many christians can't even question the bible by asking simple questions like

1.who wrote the bible?

2.who compiled it?

3.when was each book of the bible written and compiled?

4.who stored it over thousands of years?

5.who appointed and selected the book that should be included as canonical books?

6.on what basis were some canonical books removed and added and why is the book of the bible 66?

7.did supreme God himself pick the book of the bible to be included during compilation?

8.did Supreme God appoint anyone as compilator...then when was that..and whom did he appoint?

9.why did pagan historical actors like emperors and ceaser has so much influence on the bible?

10.who truly wrote ecclesiastes, proverb and many more books in the bible with controversial authors?

Why do you care to no

bewla:
Why do you care to no

because I want to verify the authenticity and validity of the bible

Mutant001:
because I want to verify the authenticity and validity of the bible

various bible they they

bewla:
various bible they they

so what are you trying to insinuate?

Mutant001:
so what are you trying to isunerate?

I don't no yet

Let me go off air

Mutant001:

1.who wrote the bible?

2.who compiled it?

I can clearly say that Genesis is Written by The Lord, Whom we call Jesus Christ especially as we can see that The Writer is writing as A Person who was present when these things happened. Clues: "Proverbs 8:22-31; John 1:1-4.

Exodus is by Moses. He spent too much time with God, so he wrote more than 10 commandments.

Mutant001:

10.who truly wrote ecclesiastes, proverb and many more books in the bible with controversial authors?

Proverbs 1 and Ecclesiastics 1 answers you and both books confirm that David was the Author.

All other questions are too stupid to be even considered.

Mutant001:
because I want to verify the authenticity and validity of the bible

The Bible is not begging you to accept it.

Even this earth is fallable but

Truth will always be truth, regardless of lack of understanding, disbelief or ignorance. (Or stupidity)

W. Clement Stone

2nd Timothy 3:16 answers most of your questions.

Mutant001:
many christians can't even question the bible by asking simple questions like
1.who wrote the bible?
2.who compiled it?
3.when was each book of the bible written and compiled?
4.who stored it over thousands of years?
5.who appointed and selected the book that should be included as canonical books?
6.on what basis were some canonical books removed and added and why is the book of the bible 66?
7.did supreme God himself pick the book of the bible to be included during compilation?
8.did Supreme God appoint anyone as compilator...then when was that..and whom did he appoint?
9.why did pagan historical actors like emperors and ceaser has so much influence on the bible?
10.who truly wrote ecclesiastes, proverb and many more books in the bible with controversial authors?

None of that has any relevance to the lessons that people can learn from it if they want to, about how to live the best life we can.

Mutant001:
so what are you trying to isunerate?

there's no such word as isunerate,alternatively incernirate.

Mutant001:
so what are you trying to isunerate?

no such word as isunerate,instead incinerate.

Mutant001:
many christians can't even question the bible by asking simple questions like

1.who wrote the bible?

2.who compiled it?

3.when was each book of the bible written and compiled?

4.who stored it over thousands of years?

5.who appointed and selected the book that should be included as canonical books?

6.on what basis were some canonical books removed and added and why is the book of the bible 66?

7.did supreme God himself pick the book of the bible to be included during compilation?

8.did Supreme God appoint anyone as compilator...then when was that..and whom did he appoint?

9.why did pagan historical actors like emperors and ceaser has so much influence on the bible?

10.who truly wrote ecclesiastes, proverb and many more books in the bible with controversial authors?

The 66 books of the Bible as we have it today was handpicked by the Catholic church.

There are many other books that were not deemed fit as "canonical" by the Catholic church and therefore, didn't make it to final list.

Books like - the book of Enoch, the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, the book of the wars of Jehovah, etc.

Personally, I see the Bible as more symbolic/allegorical than literal.

When taken as LITERAL history, there becomes too many contradictions.

AllenforGOD:
no such word as isunerate,instead incinerate.

you are an educated illiterate ...even though it was a typographical error what I wanted to type was "insinuate"
It is "insinuate" not "incinerate"

All this are simple questions with very solid and proof able answers

AngelDove10:
All this are simple questions with very solid and proof able answers

oya...give me the solid and proof able answers

Yahweh worshippers bwahahahah

Dtruthspeaker:


I can clearly say that Genesis is Written by The Lord, Whom we call Jesus Christ especially as we can see that The Writer is writing as A Person who was present when these things happened. Clues: "Proverbs 8:22-31; John 1:1-4.

Exodus is by Moses. He spent too much time with God, so he wrote more than 10 commandments.



Proverbs 1 and Ecclesiastics 1 answers you and both books confirm that David was the Author.

All other questions are too stupid to be even considered.

you still haven't answered my question with validity, precision and accuracy
What proof do you have that jesus christ wrote the book of genesis?
What proof do you have that the book of moses was not distorted by modern translators and conspiracy theorist?

the other questions are too stupid because your underdeveloped brain can't ascertain a valid response to those questions

ReubenSandwich:


None of that has any relevance to the lessons that people can learn from it if they want to, about how to live the best life we can.

what are you trying to imply?

Mutant001:
you still haven't answered my question with validity, precision and accuracy
What proof do you have that jesus christ wrote the book of genesis?

1) No one can find the Writer.
2) Presumption of Law: Exactly as you are doing right now, The person who reasonably appears to have written a document, is presumed to be the Author of that document as you are doing right now, because we reasonably see mutant001 is the one who wrote this post, then we reasonable say that you are the Author.

