surah 7:18 Allah said, “Get out of Paradise! You are disgraced and rejected! I will certainly fill up Hell with you and your followers all together.”
surah 7:20 Then Satan tempted them in order to expose what was hidden of their unclothedness. He said, “Your Lord has forbidden this tree to you only to prevent you from becoming angels or immortals.”

Satan is more powerful than allah. allah could not ask satan to leave paradise. After asking satan to leave paradise, Satan remained there to deceive Adam and Eve.

So, he does not obey allah and allah does not have the power to evict him out of paradise.

satan has to be the all-powerful in that islamic paradise.

U dey whine yourself

Relax from ur madness

Its 2022. Religion is dead

You know how to jump to conclusion o. Don't u think he may have kept Satan here in order to prove a point? Adam and Eve rebelled against his rulership, his sovereignty. And he already prophesied that that rebel will be destroyed.

Islam states that they were in heaven at the time the deception happened.

What's your take?

tijahesurua:
You know how to jump to conclusion o. Don't u think he may have kept Satan here in order to prove a point? Adam and Eve rebelled against his rulership, his sovereignty. And he already prophesied that that rebel will be destroyed.

Sixfiguresmart:
Islam states that they were in heaven at the time the deception happened.

What's your take?

Oh i don't believe they were in heaven. If it were true it would only be in a figurative sense. They were "in His presence." One reason is that the contemporay book the Bible says that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom (1Cor. 15:50). So what¿ They cast those guys out of heaven into another realm earth? This beautiful planet was created to be inhabited forever. Heaven belongs to Him. And soon, He will bring an end to those ruining it and the meek ones will live and enjoy this world just as He purposed.

tijahesurua:


Oh i don't believe they were in heaven. If it were true it would only be in a figurative sense. They were "in His presence." One reason is that the contemporay book the Bible says that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom (1Cor. 15:50). So what¿ They cast those guys out of heaven into another realm earth? This beautiful planet was created to be inhabited forever. Heaven belongs to Him. And soon, He will bring an end to those ruining it and the meek ones will live and enjoy this world just as He purposed.

You are right, Sir.
What I had posted is the false teaching of islam. They claim that Adam and Eve were in heaven before they were thrown down to the earth. Are you aware that 1.8 billion muslims are being deceived right now?

Sixfiguresmart:
You are right, Sir.
What I had posted is the false teaching of islam. They claim that Adam and Eve were in heaven before they were thrown down to the earth. Are you aware that 1.8 billion muslims are being deceived right now?

Indeed we have to realise that we all are being deceived one way or another because we never take enough time and to see for ourselves what the truth is.
For example due to the infiltration of philosophies that teach false doctrines such as the immortality of the soul, the trinity, a hell of torment and even the date of Jesus' birth and pagan ceremonies that dishonour the One we claim to serve has deceieved a lot more than we thought. I mean its part of the reason people leave religion totally.

tijahesurua:


Indeed we have to realise that we all are being deceived one way or another because we never take enough time and to see for ourselves what the truth is.
For example due to the infiltration of philosophies that teach false doctrines such as the immortality of the soul, the trinity, a hell of torment and even the date of Jesus' birth and pagan ceremonies that dishonour the One we claim to serve has deceived a lot more than we thought. I mean its part of the reason people leave religion totally.

I totally agree and that is one of the more reasons why we have the Bible as a constitutional guide for Christians. It is divinely structured to serve as a mentor and a power that supersedes our knowledge, age, experience, and permutations.

The infiltrations can all be traced back without difficulties and that is one of the selling points of Islamists. Because they thrive amidst the disparity that outrageously encircles Christian denominations. They are a political ideology that strives to derive legitimacy from Islam. My goal is to be an instrument to reach out to black Muslims that I also love as compatriots and tell them the verified facts straight from their own sources so that they can see how deceitful these big wigs have been and how they have manipulated the truth and painted Islam as a noble, peaceful and honorable religion that is worth dying for. And, the fallacious prospect of living in a paradise with 72 virgins.

They also stand the chance to know Christ and God so as to make it.

Sixfiguresmart:

They also stand the chance to know Christ and God so as to make it.

To know The True God yes.

But to know Christ or Chrestus is another level of deceit.

The Roman Empire created Christ after they destroyed Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple in 70AD because the Jews were waiting for a Messiah to come and defeat the Romans for them

But Christ lived and died before the 70 CE. So, how did they create him when they themselves HEARD of him?
And, think about this, did they also create the prophecy about him that was written before they became an empire?

