duwdu:


Unfortunately, even such data cannot prove who voted for who and in what numbers, sorry.

........
P34c3
.....
...

davodyguy:
They will never listen.
For those of you shouting server this, server that.
Ask yourself

1. Why did 37 professors that served as returning officers travelled to Abuja to read out results of all political parties as long as the list was?

2. We're the results read on national TV signed by all party agents at ward levels and polling centres where elections were held?

3. Did people vote manually using their fingers on a paper and the papers were manually dropped in a ballot box?

4. Apart from using the machine for accreditation, did any Nigerian vote using machine or they used a hard copy paper?

5. Let's assume there's a server that records the accreditation and PVC that were used before voting, did any of the PVC show the political parties that the holder of the PVC voted for?

6. There was a server and the server showed number of PVC that were screened. Did the server also show who was voted for by the owner of the PVC?

I think people should learn how to reason with common sense.


If I'm a judge, I'll dismiss Atiku and PDP's case for waste of time

jamace:


If the server is not known to the Electoral Act, why did INEC use the Smart Card Reader which MUST work with a server?

objobj:



Block head. So that is why the whole vote all over the wards were shared between PDP and APC according to atiku servers results. No void votes. No other part was voted for. Not even the candidates of other parties voted for themselves.

jamace:


It seems you don't understand the argument. The argument is that many voted without accreditation and that gave APC the upper hand to influence and allocate bogus scores to itself, particularly in the Boko Haram infested States, hence the need to confirm from server the number of accredited voters versus number that actually voted.

The server issue has become a thorn in APC's flesh therefore APC is using all available means to ensure the server is not made available to PDP.

davodyguy:
They will never listen.
For those of you shouting server this, server that.
Ask yourself

1. Why did 37 professors that served as returning officers travelled to Abuja to read out results of all political parties as long as the list was?

2. We're the results read on national TV signed by all party agents at ward levels and polling centres where elections were held?

3. Did people vote manually using their fingers on a paper and the papers were manually dropped in a ballot box?

4. Apart from using the machine for accreditation, did any Nigerian vote using machine or they used a hard copy paper?

5. Let's assume there's a server that records the accreditation and PVC that were used before voting, did any of the PVC show the political parties that the holder of the PVC voted for?

6. There was a server and the server showed number of PVC that were screened. Did the server also show who was voted for by the owner of the PVC?

I think people should learn how to reason with common sense.

If I'm a judge, I'll dismiss Atiku and PDP's case for waste of time

Racoon:

Even Jega So the 2015 election Jega conducted was also fraudulent.How can people be this stupid? So why was monies allocated for servers?

Guess Nigerians can now appreciate why the Buhari presidency flatly refused to enhance our electoral process by signing the 2019 amended electoral law in a democratic process that is constant evolving?

INEC is just desperate to defend the illegality and fraudulent conduct of the 2019 presidential election.Meanwhile, why is the EFCC yet to get Prof.Mamud Yakubu arrested for collecting govt monies under false pretense?

truthstands20:

You are simply myopic. If the card reader was used, it will show whether there was up to 900,000 persons accredited in Bornu state, same with Katsina, Kano and all those states that APC inflated the figures. Thank God you are not a judge and will never be because you are biased. Allow the courts to do their job.

Toks2008:
The beauty in all these is that we now know there is a possibility of transmitting results directly to INEC server which means there is hope for future credibility...its all about us clamouring for the use in subsequent elections as well as public display of results directly from server after declaration of results unit by unit...

We will surely get there.

konoplyanka:


card reader was also used in 2015 and nobody talked about servers. I wonder where you get your assertion from.

checkedout:



Elections in Nigeria has always been a big fraud, may be with the exemption of 1993 sha.

duwdu:


And how will you prove any inflated figures were exclusively allotted to one party and not to any of the other parties without dabbling into conjectures?

........
P34c3
.....
...

jamace:
Because GEJ did not challenge the 2015 Presidential result.

Now that PDP has challenged the outcome of the 2019 Presidential elections, PDP has the legal right to investigate equipments and materials used in the elections to prove its stand.

duwdu:


You're right — provided of course that such material existed and can be proven it exists.

......
P34c3
.....
...

duwdu:


Who said a Card Reader must work with a server? Na wa o.

The whole point was that a Card Reader, once programmed with voter details such as biodata, became an independent unit complete with its own power supply infrastructure. The Card Reader did not require to connect to an external device such as a remote server to carry out its main purposes, including verification of voter biodata.

........
P34c3
.....
...

