decatalyst:


Ogbeni calm down, you are not addressing one for the "kids" on nairaland.

This is logic...may I inform you that all these claims are hypothetical and they are not factual! Even the 'age' of planet earth is also hypothetical, at best, it an estimate that earth is over 4.4billion years.

So, someone saying they discovered the FOOD a certain mythical animal ate, over 100 million years ago, is rather fictional to me.

Abi you know the water e drink on top too?

That's y I said u shouldn't just sit,go and make Ur own research to prove them wrong,u don't have equipment or anything, u just stand up to say they are lying,listen,learn,discover,ask and research, don't let your knowledge base on what u red on bible or Quran,at least non of those books tell u how to operate smart phones and laptops,that's is the reason why u need to explore beyond.

Vyzz:




Nope it is not ị tell u bro.

It is.. They always seek.. While we on the other hand prefer living in ignorance.

DarkJeddi:
Yeah..

You would rather believe all the unsubstantiated baloney the Bible and other religious Fairytale books reels out..

Don't be silly!

You don't even know if I am a Buddhist or a traditionalist, you just jumped the gun

Meritocracy:
Scam, 110million wating. What do they used to calculate the years, they will just open mouth wide called million year

You didn't make research on how they come up with the years but you concluded that it's scam?
Typical Nigerian.
Always void of reasoning.

decatalyst:


Don't be silly!

You don't even know if I am a Buddhist or a traditionalist, you just jumped the gun

U don't sound like someone that are not Christian or Muslims,u will be either of the two, that's why your reasons can't go beyond wat u red

This great scientists are bringing to public knowledge incredible findings, research is bae. Thumbs up great guys.

Supersymetry:

Though there's a lot to learn from nature. Evolutionary theories and principles seems fabricated to the uninformed, because most models in science especially in biology include or are emerged properties. So it's necessary for one to learn the term "emergence" ( which is, one of the properties, of our universe) before learning the theories.

If you don't know how voice differences emerge from the differences in the properties of individuals vocal cords, then you have to search the internet.

Oga you have not said anything.

Besides there is no evidence for macro evolution of species. Even Darwin himself said so in his book. He was afraid that will ruin all his research. (I am sure you dont know about that and haven't read it.)

I know when people who don't know anything about evolution try to form they are knowledgeable by the things they say.

Whenever I see so called evolutionists propagating things even Darwin himself doubted, I just shake my head.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/11674244_4697681_pngf6855c1b4788a08853546b3cbe2866d9

...

SEGLIZ:

the minister don turn learner. this oyinbo people are just forcing this whole dinosaur theory down our throats.

Same way they forced religion on us right?

Lie lie, 110million years

decatalyst:


Don't be silly!

You don't even know if I am a Buddhist or a traditionalist, you just jumped the gun

Whether you are a Buddhist or a Traditionalist or whatever..

You all would rather believe in some unsubstantiated and unverifiable Fairytale,by Some Superstitious Nomads who don't know better..

And prefer to ridicule Science and its attempt to discover the origin of life and genesis of the Universe..

Macsjebs:

Kingxsamz, Tomiwa69
Any research to throw more light on this?

He should have asked when humans started counting dates.

DarkJeddi:
Whether you are a Buddhist or a Traditionalist or whatever..

You all would rather believe in some unsubstantiated and unverifiable Fairytale..

And prefer to ridicule Science and its attempt to discover the origin of life and genesis of the Universe..

See, you just shot yourself again

All these 'discoveries' are just another set of "unsubstantiated and unverifiable fairytale" as you put it! Even the age of planet earth is an estimate!

kingxsamz:


He should have asked when humans started counting dates.

I know the dating system is fairly recent but while growing up we were made to believe AD means after death and BC before Christ, it was in my 100l I learnt they were Latin words

decatalyst:


See, you just shot yourself again

All these 'discoveries' are just another set of "unsubstantiated and unverifiable fairytale" as you put it! Even the age of planet earth is an estimate!

At the least Science does not abrogate to itself the Toga of an all knowing and infallible entity..

Unlike some Divine Beings..

Why not trillions of years? Another bullshit crap of scientific ASSUMPTION!

Macsjebs:

I know the dating system is fairly recent but while growing up we were made to believe AD means after death and BC before Christ, it was in my 100l I learnt they were Latin words

Brb, I'll throw more light on this.

GodSaklek:


U don't sound like someone that are not Christian or Muslims,u will be either of the two, that's why your reasons can't go beyond wat u red

You seem to be lost as to what qualifies/defines someone as knowledgeable and smart!

You can be knowledgeable but not smart, but you can't be smart and not be knowledgeable. Either ways, you ain't displaying any at this point.

Go straight to the crux of discussion, which is research! It's not about religion, race or culture.

veeshock:

It takes a creative, wise, intelligent, supernatural mind to create a man from dust, fish, monkey, or whatever. Science is based on evidence not fabrication mr man, if not for science you wont know water is H2O, you wont know anything called internet or cell phone, and you wont be able to share your ignorance to millions at same time.
Did your Bible or whatever book you believe in describe exactly how the universe or man was formed? Even in the Bibles creation story the sun was made on the 4th day, on the 4TH DAY, with morning, evening, night already existing from day 1-3 before the sun and moon were created, can you explain that?
Btw evolution also says man was made from dust, through stages encompassing millions of years.