Also, think about the fact that there is no document or reference to back your claim.

More so, you can reckon that if they wanted to create Christ, they would have done it in Latin because we had Khristós in Greek before Christus in Latin.

MindHacker9009:


To know The True God yes.

But to know Christ or Chrestus is another level of deceit.

The Roman Empire created Christ after they destroyed Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple in 70AD because the Jews were waiting for a Messiah to come and defeat the Romans for them

Sixfiguresmart:
But Christ lived and died before the 70 CE. So, how did they create him when they themselves HEARD of him?
And, think about this, did they also create the prophecy about him that was written before they became an empire?

Also, think about the fact that there is no document or reference to back your claim.

More so, you can reckon that if they wanted to create Christ, they would have done it in Latin because we had Khristós in Greek before Christus in Latin.

Watch the video documetary, Jesus Christ was not mentioned in the scrolls written during time the of Jesus near Jerusalem.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PuogYgGtTQ

We know that Jesus was not mentioned.
The dead sea scroll covers the old testament or the Hebrew scriptures.
No one built a case on whether Jesus was mentioned of not. Jesus was not mentioned and neither was allah mentioned.
The name mentioned in it is YHWH which is transliterated as YAHWEH or JEHOVAH.

Now that you have come to believe that Jesus is not found in the dead sea, it proves that you have faith in the integrity of that scroll. Right in the scroll, the name found there is JEHOVAH. Will you now accept that allah is a false name and that JEHOVAH is the rightful name of God?

You cannot eat your cake and have it. Jesus is not found there. We agree with you. Now, from the same document on which you build you case, the name JEHOVAH is mentioned. How virtuous a man are you right now to acknowledge that that name found in the dead sea scroll is the actual name of God.

I want to hear from you

MindHacker9009:


Watch the video documetary, Jesus Christ was not mentioned in the scrolls written during time of Jesus near Jerusalem.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PuogYgGtTQ

You are doing a good job on Islam.

But on Jesus Christ, some of the scrolls were written during the time of Jesus Christ about events at that time. But there was no mention of Jesus Christ.

If you check my first post l did not mention allah.

This was my first post:

To know The True God yes.

But to know Christ or Chrestus is another level of deceit.

The Roman Empire created Christ after they destroyed Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple in 70AD because the Jews were waiting for a Messiah to come and defeat the Romans for them

Sixfiguresmart:
We know that Jesus was not mentioned.
The dead sea scroll covers the old testament or the Hebrew scriptures.
No one built a case on whether Jesus was mentioned of not. Jesus was not mentioned and neither was allah mentioned.
The name mentioned in it is YHWH which is transliterated as YAHWEH or JEHOVAH.

Now that you have come to believe that Jesus is not found in the dead sea, it proves that you have faith in the integrity of that scroll. Right in the scroll, the name found there is JEHOVAH. Will you now accept that allah is a false name and that JEHOVAH is the rightful name of God?

You cannot eat your cake and have it. Jesus is not found there. We agree with you. Now, from the same document on which you build you case, the name JEHOVAH is mentioned. How virtuous a man are you right now to acknowledge that that name found in the dead sea scroll is the actual name of God.

I want to hear from you

I think the OP is blinded with Islam than he even knows about Christianity!

Sixfiguresmart:
We know that Jesus was not mentioned.
The dead sea scroll covers the old testament or the Hebrew scriptures.
No one built a case on whether Jesus was mentioned of not. Jesus was not mentioned and neither was allah mentioned.
The name mentioned in it is YHWH which is transliterated as YAHWEH or JEHOVAH.

Now that you have come to believe that Jesus is not found in the dead sea, it proves that you have faith in the integrity of that scroll. Right in the scroll, the name found there is JEHOVAH. Will you now accept that allah is a false name and that JEHOVAH is the rightful name of God?

You cannot eat your cake and have it. Jesus is not found there. We agree with you. Now, from the same document on which you build you case, the name JEHOVAH is mentioned. How virtuous a man are you right now to acknowledge that that name found in the dead sea scroll is the actual name of God.

I want to hear from you

The dead sea scroll also mentioned EL, the one that gave israEL to yahweh as inheritance.
You’ve forgotten both you and Muslims are worshipping Abrahamaic gods?

