Dande55: How can you say dick is becoming the prize when there are more feminist lesbians springing up daily and with the production of sexual tools that can perform better than some dìcks without giving you infection or pregnancy?
One of the girl is still getting d11cked if you check well
Yes. Men should start learning how to be pregnant with technology advancement. If not, with the way things are going and some women becoming radicalized, men will go into oblivion in the next couple of decades.
Don't worry about men going oblivion, don't worry about robots taking over men's duties, don't worry about women taking over men positions and powers, if you need all that, you can take it. We are at a point where we should be thinking about ourselves alone and not the perception of women about men. Over the years, we have paid with our blood in wars, sweats to protect women and make them happy, to protect the family, village, community etc just for our women and kids to be happy and safe and at this point if you don't need it again and call them useless, so be it and let them be. Get all the powers you want, all the money and luxuries and dicks all you want but please don't worry about people that are now gradually not worrying about you people.
In actuality, it's gonna pose as a big threat in the future. Keep it up. They are doing things for men, taking your powers, engaging themselves while chasing you out of corporate world. Kudos with your ideology.
Let them take the power, we don't need it anymore.
This shows you are a cave man. Feminist movement is the largest all over the world. And their main aim is to emasculate Men, either through LGBTQ or by changing the natural order of things such as telling women to be independent. And your movement is actually helping them succeed. By the time men stop providing for women, and women become their own providers, men won't hold any power against women anymore. The reason men are still feared is cos of money they possess. And money brings power and courage. When women start making equal contributions to the society, they will also hold powers and then, with the termination of male foetus, male gender becomes dominated by these radicalized feminists. See black community where their men have been reduced to gays and effeminate entities and the women their embraced education and power, keep it up. Lool.
The truth men have realised is that they don't need to hold any power against women anymore. It is a free world. Live and let's live. Why are you worried about power slipping off men's hand? Thought that is what you people have been yearning and clamouring for? Then have it and let us rest. Use it how you want it even if it means aborting all male children. We don't care anymore, it is a free world.
Kudos Prophet Ubunja. I hereby declare you a Citizen of Federal Republic of Nigeria by Association. You are now a Nigerian. You can come in and go out as you like. Get you passport at the nearest embassy to you bro and the flight to nigeria is on me(lol)
How Fatherless Girls Become Women Who Spend On Men, Put Men On A Pedestal And Consider Men The Prize.
PROLOGUE. When a man chooses a woman, the woman is the prize. When a woman chooses the man the man is the prize.
This is true between one man and one woman.
And this is true between men as a group and women as a group.
In a patriarchy women are the Prize.
In a matriarchy men are the Prize.
The gender that holds power in a society holds the power to choose who to love. But choosing who to love places the romantic power in the hands of the gender that is chosen. The chosen gender is the prize. Hence in today's world - a Patriarchy - it's the men chasing, spending, impressing and sacrificing. While women barely lift a finger because they're the prize.
But now with women gaining power equal to, and even more than, men's, at all levels from education to business to politics - thanks to Women Empowerment and female focused government legislation - the prize is slowly becoming men. The more power women are gaining the more power they have to choose the men they really want, but the less power they have in relationships with those men.
The more powerful women are becoming, the less powerful men are becoming but the more powerful dick is becoming. Just like how the more powerful men were the less powerful women were but the more powerful pussy was.
This sea change begins with the rise of one particular individual who the Red Pill especially hates with a passion, but who's about to alter reality by redefining Femininity and Masculinity - changing everything.
That individual is the Single Mother.
She changes everything.
THE SINGLE MOTHER, THE GAME CHANGER. Let's say a man and his wife have a daughter and a son. The man will be gentle with the daughter but stern with the son. While the mother will be gentle with the son but stern with the daughter.
This is generally how parents relate to their children in many countries.
The daughter enjoys the father's love. The son enjoys the mother's love. The daughter endures the mother's tough instruction. The son endures the father's tough instruction. This way the children grow up balanced having been sternly instructed and also dearly loved.
As for the girl, her father's unconditional manly love allows her to be soft, vulnerable and girly - which is her femininity. And growing up she'll be drawn to masculine men - men like her father - who provide safety and allow for her to maintain her vulnerability. "Safety" here DOES NOT mean physical safety but a "safe place" - someone who can be trusted. With a man she can trust, a woman can be vulnerable. Where "vulnerable" DOES NOT mean weakness but rather a woman feeling safe enough with a man to admit to him her truest feelings, by so doing risking him taking advantage of her but trusting him not to take advantage.
Think of it this way: Weakness is a woman not being strong enough to challenge a man to a fight. But vulnerability is a woman opening up to a man about her weaknesses, limitations, fears, hopes and desires, and trusting this not to be used against her. This is vulnerability. It's placing yourself in a position where you can be hurt, by baring your heart. It takes bravery. When a woman is vulnerable with the right man, he compensates for her weak points and shortcomings. What he does is he unites his strengths with her weaknesses. He unites his plans, ambitions and purpose in life with her wishes, hopes and desires.
Many women have not opened up to their boyfriend or husband. Never will they let him see them at their weakest and lowest, overwhelmed by life's problems and breaking under the weight of the world. Most women will rather show weakness to their friend. Only their friend gets to see them at their lowest and weakest overwhelmed and broken. Never their man. Why? Because they don't trust their man. They fear their man will take advantage. That he'll use this against them tomorrow.
