EMILO2STAY:
Its a pity you either lack understanding or your just pretending the burden of proof lies with me.

EMILO2STAY:
Oga i have done my part i am still waiting for you to do yours ever since we started this debate.

EMILO2STAY:
Pls and pls stop typing many words, just go straight to the point.

EMILO2STAY:
If you mention me again without putting up the so called proof you have i will not indulge you again on this.

OkCornel:
Jude 1 v 6;

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.


Now further questions for those proposing the sons God to be either the Sons of Seth abi Cain?

1) Which angels was Jude referring to in verse 6, and when did they leave their first estate?
2) If you say it is those angels that rebelled alongside Lucifer, shouldn't they all be in everlasting chains right now awaiting judgement? Shouldn't this earth be free from demons and evil spirits?

MuttleyLaff:
Its a pity you are an ignoranus because I certainly dont think, talkless pretend the burden of proof lies with you. All I asked and insisted on, is for the record, that you to provide proof beyond reasonable doubt and with chapters and verses proving the sons of God to be angels, then after that, we can together go on the journey to show how "sons of God" in scripture has been and always being humans and never celestial beings aka angel but you refused

Oga, you know what my terms and conditions are. Take it or live it

Just go straight to the point? It doesnt work like that, EMILO2STAY.

Somebody like me, who knows the one thing, on the "sons of God" that you don't know about, didnt get to know about it, from just go straight to the point.

EMILO2STAY, never treat anyone as unworthy of serious consideration because you never know what true knowledge about the "Holy Grail" meaning of the "sons of God" information you want to know, they might be holding in



Like, as if I care, if you indulge or dont indulge. Listen, EMILO2STAY, I enjoy being alone, my soul is at peace in the silence. It's better to walk alone, than with a crowd going in the wrong direction.

EMILO2STAY, its your loss because I know what "Holy Grail," I bring to the table, so trust me when and/or if I say, I am not afraid to eat alone.

MuttleyLaff:


Smh, lol, my long lost very good "customer mi, daada ni". It is true that sometime last year around September, if I recall correctly and early this year February, I did, at least that twice, engage you, on the subject matter of "sons of God" mistaken for angels, Nephilims etcetera.

On each of those two occasions, you were blindly and poorly arguing that angels have sexual desires. You were mistaking Nephilims in Genesis 6:2-4 and elsewhere, like in the book of Job, to be angels. You did your disappearing AWOL act after trying to obfuscate the topic with bringing in the witch of Endor and Prophet Samuel's dead spirit. Smh

I informed you then that angels are celestial beings, who only take on appearance of human forms when on assignment from God. Except being on official assignment, celestial beings never take on form that look or resembles human beings. I further mentioned that, it is part of the reasons, why no one has ever seen physically Satan or physically seen a demon. Maamin, should in case you've forgotten. I expressly repeat here again for your attention that, only human beings are given the mandate to procreate, and never celestial beings, also known as, angels are granted that privilege

Maamin, Maamin, Maamin, how many times did I call? Lol, nvm. Read the last sentence in your comment and please tell me if its not a reflection of you. Fyi, I am conversing with nijabazaar at the moment on this same subject matter, why not keep your eyes and ears open, as you will learn something from my interaction with him. Lol.

None of you guys have the chutzpah. Nine out of ten of y'all, can't even swallow, stomach and retain my tough and hard good bullshits, let alone stand head-to-head with me on this subject matter. See, I gave the go-ahead to shine like a star to "you-know-who", told "you-know-who" to go open a thread, send me an invite notification to come join and trash out the genuineness or not, of the Book of Enoch together, but did "you-know-who" create the thread and be willing to go toe-to-toe with me on it?. Of course not, "you-know-who" couldn't and wouldnt, because "you-know-who" developed stage fright from knowing what will come of it, it will be the death and end of the truth, diluted with lies, "you-know-who" learned and have enjoyed to believe.

Maamin, truth is more valuable if it takes you a few years to find it. Even if you know a thousand things, ask the man, somebody like me, who knows the one thing on the "sons of God" you don't know about. Never underestimate someone because you never know what true knowledge about the "Holy Grail" meaning of the "sons of God" information, they might be holding in

Now watch and learn Maamin. Take it, as an unexpected learning opportunity and thank nijabazaar later for it.
https://www.nairaland.com/5450889/why-book-enoch-removed-bible/1#82913164

Maamin:
Nephililms are not sons of God but the offsprings as a result of what transpired between the sons of God and daughters of men.

Maamin:
Your too many words with no message is making you say things and generate stories that were never told. Watch it bro!

Maamin:
And for the scriptural truth ....sons of God in Genesis 6:1-2 are angels.

Maamin:
You can deny all you want but you can't change that. It is written and sealed!