Maynman:


The dead sea scroll also mentioned EL, the one that gave israEL to yahweh as inheritance.
You’ve forgotten both you and Muslims are worshipping Abrahamaic gods?

Lesson 101, Elohim was not the God that Abraham worshipped. Elohim mean god. Elohim was used as the gods of Egyptian, Elohim is used to refer to stone, Elohim is used for wooden gods and humans.

That Elohim worshipped by Moses has a name. His name is Jehovah. In Hebrew, it is Yahweh. In Aramaic it is YHWH.

So choose your preference in the language that you speak.

Just as Jesus name is not Christ (which means anointed one)Jesus is English, while Yehoshua or Yeshua is Hebrew. Choose your preference according to the language that you speak.

El is the short form of Elohim.

Look at the attached and thank the true God for enlightenment.

Maynman:


The dead sea scroll also mentioned EL, the one that gave israEL to yahweh as inheritance.
You’ve forgotten both you and Muslims are worshipping Abrahamaic gods?

So now that you have got this education, will you accept that allah is a false name?

If I asked you the meaning of the name of your god, truly you have no clue. You are not taught. They do not want you to know anything. You will go out of the quran to source for answers. But, the Bible is whole. Explains itself.

Sixfiguresmart:
Lesson 101, Elohim was not the God that Abraham worshipped. Elohim mean god. Elohim was used as the gods of Egyptian, Elohim is used to refer to stone, Elohim is used for wooden gods and humans.

That Elohim worshipped by Moses has a name. His name is Jehovah. In Hebrew, it is Yahweh. In Aramaic it is YHWH.

So choose your preference in the language that you speak.

Just as Jesus name is not Christ (which means anointed one)Jesus is English, while Yehoshua or Yeshua is Hebrew. Choose your preference according to the language that you speak.

El is the short form of Elohim.

Look at the attached and thank the true God for enlightenment.

Elohim means gods. Elohim and allah means same thing.
Elohim is derived from EL and not a short form of it.
El means God.
Elohim are children of EL, and yahweh is one of his kids.

Christ is a greek word which means messiah in Hebrew and it means the anointed, we have many anointed prophets (christ/messiah) in tanakh.

You’ve forgotten both you and Muslims worship Abrahamaic gods? Keep shooting yourself on the foot!

Sixfiguresmart:
So now that you have got this education, will you accept that allah is a false name?

If I asked you the meaning of the name of your god, truly you have no clue. You are not taught. They do not want you to know anything. You will go out of the quran to source for answers. But, the Bible is whole. Explains itself.

Allah and elohim means same thing, and it means gods.
Is Israelite yahweh also a false god?

And you know the meaning of Yhwh which is a Egyptian hieroglyphs?
Is it in your bible?, maybe you need to listen to your advice and source for answers outside your Bible that’s written by UNKNOWN AUTHORS.



You’ve forgotten both you and Muslims worship Abrahamaic gods? Keep shooting yourself on the foot!

MindHacker9009:
You are doing a good job on Islam.

But on Jesus Christ, some of the scrolls were written during the time of Jesus Christ about events at that time. But there was no mention of Jesus Christ.

If you check my first post l did not mention allah.

This was my first post:

To know The True God yes.

But to know Christ or Chrestus is another level of deceit.

The Roman Empire created Christ after they destroyed Jerusalem and the Jewish Temple in 70AD because the Jews were waiting for a Messiah to come and defeat the Romans for them

The case here is that, the scrolls i questiois the dead sea scroll. These scrolls were copied held on by Jews who did not believe in Jesus. They were still in expectation of the Messiah who had come and gone before Jerusalem was destroyed.

There is no doubt about Jesus existence. Even atheists and Buddhists agree because you can't make that up. Jesus was already an established figure before the Roman invasion. Even Herod wanted to meet him. His works of fame were much covered even to Africa.

I don't know what school of thought you identify with that questions the existence of Christ. Jesus was in a DISTRICT of Rome not the epicenter of the seat of power.

So, why would they create Jesus when beyond the reach of the Romans, Jesus had already been preached about?

The Greeks wrote about him, the Persians, Africans, Malta, Spain. Etc. So, what is it about Jesus existence that your belief system eschews?