As a woman you may trust your man not to cheat or doublecross you. But as long as you don't trust him with your weak points and problem areas - when you're not vulnerable with him - he's not the One. Because you don't consider him a safe place. Your bond and connection will not reach soulmate level.
You don't have the implicit childlike trust in him that you had in your father.
A father is the first man a little girl trusts fully and is vulnerable with. And he'll never take advantage of her but will be her strengths and solutions. She always has his ear and sympathy. He's never dismissive. He never scoffs. He never mocks. Nothing she tells him will be used against her tomorrow.
Everything is safe with him.
He is a safe place.
Now let's go ahead and remove him from the picture:
When a girl has a strong loving father, she has someone to watch over her, shield her from harm and allow her to stay soft and carefree and peaceful - in other words, stay feminine. But the exit of the father changes everything.
With his exit the girl's shield departs. Her safe place dissolves. And she quickly learns the world can be a harsh place. And with daddy gone, she has to face the harshness on her own. There is no help coming. She has no one to count on but HERSELF.
And with that she toughens up.
She enters into her masculine.
Her femininity erases.
She has lost her innocence.
The soft, peaceful vulnerable little girl that she is withdraws inside of her as a tough persona comes out. This tough persona is the foundation of the Independent Woman. The fierce and feared self-sufficient woman who can do for herself. But inside this woman, inside the hard shell, sits a little girl - wounded and traumatized - wondering about her father. And in every man the woman deals with, she's looking for her father, a man like him, who can bring the little girl out again.
FATHERS SHAPE WOMEN'S FEMININITY. A father is the first man a girl knows. And a girl builds her femininity around him. Her feminine energy takes form using his masculine energy as a point of reference.
It's a straightforward process: Daughters win with their father by being soft, girly and vulnerable, which teaches them TO WIN WITH OTHER MEN using the same soft tools. These soft tools are what femininity is. Soft power. A woman can not develop these tools raised solely by another woman, eg her mother, because a daughter can not win with her mother by being girly, soft, tender etc. Her mother will laugh and let her know that such only works on her father. That it will never work on mothers. Hence the widow and the single mother can not raise feminine daughters. Because a single mother and a widow are both feminine and masculine because they have to be both mother AND father to their children. And thus the example is shown to the daughter that a woman has to be the do-it-all superwoman - a woman strong and able to do without men. And if and when she deals with men, she'll carry her own weight because she's proudly capable.
In a traditional family unit of a father and a mother, a daughter can watch and learn from her mother. How her mother is soft, dependent and vulnerable around her father. But absent a father, a daughter is denied that opportunity. All she'll ever see is her mother struggling to put food on the table, constantly overwhelmed and sometimes forced to work more than one job to make ends meet. The daughter is trained into self-sufficiency. Which creates the Independent Woman.
When a mother is a Provider she unwittingly trains her daughters to be providers (for men) because the daughters learn to be providers by watching her provide. So they figure that's what women do. Meanwhile, when a father is a Provider, he trains her daughters to seek out men who provide because they figure that's what men do.
Pickmeshism - the spirit of providing for men - has its roots in women-headed households where reality is altered, and Femininity and Masculinity redefined. Girls are taught to give, boys are taught to receive.
This is something I have a first-hand experience with as a man.
My father passed when I was barely 5 and myself and my siblings were singlehandedly raised by our mother. We had a step-father but he barely did anything tangible because he had his main family. Raised by a woman I grew up with a very particular mindset concerning a woman's money: It's my money too. And to this day I have no shame or embarrassment taking money from a woman. Heck there are days when I'm more concerned about a woman's purse than her pussy. And I would be lying if I said I didn't grow up trying to figure out how to access successful women.
BIRTH OF A PICKMEISHA. In a traditional family setup the father is tender with the daughter but hard on the son. While the mother is tender with the son but hard on the daughter.
The hardness from the parent of their sex trains each child to view members of their sex as competition. The boy's father is his first competition. The girl's mother is her first competition. The boy grows up competing with his father for his mother's attention. The girl grows up competing with her mother for her father's attention.
Meanwhile the tenderness of the opposite parent is a lesson on romantic love and what each child can look forward to in a relationship with the opposite sex. The boy's mother is his first love. And the girl's father is her first love.
A father is a girl's first love whether he's there or not. Whether he's a caring provider or a deadbeat loser. All the daughter's future romances will mirror that first romance. If daddy was a present dutifully father, the girl will gravitate to present dutiful men. If daddy was an absent asshole the girl will gravitate to assholes who are absent emotionally, the state of her relationship with her father shapes all her relationships with men.
If one parent, say the father, is removed from the picture, as is almost always the case with single-parent families, balance is lost.
Without a father, a daughter has to do with only her mother's sternness and hardness without the father's love and tenderness to balance her out. While the boy now has to do with the mother's tenderness and gentleness without the father's sternness to balance him out.
The daughter sees hell from her mother. She's never given a rest but is pushed to achieve more and more and more with the mother never quite satisfied with her. Add to that the spirit of competition between mother and daughter which intensifies as the mother fears the daughter - a younger fresher woman - will steal suitors from her.
On the other hand, the son grows up tenderly dealt with and softly treated by his mother to the point where he's coddled and spoilt, expecting the world to revolve around him. Expecting women to serve him. He doesn't do any chores because mother will not allow a boy in the kitchen while there's a girl in the house. A boy will not touch a broom with a girl around. A boy will not wash any clothes with a girl around. A boy will not work around the yard with a girl around. A boy will not be sent for groceries with a girl around.
