Vinstel:

So why did they force Nigeria to hand over bakassi peninsula?

They didn't.
Nigeria willingly handed over the territory.

mysticwarrior:
British cowards who can't fight battles on their own, always hiding behind the ass of the US.

you are ignorant..

Tofen:
Wow

Do you make this in 3D?

Simeonjoe1:


Baba that will even be the wrong course of action for Russia cause UK has enough stock of nuclear arsenal to decimate Russia over and over again. Forget when it comes to nuclear warfare nobody go win. The only advantage Russia have is in conventional warfare which at the same time its not a walk over for them. This is UK vs Russia toe to toe with no allies. Forget UK go stand their ground gidigba

You must be a kid
Russia possess the most nuclear weapon in the world, even more than USA
Put together all UK's nuclear warheads, it doesn't make 1/3 of Russia's nuclear warheads. Shoo kid, go play with your mates

Olaolufred:


US is already on it's way out as World power.

A mistake is all remaining for China to take over.

If they go military way with Russia, the power change will be faster.

That is why US thinks China everyday.

The glory has departed.

Only borrowed glory is remaining.

Why I believe China military is growing very fast they still have a lot of catch up to do which I believe won't even be in the next 5 decades. Note the US military is not stagnant they too are growing in sophistication and are aware of the Chinese threat which is even keeping them up on their toes. While China military is nice and shiny atleast all those are paper capabilities, the Chinese military has not been proven in actual modern multidimensional warfare. Until they prove their military might and doctrines in warfare the Chinese military will always be under the shadow of the USA and even technically Russia

Simeonjoe1:

And vice versa even though the US and allies has the upper hand. Forget no side go win. And even if one side win - AT WHAT COST?

Thanks for understanding their will be no winner.
That is why UK is fooling itself.
It is only US that has the gut to near Russia. US won't because it will come at a cost.
Na with sense mad person dey run from cow o.

[quote author=Jeromejnr post=103739960]It's brewing.

Britain and U.S should leave Russian waters alone haba.

Abi dem no get water for their country?

Simeonjoe1:


Baba that will even be the wrong course of action for Russia cause UK has enough stock of nuclear arsenal to decimate Russia over and over again. Forget when it comes to nuclear warfare nobody go win. The only advantage Russia have is in conventional warfare which at the same time its not a walk over for them. This is UK vs Russia toe to toe with no allies. Forget UK go stand their ground gidigba

Feeel the difference kid

dermmy:


Honestly I don't know why western powers always look for trouble. This same Britain forcefully took Chagos Island from Mauritius in the 60's. ICJ ruled in 2019 that Britain should vacate the Island, close the joint military base it built with U.S. there and return the Island to Mauritius but Britain has yet to obey that order it's two years since the UN ruling.

Now they are flexing muscle saying they don't recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea. They don't recognize China's artifical islands in the South China Sea. Are they not hypocrites?

And what's Russian doing in Crimea?


Why must china claims the entire southern sea to it self without considering other nations that are connected to this sea?

Without America Russia would have returned the former USSR by now with it's bullying attitudes..


How many nations or countries have America invaded and ceded to itself?


And can you elaborate on how US is a hypocrite?

Mangekyo:

You must be a kid
Russia possess the most nuclear weapon in the world, even more than USA
Put together all UK's nuclear warheads, it doesn't make 1/3 of Russia's nuclear warheads. Shoo kid, go play with your mates

Like I've said before nuclear weapon is not about how much you have. Forger if you like have 20,000 nuclear warhead and your enemy has only 1000 its still a no win situation for both side. Like I said even if they do not have the same number of nuclear warhead as Russia, the nuclear weapon possess by Britain is enough to decimate the entire (strategic locations) Russia over and over again.
It's not about how much you have but how effectively you can deliver them and their survivability in a preemptive strike

adelaja70:

You are intelligent. Most of the guys guys here don't read at all. The Germans nearly wiped out Russia. The change in weather was their savin grace. Germans were destroying everything on their way and 30km to the capital, snow started. And the Germans were not prepared for it....

No amount of preparation would have prepared them for the cold, the cold there is something else. It was just their luck. Stalin would have died in Auschwitz probably in one gas chamber .

