GreatAxeMan:
Yes, Jesus was related to Joseph by blood.
The Messiah was promised from the lineage of the House of David and Joseph was a direct descendant of David.
Jesus owed His human nature to both of His parents and not just one of them, while at the same time He also had His Divine uncreated nature as part of God's identity.

AntiChristian:


Bring the Bible verse that says Joseph copulated with Mary to give birth to Jesus. Cos that's the only way they can be related by blood!

AntiChristian:

Jesus had no father. This means he should have no genealogy. He is the son of Mary only.
How can Matthew Jesus's acclaimed disciple include in-laws or relatives in Jesus's genealogy? Was Jesus related to Joseph by blood?
No matter the way you look at it this is a big blunder!

GreatAxeMan:
Our God is not limited like Allah. God genetically made Jesus a descendant of David by divine command, [/b]not copulation. [b]Even DNA is subject to God's will.
I can understand why as a Muslim you will be obsessed with copulation since it was your prophet's favourite activity apart from plagiarizing the Bible!

GreatAxeMan:
1. Yes, Jesus was related to Joseph by blood.
2. The Messiah was promised from the lineage of the House of David and Joseph was a direct descendant of David.
3. Jesus owed His human nature to both of His parents and not just one of them, while at the same time He also had His Divine uncreated nature as part of God's identity.

GreatAxeMan:
Our God is not limited like Allah. God genetically made Jesus a descendant of David by divine command, not copulation. Even DNA is subject to God's will.
I can understand why as a Muslim you will be obsessed with copulation since it was your prophet's favourite activity apart from plagiarizing the Bible!

MaxInDHouse:


I said "according to the Jewish custom" so you may find it wrong but amongst the Jews when a woman is married, whatever child comes out of her womb is her husband's responsibility unless the man reject such a child. But from the story Joseph claimed Jesus that's why all those living in their neighbourhood back then regarded Jesus as the son of the carpenter! Matthew 13:55

Matthew is a Jew so he surely understand their custom before leaking Jesus' genealogy to Joseph's ancestral lineage!

PastorMIsBack:


I read EVERYTHING you wrote and it does not CLAIM that Jesus had no father!

AntiChristian:



Where did God said he genetically made Jesus a descendant of David. You guys can lie for Christ o! Where did your God say all these in the Bible mentioning genetics and DNA?

GreatAxeMan:
Simple. Why does Jesus have two lineages if David's genetic root was not supernaturally and divinely planted into His DNA?

AntiChristian:


Bring the Bible verse that says Joseph copulated with Mary to give birth to Jesus. Cos that's the only way they can be related by blood!

cornelboy:


We all know that Jesus was conceived without copulation. He had an earthly father Joseph the husband of Mary. Mary had other sons aside Jesus.

He didn't need to be his biological father before he could father him.

Kobojunkie:
Probably directly through His mother.

AntiChristian:
The mother was never mentioned in the two genealogies! Joseph was mentioned in both!

AntiChristian:


Jesus wasn't connected biologically to Joseph so how was he connected genealogically to David by two separate family trees?

AntiChristian:

The mother was never mentioned in the two genealogies! Joseph was mentioned in both!

MaxInDHouse:


Are you sure?

"Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ" Matthew 1:16

AntiChristian:

[b]The Genealogy was unrelated to Mary but to her husband.[/b] Was Mary mentioned as part of the genealogy?

MaxInDHouse:


I have explained to you but it seems you're not reading with keen interest to get the answer to your question.
Matthew mentioned "Mary" because he was referring to Mary's genealogy not Joseph's that is why some names along with line did not correlate with that of Luke's account!

AntiChristian:


No it wasn't related to Mary!

Eliud was the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. Matthew 1:15-16

Jesus Himself was about thirty years old when He began His ministry. He (Jesus) was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph Luke 3:23-23

cornelboy:
If you don't get it forget about.

The Koran is there for you to deal with.

Have you seen my post about Satan revealing part of Koran to Mohammed? And how your prophet was bewitched?

AntiChristian:


Off-points! You can create a thread for that since if you can't decipher the blunder above!

AntiChristian:


No it wasn't related to Mary!

Eliud was the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. Matthew 1:15-16

Jesus Himself was about thirty years old when He began His ministry. He (Jesus) was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph Luke 3:23-23

MaxInDHouse:



Matthew was talking about the tradition of the Jews which states that your son in-law become your son due to marriage!

AntiChristian:

Where did Matthew state that?
And how come two different genealogy and only Joseph and David is same while others are different?

AntiChristian:


Where did Matthew state that?

And how come two different genealogy and only Joseph and David is same while others are different?

cornelboy:
What are the names of David's sons?

MaxInDHouse:


Joseph and Mary were both descendants of King David but one descended through Solomon (son of David) Matthew 1:6

While the other from Nathan (son of David) Luke 3:31

AntiChristian:


This is a lie! Never was that stated in that Luke verse

Jesus Himself was about thirty years old when He began His ministry. He (Jesus) was regarded as the son of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph Luke 3:23-24

MaxInDHouse:


Of course nah, we are saying the same thing.

Jesus was REGARDED as the son of the man who raised him. So Luke's account is about Joseph's genealogy!

AntiChristian:

Both account is for Joseph! None is for Mary!

MaxInDHouse:


Please don't give yourself BP over this matter!