All these things are the girl's job as a woman and a future wife! All the boy can do is spend his days adored and dotted on. This treatment, these things, over the years, add up and finally convince the girl that his brother is indeed the Prize. That boys are the prize. That men are the prize.
But not just by mother's treatment of her brother is the girl made to view men as the prize, also by the way her mother, over the years, pursues men up and down begging for their affection and companionship. Her mother constantly setting the bar low, settling for less and tolerating mediocrity. All these teach the girl that men are above women. That a woman must do her best for men even if they respond with the bare minimum. It's okay. Because men are that important. And so the girl grows up seeking men's approval. Men's validation. Longing for their acceptance. Wishing to be the one chosen by men among other women. To be the one picked. She becomes what is called a Pick-Me. Which is the original term for Pickmeisha.
Pickmeisha believes she's a good catch for any man because she's better than any woman because she has achieved more than any woman and any man who chooses her will find her to be an asset. She has it all - PhD, career, car and house. Honestly how many women have that! She's a catch and men must pick her!
Pickmeisha doesn't understand that between her 35 year old self with all her accomplishments, and a 21 year old with none of her accomplishments, men will pick the 21 year old. Because the things Pickmeisha considers her "assets" are the same things men consider their "assets". The things men bring to the table, she also brings to the table. And so men don't see the need to date her because they don't feel needed.
The things that other women want from men, Pickmeisha offers to men. And so the men she attracts are different from the men other women attract. Other women attract masculine men who provide. Pickmeisha attracts feminine men who take. AKA broke men.
MATRIARCHIES CREATE PICKMEISHAS. Pickmeisha is the product of the Matriarchy that takes form when there's an oversupply of Single Mothers and girls are raised to be tough and independent and to see education and career as the solution to hardship - which is true, but these girls never had a father and they place part of the blame on themselves believing they were bad daughters that's why daddy left and so in every man they date they seek the father they never had and they will pamper a man and spend on him to prove themselves better daughters this time around.
When the girls were young, Daddy was a symbol of all future men, now as adults, all men are a symbol of long-lost daddy.
And the cruel irony is that the more power women gain politically and economically the more they become Single Mothers and the more they raise Pickmeishas - a whole generation of successful women saturated in masculine energy who consider it their "right" and "privilege" to spend on the men they choose to love. Women who consider it unfair in a world where women have their own resources for men to be held to the outdated standard of being providers. And these women will have a point. Because they're logical. Where masculine energy flows, logic follows.
**See the last 3 pics below to see how pleasantly reasonable Pickmeishas can be.
PICKMEISHA AND BROKE MEN. Broke men can not afford a feminine woman who seeks a masculine provider. And they don't really need such a woman. What they need is a masculine woman who makes her own money and enjoys spending on her man.
That will be Pickmeisha.
Pickmeisha is a perpetual thorn at the side of gold diggers and women in general. They hate hate hate her. More than they hate sluts and hoes. Because unlike sluts and hoes who just give sex, Pickmesha - because she's educated and has her own money - she gives men sex AND money. Can you imagine!
But the union of a broke man and a woman who has money is doomed. Because when a woman has money but she dates a man without money, the man is never happy because he is not in his masculine. Meaning he never really feels like a man. You would think a broke man dating a woman who has money will be thankful and appreciative enough to show loyalty. But we all know what broke men in these situations do. What will happen is that the man will take the woman's money AND USE IT ON SOME OTHER WOMAN whom he really loves because it is with this other woman that he feels like a man. The broke man is so desperate to activate his masculinity even if it means using one woman's money to be masculine with another woman.
The problem here is that Society conditions men to believe their value lies in their ability to provide for women. Which makes a broke man have a problem dealing with a woman who has money even though the woman herself doesn't have a problem with his brokeness. Therefore the broke man's real problem is mindset. Not money. Hence the saying, Poverty is a mindset
THE WOMAN WHO PAYS FOR SEX. Where masculine energy flows, logic follows.
When women carry masculine energy they become like men, but not only in their thought process, also in their sex drive. Being masculine they carry a masculine sex drive.
They chase dick like there's no tomorrow.
There's only one woman who pays men for sex. It's not the nubile in her 20s - that one is broke. It's not the cheating wife screwing around behind hubby's back - that one is just giving it free. It's not the slut. It's not the hoe. And it's not the prostitute. *It's the Independent Woman.* That educated successful woman doing her own thing.
Ask any male prostitute or gigolo, or read any account by men who sell sex, and their most popular customer, by far, is the Independent Woman - that successful career woman living alone who has everything she wants.
She's the woman getting dicked down by prostitutes and gigolos.
She'll say she's living that lifestyle because she's too busy to date. She'll say men are too intimidated to date her so she has to buy. She'll say she owns her sexuality like men do. But what is happening is, she's burning with the lust of masculine energy.
PICKMEISHA TO FEMININITY. A woman who grew up without a father is a woman who had to be tough in a tough world. But inside the tough exterior is a timid little girl still looking for her father. Still expecting him to ride in on a white horse and deliver her. And in every man the woman deals with, she's looking for her father, a man like him, who can set the little girl free.
And how will the woman identify such a man?
Definitely not by his money. Not by his muscles. Not by his looks. And not by the words he speaks. But rather BY HOW THE WOMAN RESPONDS TO HIM. What the man brings out of her. This will be the man who will bring out her girliness, her softness, her vulnerability and her peacefulness - which is her femininity. Her femininity is her long lost innocence. The little girl inside of her. Breaking through her masculine shell.