Whether you like it or Not Science can never explain the origin of life through Evolution theory

DarkJeddi:
At the least Science does not abrogate to itself the Toga of an all knowing and infallible entity..

Unlike some Devine Beings..

Hmmm...you have a point. I am seeing your position from another prism now.

kingxsamz:


Brb, I'll throw more light on this.

Yeah, so much controversies on it

The thing is, the church was the head of government then

decatalyst:


You seem to be lost as to what qualifies/defines someone as knowledgeable and smart!

You can be knowledgeable but not smart, but you can't be smart and not be knowledgeable. Either ways, you ain't displaying any at this point.

Go straight to the crux of discussion, which is research! It's not about religion, race or culture.

OH my god...

Just go in peace

Macsjebs:


Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/02/world/nodosaur-fossil-stomach-contents-scn-trnd/index.html

the fact is that... there is science, and there is magic, physical or spiritual, the choice is yours.

light099:
Scientists with their Carbon 14, Carbon dating bullcrap.
Extraordinary bullcraps, only valid until another bullcrap invalidates the former.
Continue searching, you would never discover anything of tangible relevance to your search, you would only end up more confused and misinformed every time.

As a human, you would always have to believe in one shit or another, either the religious shit or the scientific shit. No side seems to be devoid of shits, except that one shit is obviously the way to go, while the other is nothing more than futile bullcrap.

It's more sensible to believe the allegory of a snake talking in a garden than theories of how fish turned into man;
It's more sensible to believe this masterpiece universe is designed and fabricated by a creative, wise, intelligent, supernatural mind than to believe it created itself and exists on it's own. More ridiculously originated from a tiny bang. You don't mean it?
It's more sensible to believe a path that tells us the purpose and future of the world, not one which doesn't know why we're here, where we're coming from and where we're heading to.
It's sensible to believe a great designer somewhere knows a lady should have two breasts, curvy figure and thinner voice, while the man should be more masculine with thicker voice. Or you mean nothing figured that out and also fabricated it?
All these are very shallow details by the way. It would take some tangible time to describe the minutest parts of life and infinite time for the whole vast universe.

Life is no doubt a great masterpiece of art, epitome of extraordinary creativity, climax of skillful fabrication, nexus of complex functionality and unbelievable compatibility of distinct contrasting vastness.

Science is only good in fabricating inanimate objects and making life better, that is where it belongs and it should strictly stick to that. But when atheist scientists come explaining cardinal aspects of life with science. I tell them, never mind, because you really suck at that.

Some people would mock you for being so gullible for believing in a sky daddy, until later you realize who is really more gullible.

You're still the gullible one.

kingxsamz:
Dumb fvcks would discredit this scientific research but believe that a virgin gave birth to a mini god.

Abi oh ...
Sometimes brains have been taught to accept stories as facts and reject any scientific rationale that tries to question their stories

Macsjebs:

Yeah, so much controversies on it

The thing is, the church was the head of government then

Yeah. It was based on a decision on what time to fix the Easter celebration.
Not that it validates what time Jesus was born.

GodSaklek:


That's y I said u shouldn't just sit,go and make Ur own research to prove them wrong,u don't have equipment or anything, u just stand up to say they are lying,listen,learn,discover,ask and research, don't let your knowledge base on what u red on bible or Quran,at least non of those books tell u how to operate smart phones and laptops,that's is the reason why u need to explore beyond.

Ok. Now let me tell you why going on to debunk or validate those none factual statements or expositions are of irrelevance to me.

1. The various theories of the origin of humans has not even been accepted by all (universally accepted), not to talk of that of the origin of the universe. Evolutionary theory, big bang theory etc

2. Validating the claim of the existence of a mythical animal is not even on the scale of preference at all. Let the scientist that have the grants from Harvard, Yale and the likes continue...research grant has to be used and justified Let another group of scientist that have access to grants from other sources debunk or validate the claims.

Until this happens, Biko permit me to use True/false, lie/true, correct/wrong subjectively till facts are verified and substantiated.



Let me leave you with the smart and knowledgeable word of Rene Descartes "cogito ergo sum"...less bothered about how long...

ReeLoaDead:
Abi oh ...
Sometimes brains have been taught to accept stories as facts and reject any scientific rationale that tries to question their stories

Lol, funny thing is that science keeps making discoveries every day, while the other is based on some 2000 year old book written by clueless men who didn't know how the world worked.

Bodydialect57:
And the last soup it was used to cook still intact

wait, let me check well....

Collinz2:
All these scientists na to discover wetin no go help man pikin na dem sabi

the same way them build phone, build the most powerful telescope ,automobile Shey bi no be the fine you take dey comment so?

Mumu pikin

Slawormir:
Damnnnnn niggarrr
Isoright

Baba, I think say you go ask question oooo...like what kinda skin colour does nodosaurus has?