TenQ:

Being evasive doesn't help your position.
The truth is static.

There is no one within the scientific community that does not know that ONE Gravitational Singularity inflated to produce the universe. If there is a theory that speaks otherwise, lets know!

It is surprising that its either you don't know the answer which would be pathetic or you are bent on lies in other to justify your position which is also pathetic.

Alaye, go and learn basic science and stop disturbing me.
You are scientifically illiterate, who's arguing that gravitational singularity didn't inflate in the beginning of the universe?

You are confusing yourself because you don't know science. You are only pretending that you do but it can't be hidden.

Workch:
Alaye, go and learn basic science and stop disturbing me.
You are scientifically illiterate, who's arguing that gravitational singularity didn't inflate in the beginning of the universe?

You are confusing yourself because you don't know science. You are only pretending that you do but it can't be hidden.

How many Gravitational Singularities inflated to form our universe?
It is a simple question!

TenQ:

How many Gravitational Singularities inflated to form our universe?
It is a simple question!

If answer this one, you will bring another junk science.

OK yes, so what's next?

Workch:
If answer this one, you will bring another junk science.

OK yes, so what's next?

What do you mean by YES!

TenQ:

What do you mean by YES!

A gravitational singularity inflated in the beginning.
So what?
Make sure you research whatever you want to say properly, don't embarrass yourself.

Workch:
A gravitational singularity inflated in the beginning.
So what?
Make sure you research whatever you want to say properly, don't embarrass yourself.

Where is it now?
Is it still in existence?

TenQ:

Where is it now?
Is it still in existence?

I knew you were going to ask an embarrassing question...

Do you understand big bang theory?

Workch:
I knew you were going to ask an embarrassing question...

Do you understand big bang theory?

Please Educate me!
Is the gravitational singularity (that inflated to form the universe) still in existence?

TenQ:

Please Educate me!
Is the gravitational singularity (that inflated to form the universe) still in existence?

The universe was contained in the gravitational singularity that inflated.
It's still inflating to until date. It means that we are in that inflating singularity.

Read about redshift and the expansion of the universe to understand

Workch:
The universe was contained in the gravitational singularity that inflated.
It's still inflating to until date. It means that we are in that inflating singularity.

Read about redshift and the expansion of the universe to understand

If the gravitational singularity has inflated is it still a gravitational singularity BY DEFINITION?

TenQ:

If the gravitational singularity has inflated is it still a gravitational singularity BY DEFINITION?

Nope, it was.

Workch:
Nope, it was.

So you consider the "inflated gravitational singularity" that inflated to form the universe to still be
1. With Its gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. With Its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

Is this what you are saying?

TenQ:

So you consider the "inflated gravitational singularity" that inflated to form the universe to still be
1. With Its gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. With Its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

Is this what you are saying?

Yes, that's why it had "infinite" density and gravitational force.
The smaller you make a mass, it more dense it becomes and the more gravity it exacts. We have seen this in blackholes and neutron stars, read about them

Workch:
Yes, that's why it had "infinite" density and gravitational force.
The smaller you make a mass, it more dense it becomes and the more gravity it exacts. We have seen this in blackholes and neutron stars, read about them

Ia m not asking about the definition of the gravitational singularity.

I am asking for "the specific gravitational singularity that inflated to become the universe"
If it has inflated,
Do you consider the "inflated gravitational singularity" that inflated to form the universe to still be
1. having a gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. having its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

TenQ:

Ia m not asking about the definition of the gravitational singularity.

I am asking for "the specific gravitational singularity that inflated to become the universe"
If it has inflated,
Do you consider the "inflated gravitational singularity" that inflated to form the universe to still be
1. having a gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. having its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

The inflating gravitational singularity is the universe you are in today, you are making me repeat this.

The more you reduce the volume for a certain mass, the denser it becomes. This is basic physics

Workch:


The inflating gravitational singularity is the universe you are in today, you are making me repeat this.

The more you reduce the volume for a certain mass, the denser it becomes. This is basic physics

Its because you are not answering the question.
SInce the gravitational singularity IS THE Universe,
Doe the Universe fulfil BOTH of these conditions
1. having a gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. having its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

TenQ:


Its because you are not answering the question.
SInce the gravitational singularity IS THE Universe,
Doe the Universe fulfil BOTH of these conditions
1. having a gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. having its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

You won't ask number 1 question if you had understood the volume, mass and density relationships I explained. Please go back and read it.

Number 2 question: you won't ask the question if you understand the explanation I referred you to in number 1 answer

Workch:
You won't ask number 1 question if you had understood the volume, mass and density relationships I explained. Please go back and read it.

Number 2 question: you won't ask the question if you understand the explanation I referred you to in number 1 answer

As evasively as a slime!



