deomelo:



This case is not and won't be about riddles and drama, it's going to be very basic, it's going to be a simple case of "Put up or shut up" for Atiku.

1. Atiku cannot base his case on mare allegation or by trying to bully INEC to produce the server that INEC can not produce or admit that they have and used in any fashion. The processor can not ask or force the accused to produce evidence to convict the same accused with, that burden is always on the prosecutor or the person making the accusation. The burden is on Atiku to back up his allegation with facts, not other people's den say den say.

2. Atiku and the PDP are the only parties with real or imaginary knowledge per the existence of any server so, at the end of the day, they have to reveal their source from how they reached the server to how they retrieved the content and of course, the digital address and physical location.

At the end of the day, this is what's going to happen, put up or shut up.

Swargu:

One guy said its stores inside memory card in the card reader...

Benekruku:


Why are you sounding like a novice in IT.

Data stored in server. Was voting dine manually or electronically?

How does manual thumb printing on paper gets to server?

Was voting dine with card reader or used to verify voters card.


Abeg, their is no case here.

Voting was done manually on paper. Electoral officers read out result manually.

Counting was done at polling units manually.


So where does server come in here.

OfficialAPCNig:

Oga no be fight. Na that server we want to inspect. Why are you guys jittery?

Taeewo:
You are PO and you transfered result through card reader? Lie kill you there, u can only transfer the accredited voters since the normal vote was done manually.. Since the accredited vote was transferred, how did ur Atiku arrived at server result without deducting the void/invalid vote..

Benekruku:



You said it all. Am still looking for one to proof to me where a server came to play. Voting was done manually. Thumbprinting on ballot papers was used. So am waiting to hear where a server was storing votes across the country simultaneously during the election.

All I hear is server. What server are we talking about here? Except the one containing the data of the electorates which definitely could not capture votes.

Or is someone telling me the ballot papers are electronic.

gurunlocker:
Can zombies answer this simple question?


How was the card reader designated for each PU able to recognize voters card when swiped? Accept if it's right and reject if it's wrong without the help of a configured server?

deomelo:




Atiku is dumber than dumb.

If INEC actually en engaged in electronic transmission of results , it means they violated the electoral laws and the whole results and election must be thrown out in favor of a new election.

This is the best case scenario and best option option for Atikul.

baganas:

Inec didn't deny that a server exist. It even says that some pilot electronic transmission was run on some selected states. This is just for testing purposes. It's not complete and comprehensive data that can be use to determine a winner. But most importantly to use data from inec server is illegal because the existing electoral act does not provide for the use of electronically transmitted votes or server records. So pls wise up. This will not work

Benekruku:



You said it all. Am still looking for one to proof to me where a server came to play. Voting was done manually. Thumbprinting on ballot papers was used. So am waiting to hear where a server was storing votes across the country simultaneously during the election.

All I hear is server. What server are we talking about here? Except the one containing the data of the electorates which definitely could not capture votes.

Or is someone telling me the ballot papers are electronic.

deomelo:




Atiku is dumber than dumb.

If INEC actually engaged in electronic transmission of results , it means they violated the electoral laws and the whole results and election must be thrown out in favor of new elections.

This is the best case scenario and best option option for Atiku because since his main issue is transmission of election results via a server which is illegal, the server shouldn't be the real issue, it should have been illegal transmission of election results.

.....but Atiku and his lawyers are either dumb and incompetent or they are just playing games and wasting our time.

tuniski:

You simply don't get it or u are deliberately being mischievous .

Benekruku:



Whats mischievous here? That am trying to say the last election was conducted manually and their was "NO WAY" the result could have been transmitted to a server?

tuniski:

The result was transmitted electronically but since it wasn't required to be compulsorily done , INEC wanted it to be only for their own consumption.
Now it has backfired.

deomelo:




Atiku is dumber than dumb.

If INEC actually engaged in electronic transmission of results , it means they violated the electoral laws and the whole results and election must be thrown out in favor of new elections.

This is the best case scenario and best option option for Atiku because since his main issue is transmission of election results via a server which is illegal, the server shouldn't be the real issue, it should have been illegal transmission of election results.

.....but Atiku and his lawyers are either dumb and incompetent or they are just playing games and wasting our time.

jumobi1:


Could the last minute rescheduling of the elections be part two of the reason. People weren’t going to travel back to their villages twice. They’re even owed a reimbursement front the govt/INEC.

Paccus:

Nice one.. The law did not permit electronic transmission of results, but there was electronic collation of results in the last elections.. Inec is the cause of this confusion and they are trying to back out

The Electoral Bill which mandates the immediate transmission of voting results from polling units to collation centres is not yet operational, and as such, the transmitted result is invalid and any reliance place on it is null and void,’’ the lawyers maintained.

Dr. Ajulo, who is the founder of Egalitarian Mission in Africa, said that the PDP candidate (Alhaji Atiku Abubakar) has embarked on a fruitless venture with the results he claimed he got from INEC server.

Ajulo asserted that the result is not admissible in law, adding that ‘’if President Muhammadu Buhari had signed the amended Electoral Act, which included electronic transmission of results, Atiku would have had a valid case against INEC, but as it is, he cannot even tender the results at the tribunal.”

He said that electronic transmission of result is not recognised by the Electoral Act and, therefore, the result Atiku claims he got from INEC server is “just a piece of paper.”

‘’He can’t use it at the tribunal because the law does not even recognize the transmission of result electronically. I want to believe that Atiku was not properly advised before approaching the tribunal to challenge the results of the election,” he said.

https://leadership.ng/2019/04/27/electronic-transmission-of-election-result-illegal-lawyers/

tymicjay77:


Nigerians are too blind to see what is coming on them.... Political game is about to happen soon... A strategy for Northerners to succeed a Northerners is the game...
What happen in osun state some years ago will repeat itself.
Buhari will almost finished his tenure then he will hand over to Atiku,with the disguise of elections petition victory for Atiku...
Mark my words....I only pity politician like Jagaban who think myopically

Aurielfinizu:


Amen o...

But Atiku must reclaim his mandate