Yomi4reel:
A Nigerian lady has cried out after people looked on as a man she slapped for sexually harassing her, assaulted her at Ajah Park in Lagos.

The lady who said she was at the park to waybill an item to her mother, alleged the man who approached her started touching her boobs and butt after she rejected his offer.

However after she slapped him for sexually harassing her, she said he started beating her and dragged her on the road while passers-by looked on.

Watch the video below:https://wahalablog.com/lady-cries-out-after-people-looked-on-as-man-she-slapped-for-sexually-harassing-her-beat-her-up-at-ajah-park-in-lagos-video/

Sixfeetbelle:


Once it's your gender at the forefront, you people will start asking for the other side of the story but jump in and start passing judgement once it's women at the forefront? Why the partiality?

Fahdiga:
Remember the story of the man that always shout wolf when there's none. the day lion came to attack him he shouted but no one came to his rescue. this same story applies to you women. your manipulative tendencies are well documented. your reputation to cause trouble and immediately turn around to play the victim is well known hence the reason why no reasonable person believes you women when the person didn't witness what happened.

Sixfeetbelle:


For men nko? Is the level of their atrocities not documented? Is the magnitude of their wickedness not yet palpable?

Everyday, a man rapes a child, a man kills another, a man shoots another, a man lies to his constituents, everyday man did this and man did that. The most prolific serial killer is a man, the world most dangerous criminal is a man. Need I say more.

With these evil deeds attributed to men, aren't you being a hypocrite by choosing the male's recounts of the event over a woman's?

Fahdiga:
All what you listed above might be true but they don't relate to this particular post. the issue here is a woman narrating her own side of a story and expecting everyone that was not there when it happened to believe it hook, line and sinker and judging by women's past reputation in this case it would be a foolish thing for any reasonable person to believe it without hearing from the other person

plusfield:
I wont accept this story until I hear the man's side of the story. So she slapped the man because she believed the public will save her? This belief that a man should never lay a finger on any man, no matter the provocation while they at the slightest thing can slap a man is the worst form of hypocrisy.
I dont subscribe to a man hitting a lady, but where she raises her hand on a man, she is not a lady, she has lost all lady privilege, she is a tout and should be treated as one.
As for this story, I still doubt it. The man started handling her breast and buttocks in public?