It's another straightforward process: The woman usually wears jeans and trousers but around this guy she finds herself wearing dresses and skirts. The woman is bossy and headstrong but somehow around this guy she finds it easy to compromise and submit. She's fiery but around this guy she's very tame and speaks softly and gently. This guy, by just his presence makes her feel peaceful, secure and carefree - like the weight of the world has been taken off her shoulders and she feels like a little girl all over again hanging out with her all-capable father.
This guy is radiating masculine energy which is bringing out her feminine energy.
He is healing her.
The little girl inside - so long in hiding, so long in trauma - is coming out to play in the bright restorative light of the man's masculine energy.
This is like giving much attention, and inferences on the contaminated little stream(s) that flows into the ocean. It can also be compared to a mirage: from a far distance you think it's real, but on getting there: just mere optical illusion. Again, it's like taking the photos of bacteria cells from a near camera angle; they might appear enormous base on screen size, but yet almost invisible to the eyes.
Your idea here is minuscule. We shall see why.
I heard you're a woman, because I dislike vouchsafing when it comes to women. However, I will, just to make a caricature of what you think is true.
Without further ado, off we go.
Dande55: The truth remains that men are gradually outliving there values in today's world.
Very very true and correct. This is as a result of the gynocentric blue pilled society men are raised. The industrial and sexual revolution with its good purposes wrecked men, and now, we all are facing its unintended consequences:
1. Office work replaced farm works, fishing, hunting etc. These are activities which provided young boys the opportunity to interact with superior males, glean from their wisdom and become better men. Now, these values can no longer be easily encourage in young boys and men because fathers cannot take their sons and other male affiliates to the office.
Office works takes much of fathers time and energy, so they don't really have time for their young boys. Holidays are not sufficient for them, as it is use to rest and figure out how to gain promotion in the office by doing more work.
2. Since women can now determine the number of children they will reproduce through family planning, sperm banks, birth control pills, condom, IVF, they can act as they want because they know the joy of fatherhood is children. Women can now use various manipulations on men because they know that the continuity of men's lineage lies in her womb.
3. The government on the other hand, further stimulated the sexual revolution by introducing state and marital laws that favours women on the long run as the man who falls prey to the family court debilitates. Not only that, young men and boys who do not grow under the aegis of a masculine father, will definitely become effeminate, manipulated by both women and the government.
4. Pornography: as a result of the sexual revolution, made many young men felt good; because they can virtually be involve in binge sex with different women at their own convenience. And never knew that pornography causes a hinge on their natural traits as their virility gradually peters out coupled with depression and other psychological problems as a result of addiction.
All these gave rise to the effeminacy of men. An except men rise to their standard and uphold to the virility of their ancestors, they can be "outlived", but definitely not possible.
Dande55: Robots are doing the works that require physical strength while women are becoming more educated and holding office and political positions all over the world.
Robots was what first attracted me to give you a mention because you sounded too sure about it. Of course, nothing that can be imagined is impossible as far as the machine world is concern. It takes only time and patience.
You stylishly use robots to replace physical strength and accorded office and political positions to women. What a funny move.
1. How long do you think it will take to produce an avalanche of robots that will outwit, and replace men in: war and peacekeeping, mining, building and construction, manufacturing, production etc. Machines on paper sounds good, but have you considered the amount of time, energy, money and various resources it will take? We are talking worldwide, not only in Europe and Asia where machines still requires men in order to fully operate.
2. Lets say your intuition finally comes true, do you think the men who manufactured these robots will definitely run into extinction and have no absolute control of what they created?
3. If men produce enough robots, it will relief them of the hassles and politics involve in the office works, and rather, use their creation to extort a truckload of money from women who now occupy office and political positions. You see, he is smart all the way.
4. Can women willingly like to operate machines in their office, and during political campaigns? Evolution shapes women to be stress avoidant and not stress tolerant. Handling machines like robots in enormous amount is not a child's play.
5. Do women have the mental fortitude to update machines, repair them, develop more sophisticated machines when men are finally outlived? I don't think if evolution prepared women's brain for such complicated activities.
6. Will robots give women the commitment, love, attention and care required of men?
Dande55: Don't forget that most feminist will rather abort a male foetus in this world.
They are radicalizing some women into aborting any male foetus and with time, your numbers in this world will reduce and women will take power and start dealing with you lots the way you've kept women in cages for thousands of years. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Eventually you proved what Ubunja has just shared in this thread: successful women will chase men as a result of their ultimate search for the father figure and evolutionarily need for virile men. No matter the rationalization, women need men more than men need women.
Abortion of male foetus will lead to:
1. Envy and Jealousy: females will henpeck themselves because men are now scarce, they will do whatever it takes to secure any man solely, and even go as far as consuming themselves with violence as a result of the anger that reeks of from envy and jealousy: a trait naturally common among women but now, largely fueled by anger and scarcity.
2. The few available men at that time will be placed back in position, because what is scarce is highly valued and held with great admiration and respect. Because women will want that particular man for themselves, they will abdicate all positions to him; women love attention. So, in order to get this attention, they must relinquish all and become submissive for this precious and scarce gene.
