncultured fool that has been seeking for attention I have no issue with him but those idiots that take him serious

Jesus simply never existed. Jesus only a astrological explanations of the Sun moving round the signs of the zodiac which every civilisation created. Horus for Egypt, the Greek had theirs, so does the Chinese, Babylonians etc. Jesus is a tool of control the church has used for 2 thousand years

Make una still dey follo Freez. One day, he go prove to you say your mama no be woman

Sebi una still dey listen to am, he go soon prove am say na him be the next president and you go die if you no vote am.


Yeye dey smell.

Beware of Antichrist,freeze has sold his soul to the devil ,he is n agent of darkness

chisco82:

Honestly sir, you are begining to annoy me with your raps and rhethoricals about christianity. You said you are an atheist, why forcing yourself on issues that has to do with christian faith, why can't you mind your believe for God's sake or are you an agent of the devil sent to decive those of little faith? I don't see you comenting in this manner in any Islam post or thread.
Please stop coming into the christian thread to argue what you don't know. Christian faith is not logic.
Please can you and freez should tell us where how the "J" in Judah & Jerusalem comes about.

I suspect that in subsequent posts, you would have been 'put' right.


You see? This is what I have against you ill-educated mofos.

No dam.n.ed sense!

Is like death is calling this guy

chisco82:

Honestly sir, you are begining to annoy me with your raps and rhethoricals about christianity. You said you are an atheist, why forcing yourself on issues that has to do with christian faith, why can't you mind your believe for God's sake or are you an agent of the devil sent to decive those of little faith? I don't see you comenting in this manner in any Islam post or thread.
Please stop coming into the christian thread to argue what you don't know. Christian faith is not logic.
Please can you and freez should tell us where how the "J" in Judah & Jerusalem comes about.

That 'j' there like in 'Juan' and 'Jose' is principally like the the /j/ in English words like 'yam' and 'yellow'.

paxonel:
you are absolutely right here.
we all know that the original intention was not to set up the name for physical battles or some substantial achievements but only for spiritual justification which is eternal life, thats why he said my kingdom is not of this world

but christians measure success in this life than hereafter

Oluwaseun is your full name Seun.
When world power changes and the ruling power choose to address a Late you as 'Thanks ','Chopknuckle 'or' 3Gbosa' in reference to nairaland .Does that change the fact that you are Oluwaseun or Seun as known to this present generation?

Future name checkers will even refer to you as Mr Nagode ,the Hausa man whose name was manipulated over time to claim glory for your work.

Be bold enough to argue your believe independently ,without peeping from somebody's underwear and be using wireless speaker to express your candid(my foot) opinion!

mrjaydee:
But there is power in the name of Jesus! I disagree with daddy freeze totally.

Is not just the name but your fate and belief(s).

The wailer has finally gone mad

DeOTR:

While God's Name in the hebrew says YHWH (Yahweh), the english translations render it as Lord, while satan still remains satan in english.

'Lord' is not a name, it's a title. Satan was not always called Satan too

Waakanda:
Madness at its peak

Can someone tell this guy there's something called "Arbitrariness of Language". In other words, if a group of people agreed to start referring/calling a stone, "Brubru"... then it stands. With that, the word 'stone' can easily go into oblivion and everyone knows that hard thing as 'blublu'.

To explain this vividly, the word 'stone' means 'okuta' in Yoruba language, 'nkume' in Igbo, and 'dutse' in Hausa. The adoption of such different names is purely based on agreement among the individual ethnic groups.

The word/name "Jesus" can be likened to the above. That's why Yorubas pray with the word "Jesu Kristi" and those with faith in it get results... same with other tribes. Remember, the Bible says "Again I say unto you, that if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven (Matthew 18:19 KJV)".

Therefore, the word "Jesus" may be a product of agreement and I don't have any problem using it for the purpose it's meant for. Freeze lacks the locus standi to denigrate or belittle the name in question because of the forces that gave it the recognition it's enjoying today and forever.

God bless you

How can this piece reach the internet fool called Freeze. If this can reach his page for his misled followers to read, it would have been awesome.

Good explanation.

phabulux:


I suspect that in subsequent posts, you would have been 'put' right.


You see? This is what I have against you ill-educated mofos.

No dam.n.ed sense!

You did n't make any point at all upon all your proper education.

Freeze is right, sentiments apart. His name is Joshua or Yeshua. Nevertheless, those who "invented" Jesus had done no wrong. Jesus was qualified as the christ, meaning "The Annointed One". People who call the name Jesus identifies him as The Annointed". No rival.

Freeze had just brought in an apologetic discourse which is only academic and meant only for theology class and of less importance in the public domain.

Too much knowledge I think.

Originakalokalo:

I am not surprised.

Daddy Freeze uses controversy to sell himself..

It is all about money this days... Nothing else matters.

He is doing this to get money, he serves mammon.

But Jesus said you can't serve God and mammon.

Evidently, he doesn't serve God.


There are many daddy freeze in this world. They serve money.. They promote controversies for money.. and end up corrupting the society...

