tuniski:

You still dont get. it is not about voting. [b]Voting was done manually and the result collated manually, right? After that the manually collated results were then transmitted to the central server using the card reader which is enabled to do that.[/b]

The transmitted result was the remote control used to manipulated Osun election. Cos they already knew centrally that Adeleke won marginally, they then went to work disrupting and canceling some units to create an inconclusive outcome.

Enice:
can someone explain why any POS will display ur data just by inserting ur ATM card but a SCR will not display sh!t if you go outside the area you registered? because the POS is connected to a server while the SCR is not. it is just a memory card with voters data. it is a stand alone that you take to a computer to download info from. j

tuniski:

Wrong you can win presidency without winning majority in NASS. Just like in Sokoto,Bauchi Where pdp won guber but, apc had majority in state assemblies.

frankson1:



In my unit voting wasn't done manually. Infact, I had two SCRs should one fail. The POs did everything and made sure the calculations was correct before sending.I worked with INEC tech guys where I'm confused.
There is no provision on the SCRs to state the results of each of the political parties.

Enice:
can someone explain why any POS will display ur data just by inserting ur ATM card but a SCR will not display sh!t if you go outside the area you registered? because the POS is connected to a server while the SCR is not. it is just a memory card with voters data. it is a stand alone that you take to a computer to download info from. j

BabaO2:
reason why the results of those states were so contentious and very close. It is not the same with presidential, and all indicators are distinctly clear

tuniski:

Why is it difficult for you to understand? Let me explain to you again; accreditation was done by the card reader and it is mandatory. If the card reader fails to authenticate your PVC you can't validly vote.
However, after the card reader has accredited you, you are then given a ballot paper to vote manually. At the end of the voting, the ballot papers are sorted and results collated manually.

It is after this phase that the results as collated manually are then transmitted to the central server using same card reader by the E-transmission (the inec official empowered to do so)

tuniski:


Same reason why the presidential election results are now being so contentious. Do you get it?

frankson1:



I made corrections to the post you quoted.

If results were transmitted to a server, how was it distributed to the different political parties?

I DID NOT TRANSMIT ELECTION RESULTS TO ANY SERVER AND IT WASN'T ELECTION RESULTS THAT WERE TRANSMITTED.

Mightyodi:


My friend do not come and decieve people who don't have sufficient knowledge in this knowledge area. Your answer shows you are smart by half. You are saying it is a memory card that was inserted in smart card reader.
My question to you? Do they reconfigure memory card. Because when card readers was destroyed in Anambra State prior to elections, new ones were brought in and reconfigured. It is only a device that synchronizes data from a remote stored location that is reconfigured

deji68:
There is an interface on the SCR where u can allocate results to the political parties....u can watch the INEC demo video

GREATESTPIANIST:
all I know, is that I will make it in life....I will Excel, and whoesover says I will not make it will be crushed to death......Amen

frankson1:


Ok. I'll do just that right now.

The card reader wasn't used to transmit results.

I'm not saying what I don't know. If I wasn't involved in the process I would have kept quiet.

BabaO2:
How is it contentious, only a natural thief can have boldness of claiming victory over Buhari in that election. It's nauseating, somebody that can't win his poling unit wants to be president. Dubai tactics cant work in Nigeria

ishiamu:
Server Controversy: Several INEC staff say results transmitted to ‘central server


Several officials who said they were deployed as electoral officers by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for the 2019 presidential election said they transmitted results electronically to a ‘central server’ through smart card readers.

This they said was done in compliance with the directive given by the commission during a three-day training before the polls.

The 20 officials deployed to various states, who mostly worked as presiding officers, said they were told that there was a “central server in Abuja” where results are collated electronically.

It is not immediately clear on which “central Server” the officials admitted to transmitting results but this has added a new twist to the ongoing confusion trailing INEC’s consistent denial that it used no server for the election.

A manual issued to the electoral officials by INEC for the 2019 election revealed that the “Communicate” icon on the Smart Card Reader should be used to transmit the accreditation data to the central server.