3. If the world would have been more worthy without men, men wouldn't have survived the hunter gatherers days, when they risk their lives for the survival of their tribes. Albeit, men lose their lives, but as evolution progresses, the survival of the fittest made sure to spread their genes. So, if those heavy, dark and slow days didn't deracinate men completely from the earth, abortion cannot do same. And besides, abortions come with its own share of trauma, pains and adverse effects on the side of the woman involved---you will just save the soul of a precious male child if you eventually run headlock with these later phase, because your negative emotions will consume him.
4. When women eventually restores men to that position befitting for the scarce and valued, men will be forced to resplendently display their virility.
Therefore, whichever way the clock ticks; either clockwise or anticlockwise, it will definitely benefits the male in the long run with time and patience.
Besides, feminism is made popular by the mainstream media and social networks; it population is on the minor. Notwithstanding, men, through the lens of the redpill can now understand feminism for what it is, and female nature and manipulations. The men who will eventually swallow the pill, will become synonymous with their ancestors who fought and drove wild animals into extinction, and before the end of their lives passed their superior genes---the reason you and I, are alive today.
CaveAdullam: This is like giving much attention, and inferences on the contaminated little stream(s) that flows into the ocean. It can also be compared to a mirage: from a far distance you think it's real, but on getting there: just mere optical illusion. Again, it's like taking the photos of bacteria cells from a near camera angle; they might appear enormous base on screen size, but yet almost invisible to the eyes.
Your idea here is minuscule. We shall see why.
I heard you're a woman, because I dislike vouchsafing when it comes to women. However, I will, just to make a caricature of what you think is true.
Without further ado, off we go.
Very very true and correct. This is as a result of the gynocentric blue pilled society men are raised. The industrial and sexual revolution with its good purposes wrecked men, and now, we all are facing its unintended consequences:
1. Office work replaced farm works, fishing, hunting etc. These are activities which provided young boys the opportunity to interact with superior males, glean from their wisdom and become better men. Now, these values can no longer be easily encourage in young boys and men because fathers cannot take their sons and other male affiliates to the office.
Office works takes much of fathers time and energy, so they don't really have time for their young boys. Holidays are not sufficient for them, as it is use to rest and figure out how to gain promotion in the office by doing more work.
2. Since women can now determine the number of children they will reproduce through family planning, sperm banks, birth control pills, condom, IVF, they can act as they want because they know the joy of fatherhood is children. Women can now use various manipulations on men because they know that the continuity of men's lineage lies in her womb.
3. The government on the other hand, further stimulated the sexual revolution by introducing state and marital laws that favours women on the long run as the man who falls prey to the family court debilitates. Not only that, young men and boys who do not grow under the aegis of a masculine father, will definitely become effeminate, manipulated by both women and the government.
4. Pornography: as a result of the sexual revolution, made many young men felt good; because they can virtually be involve in binge sex with different women at their own convenience. And never knew that pornography causes a hinge on their natural traits as their virility gradually peters out coupled with depression and other psychological problems as a result of addiction.
All these gave rise to the effeminacy of men. An except men rise to their standard and uphold to the virility of their ancestors, they can be "outlived", but definitely not possible.
Robots was what first attracted me to give you a mention because you sounded too sure about it. Of course, nothing that can be imagined is impossible as far as the machine world is concern. It takes only time and patience.
You stylishly use robots to replace physical strength and accorded office and political positions to women. What a funny move.
1. How long do you think an avalanche of robots will be produced to outwit, and replace men in: war and peacekeeping, mining, building and construction, manufacturing, production etc. Machines on paper sounds good, but have you considered the amount of time, energy, money and various resources it will take? We are talking worldwide, not only in Europe and Asia where machines still requires men in order to fully operate.
2. Lets say your intuition finally comes true, do you think the men who manufactured these robots will definitely run into extinction and have no absolute control of what they created?
3. If men produce enough robots, it will relief them of the hassles and politics involve in the office works, and rather, use their creation to extort a truckload of money from women who now occupy office and political positions. You see, he is smart all the way.
4. Can women willingly like to operate machines in their office, and during political campaigns? Evolution shapes women to be stress avoidant and not stress tolerant. Handling machines like robots in enormous amount is not a child's play.
5. Do women have the mental fortitude to update machines, repair them, develop more sophisticated machines when men are finally outlived? I don't think if evolution prepared women's brain for such complicated activities.
6. Will robots give women the commitment, love, attention and care required of men?
Eventually you proved what Ubunja has just shared in this thread: successful women will chase men as a result of their ultimate search for the father figure and evolutionarily need for virile men. No matter the rationalization, women need men more than men need women.
Abortion of male foetus will lead to:
1. Envy and Jealousy: females will henpeck themselves because men are now scarce, they will do whatever it takes to secure any man solely, and even go as far as consuming themselves with violence as a result of the anger that reeks of from envy and jealousy: a trait naturally common among women but now, largely fueled by scarcity.
2. The few men at that time who be available will be placed back in position, because what is scarce is highly valued and held with great admiration and respect. Because women will want that particular man for themselves, they will abdicate all positions to him; women love attention. So, in order to get this attention, they must relinquish all and become submissive for this precious and scarce gene.
3. If the world would have been more worthy without men, men wouldn't have survived the hunter gatherers days, when they risk their lives for the survival of their tribes. Albeit, men lose their lives, but as evolution progresses, the survival of the fittest made sure to spread their genes. So, if those heavy, dark and slow days didn't deracinate men completely from the earth, abortion cannot do same. And besides, abortions come with its own share of trauma, pains and adverse effects on the side of the woman involved---you will just save the soul of a precious male child if you eventually run headlock with these later phase, because your negative emotions will consume him.
