Gbam your head dey there... i was surprised when INEC Lawyer said it, so they are indirectly admitting there is a server

tuniski:

Many testify to transmitting the result not just one witness and the particular witness said the code was in his phone if needed.

The issue of server and transmission of results have been materially proved.

Inec/apc said they will argue on the side of law during their defense. That simply tells you they know server existence is done and sealed.

The good thing is, inec doesn't need any law expressly to transmit result to its server. It is an administrative procedure.

We are having an interesting case at hand.

Mylove55:
the server budgeted for was actually bought, the server was use for accreditation and other usage, but not for collation of election result.

The petitioner has shown that it was equally used for transmission of results. To break the ice, the tribunal should simply ask for the inspection of the server. QED

tuniski:


Let the server be inspected. 27bn naira is not moi moi that a careless statement can be used to rationalize.

server was budgeted and paid for, the server bought was for accreditation and other usage, not for collation of election result

Mylove55:
server was budgeted and paid for, the server bought was for accreditation and other usage, not for collation of election result

It was for all. Central server does all that, that is why it is central.

In any case, an inspection of the server will settle the controversy.

tuniski:

The petitioner has shown that it was equally used for transmission of results. To break the ice, the tribunal should simply ask for the inspection of the server. QED

and the petitioner witnesses fails to prove inec wrong. They equally fails to provide the code for the transmission of result to inec server.

tuniski:

It was for all. Central server does all that, that is why it is central.

In any case, an inspection of the server will settle the controversy.

it was for all, but not necessary or compulsory for you to perform all.

Akpuoru:
Really?. Final address on what premise?. Lawyer!!

After everybody has arggued his case (open and close) the last thing is the final address before the panel deliver judgement perusing all the facts.

All the tones of material evidence, witnesses called, technicalities will be professionally linked in a final written address by the litigants.

Mylove55:
it was for all, but not necessary or compulsory for you to perform all.

At least, you have agreed it is for all. Now we are getting somewhere.

Does server exist? Yes it does.

Was election result transmitted to the server? That is the contention and the petitioners have proved it was.


Has inec now conceded to have transmitted result to the server? No, it hasn't.

Let us now wait for their defense and subsequent decision of the court on its inspection.

Wonder why you think am a pdp person! This is about the incompetence in our electoral body not party! Follow my comment to understand. Ask about servers! A dedicated server can do all and even more! It’s all about the program!

Mylove55:
you are the one with low mentality,
After verifying the voters Card, how will the server known who voted for APC and PDP. ? Funny PDP supporters.

At the moment, the bottomline is the server result possessed by Atiku and which formed the material for this petition is a falsified/forged document.

If proven that Atiku presented falsified information he will be banned from ever running for elective office under the Electoral Act.

He could also be prosecuted if care is not taken....

Afamed:

Whose witness provided the site above? I thought you were intelligent enough before

Young man stop living in fool paradise

MetaPhysical:
At the moment, the bottomline is the server result possessed by Atiku and which formed the material for this petition is a falsified/forged document.

If proven that Atiku presented falsified information he will be banned from ever running for elective office under the Electoral Act.

He could also be prosecuted if care is not taken....

How is it falsified.

Has INEC make their defense

Are you the tribunal judge.

Metaphysical indeed

Amuocha:
Rubbish post.
PM News is one media house that will be shut when Atiku becomes President

Keep dreaming

baganas:

Inec chairman has already clarified that pilot(test)electronic collation was used in some selected states and polling units. But the results so collated is not complete as well as illegal for use as evidence in a court of law. Remember electronic transmission and collation is not approve by the existing electoral act. This is just a pilot excersise for future use

Same way as SCR was not in out electoral law.

However in some region NO SCR no vote

But in some region anything goes

rinzaugustine:
Dont mind the kids typing rubbish.The case is a simple one.Atiku said there is a server INEC said there is none.Atiku applies to inspect servers and govt organization INEC refused.Issues were joined and so based on law if issues are joined application will not be granted.Under the irrebutable presumption section of the evidence act,if you withhold or refuse to release evidence the law deems it that the evidence is not favorable to you particularly in a civil case where the court looks at preponderance of evidence.Olanipekun wanted to cross examine the server expert on information within a server that is outside his custody which he smartly declined.This is what will be covered in the final address after the defense open and close their case.Dont mind all these fake and APC sponsored journalism meant for ignorant and lazy youths and people who had never to the courtroom

What can I give you this evening..

This e-apc online robots are just not normal at all

Afamed:

Whose witness provided the site above? I thought you were intelligent enough before

And the witness said this is INEC server

Olodo ni he


You lack proper and diligent understanding

tuniski:

At least, you have agreed it is for all. Now we are getting somewhere.

Does server exist? Yes it does.

Was election result transmitted to the server? That is the contention and the petitioners have proved it was.


Has inec now conceded to have transmitted result to the server? No, it hasn't.

Let us now wait for their defense and subsequent decision of the court on its inspection.

server exist but not for collation and transmission of result,
I agreed that the server can perform all function, but not compulsory to perform the transmission of result, so don't confuse yourself. You were the one that raised the issue of 27b budgeted for server, and I said the server was bought but not used for transmission and collation of result.