Another handbook for election officials in 2018 was however more précise on how presiding officers should use the card readers for electronic collation and transmission of results.

It said it became necessary to apply technology to transmit data and results from the polling units due to irregularities that take place after the voting process.

“After successfully filling the EC8A result sheet and announcing the result, the presiding officer shall tap the e-collation application on the home screen”, a part of the book read.

Backstory
The runner up in February’s presidential election, Atiku Abubakar, and his Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) are challenging the victory of President Muhammadu Buhari at the election tribunal.

Read more : https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/336496-server-controversy-several-inec-staff-say-results-transmitted-to-central-server.html

frankson1:



I made corrections to the post you quoted.

If results were transmitted to a server, how was it distributed to the different political parties?

I DID NOT TRANSMIT ELECTION RESULTS TO ANY SERVER AND IT WASN'T ELECTION RESULTS THAT WERE TRANSMITTED.

004gist:


Atiku actually won the election we all know this for sure but the compromised inec are saying another thing altogether

Koolking:
Money answereth some things but not all things.

It won't change the result of the last presidential elections.

By the way, some INEC staff is not INEC. INEC had already issued a statement, that is tenable and case closed

Deepthoughts:
The simple truth of this server issue is that INEC has servers but because the law does not permit electronic transfer of elections results,INEC deployed the servers secretly in a collaborative scheme with APC/Buhari to monitor the elections results especially presidential upfront so that if the results didn't favour Buhari/Apc as it did happen,they can quickly employ dirty tricks to manipulate the results to their taste before making their final announcement, unfortunately Atiku/PDP were ahead of them n now INEC is confused n speaking with different sides of their tongue, unfortunately the more INEC try to play smart the more their folly keep staring them in the face, except the presidential elections tribunal are compromised or without conscience the least they should do is to cancel the elections as was done in Kenya recently.

Koolking:
Money answereth some things but not all things.

It won't change the result of the last presidential elections.

By the way, some INEC staff is not INEC. INEC had already issued a statement, that is tenable and case closed

vacanci:
When you use a POS machine, the operator shows you what is about to be transmitted before you supply your PIN for transmission.

Now with the election, did the presiding officers show anyone what they were transmitting? I know the machine is called a card reader which is allowed by the law. Results were counted and collated manually and you guys want me to believe that after the collation, one PO will now enter a certain figure and transmit without any of the agents vetting it.

frankson1:



Sir, I don't know if the POs are authentic. The SCR wasn't used to vote. What the SCR state is the number of accredited and failed votes. I don't know what results they said the SCR transmitted.

frankson1:


Yeah, you're very correct when you say voting was done manually and the result also collated manually. But you're not correct when you say the results were transmitted electronically using the SCR. I was with the POs and I did everything and made sure my calculation was correct before sending. I worked with INEC tech guys where I'm confused.
There is no provision on the SCRs to state the results of each of the political parties.

I REPEAT, RESULTS WERE NOT TRANSMITTED TO ANY SERVER.

IT WASN'T THE RESULT THAT WAS TRANSMITTED.

OfficialAPCNig:

You are also going too far with the card reader, boss.

The data of the 80 million registered Nigerians are stored where?

#AtikuisComing

vacanci:
When you use a POS machine, the operator shows you what is about to be transmitted before you supply your PIN for transmission.

Now with the election, did the presiding officers show anyone what they were transmitting? I know the machine is called a card reader which is allowed by the law. Results were counted and collated manually and you guys want me to believe that after the collation, one PO will now enter a certain figure and transmit without any of the agents vetting it.

traihit:

I was a PO during the election and I'm telling you INEC used a server. Let's even talk about the voters' registration part, you may not need to use the SCR for that but at the end of the election, the data on our SCRs was transferred somewhere (at a point I had to use my phone's hotpot to get it done).
I was almost mobbed when I refused to make people vote because my SCR was not connecting. So your point is invalid.

udemzyudex:


Google INEC RATECH or search for the words here on nairaland and find out what their job was at the just concluded election.