You said: "Gravitational singularity IS THE Universe"
Doe the Universe fulfil BOTH of these conditions of a Singularity?
1. having a gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. having its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

It is a YES or NO answer.

You just don't want to admit that the Gravitational Singularity that inflated to form the Universe is NO MORE. What we have in its stead is our UNIVERSE.

You see how simple the truth is?

TenQ:

As evasively as a slime!



You said: "Gravitational singularity IS THE Universe"
Doe the Universe fulfil BOTH of these conditions of a Singularity?
1. having a gravity/mass is extremely dense (its density tends to infinity)
2. having its size as extremely small (almost no dimensional size)

It is a YES or NO answer.

You just don't want to admit that the Gravitational Singularity that inflated to form the Universe is NO MORE. What we have in its stead is our UNIVERSE.

You see how simple the truth is?

It's impossible for an inflating universe to still have infinite mass and gravity. Don't you know physics?
Inflaton will increase volume, hence infinite gravity and density will disappear

You just need to know the relationship between mass, volume, gravity and density and the problem is solved. Go and read it then you will understand everything and stop asking stupid questions

Workch:
It's impossible for an inflating universe to still have infinite mass and gravity. Don't you know physics?

You just need to know the relationship between mass, volume, gravity and density. Go and read it then you will understand everything and stop asking stupid questions

So, why waste everybodies time by insisting that Gravitational Singularity was a Constant entity!?

TenQ:

So, why waste everybodies time by insisting that Gravitational Singularity was a Constant entity!?

Because you don't know physics, you don't know the difference between "gravitational singularity" and "constant gravity".

You have not grasped it, you are still confused.

TenQ:

So, why waste everybodies time by insisting that Gravitational Singularity was a Constant entity!?

gravitional singularity is not constant, total gravity is constant across the universe.

Basic physics knowledge would have help you get the difference.

Workch:
gravitional singularity is not constant, total gravity is constant across the universe.

Basic physics knowledge would have help you get the difference.

See how you are twisting yourself
See the attached!

And after educating you about your mixup, you still have effontry to accuse me about your own misunderstanding

TenQ:

Gravitational constant is different from Gravitational field strength

F=G(M1M2/r*r)

The attractive force (F) between two point-like bodies is directly proportional to the product of their masses (M1 and M2) and inversely proportional to the square of the distance, r, between their centers of mass.:


The constant of proportionality, G, is the gravitational constant. it is different from the the gravitational field

The magnitude of the resultant gravitational field strength denoted by term g, at a distance r to a point is
g=GM/r*r

I rest my case

TenQ:

See how you are twisting yourself
See the attached!

And after educating you about your mixup, you still have effontry to accuse me about your own misunderstanding




I rest my case

lol, educating who?

Dude, you can’t differentiate gravitational singularity from a gravitational constant.

You are illiterate and proud in it.

Go learn basic science and come back. Start with the difference between gravitational singularity and gravitational Constant.

Even a secondary school physics student cannot find it hard to understand basic science terms like you do.

Workch:
lol, educating who?

Dude, you can’t differentiate gravitational singularity from a gravitational constant.

You are illiterate and proud in it.

Go learn basic science and come back. Start with the difference between gravitational singularity and gravitational Constant.

Even a secondary school physics student cannot find it hard to understand basic science terms like you do.

It's not a strange behaviour of atheists and wanabe atheists on NL. When they are intimidated, they result to lies and misinformation.

Good night

TenQ:

It's not a strange behaviour of atheists and wanabe atheists on NL. When they are intimidated, they result to lies and misinformation.

Good night

I have tried making you see the difference between gravitational singularity and gravitational constant but you are scientifically illiterate.

This is why you should have paid attention in class, you will be muddling simple terms up.

TenQ:

It's not a strange behaviour of atheists and wanabe atheists on NL. When they are intimidated, they result to lies and misinformation.

Good night

If I were you, I will swallow my pride browse those two terms to understand them perfectly and how they operate.

You don’t know jack, you are a sciolist

Workch:
If I were you, I will swallow my pride browse those two terms to understand them perfectly and how they operate.

You don’t know jack, you are a sciolist

LOL!!
Who is worse between an ignorant person and one who knows but falsifies the TRUTH!

Its a character problem and we all know why!

Workch:
I have tried making you see the difference between gravitational singularity and gravitational constant but you are scientifically illiterate.

This is why you should have paid attention in class, you will be muddling simple terms up.

Only a fool will not be able to quote where I misdefined these two terms

[s]

TenQ:

Only a fool will not be able to quote where I misdefined these two terms

[/s]Thicker than a brick. Illiterate that won’t learn

Workch:
[s][/s]Thicker than a brick. Illiterate that won’t learn

Then I assume only the fool cannot defend his false allegation!

TenQ:

Then I assume only the fool cannot defend his false allegation!

You want an inflated singularity to still remain a singularity.