Yugoslavia247:



Oga rest.

Debunk it.

No time

Minjim:


I should debunk nonessential


These Obituaries have finally lost it.

The same way you people claimed Buhari was a clone and i should debunk that one too ,ba?

Yugoslavia247:


Lol!

Better read the history of eiye bucanneer and aiyes.

Better be informed.

Why do they do meetings at night

Yugoslavia247:



Bro leave that story. It is stale.

Debunk this

Minjim:


Knowledge is far from you.

Did you think Prof. Wole Soyinka single-handedly founded the pirate fraternity?


What role did Sylvanus Egbuche, Pius Olehi, AIG Imokhuede and Ralph Okwara played.

Go and read deeply on this. Lemme help you, there was a thread on it some years ago on Nairaland

https://www.nairaland.com/2002310/how-prof-wole-soyinka-formed

I'm sure you were still in secondary school when we had this debate

Minjim:


There you have it!

Yugoslavia247:


He spearheaded it.

Oga you no get point. He never denied it. Stfu

Minjim:



Lol!

Typical Ipob behaviour

Minjim:


Knowledge is far from you.

Did you think Prof. Wole Soyinka single-handedly founded the pirate fraternity?


What role did Sylvanus Egbuche, Pius Olehi, AIG Imokhuede and Ralph Okwara played.

Go and read deeply on this. Lemme help you, there was a thread on it some years ago on Nairaland

https://www.nairaland.com/2002310/how-prof-wole-soyinka-formed

I'm sure you were still in secondary school when we had this debate

MrBiGGEST:
Òmò you guys are becoming very irritating this day's 😒

Yugoslavia247:
Please prof of history Help me

In 1986, when African writers decided to boycott the Nobel Prize for the apparent discrimination from the Royal Academy (up until then, no African was considered good enough for the prize), Soyinka showed up as a betrayer of the African collective cause and got the award

.....Soyinka might have a Nobel Prize, but that is not surely a comment on his social value as a writer. Even Abdulrazak Gurnah who was awarded the prize in 2021 said he thought it was a joke. Nobody knew him and he knew he did not deserve it.

In contrast, Ngugi wa Thiong'O has consistently been ignored by the Royal Academy, even though everyone in the literary field knows he is supposed to have long won it on merit. To put things in perspective, he taught Gurnah way back, and has taught many other greats

Ngugi's sin is that he would never bend to the Western ideologies, and he has canvassed on different occasions for African writers and indeed, writers from the Orient, to develop literature in their languages, instead of enriching metropolitan languages.

The West hates people like Ngugi, and can never reward them with their treasured literary prizes like the Nobel. To be an African writer deserving of the award, you have to have no hurtful opinion about the West. It is basically politics by the institutions of World Lit.
Achebe cut the perfect figure for the prize, and it was not surprising that he got it in 1986. Canonised writers like Achebe who took on Greene and Conrad could not have been rewarded for questioning the jaundiced representation of Africans in Western literature
2
https://twitter.com/onyeka_real/status/1644823054587944961?t=C8B9sK8aOooO7TUj0FTgQw&s=19

Yugoslavia247:


So was Ngugi wa Thiong given the Nobel laureate prize for literature?

Remember his student was given.

Even Oscar award dey discriminate now tell me about those days.

Abeg

MrBiGGEST:
Òmò you guys are becoming very irritating this day's 😒

haffaze777:
Thread for nattering nitwits?

NtiObaEneke:

Indeed, it is

Magnoliaa:


This is literally on the FP as at this night.


Every single rebuttal against Adichie has made front-page, from FFK's own to Alake's. And it's just one against Soyinka I've seen.


This is how you guys literally obfuscate facts to make it seem as if the other party are the ones doing overwhelmingly much, meanwhile the other guys are still going over and far beyond, creating multiple threads and stuff about CNA.


If at all you want to condemn any disrespect, then condemn BOTH writers being attacked. But you not saying anything concerning the other, while in your bias, you wish WS to be left alone, just shows you to be an unserious hypocrite.

LegendHero:
Lol this Hundeyin guy agin.

Go and listen to Prof. Wole Soyinka speech at the Nobel Prize, his theme speech was about black people and their pains.

It’s only the headless mob that will take you serious. Hundeyin is also a classless liar, Desmond Tutu already got the Nobel peace prize in 1984/85, a year before Soyinka, so how exactly did the Nobel ignore blacks?

Magnoliaa:


This is literally on the FP as at this night.


Every single rebuttal against Adichie has made front-page, from FFK's own to Alake's. And it's just one against Soyinka I've seen.


This is how you guys literally obfuscate facts to make it seem as if the other party are the ones doing overwhelmingly much, meanwhile the other guys are still going over and far beyond, creating multiple threads and stuff about CNA.


If at all you want to condemn any disrespect, then condemn BOTH writers being attacked. But you not saying anything concerning the other, while in your bias, you wish WS to be left alone, just shows you to be an unserious hypocrite.

Yugoslavia247:
Please prof of history Help me

In 1986, when African writers decided to boycott the Nobel Prize for the apparent discrimination from the Royal Academy (up until then, no African was considered good enough for the prize), Soyinka showed up as a betrayer of the African collective cause and got the award

.....Soyinka might have a Nobel Prize, but that is not surely a comment on his social value as a writer. Even Abdulrazak Gurnah who was awarded the prize in 2021 said he thought it was a joke. Nobody knew him and he knew he did not deserve it.