4. When women eventually restores men to that position befitting for the scarce and valued, men will be forced to resplendently display their virility.
Therefore, whichever way the clock ticks; either clockwise or anticlockwise, it will definitely benefits the male in the long run with time and patience.
Besides, feminism is made popular by the mainstream media and social networks; it population is on the minor. Notwithstanding, men, through the lens of the redpill can now understand feminism for what it is, and female nature and manipulations. The men who will eventually swallow the pill, will become synonymous with their ancestors who fought and drove wild animals into extinction, and before the end of their lives passed their superior genes---the reason you and I, are alive today.
ubunja, I'd like to hear more of your opinion about single father parenting? What effect does a single father cause on both the boy and girl child like you stated about single mothers?
wisethoughts: ubunja, I'd like to hear more of your opinion about single father parenting? What effect does a single father cause on both the boy and girl child like you stated about single mothers?
hie bro. That will be an interesting study to undertake. But I believe with single fathers in charge much changes in terms of the patriarchy and the matriarchy.
From your write up above, I want to understand the perfect match for a masculine girl( a girl without no father).... Is it a feminine or masculine man? If it is masculine man(tough, strong man) ::- do you think it will work out, since she is already masculine herself ( as they likely "say like terms repair and unlike terms attract". since she can provide for herself, she can not seek out a masculine man rather a feminine man that she can provide for(as you also said)... now if it is
Feminine man (broke, nice, soft, gentleman ) ::- how can he bring out the softness, decent girl and, vulnerability in her, as the man himself is dependent, vulnerable and also soft like a lady? because to bring out those attribute in her, you must be masculine, which means you must be tough, harsh etc on her(the like of a father).
Main Question who will she be attracted to is it the feminine man that won't be able to portray the life of a father( I.e unable to bring out the innocent, decent and soft girl in ?) Or The masculine guy that is also exhibiting the same character with her, as she is now masculine and independent of her own.
And also how can one bring out the decent, nice peaceful girl on a masculine girl I hope you understood what I meant there? Just emphasis on that areas
Ubunja I will be glad if you can give me the answers to those questions. thanks in advance
emmaodet: Kudos Prophet Ubunja. I hereby declare you a Citizen of Federal Republic of Nigeria by Association. You are now a Nigerian. You can come in and go out as you like. Get you passport at the nearest embassy to you bro and the flight to nigeria is on me(lol)
CaveAdullam: This is like giving much attention, and inferences on the contaminated little stream(s) that flows into the ocean. It can also be compared to a mirage: from a far distance you think it's real, but on getting there: just mere optical illusion. Again, it's like taking the photos of bacteria cells from a near camera angle; they might appear enormous base on screen size, but yet almost invisible to the eyes.
Your idea here is minuscule. We shall see why.
I heard you're a woman, because I dislike vouchsafing when it comes to women. However, I will, just to make a caricature of what you think is true.
Without further ado, off we go.
Very very true and correct. This is as a result of the gynocentric blue pilled society men are raised. The industrial and sexual revolution with its good purposes wrecked men, and now, we all are facing its unintended consequences:
1. Office work replaced farm works, fishing, hunting etc. These are activities which provided young boys the opportunity to interact with superior males, glean from their wisdom and become better men. Now, these values can no longer be easily encourage in young boys and men because fathers cannot take their sons and other male affiliates to the office.
Office works takes much of fathers time and energy, so they don't really have time for their young boys. Holidays are not sufficient for them, as it is use to rest and figure out how to gain promotion in the office by doing more work.
2. Since women can now determine the number of children they will reproduce through family planning, sperm banks, birth control pills, condom, IVF, they can act as they want because they know the joy of fatherhood is children. Women can now use various manipulations on men because they know that the continuity of men's lineage lies in her womb.
3. The government on the other hand, further stimulated the sexual revolution by introducing state and marital laws that favours women on the long run as the man who falls prey to the family court debilitates. Not only that, young men and boys who do not grow under the aegis of a masculine father, will definitely become effeminate, manipulated by both women and the government.
4. Pornography: as a result of the sexual revolution, made many young men felt good; because they can virtually be involve in binge sex with different women at their own convenience. And never knew that pornography causes a hinge on their natural traits as their virility gradually peters out coupled with depression and other psychological problems as a result of addiction.
All these gave rise to the effeminacy of men. An except men rise to their standard and uphold to the virility of their ancestors, they can be "outlived", but definitely not possible.
Robots was what first attracted me to give you a mention because you sounded too sure about it. Of course, nothing that can be imagined is impossible as far as the machine world is concern. It takes only time and patience.
You stylishly use robots to replace physical strength and accorded office and political positions to women. What a funny move.
1. How long do you think it will take to produce an avalanche of robots that will outwit, and replace men in: war and peacekeeping, mining, building and construction, manufacturing, production etc. Machines on paper sounds good, but have you considered the amount of time, energy, money and various resources it will take? We are talking worldwide, not only in Europe and Asia where machines still requires men in order to fully operate.
2. Lets say your intuition finally comes true, do you think the men who manufactured these robots will definitely run into extinction and have no absolute control of what they created?
3. If men produce enough robots, it will relief them of the hassles and politics involve in the office works, and rather, use their creation to extort a truckload of money from women who now occupy office and political positions. You see, he is smart all the way.
4. Can women willingly like to operate machines in their office, and during political campaigns? Evolution shapes women to be stress avoidant and not stress tolerant. Handling machines like robots in enormous amount is not a child's play.