Mangekyo:


Feeel the difference kid

Baba forget all those numbers a 50 well placed nuclear weapon is enough to cripple a major power.

Mangekyo:

You must be a kid
Russia possess the most nuclear weapon in the world, even more than USA
Put together all UK's nuclear warheads, it doesn't make 1/3 of Russia's nuclear warheads. Shoo kid, go play with your mates

More than the US?


Having this nuclear is a different thing, launching them is another..


How fast can Russia launch its nuclear? Do you know how many nuclear America has all over it's bases around the world?

dermmy:


Honestly I don't know why western powers always look for trouble. This same Britain forcefully took Chagos Island from Mauritius in the 60's. ICJ ruled in 2019 that Britain should vacate the Island, close the joint military base it built with U.S. there and return the Island to Mauritius but Britain has yet to obey that order it's two years since the UN ruling.

Now they are flexing muscle saying they don't recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea. They don't recognize China's artifical islands in the South China Sea. Are they not hypocrites?

You only remember Chagos island claimed by Mauritius and the issue of the south China sea involving China and its Asian neighbours.

What about the Falklands island and the st George island that Britain under late british pm, Margaret Thatcher government went to war with Argentina.

Argentina called the island The malvinas.

Britain refused to surrender the Falklands island to Argentina even to this day.

Oppression is by almost all the Superpower countries.

Toktee:
More than the US?


Having this nuclear is a different thing, launching them is another..


How fast can Russia launch its nuclear? Do you know how many nuclear America has all over it's bases around the world?

Yes he's right Russia has more warhead than US. but you're also right having the most is one thing, the real question is how many of them are deployable.
Who has the most effective means of deploying them.
How many of them can survive a preemptive strike or evade an adversary missile defense system.

Simeonjoe1:

Like I've said before nuclear weapon is not about how much you have. Forger if you like have 20,000 nuclear warhead and your enemy has only 1000 its still a no win situation for both side. Like I said even if they do not have the same number of nuclear warhead as Russia, the nuclear weapon possess by Britain is enough to decimate the entire (strategic locations) Russia over and over again.
It's not about how much you have but how effectively you can deliver them and their survivability in a preemptive strike

Lmfao Russia is a lot bigger than England. Even if UK fires 120 nuclear weapons into Russian territory, they will still survive since the size of the country is huge. Citizens and military equipments can spread out. Compared to the USA that have just a little land space, if the Russia fires just 2 warheads into a state pretty much everyone is dying since their citizens are jam packed
Russia possess more nuclear weapons, airforce fighter aircrafts, land vehicles which include armored vehicles and tanks, and also navy. How do you think UK are winning Pls elaborate to me
They get pommeled on land, on sea, in the air EVERYTHING. sit down boy

Simeonjoe1:

Yes he's right Russia has more warhead than US. but you're also right having the most is one thing, the real question is how many of them are deployable.
Who has the most effective means of deploying them.
How many of them can survive a preemptive strike or evade an adversary missile defense system.

Russia have more deployable warheads than USA not to even talk of small UK lol. Even small Pakistan is wretching UK

Toktee:
More than the US?


Having this nuclear is a different thing, launching them is another..


How fast can Russia launch its nuclear? Do you know how many nuclear America has all over it's bases around the world?

Russia can launch them from anywhere including the seas since they have Submarines that can launch them, so launching them fast shouldn't be a problem at all lol.

Mangekyo:


Russia can launch them from anywhere including the seas since they have Submarines that can launch them, so launching them fast shouldn't be a problem at all lol.

And the Americans will stand and watch it to it's destination?

Mangekyo:


Lmfao Russia is a lot bigger than England. Even if UK fires 120 nuclear weapons into Russian territory, they will still survive since the size of the country is huge. Citizens and military equipments can spread out. Compared to the USA that have just a little land space, if the Russia fires just 2 warheads into a state pretty much everyone is dying since their citizens are jam packed
Russia possess more nuclear weapons, airforce fighter aircrafts, land vehicles which include armored vehicles and tanks, and also navy. How do you think UK are winning Pls elaborate to me
They get pommeled on land, on sea, in the air EVERYTHING. sit down boy

