Brendaniel:


If he didn't commit a crime why was money seized from him, can you allow your bank take your money for free?

NaijaHelper1:
That explains why he cannot enter the US and is also proof that the matter is still ongoing which also causes him to be accomodated under the section that prescribed disqualification for matters of dishonesty within the last 10 years.

Bashet:
stop disturbing my mention with dumb trash. Show evidence of where Tinubu was convicted or shut your hole. Secondly, go learn what's meant by civil case.

Golan007:


Explain this picture if you can.

Okoroawusa:
If there is no place in the 58 pages document that says that Tinubu was convicted of a crime in the USA please keep it to yourself...

When it was said that you "will labour in vain " you thought it was a joke right?

CodeTemplar:
what happened, you switched sided or just ground work for weightier onslaught on shaky shaky daddy?

swaggerjack:

Explain this

Brendaniel:


With all the allegations there, what is your heart telling you about Tinubu?

Okoroawusa:

That he is the president-elect of the Federal Republic Of Nigeria

Brendaniel:


Oga I am not here to argue about whether Tinubu was convicted or not, I only created this thread to summarize Tinubu's drug case in the U.S and that is what I have done, If you don't like it you could have ignored my thread, the things I wrote are from the documents...

Bashet:


Then shut your hole and stop writing gibberish.

Tinubu case had nothing to do with drug. It was a civil case.

Brendaniel:


Court documents are not gibberish, if you call court documents gibberish then you are the one talking gibberish...

Brendaniel:


Court documents are not gibberish, if you call court documents gibberish then you are the one talking gibberish...

swaggerjack:

Don't mind the clown. You simply summarised the court document.

Even the current CJN previously ruled forfeiture is a crime.

Bashet:


What you wrote was gibberish! Tinubu had nothing to do with drug. It was a civil case

Brendaniel:

swaggerjack:

This is why this is one of the main points Peter Obi used to have him disqualified from the 2023 presidential election in his court case. Will the CJN contradict his previous ruling.

favor914:
No case submission. Dead before arrival.

Brendaniel:


I now see part of the reason they are getting scared....

Brendaniel:

Brendaniel:


Court documents are not gibberish, if you call court documents gibberish then you are the one talking gibberish...

Bashet:


Was Tinubu convicted of any crime? You get brain so?

Typical Ipob brain head who doesn't know what an investment company means.

Tinubu offence had nothing to do with drug but investment money case. It was a civil case.

Tinubu was operating an investment company (compass investment company to be exact) where several people invested their money for a period of time to generate interest. One of the people who invested money was a criminal of course and the said money was forfeited. In fact, I loved how Tinubu later claimed some of the forfeited money as his own. No be only USA go get all the money of the arrested criminal who invested into Tinubu's compass investment company. What about Tinubu's sweat while operating the compass investment company?

uba1991:
plea bargain and forfeiture is equal to conviction.

Bashet:


Or Neglect of duty! You get brain so? Typical Ipob brain

Bashet:


You're the one writing gibberish!

Court document didn't convict Tinubu of any crime and it was a civil case

Brendaniel:
.

Bashet:


Crime or civil case (Neglect of duty or breach of obligation).

Those drug criminals arrested, convicted to prisons while their properties/money were confiscated are crime cases.

Civil case only deals in minor things such as breach of obligation or neglect of duty)


Tinubu's case was civil case.

Now, I'm expatiating for Ipob brain who can't understand simple things. I know it's in the genes

Brendaniel:
.

Bashet:


Stop disturbing my mention with your dumb trash

DMerciful:
Why have they not come for Abba Kyari?

Brendaniel:


It is in the document, Kevin Moss was mainly after the forfeiture after his findings because he didn't have hard evidence to ask for an extradition and Tinubu wasn't forthcoming with enough information, that was why the court gave that opportunity for him to come and clear the allegations and give reasons why the forfeiture should not happen, so it will not be that they did a forfeiture with giving the owner an opportunity to explain himself to stop the forfeiture, it was these reasons I wrote here that the court used as evidence from Keven Moss to effect the forfeiture....