Mynd44:
Every time the PDP mentions "server" I get confused.

1. There was no electronic voting

2. Collation was done manually and transmitted manually hence no server was involved

3. The results have not even been uploaded to INEC's website so it is on? Paper.

4. Calculation was done via pencil, biro and calculators.

So

1. How did the PDP come up with this allegation of INEC server?

2. How did they even get access to the "server" sef?

erico2k2:

ANything you can do with your Samsung Tab.

Ratello:
It is gradually becoming interesting.... Buhari and his goons are about to be dispatched to the jungle of Daura.

*******
To those who are still confused on how Atiku arrived at these figures, you must understand that there was a hand held device like a POS Machine that is connected directly to INEC server given to each INEC Collation Officers with the specific instructions that after the final results declared by the Collation Officer at each polling Unit, he or she is to key in those figures as it applies to each party contending and automatically it gets stored in the system and cannot be altered and at the collation centre from the polling Units, what had been stored already on that hand held device from every available polling units in that Ward are finally sent to INEC''s server which cannot be tampered with. I hope you got the whole picture now!

Mynd44:
Every time the PDP mentions "server" I get confused.

1. There was no electronic voting

2. Collation was done manually and transmitted manually hence no server was involved

3. The results have not even been uploaded to INEC's website so it is on? Paper.

4. Calculation was done via pencil, biro and calculators.

So

1. How did the PDP come up with this allegation of INEC server?

2. How did they even get access to the "server" sef?

Biglittlelois:




I expected you to be better than this,

Pdp has access to their server cos the court granted him access,

If the collation of results was done on paper, won't it be updated in their system for posterity's sake

It's just like in some schools, the teacher marks exams with pen on paper, won't it be updated on in the school's system for future reference

You are better than this Mynd44

MrCaesar:



card reader sends everything to INEC server after election. If you have been an ad-hoc staff recently, you will know.

panmunium:
so you now agree that Jonathan is a peaceful man while your dullard is a tyrant abi

Mynd44:
Every time the PDP mentions "server" I get confused.

1. There was no electronic voting

2. Collation was done manually and transmitted manually hence no server was involved

3. The results have not even been uploaded to INEC's website so it is on? Paper.

4. Calculation was done via pencil, biro and calculators.

So

1. How did the PDP come up with this allegation of INEC server?

2. How did they even get access to the "server" sef?

midolian:
This man is SICK!

Iamgrey5:
How will that be possible bruv

it is a card reader for God sake not a laptop

Please explain

post=76838860:
Lol .
Atiku oooo!!
A drowning man, clings to a straw!

Atiku lawyers are already cursing and swearing for everyone that is advising Atiku not to go to court, they say they have to eat their share of our looted national treasury he is spending all around!
Odiegwu!!

Opinedecandid:
Buhari OLE Tinubu OLE Hell Rufai OLE Ameachi OLE Mamood OLE Lair Mohammed OLE Gandollars OLE
Who I don skip there, abeg, add una own.

spartan117:

There is a 'communicate' app on the card reader, I used this to send the results straight to Inec server.

otokx:


Sorry to bust your theory, yours truly was a consultant and trained both as SPO and collation officer which was my final posting, POs were specifically told their boundaries. Many results brought by presiding officers to collation centers were rejected because the accredited voters on those result sheets were far more than what was in the SCR. Its either you check and correct your mistakes using your EVR to tally with the number of accredited voters on the SCR or have the entire results rejected with a report made.

The funny part is that the party agents have already snapped the wrong result and sent to their party officials leading to more suspicion when the final results are announced.

Iamgrey5:
You used it to send results to inec sever?

Yet. people were complaining about torn ballot paper.