They serve mammon. They serve the devil... and corrupt God's creation in the process...

and ignorantly, they incur the wrath of God .

Are you a daddy freeze? You are an enemy of God.

You are exactly right.

phabulux:



That 'j' there like in 'Juan' and 'Jose' is principally like the the /j/ in English words like 'yam' and 'yellow'.

and so what aphabet is there, maybe we should remove the "j" and put "y" so you don't kill yourself over the God that you never believe that exist. Rubish.

Seun:
Daddy Freeze is absolutely right that the original name of Jesus is 'Yeshua' or 'Joshua'. The 'controversy' here is about whether or not the translated versions of this name in other languages, such as Ιησούς (Greek), Jesus (English), Jesu(Yoruba), Jizọs(Igbo), Yesu(Hausa), and Isa(Arabic) are as potent against demons, and for causing prayers to be instantly answered, as his original Jewish name, 'Yeshua' or 'Joshua'.

One could argue that there is no magic in any of the names: they've all been used against ISIS and Boko Haram and none of them worked.

You sound stupid.

HE NEEDS TO GIVE HIS LIFE TO JESUS CHRIST BEFORE ITS TOO LATE FOR HIM.

The name is Latin, that I'm sure of. I have colleagues who bear that name but the "J" sounds like "Y" when called. Both of the guys are originally from Brazil.

So Freeze is literally right.

Lukuluku69:


The correct pronunciation is Yehudi and not the latinized Judah.

so Jew would be Yew?

This one has gone crazy

Antagonizing the Bible is a cool way to destruction.my people perish for lack of knowledge.all this is for trending sake.why not mention the Quran and get killed during the night by the Alfas idiot man in human form.

Check my signature for any car of your choice.

the name of Jesus is being used all over the world and Working wonders and miracles and series of deliverance, and the name is in the Bible, so is this man trying to say that the Bible is not correct? So freeze expect me to believe him over the Bible? is he having mental issues or under a curse? probably enchanted

ollah2:



I wasn't wrong when I said you guys are too emotionally dumb to research. You have been lied to all your lives and it's difficult to admit the truth. You would rather resort to abuses, curses and threats rather than unlearn, relearn and learn.

if I ve been lied to all my life, is this the thing that will tell me that?

0monnak0da:

It is the Anglicized Form just like Igbo is the Yoruba formof Igbo and Jesu is the Yoruba form

What is your point?

Why not keep quiet when you have nothing of value to say

.





Please you don't need to insult to make your point.

The problem is that most of you don't read or go researching to figure things out.

"Anglicized" you said, Anglican didn't exist when The Messiah YAHusha was on earth. In fact even Christianity.

Even on the wrongly / deceitfully translated Bible version that you are using, is there any where you've read that The Messiah 'Yahusha' went to the synagogue on Sunday except on Sabbath day or was Anglican ?

From Genesis to Revelation have you seen the word Sunday ?

So who gave the beast that introduced Sunday keeping the power & authority to deceitfully and wrongly assign the name Jesus to The Messiah against the correct Hebrew name YAHusha ?

They equally gave you a whitewashed Jesus against the real / original black Messiah (Yahusha).

king Solomon, Abraham, The Messiah, original Israelites, etc, were all blacks ...

All the correct original Hebrew names glory The Almighty just like Igbo names.

Kelechi - Thank YAH
YAhusha - YAH is salvation

HalleluYAH means praise YAH (YAH The Almighty three letter name for The Almighty (not g.o.d.).

The very first KJV is King James 1911.
The name was spelt Iesus there. Have you read that version ?

On that version you'll notice for instance that The Messiah wasn't crucified on the cross but rather tree which is correct in Hebrew practice. Cross was deceitfully introduced by the beast too ... Find out why & its origin.

You'll equally observe that as early as King James 1911 the beast has already deceitfully / wrongly translated many things to push Sunday keeping against Sabbath keeping (seventh day) as instructed by Yah.

Note:
Many other stuffs were equally removed to hide truth from us (especially from black folks).

.

Waakanda:
Madness at its peak

Can someone tell this guy there's something called "Arbitrariness of Language". In other words, if a group of people agreed to start referring/calling a stone, "Brubru"... then it stands. With that, the word 'stone' can easily go into oblivion and everyone knows that hard thing as 'blublu'.

To explain this vividly, the word 'stone' means 'okuta' in Yoruba language, 'nkume' in Igbo, and 'dutse' in Hausa. The adoption of such different names is purely based on agreement among the individual ethnic groups.

The word/name "Jesus" can be likened to the above. That's why Yorubas pray with the word "Jesu Kristi" and those with faith in it get results... same with other tribes. Remember, the Bible says "Again I say unto you, that if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven (Matthew 18:19 KJV)".

Therefore, the word "Jesus" may be a product of agreement and I don't have any problem using it for the purpose it's meant for. Freeze lacks the locus standi to denigrate or belittle the name in question because of the forces that gave it the recognition it's enjoying today and forever.

The theory of conventional agreement. Spot on, I like when people know their onions.