Don't underestimate the UK military and their war industry. While I believe Russia has a numerical advantage, the UK can also stand on its own. It has its number and technological proven weapon. Comparing weapons 1 on 1, most UK weapons are technologically superior to its Russian counter part. UK also have an effective and well trained fighting force. Forget most of those Russian weapons are old and outdated from the ussr Era, they only have limited effective ones (but they have been improving on this), even their large military combatant are less experienced and professional compare to the UK (that's why Russia is massive cutting down its active service member down to create a more robust and effective fighting force).
Guy concerning nuclear weapon you don't have to target the whole of Russia or kill every one, all you just have to do is effectively cripple your opponents(targeting strategic locations). And like I said the UK stock is enough to decimate the Russian over and over again

Bdzets:
You're damn right. As an employer of labour in UK, the double standars are evident, very very institutionalised

Gud day Mr Akintola

Pls I just sent you a dm, kindly reply sir

Mangekyo:
Someone should tell Britain to be careful, because if they successfully get on the nerve of Putin (The real nigggaa), Britain would be history. Same with the US!

how old are you? War is not by making noise, Russia are like the agberos at the motor park ,can shout but can't bite, war required a lot both economic and political which Russia does not have what it's take to sustain prolonged war.

Abeg Britain dey ur dey.. Or e go choke u oooo!!

Russia have been making empty threats for some time now,the popular saying that dog that bark don't bite, the one that bites don't bark,USA is the latter.

Mangekyo:


Russia have more deployable warheads than USA not to even talk of small UK lol. Even small Pakistan is wretching UK

And guy like I said before a war between UK and Russia will be a conventional warfare as both side would be skeptical on going nuclear and when it comes down to conventional it will be a war of attrition on both side. (tired, unending with massive casualties on both side) and when it comes to that, the thing that can sustain you is your economy, defense industry and the mindset of your citizens. These I believe UK surpass Russia in some areas.... I will still say a a war between Russia and UK toe to toe no allies, UK will stand gidigba and its no walk over for the Russians

Simeonjoe1:

Don't underestimate the UK military and their war industry. While I believe Russia has a numerical advantage, the UK can also stand on its own. It has its number and technological proven weapon. Comparing weapons 1 on 1, most UK weapons are technologically superior to its Russian counter part. UK also have an effective and well trained fighting force. Forget most of those Russian weapons are old and outdated from the ussr Era, they only have limited effective ones (but they have been improving on this), even their large military combatant are less experienced and professional compare to the UK (that's why Russia is massive cutting down its active service member down to create a more robust and effective fighting force).
Guy concerning nuclear weapon you don't have to target the whole of Russia or kill every one, all you just have to do is effectively cripple your opponents(targeting strategic locations). And like I said the UK stock is enough to decimate the Russian over and over again

You're a joke if you think Russian military equipments are outdated and are lesser in capabilities to that of the UK. Russia pomp in billions of dollars into their military every year, more than the UK. what do you think those moneys are used for? Isn't it for upgrades? The only country that can rival and is above Russia is USA. UK isjt even on the level of Russia nd India yet and you're trying to compare them to Almighty Russia, what nonsense. Pls stop wake up from your delusion, there's noway UK is standing a chance against Russia.
And for the bolded part, I'll stop replying you for this.so sentimental and biased. What makes you think Russia would fold their arms while UK launch attack on them for crying out loud. Russian military equipments including their nuclear weapons are all spread out and put in different locations in the country. The UK on the other hand stores their nuclear weapons in just on facility. If Russia drops a single nuclear weapon in the environment of that facility, pretty much they get decimated.
Russians have faster War aircrafts, navy battleships, rocket and missile launchers, land vehicles and last more personnel on board. UK doesn't stand a chance.

Lmao did you just say UK personnels go through more trainings than Russian military personnels? What a joke. I really should stop replying you

Simeonjoe1:

Don't underestimate the UK military and their war industry. While I believe Russia has a numerical advantage, the UK can also stand on its own. It has its number and technological proven weapon. Comparing weapons 1 on 1, most UK weapons are technologically superior to its Russian counter part. UK also have an effective and well trained fighting force. Forget most of those Russian weapons are old and outdated from the ussr Era, they only have limited effective ones (but they have been improving on this), even their large military combatant are less experienced and professional compare to the UK (that's why Russia is massive cutting down its active service member down to create a more robust and effective fighting force).
Guy concerning nuclear weapon you don't have to target the whole of Russia or kill every one, all you just have to do is effectively cripple your opponents(targeting strategic locations). And like I said the UK stock is enough to decimate the Russian over and over again