Mylove55:
server exist but not for collation and transmission of result,
I agreed that the server can perform all function, but not compulsory to perform the transmission of result, so don't confuse yourself. You were the one that raised the issue of 27b budgeted for server, and I said the server was bought but not used for transmission and collation of result.

Read what I said again. This time with open mind.

engineerboat:


And the witness said this is INEC server

Olodo ni he


You lack proper and diligent understanding

you are the one that lack understanding, The witness admitted that the site they are parading were not inec site, and they fraudulently created their own site on March 12 after the said election on Feb 23. And the whistle blower deceived thief atiku that their site located inec server. What a criminal minded ipob just to defraud thief atiku

engineerboat:


And the witness said this is INEC server

Olodo ni he


You lack proper and diligent understanding

On diligent understanding you are spot on. The apc goons have launch media propaganda as if the website was the inec server deceiving gullible fans of theirs.

The content in the website has been expertly traced to inec via an inec-ict whistle blower.

Mylove55:
you are the one that lack understanding, The witness admitted that the site they are parading were not inec site, and they fraudulently created their own site on March 12 after the said election on Feb 23. And the whistle blower deceived thief atiku that their site located inec server. What a criminal minded ipob just to defraud thief atiku

You simply don't get it.
INEC-ICT whistle blower created the website and uploaded the result. Now ICT expert has been called upon as required to verify the authencity of the content of the website. That he did and traced the content to inec server as authentic.

Everything needed to be done diligently has been done. Don't be emotional about it. INEC/APC have been boxed!

engineerboat:


Same way as SCR was not in out electoral law.

However in some region NO SCR no vote

But in some region anything goes

but thief atiku fraudulent server imputed result for APC and PDP in all region, both where SCR were not used.
This is just a prove that inec never transmitted result with card reader to their server, and thief atiku were scam with those his fraudulent server result.
tuniski can also understand the truth.

Mylove55:
but thief atiku fraudulent server imputed result for APC and PDP in all region, both where SCR were not used.
This is just a prove that inec never transmitted result with card reader to their server, and thief atiku were scam with those his fraudulent server result.
tuniski can also understand the truth.

Let INEC come and make their defense.


Not on nairaland

Mylove55:
you are the one that lack understanding, The witness admitted that the site they are parading were not inec site, and they fraudulently created their own site on March 12 after the said election on Feb 23. And the whistle blower deceived thief atiku that their site located inec server. What a criminal minded ipob just to defraud thief atiku

You're the one living in full paradise on this issue.


This had shown you know next to nothing on rhis case

Mylove55:
but thief atiku fraudulent server imputed result for APC and PDP in all region, both where SCR were not used.
This is just a prove that inec never transmitted result with card reader to their server, and thief atiku were scam with those his fraudulent server result.
tuniski can also understand the truth.

There was no result from Rivers state as uploaded.

Please try get up to speed on the uploaded detailed results and the corroborative data of accreditation on the SCR. Clearly INEC's manipulation has been busted.

abio on 29 th is the day....expect some revelations before then

engineerboat:


Let INEC come and make their defense.


Not on nairaland

Mylove55:
you are the one that lack understanding, The witness admitted that the site they are parading were not inec site, and they fraudulently created their own site on March 12 after the said election on Feb 23. And the whistle blower deceived thief atiku that their site located inec server. What a criminal minded ipob just to defraud thief atiku

The time it was created is immaterial let INEC come and explain itself

You can as well serve as INEC witness

engineerboat:


How is it falsified.

Has INEC make their defense

Are you the tribunal judge.

Metaphysical indeed

Is the result presented by Atiku authentic?

tuniski:

You simply don't get it.
INEC-ICT whistle blower created the website and uploaded the result. Now ICT expert has been called upon as required to verify the authencity of the content of the website. That he did and traced the content to inec server as authentic.

Everything needed to be done diligently has been done. Don't be emotional about it. INEC/APC have been boxed!

how can inec/APC be boxed, when the said expert from Kenya could not prove the authenticity, because according to the fraudulent expert, that you and I can come up with any result and claim to be from inec non existing server.
And how come thief atiku fraudulent server were able to obtain all result, even in more than 50% were card reader could not function.
Hmm, you guys are really funny.

tuniski:

On diligent understanding you are spot on. The apc goons have launch media propaganda as if the website was the inec server deceiving gullible fans of theirs.

The content in the website has been expertly traced to inec via an inec-ict whistle blower.

They are disappointed

INEC had been boxed to a corner

APC warriors are expecting something like

1. This is the INEC official
2. This is the server location
3. This is how we got into the server
4. This is when and when the server was this and that.

APC dondees, that is not how it happen in this case, youre disappointed.

Let INEC come and defend, then we will meet during cross-examination

tuniski:

There was no result from Rivers state as uploaded.

Please try get up to speed on the uploaded detailed results and the corroborative data of accreditation on the SCR. Clearly INEC's manipulation has been busted.

only rivers were not uploaded, so how come thief atiku got the result of 35 States and fct even as thief atiku himself admitted that card reader were not used in all polling unit.
So who gave thief atiku such fraudulent server result

MetaPhysical:



Is the result presented by Atiku authentic?

Let INEC come and explain itself,

We'll meet at Cross-examination,

We cannot help INEC build their case,

But we wull help them during their defense.

Till then, APC robots, enjoy your propaganda