When the Europeans came to Benin City they were amazed at the powerful Kingdom they saw and their historians wrote about it and the Oba at the time and drew pictures of the city in 1668.
But there were Roman, Jewish and other historians during the time of Jesus and not one of them wrote anything about Jesus Christ with all His fame in:

Matthew 4:24
The news about Jesus spread all over Syria,

Mark 1:28
28 And immediately his fame spread abroad throughout all the region round about Galilee.

Luke 4:14
14 Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread through the whole countryside.

Now ask yourself if Jesus was in Benin City when the Europeans were in Benin City and they did not write anything about Him during the time but decades later but unknown authors who were not born during His time after He had ascended to heaven, but the historians at the time wrote about the powerful kingdom and the Oba during the same time .

Sixfiguresmart:
The case here is that, the scrolls i questiois the dead sea scroll. These scrolls were copied held on by Jews who did not believe in Jesus. They were still in expectation of the Messiah who had come and gone before Jerusalem was destroyed.

There is no doubt about Jesus existence. Even atheists and Buddhists agree because you can't make that up. Jesus was already an established figure before the Roman invasion. Even Herod wanted to meet him. His works of fame were much covered even to Africa.

I don't know what school of thought you identify with that questions the existence of Christ. Jesus was in a DISTRICT of Rome not the epicenter of the seat of power.

So, why would they create Jesus when beyond the reach of the Romans, Jesus had already been preached about?

The Greeks wrote about him, the Persians, Africans, Malta, Spain. Etc. So, what is it about Jesus existence that your belief system eschews?

MindHacker9009:
When the Europeans came to Benin City they were amazed at the powerful Kingdom they saw and their historians wrote about it and the Oba at the time and drew pictures of the city in 1668.
But there were Roman, Jewish and other historians during the time of Jesus and not one of them wrote anything about Jesus Christ with all His fame in:

Matthew 4:24
The news about Jesus spread all over Syria,

Mark 1:28
28 And immediately his fame spread abroad throughout all the region round about Galilee.

Luke 4:14
14 Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread through the whole countryside.

Now ask yourself if Jesus was in Benin City when the Europeans were in Benin City and they did not write anything about Him during the time but decades later but unknown authors who were not born during His time after He had ascended to heaven, but the historians at the time wrote about the powerful kingdom and the Oba during the same time .

Sir, Kindly check the epochs. The civilisation and timing is monstrous. Jesus died in 33 CE which is about 2000 years ago.

The British invaded the Benin kingdom 125 years ago. Figure that. I want you to build your logic on that.

Before the formation of the kingdoms from which these historians that you are smooching, Jesus had lived and ascended.

Pull up evidence from the Syriac, amharic, persians, the Romans, the Greeks etc. All these neo-empires cannot be use in your juxtaposition.

I made reference to Benin City as an analogy just so that you can understand what happens when the Europeans occupy a kingdom.

Watch the video of the fall of Jerusalem in the 4th century BC to the Greeks and in 70 CE to the Romans and how well it was documented.

The question you should ask yourself now is why did no historian living during the time of Jesus Christ from 0 to 33 CE write anything about Him with all His fame in:

Matthew 4:24
The news about Jesus spread all over Syria,

Mark 1:28
28 And immediately his fame spread abroad throughout all the region round about Galilee.

Luke 4:14
14 Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread through the whole countryside.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF5j0URuTMs

Sixfiguresmart:
Sir, Kindly check the epochs. The civilisation and timing is monstrous. Jesus died in 33 CE which is about 2000 years ago.

The British invaded the Benin kingdom 125 years ago. Figure that. I want you to build your logic on that.

Before the formation of the kingdoms from which these historians that you are smooching, Jesus had lived and ascended.

Pull up evidence from the Syriac, amharic, persians, the Romans, the Greeks etc. All these neo-empires cannot be use in your juxtaposition.

MindHacker9009:
I made reference to Benin City as an analogy just so that you can understand what happens when the Europeans occupy a kingdom.

Watch the video of the fall of Jerusalem in the 4th century BC to the Greeks and in 70 CE to the Romans and how well it was documented.

The question you should ask yourself now is why did no historian living during the time of Jesus Christ from 0 to 33 CE write anything about Him with all His fame in:

Matthew 4:24
The news about Jesus spread all over Syria,

Mark 1:28
28 And immediately his fame spread abroad throughout all the region round about Galilee.

Luke 4:14
14 Jesus returned to Galilee in the power of the Spirit, and news about him spread through the whole countryside.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF5j0URuTMs

One thing is that I am more of a read person. I do not watch videos.

