ityP:
For the first time, I think tecno almost got it right. If they had put in a Helio P60 on this phone sef, it would really get loud applauses. One can forgive the build material and micro USB, but Helio p35 on a 77k phone is pure stupidity tbvh. I'm very impressed in the camera though. They did what no other company can do in placing dual flash on the front. Makes a whole lot of sense. And the back cameras take awesome pictures. If it came with a Snapdragon chip, installing gcam would have taken it to flagship camera standard tbvh. The only critical box this phone didn't tick for me is Processor and GPU

Lol many phones have front camera flash light
Shit feature tbh

chigoziri2403:
be updated, the ban takes effect by September, so am still enjoying Google

updated! Enjoy while it lasts.

Naso
Clear matters

naturefellow:
updated! Enjoy while it lasts.

something far better than Google is on the offing, calm down and take krest

I have one word for this excuse of a crap.
A phone that couldn't be called a midrange in 2016, nor innovative in 2014.
"Cubot max 2."

hustla:


Lol many phones have front camera flash light
Shit feature tbh

Very few, if any dew drop or u-drop notches come with front flash. Dual for that matter on the Phantom 9 is commendable. A Snapdragon 636 chip on this would have made mega sense

they have always get it right from day one, but this new device is maddd

ityP:
For the first time, I think tecno almost got it right. If they had put in a Helio P60 on this phone sef, it would really get loud applauses. One can forgive the build material and micro USB, but Helio p35 on a 77k phone is pure stupidity tbvh. I'm very impressed in the camera though. They did what no other company can do in placing dual flash on the front. Makes a whole lot of sense. And the back cameras take awesome pictures. If it came with a Snapdragon chip, installing gcam would have taken it to flagship camera standard tbvh. The only critical box this phone didn't tick for me is Processor and GPU

WAWU the camera is fucking lit

henry007:
More pics

chigoziri2403:
something far better than Google is on the offing, calm down and take krest

sorry, krest is no longer in the menu. Not even Schweppes or Teem

Freelancerx:
they have always get it right from day one, but this new device is maddd

Got it right with crappy processor

naturefellow:
sorry, krest is no longer in the menu. Not even Schweppes or Teem

bitter lemon can be used

Flagship ni flagship ko..... With helio P35


This one na flagcanoe..

Well the phone looks sexy and we'll to do

The phone is attractive

tbadejo25:


A good attempt but I want the pro version with type C cable

The Galaxy A20 at 51K managed a USB type C and we have to wait for the Pro version at over 100k before any hope of a USB type C.

ityP:




Very few, if any dew drop or u-drop notches come with front flash. Dual for that matter on the Phantom 9 is commendable. A Snapdragon 636 chip on this would have made mega sense

Front Camera flash are overrated,

Which BETTER phone with great low light shots has front flash?

Pixel 3 XL,Galaxy S10+, iPhone XS Max,OnePlus 7 Pro,Huawei P30 Pro?

NON!

Just another overhyped feature to flaunt..

There are quite a lot of things that make sense. The storage capacity, the AI triple camera, the body design and a host of others.

Mckandre:
The only thing that makes sense here is location of the selfie flash. Kudos

Jimgym:
There are quite a lot of things that make sense. The storage capacity, the AI triple camera, the body design and a host of others.

nd ure telling me this because like m some kinda tecno fan that is just hearing such mediocre features for the first time , tecno nd other transsion devices re far below my standards, Sorry to burst ur bubble ni but thnx anyways.

The price is cool. Na to find money buy the phone when dem release am.

8hours is a lot of time, considering that browsing and playing with your phone is not all you do in a day, unless you don't have a job

chigoziri2403:
I have not used Nokia, but the battery is OK, fast charge, can last up to eight hours with constant browsing

Jimgym:
8hours is a lot of time, considering that browsing and playing with your phone is not all you do in a day, unless you don't have a job

what if your job entails being on the phone always

drjprince:
very useless device,polycarbonate material helio p35 I am disgusted

The Huawei Y9 Prime 2019 also comes with polycarbonate material back. So no big deal about that.

horlahwaley:
Tecno sha, what would cost them from using atleast helio p60 on this device and type c.?

All they did was to make the device affordable.

Abiodunspectre:


The Huawei Y9 Prime 2019 also comes with polycarbonate material back. So no big deal about that.

we are talking about chipset here my man tecno will continue dropping sales if they dont up there game

Batteries must run down at some point, that's why they are rechargeable batteries, so that you can charge them when they run down. The issue however when the battery doesnt last a considerable time.

chigoziri2403:
what if your job entails being on the phone always

This phone should not be more than 35k

shogsman:
This phone should not be more than 35k

what's your basis for this conclusion asides your your obvious negative bias towards the Tecno brand

Norman4real:
what's your basis for this conclusion asides your your obvious negative bias towards the Tecno brand

Nokia x5 uses helio p60 and it's around 40k,this one uses helio p35 kindly do the maths oga tecno marketer.

shogsman:


Nokia x5 uses helio p60 and it's around 40k,this one uses helio p35 kindly do the maths oga tecno marketer.

first of all I doubt if that's the official price for that X5 but that aside there's a lot that goes to pricing than just the processor, compare everything else and you'll see that the phantom is way ahead in every aspect. Though I think the phantom could have been a bit cheaper by at least 15k,the 35k you say is unreasonable in every possible way. I'd pick the phantom any day over the Nokia despite the weaker processor.

Norman4real:
first of all I doubt if that's the official price for that X5 but that aside there's a lot that goes to pricing than just the processor, compare everything else and you'll see that the phantom is way ahead in every aspect. Though I think the phantom could have been a bit cheaper by at least 15k,the 35k you say is unreasonable in every possible way. I'd pick the phantom any day over the Nokia despite the weaker processor.

smh.. The phone beats whatever you are marketing in almost every aspect.. the phantom 9 shouldn't exceed 60-63k

Norman4real:
first of all I doubt if that's the official price for that X5 but that aside there's a lot that goes to pricing than just the processor, compare everything else and you'll see that the phantom is way ahead in every aspect. Though I think the phantom could have been a bit cheaper by at least 15k,the 35k you say is unreasonable in every possible way. I'd pick the phantom any day over the Nokia despite the weaker processor.

Not a good decision sir. Is not as if the cameras are that great? Abi is the sluggish on screen fingerprint?