5. Do women have the mental fortitude to update machines, repair them, develop more sophisticated machines when men are finally outlived? I don't think if evolution prepared women's brain for such complicated activities.
6. Will robots give women the commitment, love, attention and care required of men?
Eventually you proved what Ubunja has just shared in this thread: successful women will chase men as a result of their ultimate search for the father figure and evolutionarily need for virile men. No matter the rationalization, women need men more than men need women.
Abortion of male foetus will lead to:
1. Envy and Jealousy: females will henpeck themselves because men are now scarce, they will do whatever it takes to secure any man solely, and even go as far as consuming themselves with violence as a result of the anger that reeks of from envy and jealousy: a trait naturally common among women but now, largely fueled by anger and scarcity.
2. The few available men at that time will be placed back in position, because what is scarce is highly valued and held with great admiration and respect. Because women will want that particular man for themselves, they will abdicate all positions to him; women love attention. So, in order to get this attention, they must relinquish all and become submissive for this precious and scarce gene.
3. If the world would have been more worthy without men, men wouldn't have survived the hunter gatherers days, when they risk their lives for the survival of their tribes. Albeit, men lose their lives, but as evolution progresses, the survival of the fittest made sure to spread their genes. So, if those heavy, dark and slow days didn't deracinate men completely from the earth, abortion cannot do same. And besides, abortions come with its own share of trauma, pains and adverse effects on the side of the woman involved---you will just save the soul of a precious male child if you eventually run headlock with these later phase, because your negative emotions will consume him.
4. When women eventually restores men to that position befitting for the scarce and valued, men will be forced to resplendently display their virility.
Therefore, whichever way the clock ticks; either clockwise or anticlockwise, it will definitely benefits the male in the long run with time and patience.
Besides, feminism is made popular by the mainstream media and social networks; it population is on the minor. Notwithstanding, men, through the lens of the redpill can now understand feminism for what it is, and female nature and manipulations. The men who will eventually swallow the pill, will become synonymous with their ancestors who fought and drove wild animals into extinction, and before the end of their lives passed their superior genes---the reason you and I, are alive today.
Watch, wait and see.
Thanks.
Hats off for you my good sir. Beautifully said. Henceforth, consider Jasper a fan
softguy1: From your write up above, I want to understand the perfect match for a masculine girl( a girl without no father).... Is it a feminine or masculine man? If it is masculine man(tough, strong man) ::- do you think it will work out, since she is already masculine herself ( as they likely "say like terms repair and unlike terms attract". since she can provide for herself, she can not seek out a masculine man rather a feminine man that she can provide for(as you also said)... now if it is
Feminine man (broke, nice, soft, gentleman ) ::- how can he bring out the softness, decent girl and, vulnerability in her, as the man himself is dependent, vulnerable and also soft like a lady? because to bring out those attribute in her, you must be masculine, which means you must be tough, harsh etc on her(the like of a father).
Main Question who will she be attracted to is it the feminine man that won't be able to portray the life of a father( I.e unable to bring out the innocent, decent and soft girl in ?) Or The masculine guy that is also exhibiting the same character with her, as she is now masculine and independent of her own.
And also how can one bring out the decent, nice peaceful girl on a masculine girl I hope you understood what I meant there? Just emphasis on that areas
I concur with your comment. Very significant questioning.
softguy1: From your write up above, I want to understand the perfect match for a masculine girl( a girl without no father).... Is it a feminine or masculine man?
The perfect match for any woman is a man full of virilities. A man that is strong, courageous, brave, smart and intelligent. A man full of life, grace and vitality. A man respected by all and sundry. A promethean. A man who other men want to become. A man who other women lust after. A man that passes shit tests. And lastly, a dominant man that maintains frame.
softguy1: If it is masculine man(tough, strong man) ::- do you think it will work out, since she is already masculine herself ( as they likely "say like terms repair and unlike terms attract". since she can provide for herself, she can not seek out a masculine man rather a feminine man that she can provide for(as you also said)... now if it is
If a masculine woman finds a man that I described above, she will naturally exude her feminine side, because biology and evolution shapes her to be receptive to such genres of men. Because she knows that such genres of men are rare, inestimable, paragon of masculinity, beautiful to behold, she will definitely cede her masculine behaviour or else she will lose him to the plethora of other women who lusts after him.
softguy1: Feminine man (broke, nice, soft, gentleman ) ::- how can he bring out the softness, decent girl and, vulnerability in her, as the man himself is dependent, vulnerable and also soft like a lady? because to bring out those attribute in her, you must be masculine, which means you must be tough, harsh etc on her(the like of a father).
Nothing good about feminine men, except as a form of machiavellianism. Women don't lust after women(feminine men). Ditto for men. Same sex attraction is abnormal as human genetic make up is not shaped for same sex intersexual relationship. LGBTQ, are outliers, and of course, cannot, and do not cancel the rule.
A woman cannot lust after a feminine man, she will only use him for the main time, and later continue her ultimate search for the man who is an epitome of the father figure.
softguy1: Main Question who will she be attracted to is it the feminine man that won't be able to portray the life of a father( I.e unable to bring out the innocent, decent and soft girl in ?) Or The masculine guy that is also exhibiting the same character with her, as she is now masculine and independent of her own.