If your analogy was rooted in invasion, it is incongruous still. The time difference is staggering.

Not withstanding before that invasion the message had already spread. In fact, it spread to the people that you are accusing of making it up. They also HEARD it.

On what are you basing your analogy?

So if a man ascends into the sky no eyewitness will write about it even though it will be seen by the whole town.

I think you should continue with exposing Isalm for now.

Sixfiguresmart:
One thing is that I am more of a read person. I do not watch videos.

If your analogy was rooted in invasion, it is incongruous still. The time difference is staggering.

Not withstanding before that invasion the message had already spread. In fact, it spread to the people that you are accusing of making it up. They also HEARD it.

On what are you basing your analogy?

Before Jesus ascended to the sky, many birds have. How many people wrote about them?

See, if I sit you down right now interrogate you in detail regarding happenings around you, you will be shock about how much information your eyes see but your mouth cannot vocalize.

Writers see a million stuff but how many can they write?

Everyone is not a writer. Back in the first century writing was like using a Lamborghini. Not everyone can afford the writing materials or have the education to write. There were special people called the masoretes or the Levites who were assigned the task of copying. That is why we have fragments of the original scrolls today. Because they used papyrus and parchments.

Even the Romans in question, ask them to produce an original copy of the outline that you claim was used in this so-called scheme that you are insinuating. They cannot. The Romans, though they were not invaded by any nation, cannot find the evidence of your arguments.

Why not give the Christians the credit due deserved. We have archaeologically proven and carbon dated fragments that went up to the time in question.

One thing to note is that, some of the books in the Bible were written during the travels of the apostles to other nations. Some were written after the invasion. Even Roman historians can attest that Christianity had already spread to the distant lands before the invasion. Talk about the Ethiopian Eunuch.

Lest I forget, the Romans didn't entertain Christianity until the 4th century. So, how could they have created an already existing Jesus in the 4th century?

The point here is that you are making assumption based not on any authoritarian source. If you had come with historical data to disprove Jesus as a real human, it would be easier for me to begin. But, this is your speculation based on your subjective analysis

MindHacker9009:
So if a man ascends into the sky no eyewitness will write about it even though it will be seen by the whole town.

I think you should continue with exposing Isalm for now.

Equating a human flying and a bird flying as the same thing?
Bwahahahah

Bring alternative logic if you got that much neuron in your brain.

Jesus didn't fly. I never said that. I am talking about events that could be captured but not documented. I said not everyone had the capacity to document events. Education and the logistics are factors.

What people could do was talk.

It is disconcerting that you suddenly have no contributions anymore but a circus show. Bring forth your knowledge.

Maynman:
Equating a human flying and a bird flying as the same thing?
Bwahahahah

Sixfiguresmart:
Bring alternative logic if you got that much neuron in your brain.

Jesus didn't fly. I never said that. I am talking about events that could be captured but not documented. I said not everyone had the capacity to document events. Education and the logistics are factors.

What people could do was talk.

It is disconcerting that you suddenly have no contributions anymore but a circus show. Bring forth your knowledge.

Christian, How’s bird a worthy event to capture compare to a human ascending into the sky?
And how many years after iesus chrestus die did they create the New Testament?
The world was pretty civilized after and during iesus time and thousands of books was written after and during his time.

Its fraudulent to run away from facts that doesn’t go down when with you and claim I don’t have contributions because you’ve been brainwashed and indoctrinated with Abrahamaic gods.

I’ve already lectured you on EL, Elohim and your Israelite deity, yahweh.
Now I’ll lecture you on iesus chrestus.

Maynman:

Christian, How’s bird a worthy event to capture compare to a human ascending into the sky?

Scrap that and focus on the content. It was a metaphorical expression that I used to explain something to that other guy who is not a Muslim, not you. That is not a Christian doctrine. Focus on the doctrine not on my metaphor. Funny how you saw a breakthrough in that and you cannot find the two seas where Moses arrived and lost his fish.

Maynman:

And how many years after iesus chrestus die did they create the New Testament?

The last scroll was written around 96 CE. Can you learn from the way I respond to your questions? Direct and straightforward. Not twisting and tweaking with a great deal of sophistry and denial. Learn from this.
96 CE was about 500 years before Mohammed was born and about 3000 years after the Torah was completed by Joshua. So, the Jews preserved the Torah for 3550 years before Mohammed had any acclaimed encounter with Jubril, his ASSISTANT.