By the way, you can't do that except the results sheet was an electronic one.

if you did, you just have entered a wrong figure

Topmaike007:
thank God you said he was,not he is still

spartan117:

I can't speak for other Presiding officers but theRe was no incident of torn ballot papers in my polling unit, I Electronically Uploaded the original result from the polling unit Via the card reader. If that result was changed at the collation center then all Inec has to do is crosscheck both results to see if they tally.

wideawaken01:
The presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Atiku Abubakar in the just-completed presidential election has given a breakdown of the number of votes he believed he scored in each of the 36 states of the federation and the Federal Capital Territory as opposed to that which was announced by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Mr Abubakar released the figures in his petition against the outcome of the election filed on Monday, which challenges the declaration of Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress as the winner of the election.

On February 27, INEC declared that Mr Buhari won the election in 19 states with a total of 15,191,847 votes to defeat Mr Abubakar, who won the election in 18 states polling a total of 11,262,978 votes.

However, in this petition, Mr Abubakar claimed that the “true, actual and correct” results upon state by state computation pitched him as the winner in 21 states, excluding the results from Rivers State, which he said was not available on INEC’s server as at February 25, when the computation was made. He, thus, claims that Mr Buhari only won the election in 15 states.

Mr Abubakar said the “state to state computation” showed that he polled a total of 18,356,732 votes to defeat Mr Buhari whom he said scored 16,741,430 votes.

“The 1st Respondent wrongly and unlawfully credited the 2nd Respondent with votes which were not valid or lawful votes at various stages of the election, namely, at the polling units, the ward collating centres, local government collating centres and the State collating centres, with the result that the 2nd Respondent was wrongly returned when the said 2nd Respondent did not score majority of lawful votes,” he wrote.

“The Petitioners shall also call evidence of statisticians forensic examiners and finger-print experts at the hearing of the Petition to establish that the scores credited the 2nd Respondent were not the product of actual votes validly cast at the polling units. The Petitioners plead and shall rely on electronic video recordings, newspaper reports, photographs and photographic images of several infractions of the electoral process by the Respondents.

“The Petitioners plead, state and contend that from the data in the 1st Respondent’s Server, as between the 1st Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent, the true, actual and correct results upon a State to State computation are as reflected under the scores of the 1st Petitioner and the 2nd Respondent,” he added.

The APC has since reacted to Mr Abubakar’s petition saying he and the PDP were suffering from hallucinations after the election defeat.

“Judging by Atiku and PDP’s recent utterances and actions, it is now clear that they have slipped into severe depression and post-defeat hallucination that have left many Nigerians questioning their current state of mind,” the ruling party said in a statement on Wednesday.

https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/321303-presidential-election-the-real-number-of-votes-i-scored-in-each-state-atiku.html

ClearFlair:
See madness
When I said PDP was full of clowns people thought I was joking.

Iamgrey5:
Which inec

Your collation was done at ward level, then to local government Level, then taken to state level and then transfered to to federal level


Who will then do the cross checking?

The ward, local government, state or federal?

naijaguy1234:
Alhaji, Nigerians have rejected you and PDP, just go away quietly and many thanks for pumping your stolen wealth on the court system. Mumu stoooopid man.
He has a job as a vice president to supervise sales of government assets only to buy them all for himself .

NITEL is an example.

spartan117:

That's manual collation you just explained.

Electronic collation is done from the polling unit straight to Inec headquarters Abuja.

2undeee:



Thank God people wey get sense still dey for Naija

imam07:
card reader was as useless as anything in the last election. Don't bring in the issue of card reader in this to judge or u will fail.

Harbioye:


Just think out loud; Do you think INEC will alter the results on paper and forget to alter the ones on their server?

pchukwudi:
In other words, you are telling us that MANY of the original results that INEC announced at the polling units were useless? And such original results were corrected (changed) at the collation centers as opposed to canceling or rerunning the poling unit election? Wow! This is eye opening. You guys should keep it up.

Ratello:


This is where they keep getting it wrong forgetting that this year (2019) card readers were configured to serve dual purposes which are capturing of accredited voters and transmission of results in each polling units straight to INEC's server unlike the ones used in 2015 which was configured for just a singular purpose which is "accreditation of voters" and storing them in INEC's server. Thanks my brother for enlightening them.