MuttleyLaff "The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and afterward as well, when the sons of God had sexual relations with the daughters of men. And they bore them children who became the mighty men of old, men of renown"
- Genesis 6:4 Berean Study Bible

You will eat those words and search for me apologise. Mark my words and watch this space Ma'am

Actually, and for the scriptural truth ....sons of God in Genesis 6:1-2 et al, are humans, not and never angels Maamin

"You must not add to or subtract from what I command you ..."
- Deuteronomy 4:2a

"So be careful to obey all the commands I give you.
You must not add anything to them or subtract anything from them."
- Deuteronomy 12:32

[s]You want to deny the Bible isnt doctored, erhn, that it isnt tampered with hmm?.

Or you're admitting that you're ignorant of the truth, that at least an actual word, in the Book of Job, was interfered with, hmm? Interfered with, as in meaning, the word was changed. All Bible translation versions except for just only one, is a victim of this changing of the word. It is only one version I've found that the original word is retained and left unchanged.

Except someone wants to seal their fate, it literally is written, you must not add anything to or subtract anything from the Bible, but this word is and was changed, so thereafter draws off the scent to who really are the sons of God. 'Twas King, who said, the trust of the innocent is the liar's most useful tool. The devil is a liar. Smh[/s]

I informed you then that angels are celestial beings, who only take on appearance of human forms when on assignment from God. Except being on official assignment, celestial beings never take on form that look or resembles human beings

I further mentioned that, it is part of the reasons, why no one has ever seen physically Satan or physically seen a demon.

Maamin, should in case you've forgotten. I expressly repeat here again for your attention that, only human beings are given the mandate to procreate, and never celestial beings, also known as, angels are granted that privilege

Maamin:
Genesis 6:1-4 KJVS
And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
[2] That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
[3] And the Lord said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
[4] There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.he nephilims, were already on the earth in those days, meaning they already existed, before the sons of God began to have sexual relations with the daughters of men. The Bible in black and white doesnt not and cannot lie Maamin please.

The giants in the earth in those days came from where? ..ok use this logic Cain went to the land of Nod and got himself a woman. Where did the people of Nod came from? Did they fall from heaven? Same way the Giants on Earth in those days came from the sons of God and daughters of men. Deal with it

You are already eating your words. Let the Bible be truth and all men liars.

The Bible says otherwise ....keep reading it , it will Dawn on you soon.

You are the one adding to and subtracting out of the scriptures.

The rest is crappy epistle as usual.

kkins25:
clever tactic, metatron. does this apply to angels who are under the enuchian rule of God?

kkins25:
this is the first time i hear of the name satanel.

kkins25:
does this entity exist, is he synonymous to lucifer, is this entity the same one that fed eve/slept with eve/ asked her to look within instead of outside?

kkins25:
can they procreate but are forbidden to or they simply can't. keep in mind that you once mentioned i cant remember if you did exclusively; nonetheless that there are feminine angels.

kkins25:
moresor, with regards to the book of enoch, wasnt the whole idea of Gods hormonal induced raged triggered by disobedience of this angels, when they began to know daughters of men and to know the ecstasy of cumming to earth?

MuttleyLaff:
You this woman, you dont want lay down lying, you're a glutton for punishment, right?. Wait for me to revisit today in the late PM. Lets once and for all trash and kill this demon from the pit of hell you've being dragging. I think, I've managed to get grab you enough by the wrist of your hand now, EMILO2STAY didnt want to take the bait, but I think you took a nibble of it, that small bit you took, does me real fine, to set about going for your jugular now with a two-prong attack, lol.

OkCornel:


And this is the second day, still no answers to the questions arising from Jude 1 v 6.

Maamin:
Lol..I am not a woman Mr. Truth is clear and separate from falsehood. You can deny and reject all you want but be rest assure that will not change a thing.

kkins25:
MuttleyLaff

Maamin:
Lol..I am not a woman Mr. Truth is clear and separate from falsehood. You can deny and reject all you want but be rest assure that will not change a thing.

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s3/images/dontGiveAshit.gif[/img]
Who wan price shiit market?
To rise prick nobi by force nau
mister man abeg

orisa37:


The Bible says Male and Female, God created them Adam was a Giant. Eve was a Nephilim Cain and be Abel were human Sons and Daughters. They were all Creatures and all Sons and Daughters of God.

MuttleyLaff:
"Don't pay any attention to any of those senseless Jewish stories and human commands.
These are made up by people who won't obey the truth"
(i.e. and not give attention to Jewish legends/Jewish fables and the maxims of men who turn their backs on the truth)
- Titus 1:14.