Maynman:

The world was pretty civilized after and during iesus time and thousands of books was written after and during his time.

Please mention the thousands of book and let us look for it. The oldest Arabic book was in the 9th century. So, tell me the books and I will look for them. The oldest Greek book is from the 8th century. The oldest Latin book is from the 8th century. So, I am waiting for the names of these thousands of books during Jesus epoch. I AM WAITING DO NOT FORGET.

Maynman:

Its fraudulent to run away from facts that doesn’t go down when with you and claim I don’t have contributions because you’ve been brainwashed and indoctrinated with Abrahamaic gods.

I have been taught the du'a, I have frequented the Majlis, I have been reverted and reverted again. If brainwashing were my code, I perform a very good task at that.

What is the fact in your vault, Sir? That I metaphorically told the other guy that birds fly in the skies and they are not documented? Are you serious? Let me tell you another metaphor. Birds sing and we do not release their albums. Are you going to build an anthill on this one too? Come on, man! Get real with me.

Maynman:

I’ve already lectured you on EL, Elohim and your Israelite deity, yahweh.

I am telling you that EL or Elohim are NOT names. Take that to the bank and cash it. EL is the shortened form of Elohim. The name of the Elohim of the Israelites is Yahweh or Jehovah in English. What education are you high on and about? The Elohim of the moon is allah. The Elohim of the kaaba is Hubal. The ELohim of the star on the dome of all mosques is Sopdet.

Every ramadan, you all look for Hubal and Sopdet. Those are idols of Islam.

Maynman:
Now I’ll lecture you on iesus chrestus.

Bring it on. I will also show you from your own quran muhammed's lecture on Jesus too. So, bring your A-game and I will bring Mohammed's A-game. That is a tie.

Moreover, I didn't see your attachment earlier so I have to update this.

Serapis hahahahahahahahahahahahaha my goodness. You are at a stretch, Sir. You are about to tear your muscle. You can bring whatever you have and you will end up in your circus. Jesus was formed in the BCEs. So, your argument is as wack as naira.

Bring me more laughs Sir. You are a delightful clown.

Sixfiguresmart:
Scrap that and focus on the content. It was a metaphorical expression that I used to explain something to that other guy who is not a Muslim, not you. That is not a Christian doctrine. Focus on the doctrine not on my metaphor. Funny how you saw a breakthrough in that and you cannot find the two seas where Moses arrived and lost his fish. The last scroll was written around 96 CE. Can you learn from the way I respond to your questions? Direct and straightforward. Not twisting and tweaking with a great deal of sophistry and denial. Learn from this.
96 CE was about 500 years before Mohammed was born and about 3000 years after the Torah was completed by Joshua. So, the Jews preserved the Torah for 3550 years before Mohammed had any acclaimed encounter with Jubril, his ASSISTANT.
Please mention the thousands of book and let us look for it. The oldest Arabic book was in the 9th century. So, tell me the books and I will look for them. The oldest Greek book is from the 8th century. The oldest Latin book is from the 8th century. So, I am waiting for the names of these thousands of books during Jesus epoch. I AM WAITING DO NOT FORGET.
I have been taught the du'a, I have frequented the Majlis, I have been reverted and reverted again. If brainwashing were my code, I perform a very good task at that.

What is the fact in your vault, Sir? That I metaphorically told the other guy that birds fly in the skies and they are not documented? Are you serious? Let me tell you another metaphor. Birds sing and we do not release their albums. Are you going to build an anthill on this one too? Come on, man! Get real with me.
I am telling you that EL or Elohim are NOT names. Take that to the bank and cash it. EL is the shortened form of Elohim. The name of the Elohim of the Israelites is Yahweh or Jehovah in English. What education are you high on and about? The Elohim of the moon is allah. The Elohim of the kaaba is Hubal. The ELohim of the star on the dome of all mosques is Sopdet.

Every ramadan, you all look for Hubal and Sopdet. Those are idols of Islam.
Bring it on. I will also show you from your own quran muhammed's lecture on Jesus too. So, bring your A-game and I will bring Mohammed's A-game. That is a tie.

You’re just talking with no facts and talk is cheap, so keep talking..
When was the last scroll written and by who?
When was jesus born? Which century? Jesus was born in 8th century?
What do you mean oldest arabic book?
When was “arabic” as a language even created?