Simeonjoe1:

I will still say it's not only the number you have that matters in a nuclear warfare its a no win situation for both sides.

Mangekyo:


Lol okay. I think I'll call it a day for today . They've brought our light. Nice chatting with you, lad.

Mangekyo:


If Russia destroys that UK environment that runs their nuclear weapon, its game over. It's more like their control room, they control their nuclear weapons from there. So wiping it out should pretty much end the fight before it even starts lol. It's common knowledge, no need to type epistles.

Meanwhile, I'm laughing really hard right now reading this. It says UK gets COMPREHENSIVELY outgunned lmfao

Simeonjoe1:


And I'll end it by still stating and standing on my point a conventional war between Russia and UK will lead to war of attrition. And when it comes to that the UK has the upper hand (remember they did same against Germany in ww2).... THE UK IS NOT A WALK OVER FOR THE RUSSIA MILITARY 1 ON 1.

Toktee:
What you posted down there is an individual opinion,why don't you visit Brussels and find out from NATO itself.....first when you hear NATO what comes to your mind?..An attack on Britain will invites it allies,that's when Russia and your type will understand that the brutality of a coalition army.....

Mangekyo:


If Russia destroys that UK environment that runs their nuclear weapon, its game over. It's more like their control room, they control their nuclear weapons from there. So wiping it out should pretty much end the fight before it even starts lol. It's common knowledge, no need to type EPISTLES.

Meanwhile, I'm laughing really hard right now reading this. It says UK gets COMPREHENSIVELY outgunned lmfao

Mangekyo:


BTW, you're wrong and somewhat right too.
If both nations go all out in a nuclear battle, then both of them are getting decimated. There may be survivors in the side of Russia but definitely not UK since their land isn't that large. Nuclear weapons are so dangerous. A single drop can destroy a full city, reason why countries like Nigeria aren't allowed to have them. Also, Russia and USA are reducing the number of nuclear weapon the possess. Russia formally had upto 50k nuclear warheads. They've reduced them to about approximately 7k now, same with the USA. I think they do because it's too dangerous to possess them. Also, countries like China, North Korea, France, UK keep adding more to their Arsenal and are still nowhere near Russia and USA who are reducing theirs. See those two are boss! You think UK really stands a chance, I'll let you be. Maybe one day we'll get to see them in action

Mangekyo:


You could make a fortune from comedy

dermmy:


Bro nuclear chain of command is far more complex than you think o. Even if Russia destroys or decapitate U.K's ground base nuclear command centre they still have airborne command centre where they can issue a command to launch a massive retaliation and I know every nuclear armed state has such.

Have you heard about U.S Operation Looking Glass ? It's an airborne Boeing EC-135C command and control centre parked at Offut Airbase, Nebraska. It goes into the air once U.S. activates DEFCON-1. In case the ground base was destroyed during a nuclear first strike U.S can still activates its nuclear weapons remotely from that plane. And there is still a submarine command and control centre too. And I believe every nuclear armed state has these optional emergency command centers.

So if Russia disabled U.K's ground command centre in a first strike. U.K would still be able to activate its nukes.

NwaNimo1:
Warning!

[img]https://media1./images/7cc76913dffa93726e4dca35f821c35a/tenor.gif?itemid=22308922[/img]

Mangekyo:


You could make a fortune from comedy

DannyG8:
I just dey pity who waste sperm born this hegoat way dey call USA Britain oga your mama supposed abort you for toilet

Toktee:
same to you, you keep arguing in support of Russia like Chelsea fans just arguing blind.


How many wars have Russia fought and won?

It toom Russia 20yrs to subdue Chechen authority in war until it installed a stooge...


Russia is big in land mass not population, the population of the United is even bigger than that of Russia, I point this out cos these are the basis thru which people like hid to argue blindly.


Forget population, forget tanks,forget sub's etc...


The 21century war have gone passed that level, it's all depends on your economic viability which Russia is trading behind the UK.

The so called Russia anti defense missiles we're installed in Syria yet isreal were bush dismantling them, pls go to bed.

Toktee:
Accept what you are taught and move on instead of asking unnecessary question.

Mangekyo:


You could make a fortune from comedy

Simeonjoe1:


Lol baba go enjoy your light I dey pray may dey bring our own too. My phone don low. But you have to consider this realistically not from the books or paper to understand my point of view. CIAO

Lekison:
last time I checked, Igboho is still in Nigeria. He didn't run out of the country.

Mangekyo:


First off, you should piss off my mention if you're a man u-tard!

Weren't USA fućked by Vietnam? Perhaps it makes them weak.

Russia is in land mass and not population? Did I ever argue about that? What I said is their citizens can spread out thereby reducing the risk of them all getting caught in a nuclear attack. The UK citizens would get jam packed thereby exposing them to nuclear weapons. A single strike could wipe out half of their popolatuons with the way their land is small and jam packed by people.

Who forgets weapons, tanks, aircrafts and other military equipments in a battle?
Let's just hope you aren't a clown.

UK population is larger than Russia? Good but Russia still has more active military personnel and even researve. Sit down!

You're even comparing Israel to a country like Syria. Obviously a Defence would definitely yield in if it faces endless quality attacks.
The Iron dome couldn't intercept all the little rockets small hamas fired into their territory.

If a country like Russia fires its high quality fast paced missiles, then the result of the iron dome is gonna be the same too. It would get breached!

SmartyPants:


Ogbeni you say what?

In the history of war, no nation has fought more major wars than the British. They've calmed down of recent but cowards, they certainly have never been.

Do you know what England sacrificed in the two world wars?

Toktee:
At your age and level of education you cannot make point without insults,what's the problem?
It's because you were born this way or you have chosen to be like this?....Or maybe is poor upbringing?
Well,as you likely said I will pissed off your mention for the reason that i cannot argue with someone that lack morality.

TommyGs:
Russia is rich in mineral resources, especially gas deposit in Siberia. The West still think that Russia alone shouldn't be the owner of the gas deposits there.

Joeblack001:

Pls don't also forget that US is the current world power...I think Russia understands that better...

Ruggedniggaone:
Putin my nigga,they are just looking for a way to test their long rage missile and white house go make sense for that

Olaolufred:


I have replied your goons too.

I can't see what US and NATO achieved than being defeated by Russia in Syria.

No other side to the story.

SmartyPants:


Ogbeni you say what?

In the history of war, no nation has fought more major wars than the British. They've calmed down of recent but cowards, they certainly have never been.

Do you know what England sacrificed in the two world wars?

Mangekyo:


Well you're right, it isn't always what's on paper. But again, Russia are miles ahead of them. They have to be very strategic to stand a chance.

UK isn't that big compared to Russia. If Russia can deploy 500 nuclear weapons into UK territory, I doubt if they will survive.

Simeonjoe1:


Why I believe China military is growing very fast they still have a lot of catch up to do which I believe won't even be in the next 5 decades. Note the US military is not stagnant they too are growing in sophistication and are aware of the Chinese threat which is even keeping them up on their toes. While China military is nice and shiny atleast all those are paper capabilities, the Chinese military has not been proven in actual modern multidimensional warfare. Until they prove their military might and doctrines in warfare the Chinese military will always be under the shadow of the USA and even technically Russia