A great work then nwanne brother Maamin, you've been doing on the subject matter of who the "sons of Gods" are truly and really are. Fyi, Satan appreciates what you and others, the likes of rosy1992, Ihedinobi3, budaatum, EMILO2STAY, kkins25, missjojo, etcetera are doing in consistently pushing and advancing non-existent verse(s) in the Bible where God says of any type of angels to be to "sons of Gods". Your seriously flawed slander against angelic beings that they, angels impregnated and married female human beings are well noted. Keep it up y'all

Both you Maamin, TV01, Ihedinobi3, budaatum, EMILO2STAY, kkins25 and missjojo bring up unsubstantial bible verses, that are easily demolished and torn apart into shreds. You, in particular Maamin, along with Ihedinobi3 and EMILO2STAY have put forward bible verses, the likes of Luke 20:34-36, Genesis 6:4, Job 6:2, Job 1:6, Job 2:1 etcetera, that are not contextually read and so had them misinterpretated, then making the Bible say, what not the Bible has ever said concerning angels being the "sons of God"

Maamin:


What baffles me is how you take so much time and pride to defend what is indefensible. You have been fed so many times scriptural evidence on so many account on this thread and even on the previous thread concerning the sons of God in Gen 6:2 but your pride in wanting to win argument won't let you admit the truth. Keep it up!

MuttleyLaff:

Fyi, Satan appreciates what you and others, the likes of rosy1992, Ihenobi3, budaatum,, EMILO2STAY, kkins25 and missjojo bring up unsubstantial bible verses, that are easily demolished and torn apart into shreds. You, in particular Maamin, along with Ihedinobi3 and EMILO2STAY have put forward bible verses, the likes of Luke 20:34-36, Genesis 6:4, Job 6:2, Job 1:6, Job 2:1 etcetera, that are not contextually read

budaatum:
He keeps hearing his master!

Maamin:
What baffles me is how you take so much time and pride to defend what is indefensible.

Maamin:
You have been fed so many times scriptural evidence on so many account on this thread and even on the previous thread concerning the sons of God in Gen 6:2 but your pride in wanting to win argument won't let you admit the truth. Keep it up!

MuttleyLaff:
If you're playing a poker game and you look around the table and can't tell who the sucker is, it's you. Don't ever again make the mistake of underestimating someone because you never know, what one thing you don't know about, they might be holding in, lol.

budaatum:
If you look in a mirror, reason would make you see mutt!

EMILO2STAY:
this clown stay off my mention

MuttleyLaff:


[img]https://s1/images/stirringMuttleylaff.gif[/img]
Its a pity you are an ignoranus court jester, who you called a clown, erhn?. Not your fault, I blame myself for coming to your poxy circus. Smh. Mtcheew.

EMILO2STAY:
this clown stay off my mention

MuttleyLaff:
[img]https://s1/images/stirringMuttleylaff.gif[/img]
Its a pity you are an ignoranus court jester, who you called a clown, erhn?. Not your fault, I blame myself for coming to your poxy circus. Smh. Mtcheew.

OLAADEGBU:
I am beginning to conclude that your wrong spelling of ignoramus is deliberate for a reason best known to you.

MuttleyLaff:


[img]https://s2/images/MuttleyHilarious34d26efd4dfccb03.gif[/img]
Eagle eye. Contrary to what you believe, "ignoranus" is not a misspell nor a misspeak. Fyi and as a matter of fact, "ignoranus" is a bonafide, kosher and/or legit word in its own right, lol.

"Ignoranus" is not a wrong spelling of ignoramus. Yes, you're 1000% correct that there is a conscious effort and deliberate reason for using and prefering "ignoranus" than ignoramus. An "ignor-anus" by definition, is a person who is a stupid, rude, pompous and also an ignorant arsehole. It in fact and in short, is a blend of ignoramus and anus. Calling him an ignoranus suits our court jester to a tee, especially when he is fond of pulling worthless and useless stuff from his rear end

OLAADEGBU:
Says who? Unless ignoranus is a word that you have just coined.

MuttleyLaff:


Under what stone have you being living. The word "ignoranus" has been in use as far back as and/or circa 2004

OLAADEGBU:
Can you quote one person apart from yourself that uses that word?

MuttleyLaff:
Under what stone have you being living. The word "ignoranus" has been in use as far back as and/or circa 2004

MuttleyLaff:


Your wish, is my command:
1/ by Jackal(m): at 6:13pm On Aug 05, 2007
2/ by Chacal: 5:24pm On Mar 17, 2008 (NB: Chacal and Jackal is the same person with a different moniker)
3/ by Hannibal: at 6:00pm On Aug 27, 2008
4/ by Epi: at 2:33pm On Feb 18, 2009
5/ by kaydee(m): at 10:46am On May 04, 2009 (NB, Kaydee possibly is Chacal and Jackal)
6/ by Sauron1: at 9:09pm On Jul 15, 2010
7/ by PoDeep(m): at 5:45pm On Nov 05, 2011
8/ by Killz3(m): at 9:12pm On Apr 18, 2012
9/ by at flyca: 2:54pm On Mar 31, 2017
10/ by daveP(m): at 3:52pm On Apr 15, 2017
11/ by GodSon34(m): at 9:05am On Jun 17, 2018

OLAADEGBU, if you know, you know about ignoranus. Who no know, no go know about ignoranus, lol

OLAADEGBU:
You haven't quoted what, where and when they said it you only quoted their monikers.