Snowwy:


However, when I asked you a question on this you ran to an internet page and cut and paste someones interpretation. You have no personal conviction on it therefore.

Isn't it obvious the kind of fellow we're dealing with here. . . oh so you saw my post heh! You're simply making very lame excuses, how typical!!
personal convictions?? yeah I'm bold to say my personal convictions were formed from learning, I learn from different sources; even great books reference other books. so you mean to tell us that all your convictions were formed from just reading the bible alone huh!
All hail snowwy the all knowing

^^ What Bible?

Dude gets all his "understanding" from the "rap of errors"

nuclearboy:

^^ What Bible?

Dude gets all his "understanding" from the "rap of errors"

Naah! I doubt if the guy attends CE, his views on tithing differs from Jo's, a divided camp I'll say

Actually, what I meant by "rap of errors" is "theology of self", not ROR solely though that is a poster child for error all by itself

SirJohn:

Naah! I doubt if the guy attends CE, his views on tithing differs from Jo's, a divided camp I'll say

I dont quite agree. Jo is just inconsistent, that's all. You need to take another read at Jo's defence of tithe since his first post on NL to understand what i am talking about. Jo very much agrees with Snowwy but play safe by sticking to Melchizedek.

Snowwy is definitely a cec adherent! It's so easy to tell by all the biblical gymnastics he performs here which is very typical of deluded cec customers.