Mutant001:

What proof do you have that the book of moses was not distorted by modern translators and conspiracy theorist?

There is no smoke without fire! Right from the beginning, no such accusation existed.

Mutant001:

the other questions are too stupid because your underdeveloped brain can't ascertain a valid response to those questions

The other questions are too stupid and not worth any reasonable attention at all.

Dtruthspeaker:


1) No one can find the Writer.
2) Presumption of Law: Exactly as you are doing right now, The person who reasonably appears to have written a document, is presumed to be the Author of that document as you are doing right now, because we reasonably see mutant001 is the one who wrote this post, then we reasonable say that you are the Author.



There is no smoke without fire! Right from the beginning, no such accusation existed.



The other questions are too stupid and not worth any reasonable attention at all.

since no one can find the writer to verify its authenticity and validity..do you think it is logical and rational to take it seriously or to take it as a children fairytale told in moonlight?

So you swallow and accept hook line and sinker any documents you come across without thorough research to proof it's validity or falsity?

So because no accusation existed on the fallibility of the bible you became indoctrinated in the fairytale book...so therefore you are a programmed zombie with no will of your own?...so even if the herd is matching to the "slaughter house" you follow them without making an enquiry of where you are heading to?

The other questions are too stupid for your dullbrain to assimilate and give accurate answers to

Mutant001:
because I want to verify the authenticity and validity of the bible

Well…when you comb into the finer details, of course, the English Bible with its numerous versions are riddled with errors and certain bits interpreted out of context…

The Bible (product) is fallible, but the source (Spirit of Truth) is not.

To put things in context… let’s say we have a discussion today in the Yoruba language. Someone writes our discussion down (to the best of his or her intellectual capacity)…then our discussion is translated into several languages 3,000 years later

What are the odds that the versions of our discussion circulating 3,000 years after accurately captures 100% the content and context of our discussion?

AllenforGOD:
there's no such word as isunerate,alternatively incernirate.

No such word as incernerate either.

Mutant001:
what are you trying to imply?

People can study the Bible together and practice together to learn to live the best life they can live, if they want to, no matter what the answers are to any of your questions.

ReubenSandwich:


People can study the Bible together and practice together to learn to live the best life they can live, if they want to, no matter what the answers are to any of your questions.

answer my questions and stop beating about the bush!!!

Mutant001:
since no one can find the writer to verify its authenticity and validity..do you think it is logical and rational to take it seriously or to take it as a children fairytale told in moonlight?

Common sense would have told you that a book cannot write itself, therefore, if you can not find the writer among men, then it is time to look at Persons Who are not man who could have been present when those events took place.

But we know atheists lack ordinary natural common sense and therefore, they never think well.

Dtruthspeaker:


Common sense would have told you that a book cannot write itself, therefore, if you can not find the writer among men, then it is time to look at Persons Who are not man who could have been present when those events took place.

But we know atheists lack ordinary natural common sense and therefore, they never think well.

read the gibberish you typed and tell me whether it makes sense to you
You claim to be a Christian and you can't defend your bible...have you find those who are not men who could have been present when those event took place to validate your baseless assertion?
you are a shame to christianity and christianity is undisputably built on fallacy

Mutant001:
read the gibberish you typed and tell me whether it makes sense to you
You claim to be a Christian and you can't defend your bible...have you find those who are not men who could have been present when those event took place to validate your baseless assertion?
you are a shame to christianity and christianity is undisputably built on fallacy

hahahaha See complainings and Change of Posts because of lack of something valid to say in rebuttal! hahahahaha

When The Debate Is Lost, Slander Becomes The Tool Of The Loser
Hahahahaha

oteneaaron:


The 66 books of the Bible as we have it today was handpicked by the Catholic church.

There are many other books that were not deemed fit as "canonical" by the Catholic church and therefore, didn't make it to final list.

Books like - the book of Enoch, the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, the book of the wars of Jehovah, etc.

Personally, I see the Bible as more symbolic/allegorical than literal.

When taken as LITERAL history, there becomes too many contradictions.

What are you saying the bible is one of the most historically accurate books on the word it also accurately prophecies about the future some has happened some are yet to

Lawag3:


What are you saying the bible is one of the most historically accurate books on the word it also accurately prophecies about the future some has happened some are yet to

Well, it isn't actually the "most historically accurate" book in the world.

For example, did you know that the story of Exodus didn't happen in actual history?

There is NO RECORD in Egyptian history of a time when the Jews were enslaved for 400 years, nor is there any record of the "10 plagues" in Egyptian history.

Don't forget that the Egyptians were meticulous record keepers - they kept so much records of their life and history to the extent that a field of study was established just to study their history - this field of study is called Egyptology.

Even the flood of Noah is not an originsl story but is only a cheap copy of the flood story from ancient Sumeria.

I can go on and on, but you can do some research to verify the two examples I mentioned above.

Lawag3:


What are you saying the bible is one of the most historically accurate books on the word it also accurately prophecies about the future some has happened some are yet to

What century was this history book(bible) written?
And what century were this “prophecies” happening?
It’s just like me prophesying that buhari will become president in 2015 and writing a book about it in 2022, and then claiming “prophecy.”

And the New Testament is the most DOCTORED AND EDITED DOCUMENT IN HISTORY.
If you say the bible is historically accurate, what other books apart from the one in the bible or archaeological evidence affirm this “accurate history”?