The masculine man I first described above.
softguy1: And also how can one bring out the decent, nice peaceful girl on a masculine girl I hope you understood what I meant there? Just emphasis on that areas
By becoming like the first man I first described above. This is the essence of the redpill, and why you need to spend your teens, 20's and 30's, building up yourself in the most attractive ways. Not for the sake of vagina, but to elicit your masculine make up. The reason your ancestors ensconced their seeds in you.
softguy1: Ubunja I will be glad if you can give me the answers to those questions. thanks in advance
I think you will get a good answer when you read again the article he shared. He shed lights on it. And if he has other answers, I hope he shares, otherwise, go read and digest that article until you see the answer you desire.
CaveAdullam: The perfect match for any woman is a man full of virility. A man that is strong, courageous, brave, smart and intelligent. A man full of life, grace and vitality. A man respected by all and sundry. A promethean. A man who other men want to become. A man who other women lust after. A man that passes shit tests. And lastly, a dominant man that maintains frame.
If a masculine woman finds a man that I described above, she will naturally exude her feminine side, because biology and evolution shapes her to be receptive to such genres of men. Because she knows that such genres of men are rare, inestimable, paragon of masculinity, beautiful to behold, she will definitely cede her masculine behaviour or else she will lose him to the plethora of other women who lusts after him.
Nothing good about feminine men, except as a form of machiavellianism. Women don't lust after women(feminine men). Ditto for men. Same sex attraction is abnormal as human genetic make up is not shaped for same sex intersexual relationship. LGBTQ, are outliers, and of course, cannot, and do not cancel the rule.
A woman cannot lust after a feminine man, she will only use him for the main time, and later continue her ultimate search for the man who is an epitome of the father figure.
The masculine man I first described above.
By becoming like the first man I first described above. This is the essence of the redpill, and why you need to spend your teens, 20's and 30's, building up yourself in the most attractive ways. Not for the sake of vagina, but to elicit your masculine make up. The reason your ancestors ensconced their seeds in you.
I think you will get a good answer when you read again the article he shared. He shed lights on it. And if he has other answers, I hope he shares, otherwise, go read and digest that article until you see the answer you desire.
softguy1: From your write up above, I want to understand the perfect match for a masculine girl( a girl without no father).... Is it a feminine or masculine man? If it is masculine man(tough, strong man) ::- do you think it will work out, since she is already masculine herself ( as they likely "say like terms repair and unlike terms attract". since she can provide for herself, she can not seek out a masculine man rather a feminine man that she can provide for(as you also said)... now if it is
Feminine man (broke, nice, soft, gentleman ) ::- how can he bring out the softness, decent girl and, vulnerability in her, as the man himself is dependent, vulnerable and also soft like a lady? because to bring out those attribute in her, you must be masculine, which means you must be tough, harsh etc on her(the like of a father).
Main Question who will she be attracted to is it the feminine man that won't be able to portray the life of a father( I.e unable to bring out the innocent, decent and soft girl in ?) Or The masculine guy that is also exhibiting the same character with her, as she is now masculine and independent of her own.
And also how can one bring out the decent, nice peaceful girl on a masculine girl I hope you understood what I meant there? Just emphasis on that areas
Ubunja I will be glad if you can give me the answers to those questions. thanks in advance
you mixed it up a little. A gentleman is masculine. Masculinity does not mean the rough toughness of the Bad Boy. Because Masculinity is not external toughness as in muscles and image but a man being everything a woman is not. Which is logical, protector etc. When a man is not that himself he's feminine.
A Girl without a father is masculine drawn to feminine men. It's called Daddy Issues. It's a toxic affair. a male gold digger uses this door to exploit the masculine woman because he comes in feminine. Which I'm in favor of, by the way.
But when that woman encounters true masculinity she reaches a turning point: run or change.
Some women are so far gone down the road to Masculinity they don't see themselves as anything but. And they like the control Masculinity gives. And so they'll run back to feminine broke men. Others desire change and they allow the healing process to begin. Others have to go for therapy to help them heal of the daddy issues when they get tired of being masculine and wish to attract masculine men.
Daddy Issues frustrate Female Hypergamy. That's the most important thing to note. The more money a woman makes the harder it is for her to practice hypergamy. Not just because the fewer the men on her level but the less interested she is in a man's money because she's independent. A masculine woman finds it harder to deal with high value men because she shares a lot of the traits they have.
Actually this is Part Two of a series on Femininity but I released it first just so it displays last on my profile. In the Femininity writeup I explain these concepts broadly.
DrFunmisticGlow: long time. Hope you are also going to talk about the opposite side of the equation- How having no father figure brings out feminine men.
I understand you're a nurse. Stay safe out there don't get yourself infected with this Corona virus.
Dande55: The truth remains that men are gradually outliving there values in today's world. Robots are doing the works that require physical strength while women are becoming more educated and holding office and political positions all over the world.
Don't forget that most feminist will rather abort a male foetus in this world.
They are radicalizing some women into aborting any male foetus and with time, your numbers in this world will reduce and women will take power and start dealing with you lots the way you've kept women in cages for thousands of years. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Then men need to drop the "gentleman" bullshit and put a brutal stop to selective abortion. Whether by legislation or devious schemes, men should go do it. For a start, someone should show these "feminazi" champions how the world of men works, if you want to be disruptive, you have to be ****"" proof. Men should start being more machiavellian. What happened to corporate coups? Political Instability? Instigated crisis? The red pill should start adopting a Mafia like approach towards reclaiming the world from the feminazis. After all power is taken by force, not received. Fela was right. I no be gentleman at all.
. 
.