In contrast, Ngugi wa Thiong'O has consistently been ignored by the Royal Academy, even though everyone in the literary field knows he is supposed to have long won it on merit. To put things in perspective, he taught Gurnah way back, and has taught many other greats

Ngugi's sin is that he would never bend to the Western ideologies, and he has canvassed on different occasions for African writers and indeed, writers from the Orient, to develop literature in their languages, instead of enriching metropolitan languages.

The West hates people like Ngugi, and can never reward them with their treasured literary prizes like the Nobel. To be an African writer deserving of the award, you have to have no hurtful opinion about the West. It is basically politics by the institutions of World Lit.
Achebe cut the perfect figure for the prize, and it was not surprising that he got it in 1986. Canonised writers like Achebe who took on Greene and Conrad could not have been rewarded for questioning the jaundiced representation of Africans in Western literature
2
https://twitter.com/onyeka_real/status/1644823054587944961?t=C8B9sK8aOooO7TUj0FTgQw&s=19

Yugoslavia247:
Please prof of history Help me

In 1986, when African writers decided to boycott the Nobel Prize for the apparent discrimination from the Royal Academy (up until then, no African was considered good enough for the prize), Soyinka showed up as a betrayer of the African collective cause and got the award

.....Soyinka might have a Nobel Prize, but that is not surely a comment on his social value as a writer. Even Abdulrazak Gurnah who was awarded the prize in 2021 said he thought it was a joke. Nobody knew him and he knew he did not deserve it.

In contrast, Ngugi wa Thiong'O has consistently been ignored by the Royal Academy, even though everyone in the literary field knows he is supposed to have long won it on merit. To put things in perspective, he taught Gurnah way back, and has taught many other greats

Ngugi's sin is that he would never bend to the Western ideologies, and he has canvassed on different occasions for African writers and indeed, writers from the Orient, to develop literature in their languages, instead of enriching metropolitan languages.

The West hates people like Ngugi, and can never reward them with their treasured literary prizes like the Nobel. To be an African writer deserving of the award, you have to have no hurtful opinion about the West. It is basically politics by the institutions of World Lit.
Achebe cut the perfect figure for the prize, and it was not surprising that he got it in 1986. Canonised writers like Achebe who took on Greene and Conrad could not have been rewarded for questioning the jaundiced representation of Africans in Western literature
2
https://twitter.com/onyeka_real/status/1644823054587944961?t=C8B9sK8aOooO7TUj0FTgQw&s=19

Yugoslavia247:


Bring up rebuttals.

Not emotions.

Good bye.

I need clarifications too

Your prof which class him use graduate.

Obi is second class

Babinski:


First, seeing the Twitter link is to the status of someone who had to either create a parody or an account using the name of Hundeyin speaks volumes about the credibility of such a person. Typically people like that in using their real identities have never been taken seriously and so have to adopt another's.

Secondly, I have gone through your piece and I am not surprised that there is no worthwhile source for any of the assertions and claims made against Soyinka. I searched the internet for any corroborating article on the alleged betrayal by Soyinka or any planned boycott of Nobel by African writers and found none except your Nairaland piece.

When Soyinka won the Nobel Prize, Achebe lauded Soyinka and stated that Soyinka was most eminently deserving of any prize. That is not the likely attitude that Achebe would display if Soyinka had been a betrayer as you claimed. Trying to paint Soyinka as a lackey of the West as a reason for winning the Nobel prize is puerile and laughable. There is no doubt that Soyinka is known as a critic who doesn't fear speaking against oppressors regardless of the colour of the foot that wears the boots. He has even been imprisoned for his stand against oppression.

There is no doubt that all these your diatribe against Soyinka is coming because of his recent opinions and statements against Obidients. I assume you are one of such Obidients who are so dyed in the wood in your ways that you abhor correction and any dissenting opinion. Anyone not toeing your line that speaks out must be cancelled and so I am not surprised about your poorly researched hack attempt at trying to damage the reputation and image of a literay icon like Wole Soyinka. Please find something else to say about Wole Soyinka instead of peddling falsehood.


https://www.thehistoryville.com/chinua-achebe/

https://saharareporters.com/2021/06/27/prizes-given-african-writers-not-write-african-language-says-kenyan-writer-ngugi-wa

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wole_Soyinka

haffaze777:
Thread for nattering nitwits?

Christian36:
Abeg name what so special about Soyinka apart from winning noble prize. He won it once while Chimamanda won it thrice and Igbos are not using her to insult others. Civilization is far from some of you.

Yugoslavia247:


Bring up rebuttals.

Not emotions.

Good bye.

I need clarifications too

Your prof which class him use graduate.

Obi is second class

alcuin:


Where did Chimamanda win it thrice?

Comelysync:
the op does not even know how to lie well, all this obidient are making some of us neutral tummy to crawl

BastadThiefnubu:
The ugly useless two faced, treacherous, idiotic, stomach infrstructure driven, shameless cultist has been exposed.

Christistruth03:
David Hundeyin everything you wrote is wicked Malicious Trash !!
No wonder Oxford University exposed you as a complete Academic Fraud
Agreed he may have gotten the Nobel Prize before you were born but Can’t you do Simple Research

The Purpose of Education is to arrive at Truth
and not to turn People into lying deceivers with no regard for decency or Conscience

With People desperate for undeserved attention Like you no wonder the country is full of all sorts of Academic Fraudsters !

Repent !
have a nice Easter