Hello,
The United Kingdom stands no clear chance whatsoever against the Russian Armed forces. The Soviets posses the strongest armed forces in the whole of Europe. This entailed the formation of NATO during the cold war to protect European nations. It might interest you to note that as it stands today, the U.K currently, alone in a conflict, do not even stand a favourable chance in a military confrontation with even India. Please visit global fire power online (https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.php) to assess the current military strengths of these nations. There is no basis whatsoever to compare the United Kingdom, solely (without NATO), to the Russian armed forces. The RS-28 Sarmat (called SATAN bY NATO) which is a liquid-fueled Super heavy intercontinental ballistic missile with hypersonic glide capabilities (excess of Mach 9 speeds) can easily wipe out the whole of London undetected by anti-ballistic missile systems.

[s]

Simeonjoe1:

And guy like I said before a war between UK and Russia will be a conventional warfare as both side would be skeptical on going nuclear and when it comes down to conventional it will be a war of attrition on both side. (tired, unending with massive casualties on both side) and when it comes to that, the thing that can sustain you is your economy, defense industry and the mindset of your citizens. These I believe UK surpass Russia in some areas.... I will still say a a war between Russia and UK toe to toe no allies, UK will stand gidigba and its no walk over for the Russians

[/s]

Trash, I doubt if you're even reading what you're typing.

elganzar:



Lol
I've not really lived in the Eastern part so I don't know, but what I said is a norm for an average yoruba man here...

Leave dem Kanu and Ojukwu out of it, they did what a sane person should in such circumstance_ Igboho is presently doing the same, and he is no coward

last time I checked, Igboho is still in Nigeria. He didn't run out of the country.

Simeonjoe1:

And guy like I said before a war between UK and Russia will be a conventional warfare as both side would be skeptical on going nuclear and when it comes down to conventional it will be a war of attrition on both side. (tired, unending with massive casualties on both side) and when it comes to that, the thing that can sustain you is your economy, defense industry and the mindset of your citizens. These I believe UK surpass Russia in some areas.... I will still say a a war between Russia and UK toe to toe no allies, UK will stand gidigba and its no walk over for the Russians

Please go through this site to observe the detailed comparison. https://armedforces.eu/compare/country_United_Kingdom_vs_Russia
https://armedforces.eu/compare/country_United_Kingdom_vs_Russia

There's NO comparison whatsoever, Russia oneshots!

If after going through the link you still come here to argue, then I'm afraid I'll leave you to your fate

Mangekyo:


You're a joke if you think Russian military equipments are outdated and are lesser in capabilities to that of the UK. Russia pomp in billions of dollars into their military every year, more than the UK. what do you think those moneys are used for? Isn't it for upgrades? The only country that can rival and is above Russia is USA. UK isjt even on the level of Russia nd India yet and you're trying to compare them to Almighty Russia, what nonsense. Pls stop wake up from your delusion, there's noway UK is standing a chance against Russia.
And for the bolded part, I'll stop replying you for this.so sentimental and biased. What makes you think Russia would fold their arms while UK launch attack on them for crying out loud. Russian military equipments including their nuclear weapons are all spread out and put in different locations in the country. The UK on the other hand stores their nuclear weapons in just on facility. If Russia drops a single nuclear weapon in the environment of that facility, pretty much they get decimated.
Russians have faster War aircrafts, navy battleships, rocket and missile launchers, land vehicles and last more personnel on board. UK doesn't stand a chance.

Lmao did you just say UK personnels go through more trainings than Russian military personnels? What a joke. I really should stop replying you

I'm not stressing that UK military is above Russia or is on par with them. What I'm stating is in actual warfare UK is no pushover and they'll stand toe to toe to its Russian counter part. And concerning the storage of nuclear warhead their weapon is not store in one place as no military can be foolish to do that. Do you know they also have nuclear deterrence. Nuclear delivering submarines, bombers, nuclear silos which I believe is not ristricted to the UK only.

daddytime:


Olodo rabata

Go play in the sand with your mates Dundee.

But he's right, Britain colonised America, America got independence in 1776.