Temple1288:


1993 was more fraudulent!

jamace:


You are just speaking English. A contestant is not satisfied with the outcome of the competition and wants to examine the equipment and materials used, which he is entitled to by law. If the winner has nothing to hide, why instigating the umpire to deny access to those equipment and material to the opponent?

duwdu:


I'm sorry if this sounds disrespectful, but I think this comment of yours simply profiles you as someone who was most probably not yet born or mature during that 1993 crisis.

........
P34c3
.....
...

duwdu:


Seems to me you're a master of conjectures? But I'll simply let you be. Good luck with your world view and expectations!

........
P34c3
.....
...

jamace:
They exist of course, both in hard and soft copies.

jamace:


If the server is not known to the Electoral Act, why did INEC use the Smart Card Reader which MUST work with a server?

Amah70:
What Electoral Law is cited?


POLITICAL PARTIES ENTERED THE 2019 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WITH AN AGREEMENT ON RECORDED STATEMENTS FROM INEC THAT THE RESULTS SHALL BE TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH SERVERS, AND WINNER EMERGING FROM THE PROCESS, FOR A TRANSPARENT ELECTION.


THUS, IF INEC DID NOT USE THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION METHOD AGREED BY POLITICAL PARTIES AND INEC BEFORE THE ELECTION PROPER, THE RESULTS OF THE ENTIRE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DID NOT EMERGE FROM THE METHOD THE PARTIES AGREED UPON WITH INEC BEFORE ENTERING INTO THE ELECTION.


THUS, IN THE PROCESS OF CONDUCTING THE ELECTION, INEC BREACHED THE TRUST AND AGREEMENT IT ENTERED WITH THE POLITICAL PARTIES BEFORE THE ELECTION.

THEREFORE, THE RESULTS OF THE 2019 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION REMAIN NULL, VOID AND OF NO EFFECT.

OAUTemitayo:

The electoral act allows the verification of voters with card readers but ONLY allows collation of results THROUGH a physical form that must be signed by; electoral officer, the party agents and the security detail at the polling booth.

And when you want to prove electoral irregularities, you prove it by adding up the numbers on the result sheets given to your party agents and reconciling it with INEC's announced figures.

Only the manual result sheet is admissible as evidence before the tribunal, that's exactly what the electoral act said. All these server server are just unnecessary distractions from the Cameroonian.

Maybe you should ask Atiku why he finds it so difficult to use the copies of result sheets given to PDP agents at polling booths.

Atiku is a fraud, just forget about all his noise.
They know some Nigerians are gullible and will swallow it like sharwama.

Secondly, between the manual result sheets which was filled with the result of each candidate/party in the full glare of all present party agents, election observers, security agents and MOST IMPORTANTLY, the voters who waited till end of voting, and a 'supposed' server that not all corp members sent results to through the card readers in public, which one do you as a learned person, as somebody who believes in transparency want a constituted tribunal backed by law to accept as admissible evidence?

davodyguy:
They will never listen.
For those of you shouting server this, server that.
Ask yourself

1. Why did 37 professors that served as returning officers travelled to Abuja to read out results of all political parties as long as the list was?

2. We're the results read on national TV signed by all party agents at ward levels and polling centres where elections were held?

3. Did people vote manually using their fingers on a paper and the papers were manually dropped in a ballot box?

4. Apart from using the machine for accreditation, did any Nigerian vote using machine or they used a hard copy paper?

5. Let's assume there's a server that records the accreditation and PVC that were used before voting, did any of the PVC show the political parties that the holder of the PVC voted for?

6. There was a server and the server showed number of PVC that were screened. Did the server also show who was voted for by the owner of the PVC?

I think people should learn how to reason with common sense.

If I'm a judge, I'll dismiss Atiku and PDP's case for waste of time

davodyguy:
They will never listen.
For those of you shouting server this, server that.
Ask yourself

1. Why did 37 professors that served as returning officers travelled to Abuja to read out results of all political parties as long as the list was?

2. We're the results read on national TV signed by all party agents at ward levels and polling centres where elections were held?

3. Did people vote manually using their fingers on a paper and the papers were manually dropped in a ballot box?

4. Apart from using the machine for accreditation, did any Nigerian vote using machine or they used a hard copy paper?

5. Let's assume there's a server that records the accreditation and PVC that were used before voting, did any of the PVC show the political parties that the holder of the PVC voted for?

6. There was a server and the server showed number of PVC that were screened. Did the server also show who was voted for by the owner of the PVC?

I think people should learn how to reason with common sense.

If I'm a judge, I'll dismiss Atiku and PDP's case for waste of time